Hooli (@Hooliwins) header
Hooli (@Hooliwins) profile picture

// Founder // Ai Development and Design //

Joined October 2023
Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)Photo by Hooli (@Hooliwins)
Hooli retweeted
WE F’N DID IT! THE ENTIRE ABSTRACT MAINNET. CAPTURED. Every single block, tx, user and every movement of funds. They wanted to shutdown a blockchain that 400,000 of us spent 2 years building on. That could have taken an entire ecosystem’s history offline. They wanted to hide evidence. We preserved it. ALL Now we’re preparing to open-source the data and put it in the hands of the world’s best onchain investigators. Follow the wallets. Trace the money. Connect the dots. No selective disclosures. No gatekeepers. Just the public record. THE ABSTRACT FILES. 🔓 And we’re only getting started. RECALL!
FIRST DOWNLOAD DONE. We’ve downloaded and preserved the ENTIRE ABSTRACT TESTNET. Every block. Every transaction. The complete public history. And we’re going to open source it for the entire world to investigate. THE ABSTRACT FILES. This is only the beginning. 🔓
30
41
13
292
14,503
After watching this documentary, I'll never put a single dime into Pudgy Penguins ecosystem. I want to believe Luca Netz might have started with pure intentions, but somewhere along the way, something changed. I genuinely feel sorry for everyone who believed the promises around Abstract, only to realize they were sold a false dream. It's time to wake up.
79
79
28
556
36,975
I’ve been here since 2015, and let me tell you: this isn’t crypto anymore. This isn’t even trading. It’s a casino designed to drain your money, and Pump.fun is the house. If you’ve lost money over the past few months, you’re caught in a system that profits from your losses. This ecosystem has been rotten to its core for a very, very long time. Want to make real money? Learn how to actually trade. Not by buying and selling memes, but by understanding real markets. Learn how to trade BTC with leverage, the Nasdaq, or stocks. Learn risk management and how markets actually work. But trust me on one thing: get out of Pump.fun.
Kimchi just BEAT his $40M Trump trade in 1 HOUR after joining Pumpfun
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Kimchi holds ~75% of the low-liquidity $KIMCHI meme coin supply per pump.fun/coin/CSocnzcRp… explaining the displayed portfolio value after his Pumpfun affiliation, contrary to implied trading profits. The $40M Trump trade is an unverified legend with no on-chain confirmation memecoin.wiki/wiki/kimchi. x.com/crypto_echad/s… x.com/iamtheR2G/stat…
70
131
17
1,055
60,528
💵 Who wants a banknote? 💵 TAG + RT + drop your EVM wallet!
33
26
2
41
1,375
Hooli retweeted
last 30D on pumpfun: - 97% of traders lost money - $3M+ was rewarded to bundlers - team extracted another $43M no wonder the trenches are bleeding
270
188
146
1,266
147,414
It looks like @LucaNetz hurt the whole space. 🥲 (Ok, Blur and OS did not help either) 22 top OG NFT collections by all-time volume is down over the past 7 days. Except Moonbirds. And honestly? It’s understandable. I’m sick and tired of watching people lie, steal, manipulate and walk away without consequences. Sometimes I genuinely wonder why any semi-normal person would choose to stay in this space. At my core, I’m a liberal. But the old-school kind. Minimal government intervention. Maximum individual freedom. Do whatever the hell you want, as long as you don’t hurt others. Adam Smith had a beautiful idea with his invisible hand. Markets, left free, could regulate themselves through individual choices and competition. But perhaps Thomas Hobbes understood human nature better when he described life in a state of nature, without a common authority to keep people in check. Homo homini lupus / man is a wolf to man. Almost 400 years later, watching the crypto space unfold, I’m starting to think Hobbes had a point. Smith imagined individuals pursuing their own interests within a functioning society. Hobbes warned us about what happens when everyone is left to their own devices, with no authority capable of enforcing the rules. And here we are, watching people exploit the very freedom that made this space possible. I’m not calling for governments to micromanage crypto. Quite the opposite. But freedom without accountability eventually becomes a playground for predators. And we’ve proven, time and time again, that this community is terrible at self-regulation. We keep rewarding the very people who destroy the trust we need to survive. We give scammers platforms, celebrate their next launches, and pretend nothing happened as soon as a new narrative comes along. Where is the collective outrage? Where are the consequences? Where is the point at which the community collectively decides: You are no longer welcome here. I’ve been around since 2017, the ICO era. That was the real Wild West. Millions of projects, endless