Squaddies = 🚫 Megxiters that can't have a civil debate = 🚫 *** My apologies in advance for the typos. If you share my content, please credit me.

Joined March 2025
If any UK people would like to copy and paste the post below and report it online to Met Police, feel free and PLEASE DO. I reported The Sun for violations under Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: 'Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.' If you know of others, please include them if you file a report. I am an American and I have no idea if I've come close to exhausting all the laws that may have been violated. *** Reposting is always nice, too. It will definitely take more than just a few to prompt the Met Police to take action. ***I know others have already reported to Met Police, THANK YOU for your due diligence, care, and for prompting me to look for specific UK laws violated within the UK. **** xitter.cf/GoFakeYourselfM/status…
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
3
11
38
730
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @GoFakeYourselfM
Phase 2. I now recognize the signs. I must make sure we are safe ( and generously compensated & retain titles)
1
1
1
33
***This 'ex-detective' is carrying MeMe's message to Mark Dolan.*** "...dismissed the allegations...knowing of the disputes the former wife might make..." "...and this is a reason she didn't follow up." Then why did she write that she "KNOWS" her Dad is an abuser after nothing came from an investigation she said believed was underway in 2019? **** This does not bode well for the other claims he shared. The above are MeMe approved statements. So, everything he claimed was almost certainly also MeMe approved.
1
1
8
154
(Fade in) *Tearless crying begins* MeMe: "Oh, my sweet Lil'Bidet, Mama is imagining you on 35mm film with my daddy, and my heart is shattered into a million and 44 pieces. That's why I don't have one. Daddy done busted it all apart." (END SCENE) Everything that's been found is 'girls' not 'boys.' Rest assured, the next shoe that will drop is currently being raised high....whatever it is.
4
1
20
365
Disgusting. This had to be reported. HAD TO. MeMe's orders. hellomagazine.com/royalty/93…
1
1
44
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
22
103
11
397
5,163
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
UK laws are addressed below. ā¬ In addition, all 50 U.S. states have mandatory reporting laws that require designated professionals to report suspected child abuse or neglect to authorities. Designated professionals Includes law enforcement professionals. Knowingly failing to report can lead to criminal charges. Meghan Markle said on multiple occasions that she was made aware of potential child abuse. With all of her public statements she has never once stated that she reported it to the proper authorities in the respective countries where the abuse may have happened. In her interview with Oprah Winfrey in March of 2021, Meghan spoke about feeling a sense of betrayal and "loss" regarding her father after he denied cooperating with the press. These statements were made in the United States. In an interview with The Cut in August 2022, she noted that she felt she had "lost" her father through media scrutiny. These statements were made in the United States. In the 2022 Netflix docuseries Harry & Meghan, her husband referred to the emotional loss and estrangement of Meghan's relationship with her father. "Of course it's incredibly sad what happened. She had a father before this, and now she doesn't have a father. And I shouldered that because if Meg wasn't with me, then her dad would still be her dad." These statements were made in the United States. Markle is not shy and never misses an opportunity to praise herself publicly. If she had reported these very serious events she needs to make that clear. In the meantime, we can rightfully assume she has not.
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
1
2
5
206
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @Furiosa24
The FBI is the most corrupt law enforcement agency possibly in the entire world. I think this is...not good. They will destroy or invent evidence and witness statements, if they want to, and have done so many, many times. xitter.cf/Furiosa24/status/21148…
Excellent! Investigate everyone!
1
2
57
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @according2_taz
A date/time stamp on the original letter can easily be recreated on a different letter.
