I've been around GenLayer long enough to realise that the interesting part isn't just what AI can do. It's what happens when we need to trust the decisions it makes. Think about how smart contracts work today. They're great at executing rules, but the moment an agreement depends on interpreting information, understanding context, or deciding whether something actually happened, things get more complicated. Now imagine AI agents negotiating deals, managing assets, and transacting with one another. They won't always agree, and not every disagreement will have an obvious answer. Who gets to decide who's right? This is the problem that makes @GenLayer interesting to me. GenLayer is building a blockchain for intelligent contracts that can use AI to interpret information and reason through conditions that go beyond rigid, predefined rules. Its Internet Court is where this idea gets particularly interesting. It launched with 27 founding members and has since added Solana, Yellow, HOL, and Blocksee. When a case needs a verdict, validators running different AI models evaluate it and work toward consensus on the outcome. In simple terms, the goal is to make decisions that aren't dependent on one AI model simply declaring itself right. Different models participate in the process, while the network provides a mechanism for reaching an agreed result. And that's what keeps me interested. We're spending so much time building AI that can act independently. I think we should be paying just as much attention to the infrastructure that helps resolve disagreements when those actions have real consequences. Because making AI capable of doing business is one challenge. Figuring out how that business gets settled when things go wrong is another. That's the gap I find GenLayer worth exploring.