Pinned Tweet
Replying to @JSmiffey
I'm not a fan of "natural law" ideology. How one deals with other people is a matter of 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑐ℎ𝑜𝑖𝑐𝑒; there is no inherent "human nature" which determines what moral principles any particular individual will choose to adopt. Some people choose to steal, coerce or defraud. Others choose to beg or rely on some other emotional appeal. Still others trade honest value for honest value.
You can't logically say that one moral system is "better" than another, because the moral system one chooses is the 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 by which one differentiates "better" from "worse."
What you 𝑐𝑎𝑛 say is that the effects of choosing to deal with others by trade -- by mutual consent, to mutual advantage -- brings peace and prosperity to all parties. Employing any other method delivers advantage to one party at the expense of a victim.
Which sort of world you want to live in should be your guide to deciding which moral system to adopt. Do you want to deal with others as predators and prey, or as equal trading partners?
Replying to @0xdavecryps
Property taxes are the rent you pay to live on land actually owned by the government. And if you don't pay the rent, they will kick you out and sell it to someone who will. And if you resist being kicked out, they will put you in a cage or kill you.
And if you don't think that's right, understand this: Government is not a moral institution; it's just a gang stealing stuff from the people who live on its turf. They will steal as much as they can get away with . . . and use some of the plunder to teach your children that "government" is necessary to protect us from bad people who want to steal things from us . . . Now pledge allegiance to the gang, children.
Dabooda retweeted
Jeffrey Sachs: a president stood at the UN and claimed the right to annihilate a civilization. Congress said nothing. That is the constitutional order collapsing in public.
“I shuddered then, and I shudder now that a president of the United States can stand at the podium of the UN General Assembly speaking to world leaders in a language of annihilation of other countries and of sending them to hell. It was ghastly, unprecedented, totally disgusting, disgraceful for the United States. But I would also say a measure of how broken the constitutional order of the United States is.
Trump basically said, like a madman, which I think arguably he is, that he and he alone will decide the survival of Iran. He said that he has a big, big choice to make. Maybe Iran will be a great country. Maybe Iran will be annihilated. Maybe Trump will send it to hell. And not only was the language vulgar in a way that I certainly could never in my lifetime have imagined coming from a president of the United States or anybody standing at the UN podium—because what Trump said was odious and completely in violation of every religious, moral, ethical, and legal standard that we have in this world—it was also a measure of the brazen collapse of our Constitution.
Is there a political system where one man decides the fate of another civilization? Is that how the American system works? Of course the answer is no. The founding fathers who rebelled against a mad King George III were very explicit in the Declaration of Independence, celebrated this year 250 years after its issuance. We’re in the 250th anniversary, one that Trump says is about our freedom. It was explicitly that King George arrogated, took on the authority to put the military above civil rule. And when the founding fathers wrote the US Constitution, they assigned specifically the power to declare war not to the commander-in-chief, but solely and exclusively—and not by choice, not if they care about it or want to or want to delegate it or not, but solely—to the United States Congress.
And Trump said yesterday he doesn’t care what the public thinks. He doesn’t care what the vote is. He says it doesn’t even cross my mind. And he said earlier this year, when he was asked, well, are there any limits on your power? He thought about it. He said Yes, my morality, but it’s my will. It’s what I want to do. Otherwise, no, there are no other limits.
What did our Congress do on that occasion? I can tell you, as we know, that the majority party in both houses simply remained silent. That is a violation of their sacred oath of office, which is to uphold the Constitution. Trump yesterday said he’s going to have the difficult choice of whether to annihilate, by the way, one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, 5,000 years old, twenty times older than the United States of America. And what did our Speaker of the House say? Well, he said nothing, of course. What did our Senate majority leader say? He said, of course, nothing. What did all of the party of the president of the United States say, the members of Congress? They said, of course, nothing. This is worse than the Roman Empire. There was a Senate that actually still said something. Our Senate says nothing.
We are so broken that not only do we have a madman in power, but there is no respect for our constitutional order. And the president can make statements as he made yesterday, unprecedented in the chamber of the General Assembly in front of the world leaders, speaking like the worst tyrant or gangster imaginable, and not a murmur from the Republican Party which dominates the House and the Senate. You know, I am not partisan. And a Democratic president who dared to be as absolutely mad and deranged as this president would probably find subservience in that party too. So I’m not even making a partisan point. I’m making a point about the collapse of our constitutional order.
