Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals) header
Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals) profile picture

Independent history project by @NicoFassino. Exploring Catholic history through the untold and forgotten experiences of the laity across the centuries.

Joined July 2020
Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)Photo by Hand Missal History Project (@HandMissals)
I’m back with a new research project! It's a study of vernacular congregational participation at Mass between 1861 and 1961. Everything you think you know about liturgy before the Second Vatican Council is probably wrong 🧵⤵️
10
24
10
164
20,968
The practice of the congregation reciting the Our Father with the priest was, strictly speaking, foreign to the Roman Rite... on the level of what was prescribed in the official liturgical books But it was indeed a local custom in many places, long before Vatican II 🧵
Replying to @DrRobinWard
Yes, in 1955 at the Easter Vigil. Unprecedented in the Roman Rite.
3
7
1
89
7,860
In early modern prayer books for the laity, we find in the Mass-devotions section which strongly suggest that it was at least an extant custom for the laity to recite the Our Father with the priest See, for example, these from 1595 and 1613
1
1
37
904
This post is ostensibly about the ancient and famous frescos of Santa Maria Antiqua Yet the image shown is a meaningless, fake, AI-generated frankenstein mishmash which does NOT represent either the Antiqua frescos or other real Byzantine iconography what is the point of this?
The earliest known depiction of the Virgin Mary as a queen (Santa Maria Regina) is a 6th-century palimpsest wall painting located in the ancient church of Santa Maria Antiqua in Rome, Italy. Here the word “palimpsest” means incomplete. That church is in the Roman Forum and beneath the slopes of the Palatine Hill. It is something of a time capsule in that it was ruined and covered over by an earthquake in AD 847, and was more or less been left untouched and buried for over a millennium. It has once been the papal church of Rome (under Pope John VII). Because Santa Maria Antiqua was never redecorated by the baroque aesthetic in later years, it reveals the paleo-Christian aesthetic of the earlier ages of our history. Now excavated, this gives us a glimpse of what Roman churches would have looked like in the first millennium. In looking at these palimpsest frescos therein, one is sometimes looking at multiple frescos at once, as sometimes the outer layer of the latest fresco is seen, and sometimes one or more of the older frescos that are earlier are seen partially beneath, depending upon how many layers of plaster were chipped away. So, it can be a little like looking at three partially completed puzzles one a top another. This church is fifth century, and the fresco of the enthroned Virgin Mary is from the sixth century, and is considered to be the oldest extant image of Mary as a Queen in the world.
1
2
24
902
There is a particular irony to this in that the original fresco of the Virgin Mary is seriously damaged and is missing the entire top half of the image The church uses projectors to show an authentic reconstruction of what the original image looked like Why not show that?
1
1
13
279
Love finding little smiley face guys in medieval manuscripts (this is from a 15th century Book of Hours)
3
1
20
733
I regularly access microfilm in my archival work, and I am of course grateful that the materials are preserved at all However, I have encountered some records where the cellulose acetate is warped and the film can no longer be used If the originals were destroyed .... it's gone
I've now been around long enough to know that this is not the first time that this has happened. There was a move in the 20th c. to move books and newspapers to microfilm and microfiche. That process often involved the guillotining, copying, and disposing of books.
1
1
17
943
One can only hope that major institutions would engage in a program of comprehensive digitization of any microfilm/fiche collections before it's too late, but such digitization is expensive
2
9
300
Inspiring and aspirational 😅 (the year is over half gone, and I have accomplished almost none of my original project and article goals for the year)
if you see me online on friday you're allowed to kill me
8
597
Yes. I touched upon this in my "New Mass of 1964" series, as many of you know. It was quite difficult to hunt down a variety of contemporary sources and surveys, but they do exist and speak to this reality.
Interesting. Mass attendance rates fell more sharply in the years *before and during* Vatican II than in the decades after the council's implementation (the immediate decade after VII was the steepest tho)
3
10
53
2,592
There was a noticeable decline in Mass attendance between even 1964 and 1966, and when asked in at least one national survey the laity themselves said the "New Liturgy" was at least part of the reason
1
1
15
401
Sharon's annual Carmelites-of-the-Compiegne posting is always a treasure
In anticipation of the feast of the Carmelite Martyrs of Compiegne tomorrow, I'm posting my annual round-up of posts and articles I've written on the subject. My latest post is a small collection of news clippings and ephemera about the Carmelites' beatification in 1906.
1
14
1,061
This is precisely why I undertook my study of the implementation and reception of the liturgical reform between 1964 and 1968 As I described in my "New Mass of 1964" series, there are essentially zero works of scholarship in English which cover this period in any depth
From Card. Burke's interview: "one must revisit the historical & liturgical studies covering the years 1965-1969... These matters certainly need to be examined more deeply in light of the archives that are beginning to open up. There is still much work to be done in this regard."
