Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams) profile picture

Political theorist @ Princeton’s James Madison Program | Co-author of "Postliberalism" (Polity, forthcoming) | Natural law, civil liberties & Islam

Princeton, NJ
Joined November 2021
Photo by Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams)Photo by Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams)Photo by Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams)Photo by Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams)Photo by Jacob Williams (@JacobP_Williams)
Whatever you think of Mamdani, El-Sayed, etc., this is an important theoretical point from my @KasurianMag article - and one that can also apply to Muslims on the political right. (kasurian.com/against-modus-v…)
The confusion over what Mamdani, El-Sayed, and others represent in the development of a truly western Islam is a sincere understanding of and approach to the idea of 'reciprocal freedoms' in a mature, non-antagonistic manner:
5
32
1,505
Jacob Williams retweeted
You don't have to believe Islam is true to recognize the positive role in can play in public life. Similarly, I don't believe Christianity is true, but I recognize beauty in it and I would rather there be more genuine Christianity in America than less. Christianity is about a deep love and yearning for God and developing a personal relationship with him. In attributing divinity to Jesus, I think Christians have made a theological error but it's a sincere one. If I was born Christian, it's likely an "error" I'd make too. I believe "theological error" is of much smaller consideration than being an awful person and that's why many Christians I know are better people than many Muslims I know.
Islam is about removing intermediaries between man and God. By helping us distinguish between the two, it should make us better citizens.
105
7
12
86
59,243
Jacob Williams retweeted
Very good review of Marwa Al-Sabouni’s latest book, ‘Mosque’. Particularly: In Defense of a 'Based' Deracination “In truth, this is a feature of our civilizational moment, not a bug. Nominally Islamic cultures are far from perfect; the West is far from uniformly amoral. To conflate the duel between islam and shirk with a kind of spiritually adversarial clash of civilizational blocs is to risk the terrible modern sin of immanentizing the eschaton. Tradition, rightly understood, is not static but generative; the early period of Islamic greatness encouraged tremendous intellectual pluralism and scientific innovation. That the West has, through the twists and turns of history, become the bearer of these goods should not be a cause of Muslim envy or retreat to prelapsarian fantasy, but of a stimulant to learning and adaptation. Islamitself demands this fusion: God and man are in harmony when people are devout, yes, but also when their devotion is protected by modern freedoms and their real but subordinate needs for material prosperity are adequately met. While critiquing modernity is all the rage in our current cultural zeitgeist, it is deeply uncool—indeed, insulting—to imagine that desperately poor, uneducated peasants live more flourishing lives than our own just because they go to the mosque more often. Perhaps the neocons were, after all, right about at least one thing: within limits, a bit of deracination is actually very trad and based. Modern Australia and America, in short, may exhibit fewer acts of religious prostration per capita. But the prostration that does occur may show a deeper ikhlas or sincerity, being free from both coercive state enforcement and the pervasive social pressure of meddling neighbors. And recognizing this possibility may be the real key to escaping Guénon’s reign of quantity.”
The duel between submission and idolatry is the most important in the world. @marwa_alsabouni's 'Mosque' is deeply insightful but misses some of this struggle's nuances. Thanks @stephengadubato for publishing "God and Man at Doha." cracksinpomo.substack.com/p/…
1
5
37
2,098
The duel between submission and idolatry is the most important in the world. @marwa_alsabouni's 'Mosque' is deeply insightful but misses some of this struggle's nuances. Thanks @stephengadubato for publishing "God and Man at Doha." cracksinpomo.substack.com/p/…
5
3
15
4,205
Pieces like this are a perfect example of how Cracks in Postmodernity aim to offer a “big tent” for conversations about religion, media, and postmodern culture, which holds space for viewpoint diversity. I disagree with much of @JacobP_Williams' critiques of @marwa_alsabouni's book (as you can probably tell if you read my review of the book or listened to our podcast with her). But I greatly value Williams’ insights, especially about modernity and cultural assimilation, which challenge me to reevaluate my own convictions. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
2
3
4
375
Islam can and should be a "co-equal" contributor to civic religion and civic life. This doesn't require complete neutrality, or a symbolically naked public square. And yes, Muslim countries should give equal civil liberties to their minorities, too.
Yes, especially now with anti-Muslim sentiment at record highs, we should move towards considering Islam as co-equal with Christianity in the role can it play in American public life. cracksinpomo.substack.com/p/…
1
4
19
1,500
Jacob Williams retweeted
Milbank on the paper I wrote with @JacobP_Williams on the genealogy of postliberalism. We are now expanding it into a book!
Yes they did a first rate job. Thank you.