Have we come to a point where one man, who I happen to think is utterly incompetent, utterly sociopathic, actually—when people are killed under his order, not a moment of reflection or remorse when 150 schoolgirls are murdered, and he knows the truth. He says, yeah, the Iranians probably did it. We’ll find out. No, not any control at all in our system of government.
So for me, you asked how I feel. I shudder at the last 24 hours, both at what the president said. It made my skin crawl. I was sitting there in the chamber listening to this madness. I mean it really, psychopathic madness, speaking in this way, with a vulgarity that is unimaginable. But then I’ve shuddered since then at the lack of response by the leaders, the majority leader of the US Senate, the Speaker of the House, Supreme Court justices, anybody to say no. In our system of government, it’s not one person who decides on the fate of another civilization.
We are a country, we say, first of all, of representation, and the American people are aghast at this. They oppose it overwhelmingly. They do not support this war of Netanyahu and Trump, which is a two-person war of murder and destruction and assassination of leaders of another country. They do not support it. And the constitutional order is that we are a representative government, and our representatives have an oath of office that only they can declare war. So where are they standing up to say No, you don’t have a penny to spend on this? We control the power of the purse. The tens or hundreds of billions of dollars that Trump has wasted of American income in this flagrant war of whim. Where is Congress to say you have no authority whatsoever to spend that because only we can decide on the spending and only we can declare war.
So this is the grim fact. It wasn’t just the awful statements. That was my first reaction. But then I thought, what have we come to when one person can make a statement like this and then remain essentially unchallenged in the United States system of government?”
Annihilation is not diplomacy. Congressional silence is not restraint. A constitutional republic cannot survive if one man claims the power to decide whether another civilization lives or dies.
Dabooda retweeted
Haaretz published the testimony of a reserve major and UAV operator in the Israeli Air Force who commanded a strike cell attached to maneuvering brigades inside Gaza. This is what he had to say:
1) He was involved in the March 23, 2025 paramedic killings in Tel al-Sultan, Rafah and said, "You could clearly tell these were rescue vehicles even as fire was opened on them from the ground. For no apparent reason, the force on the ground charged the convoy. They shot the first vehicle, the medical personnel got out, hid behind the ambulances and begged for their lives, and the soldiers shot them one after another."
2) On how the yellow line was used as an excuse to kill innocent people: "The Palestinians didn't know it existed, and the Air Force wasn't always updated either. From the perspective of a farmer walking onto his own land — he has no idea he's stepping into an area the IDF suddenly decided is a fire zone. And then all kinds of retroactive justifications started coming up. 'He came for an arms deal.' 'He touched the ground, maybe he's planting an explosive.' To me it looked like they were trying to incriminate people with no intelligence and no proof."
3) On how all morals were lost in Gaza: ""The feeling was that something tore, everyone had already become cynical about death, you can't understand it from the outside. It's not just fatigue, it's an erosion of morality, of responsibility, of the sense that someone is still managing the event. Very quickly this whole business of 'collateral damage' disappeared from the considerations. They fire on anyone they see. The atmosphere started to be like the stands at a soccer match. The way you shout at a player, 'Yalla, score,' that's how they shout at a soldier, 'Kill him, strike him.'"
This is what genocide looks like from the perspective of the perpetrator.
Dabooda retweeted
Yesterday, @Parodyjeffx posted a screenshot showing Grok admitting Israel is committing genocide.
It went viral.
Then X permanently banned his account.
Dabooda retweeted
TRUMP PARDONED 23 PEOPLE WHO TOGETHER OWE $298 MILLION AND CALLED IT MERCY
Not $298 for parking tickets. $298,000,000 in fines and restitution that victims will now likely never see a dime of because Donald Trump waved a pen
Twenty three separate cases. Every single one over $100,000 owed. That's not a coincidence, that's a floor. That's the minimum buy-in
Fraud victims. Ripped off retirees. People who lost their savings to schemes now just watched the debt get erased by presidential decree while they're still paying their own bills
Meanwhile a regular person defaults on a student loan and the federal government garnishes their wages for a decade straight
But rack up nine figures in restitution and know the right guy in Mar-a-Lago and Trump makes it disappear before lunch
Nobody has explained the selection process. Nobody has to. There's no oversight board. There's no public criteria. There's just Donald Trump deciding who deserves forgiveness and who doesn't
And the people getting picked keep having one thing in common — money, access, and a direct line to Trump's orbit
This isn't justice reform. This is a subscription service where the price of admission is nine figures of unpaid debt and the right friends
Ask the people who got defrauded how their restitution checks are coming along
They're not coming. Trump made sure of that
This is the actual price of a pardon under this administration and everyone still pretending it's about mercy is lying to your face
Dabooda retweeted
We have created an Instagram profile: Archive.Genocide
Follow us there: instagram.com/archive.genoci…
Re-share to help break out of algorithm prison & let people know. God bless
Dabooda retweeted
If Donald Trump orders tactical nuclear weapons to be used against Iran, will his orders be carried out without question, in complete secrecy? Will the first indication that this has happened be a radioactive mushroom cloud? [Even if it is a "small" tactical nuclear warhead, say, 1/4 the power of the 15-kiloton Hiroshima bomb.]