1
18
415
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Well, this is a bit of a stretch aimed at making it appear Murky and Dumbo are distraught when that is not true. It's actually October half-term break in Cotswolds schools and they are on holidays until 2 November. Talk about lying in a PR statement to frame Murky as the victim. She's disgusting šŸ™„
1
4
58
1,486
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
LOOK! A wholesome, happy family !!!ā™„ļø
24
134
6
1,641
7,367
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Replying to @metpoliceuk
@metpoliceuk -- I am having difficulty on your website reporting a possible violation of Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: ā€˜Conspiracy to commit offences outside the United Kingdom.’ *** According to public records, the UK news publication, The Sun, may have conspired – within the UK – to pay individuals to travel to the Philippines, view child pornography, and destroy &/or tamper with evidence. They did not report the existence of the alleged child pornography evidence to local police. Some or all of these allegations are crimes in the UK, too. According to the embedded metadata within photographs taken and published by The Sun, staff and/or others paid by the publication viewed what they reportedly believe to be child pornography – FOUR DAYS before it was turned over to police. In fact, the individuals paid by The Sun never reported nor turned the evidence over to local police. What happened in those 4 days they had access to the alleged child pornography is unknown. The Sun published redacted close-up photographs of some of the material suggesting they did, in fact, look very closely at the material and the photographs they took may exist in an unredacted form within the UK. If the photographs are indeed copies of child pornography, that suggests the unredacted photos constitute child pornography, as well. These are very serious allegations yet there is credible evidence to warrant an investigation into The Sun’s actions and communications, with regard to this matter. You must investigate the planning, communications, and actions taken -– and not taken – by people paid by The Sun to participate in this conspiracy. I am posting this on my social media with the hope that others within the UK might have an easier time reporting it than me, in the US. I understand many UK citizens are very concerned about this matter receiving the attention it warrants. There should be ZERO tolerance if crimes have been committed. Thank you and please confirm if/when you have seen this. *** LINKS: 1. Section 1A of the Criminal Law Act 1977: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/199… 2. Metadata for The Sun’s October 19, 2026 photograph of evidence they believe to be child pornography. They reported staff viewed the materials: jimpl.com/results/Rwphz97Un9… 3. The October 19, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 4. Metadata for The Sun’s October 23, 2026 photograph of police taking possession of the evidence The Sun viewed and photographed, FOUR DAYS PRIOR: jimpl.com/results/vtx85KhgtK… 5. The October 23, 2026 photo on The Sun's website: thesun.ie/wp-content/uploads… 6. The Sun's report/statements regarding the material, in question: the-sun.com/news/17198310/me…
22
103
11
397
5,163
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
It went something like this
šŸ¤– Made with AI
11
38
6
280
8,396
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Mendacious meddling menace Meghan Markle deserves no apology from anyone, but keep an eye on dodgy deviant Thomas Markle, Jr. also. How much was this rotten rat paid to shove the knife in? Something about the role of both of them in this stinky story truly stinks to high heaven. #MeghanMarkle #ThomasMarkle #TomMarkle #TomSr #TomJr #ThomasMarkleJr #ThomasMarkleSr #KingCharles #PrinceHarry #SussexSquad #FormerRoyals #PrivateCitizens #Abuse #Porn #ChildPorn #ChildAbuse #MetPolice #MetropolitanPolice #FBI #PiersMorgan #Apology #Sorry #SorryNotSorry #Truth #Fiction #Publicity #PublicityPeddler #SympathySeeker #SympathyCard #Deranged #Deviant #Liar #LiarLiar #MeghanMarkleLiar #MeghanMarkleExposed
I’m very sorry her father is an alleged paedophile and that she knew this while falsely accusing the Royal Family of being callous racists.
8
24
1
193
3,194
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Funny how @chrisshipitv can go to pains to investigate foliage to try & catch #PrincessofWales out, but can't be fcked to check the date or legitimacy of a letter with very serious accusations in it. This guy needs to be booted off the royal rota @KensingtonRoyal @RoyalFamily
65
305
9
2,937
18,526
I’m telling you I can see why Ari said he doesn’t represent M. No PR team would have you leaking out about a possible children’s reality show, when you are being accused of ignoring your father being a pedophile and doing nothing. Did the stupid bus come to town…
23
91
1
1,537
25,559
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Anyone else sick and fucking tired of Meghan Markle and her ā€œlettersā€
457
381
27
9,196
87,714
"There is no question in my mind that a specialist working on the material now will be able to confirm the identity of the person responsible for downloading illegal images.ā€(Sun) Impossible. They would need to prove that no other people had access to the device(s) when the material was downloaded AND Thomas Markle was in possession of the device(s) at the time the material was downloaded.