promises, and scams everywhere. Back then, these guys didn’t have AI writing whitepapers for them. They’d just steal one from another project, change the name, throw up a website, and start collecting money. Almost ten years later, we’re still swimming in the same old, stinky water. The tools have changed. The narratives have changed. The profile pictures have changed. But the people exploiting this space? Same shit. Better marketing. And maybe that’s the most depressing part of all this. NFTs were supposed to be about ownership, culture, creativity and communities building something together. Instead, too much of the space has become an endless game of extracting value from the next person who walks through the door. You can’t build a lasting market on broken trust. You can’t attract serious people if the price of participation is constantly being lied to, exploited or rugged. And you can’t keep telling everyone that crypto is the future while refusing to deal with the people poisoning its present. Freedom is not the problem. A culture that mistakes the absence of consequences for freedom is. If we can’t clean up our own house, sooner or later someone else will come in and do it for us. And we probably won’t like how they do it. Hope @pudgypenguins community find a way to clean their name and becomes a shiny bird once again, that would be a biggest win for the whole space. This started as a short post about NFTs in red and I ended up with this long rant, sry if anyone read a whole thing 😅
24
10
99
6,982
Holding for next pop $NET
Shareholders, NET trades at about $170 against $163.62 of onchain backing per NET, a premium of three percent, with the inverse bond bidding under it at $161.19. For the first time since genesis the price and the number behind it are the same. From zero NetNet opened on July 17 with $0. 87 days later, the Treasury holds $24.53M and the Sleeve holds ~$4M of Stock Tokens and positions. How we get paid There is no team allocation of NET, no salary drawn from the Treasury, and no share of the tax. Management is paid through pTEAM, our pToken in the tradition of pOHM. It is an option to mint NET at a strike of one USDG, against a cap of 15 percent of circulating supply. Every term is immutable and disclosed in full on the Management Compensation page of our docs, under pTEAM options. Every exercise is logged as an event on the contract, and the figures below are read from those events. What we did with it We exercised 13,320 NET of pTEAM in 192 clips between July 24 and September 28. That comes to about nine percent of supply. Of the NET we minted, 10,270 went into the Real World Bond desks as inventory. Those desks sold it to bonders for $5.13 million of USDG and remitted $680,000 in fees to the Treasury. The rest bought Stock Tokens, which is where most of the Sleeve came from. Another 550 NET seeded the Asset Bond Desk and 250 NET seeded the Superstore. Real World Bonds are no longer inflationary, we now use NET we purchased at market to fill the bond desks. The remaining 2,250 NET was used to fund our operation. We take nothing from the tax and nothing from the Treasury. We need to hire and grow the operation to set ourselves up for the next 900 days and beyond. What we bought The Sleeve has bought about 5,770 NET on the open market since August, through Rialto and Uniswap, and staked most of it. At no point has it sold NET into the pool. The protocol has been a buyer too, because the inverse bond has taken 22 fills, retiring almost 200 NET for about $31,000. Why we are bullish No single wallet on Robinhood Chain holds more NVDA, SPCX, GOOGL or AAPL Stock Tokens than the Sleeve. Those Stock Tokens are worth $4.04M. None of what follows existed in July, and all of it was built inside the same 87 days. Fifteen games, fourteen RW-PLAY cabinets plus WinNET, have taken in about $1.9 million of play, and NetCorp, the flagship, is in Beta. NET LONG went live this week: long any listed token with leverage, wsNET as margin, every USDG fee buying and burning NET. Predict grades the Treasury number every Monday and its fees buy NET, while THE BOOK writes sports markets in wsNET. NET ADVANCE has 288 locks open and $294,000 receivable, with five percent of every close going to the Treasury. NetNet Credit lends USDG against wsNET and Stock Tokens through a Morpho vault we curate, and the Sleeve earns the curator's share. All of them charge a fee, and every fee ends as NET backing or NET burned. The onus is on us Bonds built this balance sheet, and at NAV the bond engine idles. Inflows ran about $250,000 a day last week against $320,000 the week before, and we are not going to dress that up. Our thesis has never been that the bonds run forever. It was that a treasury of this size, in yield bearing dollars and Stock Tokens on Robinhood Chain, could run desks that earn. We are confident we can deliver.