4
5
75
3,495
When an article or book mentions this 1964-1968 period at all, it is almost always just a handful of sentences Almost all current scholarship focuses nearly exclusively on the period from the announcement and publication of the revised Missal in 1969-1970 onward
1
1
15
290
Sharon is back with another characteristically excellent and interesting project. On what days and at what times did Catholics get married around the turn of the century? The custom of getting married on Saturday, or in the afternoon, only became popular very recently!
I've finished my latest newspaper/data project! "When's the big day?": The days and times of Catholic wedding masses, 1871-1960 I looked at over 3,000 articles across 30 American Catholic newspapers to tabulate what day of the week and time of day people had their wedding masses. Link below!
1
3
8
1,072
This column from 1892 is such a brilliant find. It offers an extraordinary glimpse into the state of Catholic marriage practice in America around the turn of the 20th century ... there were very very few people getting married at nuptial masses! teapaw.org/1SharonKabel/status/20…
Replying to @1SharonKabel
I confess that what might be more interesting than my original research q is the constellation of moving stories I found. For my conclusion, I transcribed a column from Father Edward Sweeney (1843-1909). He paints a vivid picture of domestic Catholic life in Maryland.
2
1
8
393
As far as I am aware, Sheen did not comment much on the revised liturgy between 1964 and 1968 or after the new missal of 1970 However, it is worth noting that he did not only say things like this privately to individuals. He also expressed similar sentiments publicly:
Thanks. At the time a lot of people were saying this kind of thing to the people they regarded as too simple to contradict them. No doubt Sheen thought that in a ‘large sense’ it was true or something. But it reflects very badly on him.
4
3
63
8,713
***1628 🤦‍♂️ what a typo lol
Replying to @HandMissals
It is less well known that this original medieval rood screen was replaced during the early 17th century In 1826, the French queen Anne of Austria ordered the wholesale renovation of the rood screen It was designed in baroque fashion by François Mansart and installed in 1645
20
1,834
This post inspired me to do a quick mini-thread on the rood screens of Notre Dame I learned a number of interesting things while researching for my recent Pillar article on the history of altars at the cathedral There's not much info on this in English, so check it out: 🧵⤵️
De brand in de Notre-Dame in Parijs leidde tot een bijzondere archeologische ontdekking: meer dan 1,000 fragmenten van middeleeuwse sculpturen werden ontdekt tijdens de restauratie, waaronder levensgrote beelden van het oorspronkelijke oksaal uit de 13e eeuw.
1
17
2
98
11,291
This reminded me of something I found while researching rituales: The 1680 rite for Les Mans directs that the couple should kneel on the lowest step of the altar (husband on the Epistle side, the wife on the Gospel side) and hold candles throughout the wedding mass!
Why at a Nuptial Mass the Couple May, and Should, Kneel Inside the Sanctuary dlvr.it/TSWRKf
5
22
1
160
11,965
I just learned that my "New Mass of 1964" series received mention in the @CatholicHerald My thanks to @LMSChairman for reading and engaging with my study of the popular reception of the initial liturgical reforms, between 1964 and 1968
1
6
30
1,638
Was doing some microfilm scanning myself on a recent visit to the Wisconsin Historical Society Library
2
23
782
I’m back with the final installment of “The ‘New Mass’ of 1964” series This article is the conclusion for the whole series It's a huge milestone for me as I wrap up this project, so come along with me for one final thread! 🧵⤵️
14
91
14
515
122,041
I missed the brouhaha over this yesterday setting that aside, it is remarkable to me that almost *literally identical* statements were being published in diocesan newspapers in 1966 about the failures of the New Liturgy e.g., The Catholic Transcript, September 2, 1966, page 3:
What's it mean when over half the people in Mass don't participate or say the responses?
4
4
69
4,749
I’m back with the fourth installment of “The ‘New Mass’ of 1964” series Part 4 is titled “What went wrong?”: Pastoral Accompaniment, Disillusionment, and Blame 🧵⤵️
7
52
15
157
36,244
This installment explores how the church provided pastoral care to the laity during the initial liturgical changes and how the laity and clergy dealt with confusion, frustration, shifting expectations, and feelings of failure Here’s the link: 🔗handmissalhistory.com/newmas…
3
2
1
26
3,884
Happy Easter! As some of you likely noticed, my fourth installment in the "New Mass of 1964" series was delayed last Fall Things got totally derailed by a combination of home improvement projects, endless family health issues, and an extraordinarily busy period for my day job
1
1
27
2,178
But I am happy to announce that Part 4 is finished and will be published on Wednesday! This will be the final major installment, to be followed by a series conclusion in which I hope to briefly summarize everything and reflect on a few final tidbits.
3
6
1
35
949