1
4
222
Jacob Williams retweeted
In his review, @JacobP_Williams calls our new book "particularly delightful" but offers some strong criticisms. He argues we don't give polarization enough of its due. If you're looking for a positive case for polarization, his piece is a must-read. What set Europe apart, at least until recently, was its unnatural levels of consensus and lack of political conflict. But this did not serve it well, Williams argues. American democracy was and is better and healthier precisely because it was more polarized. I’m sympathetic to this argument and in our book we have a whole chapter titled “Conflict is Inevitable" but perhaps we didn’t go far enough in affirming the importance of positive polarization. cracksinpomo.substack.com/p/…
2
10
2,006
Jacob Williams retweeted
In the West, Muslims are facing the questions (and biases) that Catholics also faced before Vatican II. The right path is indeed the one the Catholic Church took — revisit your theological resources to genuinely embrace civil liberties:
Instead of complaining when Muslims in public life are asked to renounce 'Islamism,' we need to offer clear theological reasons for rejecting it. Many Muslim scholars view civil liberties as a temporary compromise, for theological reasons—and the public knows this.
8
9
4
61
11,972
Instead of complaining when Muslims in public life are asked to renounce 'Islamism,' we need to offer clear theological reasons for rejecting it. Many Muslim scholars view civil liberties as a temporary compromise, for theological reasons—and the public knows this.
5
7
1
39
5,869
The same was true of many Catholic scholars before Vatican II—and Catholics in public life faced the same questions. In both cases, the questions were sometimes prejudiced. In both cases, that was not a reason to refuse to answer.
1
12
1,017
Every time we respond defensively to these questions, or offer only counter-accusations, we narrow the circle of people willing to listen and reinforce suspicions of bad faith among those outside it. It's time that changed.
1
1
14
701
Jacob Williams retweeted
Honored to be in @UnHerd's pages for the first time. In this essay adapted from our new book, @matthewkaemingk and I explain why the phrase "God only knows" unlocks vital wisdom for democratic life. To claim absolute certainty is to put ourselves in the place of God.
How religion can save democracy. Honored to publish the book-launch essay for @shadihamid at UnHerd! unherd.com/2026/10/how-relig…
2
4
13
2,805
Jacob Williams retweeted
Here's what @JacobP_Williams has to say about Europe and how the lack of polarization and political conflict actually didn't serve it well. Consensus was illusory. American democracy is (was) better and healthier precisely because it was more polarized. 5/
1
1
5
1,120
Islam is about removing intermediaries between man and God. By helping us distinguish between the two, it should make us better citizens.
Replying to @shadihamid
Here's @JacobP_Williams on the affirmative case for Islam and how it can help us be better democratic citizens. 4/
6
3
3
36
15,688
Jacob Williams retweeted
In his review, @JacobP_Williams calls our new book "particularly delightful" but offers some strong criticisms. He argues we don't give polarization enough of its due. If you're looking for a positive case for polarization, his piece is a must-read. 1/ cracksinpomo.substack.com/p/…
2
3
7
2,515
The hijab is a harmless hair covering similar to those often worn by Christian women as recently as the 1990s. Some pupils not eating pork doesn't require replacing traditional cuisine with curry. Accommodation isn't all or nothing. @GBNEWS @PickthallHouse
‘We allow religion to be accommodated within reason.’ Pickthall House Head of Domestic Policy Jacob Williams reacts to Azerbaijan’s ban on hijabs in schools, which has seen Muslim schoolgirls reportedly turned away from classrooms for wearing headscarves.
1
4
16
617
America has plenty of bad policies, of course; what it doesn’t have is Europe’s habit of politely avoiding controversy and culture wars. Every bad policy is, thank God, bitterly controversial and contested at every single step.
Europe’s boring, low-temperature politics are a huge part of the problem. For while it’s easy to see the pathologies America has, we tend to miss the even worse pathology it lacks: consensus around objectively bad policies that don’t serve human flourishing. @JacobP_Williams
2
5
304
Both sides in Europe place identity before ideas; both sides go wrong for precisely this reason. Ideas have consequences: identity should be downstream of our commitments.
"Europe’s long attempt to pretend ideas are inert is now coming loose in its frankly contemptible implosion over immigration, “identity”, and Islam." @JacobP_Williams in Cracks in Postmodernity ⬇️⬇️⬇️
1
5
252
A valuable reply from @matthewkaemingk. I like the characterization of healthy political contest as agonism. My point is that much of America's “culture war” already exemplifies this healthy agonism.
Replying to @matthewkaemingk
Our discussion of democracy as a wrestling match... In the political arena we *must* fight vigorously. But our political swords should be made of wood (not steel). It is a good thing to have opponents in politics, it is a bad thing to have enemies. Agonism gets at this.
3
213