2
71
First one is done for @genxdegenerate true supporter
🤖 Made with AI
Tomorrow, holders of 10 NFTs, as well as those who delist their NFTs, will be able to upgrade any Jean Phil they own. Join Us
3
2
1
27
546
Hooli retweeted
HOLY SHIT FORBES REALLY DON’T MISS 😭
LUCA NETZ WAS TEACHING PEOPLE HOW TO MANIPULATE CUSTOMERS AND MAKE MONEY IN HIS $1,700 COURSE Footage from a training program previously sold for $1,700 by Luca Netz, the owner of Pudgy Penguins, reveals highly questionable marketing practices and raises serious concerns about the methods he was teaching. Throughout the course, Luca explains how ordinary products can be sold at inflated prices by exploiting human psychology, creating artificial perceptions of trust, and influencing consumers' purchasing decisions. 1. SELLING PRODUCTS UNDER THE PRETEXT OF SAVING KOALAS One of the strategies Luca discusses in his course involves purchasing bracelets and necklaces from Chinese suppliers at extremely low prices and reselling them for approximately five times their original cost. However, the most concerning aspect is not the profit margin itself, but the marketing strategy used to sell these products. The accessories were marketed as products that would help rescue and protect endangered koalas affected by wildfires in Australia. Customers were told that a portion of the profits from every purchase would be donated toward rescuing and protecting these animals. In other words, people's compassion for animals and their genuine desire to help were placed at the center of a commercial sales strategy. This raises several important questions. How much revenue did this campaign generate? How much of that money was actually donated? Which organizations received those donations, and where is the documentation proving that the donations took place? 2. CREATING AN ARTIFICIAL PERCEPTION OF LUXURY AROUND ORDINARY PRODUCTS In another section of the course, Luca explains how he made an ordinary product sourced from China appear significantly more valuable than it actually was. To accomplish this, he added expensive products from internationally recognized luxury brands to his website. He then marked those products as sold out, leaving only his own product available for purchase. This strategy was designed to make visitors believe they were shopping from a prestigious luxury brand. A product that was relatively inexpensive to source was presented alongside high end brands to artificially increase its perceived value. The objective was not simply to promote a product, but to deliberately influence how consumers perceived its worth. 3. CREATING FAKE TRUST THROUGH PURCHASED FOLLOWERS, LIKES, AND COMMENTS One of the most revealing parts of Luca's course involves his explanations of how to manufacture social media popularity. Luca discusses how his friends attempted similar sales strategies but failed to achieve the same results. When explaining why they were unsuccessful, he suggests that they had not put enough effort into developing their Instagram accounts, purchasing likes, and faking various aspects of their online presence. The course also demonstrates where students can purchase fake followers, likes, and comments. The purpose of these methods is to create an artificial impression of popularity and credibility among potential customers who encounter the brand for the first time. Consumers may naturally assume that a brand with thousands of followers and numerous positive comments is trustworthy. However, when those interactions are purchased rather than earned organically, the trust influencing their purchasing decisions is based on manufactured social proof rather than genuine customer experiences. 4. TEACHING THESE METHODS TO THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE Perhaps one of the most disturbing aspects of this situation is that Luca was not merely discussing these strategies in relation to his own businesses. He was teaching them to students as part of a $1,700 training program. The methods described in the course included exploiting people's desire to support charitable causes, manufacturing an artificial perception of luxury around ordinary products, and creating credibility through purchased social media engagement. Teaching these practices to a large audience raises concerns that extend far beyond a single brand or business. It potentially encourages the widespread use of deceptive marketing techniques that could influence purchasing decisions across numerous online stores. 