At this point , the important thing is that the children are identified and protected . Hopefully it can be done quickly though it said may take months to go through all the evidence. The source said if evidence pointed to a strong case ā€œas seems likelyā€ a report would be sent to the Department of Justice. They added: ā€œThe DoJ will then decide whether any attempt should be made to extradite the suspect in the US or hand the case to the FBI through established channels. ā€œThere is no question in my mind that a specialist working on the material now will be able to confirm the identity of the person responsible for downloading illegal images.ā€(Sun)
3
5
45
718
I doubt anyone can confirm the identity(ies)...but especially not a data forensic specialist. This requires more evidence than 'data'.
1
43
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
I am not here to defend Thomas Markle. He has a big mouth and is every bit as short-sighted as his daughter. If Thomas is guilty of what his son is accusing him of—though I actually think it is Thomas Jr trying a cash grab and to cover himself, putting it all on his old, frail dad who has dementia—then lock him up. I don't care about him. Look at the facts: this is Thomas’s ex-wife, Roslyn, actively defending her former husband back in 2017—and a year later, she is supposedly turning on him? We are expected to believe that she then suddenly turned around and wrote a letter to the Met Police condemning him. I am here to piece through Meghan’s clear opportunistic media campaign to rewrite history in the court of public opinion. But it's not working. The same people dislike her, while the others continue to gaslight the majority of the public—who are simply not buying this latest PR scheme and narratives. I don't believe that letter ever existed. The copy The Sun supposedly saw was an absolute forgery, and even the timing alone gives the whole game away. Harry, Meghan, and The Sun haven't actually provided any evidence that would stand up in court. We have just got their say-so sensationlism. Absolutely nothing has changed, and intelligent people are easily able to compartmentalise this. The British public sees right through the BS and media manipulation. We know precisely how Sunshine Sachs and PR companies propaganda works, and we are not buying it. Example, just look at the NYC car chase. Their team splashed this "catastrophic" car chase across the entire mainstream media, and none of them actually investigated it. They just swallowed up what Harry and his current wife said, regurgitating word-for-word the press release and the narrative pushed by their mouthpiece, Omid Scobie. There was absolutely no critical thinking from the press. But the propaganda had so many holes, and when logic and rationale were included, little by little the whole story fell apart. Royal watchers have spent the last six years watching this exact playbook unfold when it comes to Harry and Meghan. We have watched them thrashing Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip's last years on earth with damaging allegations and lies, all so they could launch themselves in the US to make millions of dollars. They released even more lies in a Netflix docuseries only months after the late Queen died, after already threatening her in The Cut magazine while she was dying of cancer. They passed information to Scobie to label the Princess and the King as racists, and they helped fuel the intense harassment against Catherine while she was undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. Their bad behaviour tracks all the way back to the beginning, from the bullying of Princess Charlotte at the bridesmaid fitting to the shameless PR exploitation of the Uvalde school shooting and the California wildfires. A continuous stream of media games. The obsession with the Royal Family is so intense that it results in constant stalking, copying, and the creation of endless daily puff pieces. From the sick "Diana PR stunt" in Paris to the ghostwriting of Spare and the countless lies told across multiple interviews, it is all part of the same calculated campaign and this Thomas Markle nonsense changes nothing of what harry and Meghan have done in the last six years. The public is simply refusing to be manipulated any longer. So no, as it stands, I'm not buying this nonsense, especially when the source is Thomas Markle Jr who contaminated evidence. He is a long-time alcoholic, stole his dad's GoFundMe money, and has a very twisted and depraved mind. Just look at his YouTube channel—he is vile, chauvinistic, vulgar and was banned from seeing his children. He was arrested for domestic abuse and is the only Markle to be publicly seen with a small and questionable Filipino partner who looks like she's 16. He is not a reliable source; he's a liability.
92
177
15
1,440
62,889
GoFakeYourselfMeghan retweeted
Nobody has met those children
Meghan Markle allegedly told her father he'll never meet her children
64
55
4
1,360
9,410