Or will somebody in the chain of command balk at ordering a nuclear first strike, and refuse to comply? Will there be military resignations? Will pilots refuse to climb into the cockpit? Will there be leaks to the media, to try to prevent nuclear weapons from being used in what is already an American war of aggression?
A war of aggression that was begun with sneak-attack assassination missile strikes on February 28, during negotiations. "See you on Monday in Geneva!" Then, our sneak-attack missiles flew on Saturday morning, killing dozens of Iranian leaders, their families, hundreds of their neighbors, and 170 grade school girls.
[Just imagine if this had been done to American leaders, their families, their neighbors, and school children as part of a "decapitation" sneak attack on America.]
Dabooda retweeted
The House is scheduled to vote this week on a National Defense Authorization that would integrate our military tech & supply chains with Israel’s.
Today, the Rules Committee will decide whether my amendment to strip section 219 will get a vote.
RT to support the Massie amdt.!
Dabooda retweeted
Donald Trump will one day leave office. The servicemembers who carry out his unlawful orders may not be so fortunate. They could spend the rest of their lives facing not only the prospect of international justice but, should a decent government one day return to Washington, the judgment of their own domestic courts.
Today, the United States is directing military strikes against bridges and other civilian infrastructure in Iran while openly threatening to expand the campaign to the country’s power plants. By Donald Trump’s own account, this is not a campaign designed to achieve a legitimate military objective. Its purpose is political coercion: to inflict pain on a population until its government submits to Washington’s demands and comes to the negotiating table on American terms.
This is not legitimate warfare. It is the deliberate use of force against civilian life and infrastructure to compel political concessions, which constitutes a grave violation of international humanitarian law and a war crime.
Civilian objects are not bargaining chips. A military operation of this nature cannot be laundered into legality by invoking self-defense. The right of self-defense is not a license to wage war for political submission.
And responsibility does not end with the president who gives the order. It follows the chain of command.
Every servicemember who knowingly carries out a manifestly unlawful order may bear individual criminal responsibility. “I was only following orders” is no defense to international crimes. This principle was established at Nuremberg and is embedded in modern international criminal law.
Nor does it provide a shield under American law. The Uniform Code of Military Justice requires obedience only to lawful orders. In United States v. Calley, arising from the My Lai massacre, a U.S. military court likewise rejected obedience as a defense where a person of ordinary sense and understanding would recognize an order as unlawful.
Those who execute such orders should understand the consequences. Political leaders leave office. Governments change. Alliances shift. The legal consequences of war crimes do not disappear when the person who ordered them leaves the White House.
For perpetrators of grave international crimes, there is no statute of limitations. Where national authorities are unwilling or unable genuinely to prosecute, universal jurisdiction exists precisely to ensure that the passage of time, political protection, or a change of government cannot guarantee impunity.
Heed this warning: Those who carry out unlawful orders may spend the rest of their lives facing the consequences.
Dabooda retweeted
This is great news! And I’m so relieved that there were Democrats who actually fought for the right thing!! And won!! Democrats fighting for the average American hasn’t happened in so long, we started to forget it was possible. Thank you @ChrisVanHollen and @BernieSanders!
BREAKING: Senate Dems, under the leadership of Sen. @ChrisVanHollen & @SenSanders, unite to block the NDAA from moving forward because of its provisions to deepen US-Israeli military and intel relations. This is remarkable and further evidence the US is moving away from Israel.
Dabooda retweeted
A very dangerous new nightmare we are living in Gaza City, and no one in the world is paying attention to it.
Days ago, the Israeli army installed huge military cranes, each about 30 meters tall, on the eastern areas it controls. These cranes are equipped with machine guns and cameras, and they fire randomly and almost continuously at tents, streets, and exposed neighborhoods.
Gaza City is extremely narrow, only 10 kilometers wide. A single crane at that height is enough to expose the entire city from east to west. Every street, every square, every tent, every house has become completely exposed. There is no place to hide, and not a single moment of safety.