5. THE LINE BETWEEN MARKETING AND DECEIVING CONSUMERS Purchasing inexpensive products from China and reselling them at a substantial profit is not inherently fraudulent. However, manufacturing popularity through purchased followers, creating artificial prestige around products, and leveraging people's compassion to drive sales raise serious ethical concerns. When charitable causes are involved, transparency becomes even more important. Customers deserve to know whether the donations promised to them were actually made and whether the charitable claims used to influence their purchasing decisions were legitimate. The methods described in Luca Netz's course provide a striking example of how consumer trust can be turned into a commercial tool. The fundamental question is simple: If a brand's credibility is built not on genuine customer satisfaction, but on purchased followers, fake engagement, manufactured luxury perceptions, and marketing strategies that exploit people's compassion, can we really call that successful entrepreneurship? The methods Luca discusses in his own training materials raise important questions about the marketing practices behind certain business success stories. They also serve as a reminder that what is presented as entrepreneurial success may sometimes deserve much closer scrutiny. So, let me ask you this: Do you still trust this guy? If your answer is yes, then it's time to take a hard look at yourself. Source: docs.google.com/document/d/1…
44
30
5
466
42,615
When you have less than 9k volume left till verification ✅
1
10
1
47
1,092
Fashion is my profession
10
64
1,225
bummed I missed the side effects bullrun
IT IS OFFICIAL. 💥 PFIZER HAS JUST PUBLISHED THE LIST OF POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS OF ITS «COVID VACCINE». 💥 IT IS A CRIME! 1) Blood clots, 2) Acute kidney injury, 3) Acute flaccid myelitis, 4) Positive antibodies against sperm, 5) Brainstem embolism, 6) Brainstem thrombosis, 7) Cardiac arrest (hundreds of cases), 8) Heart failure, 9) Thrombosis of the heart chamber... 10) Cardiogenic shock, 11) Vasculitis of the central nervous system, 12) Death of newborns, 13) Deep vein thrombosis, 14) Brainstem encephalitis, 15) Hemorrhagic encephalitis, 16) Frontal lobe epilepsy, 17) Epileptic psychosis, 18) Facial neuropathy, 19) Fetal distress syndrome, 20) Gastrointestinal amyloidosis, 21) Generalized tonic-clonic seizures, 22) Hashimoto's encephalopathy, 23) Vascular thrombosis of the liver, 24) Reactivation of shingles, 25) *Reactivation of cancer... 26) "Turbo"-cancer, 27) Immune-mediated hepatitis, 28) Interstitial lung disease, 29) Embolism of the jugular veins, 30) Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, 31) Liver damage, 32) Low birth weight, 34) Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, 35) Myocarditis, 36) Seizures in newborns, 37) Pancreatitis, 38) Pneumonia, 39) Stillbirth, 40) Tachycardia, 41) Temporal lobe epilepsy, 43) Autoimmune disease of the testes, 44) Thrombotic stroke, 45) Type-1 diabetes mellitus, 46) Venous thrombosis in newborns, 47) Thrombosis of the vertebral artery, 48) Pericarditis, 49) Sudden infant death syndrome. SEVERE CONSEQUENCES of a so-called vaccine that neither protects against the disease, nor against its transmission or severe courses!
45
gud track
Run away, turn away, run away, run away… Too late to run. Sam and I just formed the greatest boyband in federal custody to celebrate 120B views. Choreography by SBF. Vocals by Lock-a Netz. Billions will huddle. In cellblock B.👇
28
lil bro said he mops he wasn't playin
🤖 Made with AI
Funny how Luca now had to rely on the help of someone who has an ape PFP on & someone who sits on Yuga Labs Board to save Pudgy Penguins floor after he previously said that they’ll mop any other NFT or coin that we’re betting to be better than them lol
1
24
Hooli retweeted
Thesis: solana:GTBxUiw6wJdmmkCGZgRHLyYxqu1vG4KtRpeox6yDpump goes to $1. Jean Phil is the purest expression of the AI attention economy. A silent French gentleman-boxer with a blond bob, curled mustache and houndstooth suit went from zero to tens of millions of views and 200k+ followers in weeks — spawning endless fan content, copycats and a whole AI-persona meta. Attention is the only real moat in memecoins. As AI influencers become the next content paradigm, the OG character that started it owns the narrative premium. Fair launch, authorities revoked, organic community multiplying reach daily. From ~$10M to $1B is what happens when a meme escapes crypto Twitter and becomes internet lore. Oui Madame.
25
38
5
195
7,168
I wonder if he's regretting shutting down Abster
Luca Schnetzler was a web2 DROPSHIP SCAMMER that sold ECOM botting courses for $1700. He rebranded to "Luca Netz" after thousands of people filed legal complaints. He then turned to scamming in crypto. Congrats Pudgies, you all played yourselves
50
$ATOM near $1.95, up 8% today and 12% on the week, pressing $2. Cosmos just shipped native post-quantum keys, remote KMS/HSM signing, and zero-downtime validator rotation. Hub is back, volume is in, and older L1s are getting a bid. $2 is the line. Close through it and this stops looking like a bounce.
1
15
90
3,277
solana:7Xgc5RacHtGzfhw2HukUBk5V986yBbvshr7rrCoopump coded and at $1 mil cap rn @DerekMercer2006 CA: 7Xgc5RacHtGzfhw2HukUBk5V986yBbvshr7rrCoopump
66