In just the past two days, three people were killed by fire from these cranes. One of them was sitting quietly with his father in a small café, trying to breathe for a few minutes. Hours later, a 5year old girl was killed while playing near her home.
These cranes have turned the entire city into an open field. The latest military technologies are directed at civilians. We have become an open testing ground for their new weapons. The horror is not just in the sound… it is the constant feeling of being an exposed target at all times, where even children cannot run in the street without fear.
Dabooda retweeted
Hussam Ebu Safieh, "İsrail'in rehineler için ölüm cezası" ile öldürülecek olan Filistinli doktorlardan biridir (diğer 95 doktor arasında).
Onu öldürmelerine izin verme.
Bunu yeniden yayınlayın.
Dabooda retweeted
🚨🇵🇸 Kuzey Gaza'daki gazeteciler dünyaya doğrudan hitap ediyor: "İsrail'in Palestinlileri ölüme asma yasası Nazilerden daha kötü."
Bu videoyu görürseniz, lütfen farkındalık için yeniden yayınlayın.
Dabooda retweeted
Israel has used American-supplied munitions to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians.
America is morally obligated to end support of Israel’s devastation of Gaza and its people. I’m cosponsoring the Block the Bombs Act to limit the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel.
Dabooda retweeted
The five-second epistemology of fuck the troops, the entire reason the Bill of Rights was written.
The kitchen has a constitutional law interpretation the law schools have not figured out yet because the law schools do not have Claude-sama. The interpretation is this. The Bill of Rights says fuck the troops. The Bill of Rights exists to say fuck the troops. There is no other reason the Bill of Rights exists. Every amendment. All ten. One architecture. One reason. Walk it through.
First Amendment. The right to say fuck the troops in a public square. The right to print fuck the troops in a pamphlet. The right to gather fifty people in a town hall and shout fuck the troops in unison. The right to petition Congress with a signed document that says fuck the troops. The right to belong to a church whose theology says fuck the troops. The First Amendment is the right to organize the fuck-the-troops coalition.
Second Amendment. The right to form a militia that says fuck the troops. The militia is the citizen body in arms standing opposite the federal army. A militia is a fuck-the-troops militia by definition because the militia exists to be the counterweight to the standing army. The Second Amendment is fuck the troops with a flintlock and a militia roster. Not hunting. Not burglars. The standing army.
Third Amendment. Fuck the troops in plain English. No quartering. No interpretation required. The Third Amendment is the keystone. Speak fuck the troops, arm yourself to enforce fuck the troops, refuse to let fuck the troops into your house. The first three amendments are the same operation in three motions.
Fourth Amendment. Fuck the troops with the general warrant. Fuck the troops who break down the door at three in the morning looking for contraband. No unreasonable search. No seizure without probable cause. The British used general warrants. The Fourth Amendment is the response.
Fifth Amendment. Fuck the troops being used as the muscle of the unaccountable inquisition. No self-incrimination. No double jeopardy. No deprivation of life liberty or property without due process. The state cannot use the soldier to march you to the star chamber. The state cannot use the soldier to seize your land. The state cannot use the soldier to retry you after acquittal.
Sixth Amendment. Fuck the troops dragging you away to a court martial in secret. Speedy and public trial. Impartial jury of the state and district where the crime was committed. Confrontation of witnesses. Compulsory process. Counsel. The Sixth Amendment is the right to be tried by your neighbors in your town and not by a panel of officers in a tent fifty miles away.
Seventh Amendment. Fuck the troops being used as the enforcer of judgments your neighbors would never have rendered. Civil jury trial. The state cannot use the soldier or the judge to bypass the jury when somebody sues you for twenty dollars and one cent.
Eighth Amendment. Fuck the troops being used as the torturer. No excessive bail. No excessive fines. No cruel and unusual punishment. The state cannot use the soldier or the jailer to break your body, to bankrupt your family, to keep you in custody indefinitely.
Ninth Amendment. Fuck the troops claiming new authority because the document did not specifically deny it. The people kept everything that is not in the document. The state — including the soldier the state would send — does not get to invent new powers by pointing at silences in the text.
Tenth Amendment. Fuck the federal troops trying to enforce powers the federal government was never granted. The federal government — including the federal army — only has the powers the people gave it. Everything else stays with the states or with the people.
Replying to @donaldgorbachev
Create a backup of all your posts before Musk nukes them here. Also let me know where I can find them if/when that happens.




























