
Partner at 5654 & Co. Ex govt advisor. Campaigning for better access to mental health services with #NoTimeToWait. https://xitter.cf/t.co/VfGfjOJXAW
Blackheath, England
Joined March 2012
- Tweets5.5K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.4K
- Likes4.8K
Pinned Tweet
Mental health can affect any one of us and asking for help is often the hardest part.
No one should have to wait for support when they need it most.
This is why I’m working with @telegraph to improve access to counselling.
Article 👇#NoTimeToWait
telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02… – at Greenwich, London
Quite incredible that the Government can’t say that rejoining the EU would require a referendum.
The opposite would then follow, no future government that wanted to leave would require one either.
Would the EU want a hokey cokey member?
🗣️ 'Would rejoining the EU require a referendum?' - @WilfredFrost
Sky's Wilfred Frost questions Labour MP Sally Jameson on the govt's plan for a better relationship with the EU, as the PM rules out rejoining the EU 'this parliament.'
One minute Burnham was going to abolish the whip system the next he’s demanding total ‘loyalty’ in a major issue of conscience.
Best of luck with this, as they say.
Andy Burnham will require loyalty from ministers if he pushes ahead with plans for a return to free movement and rejoining EU amid cabinet splits
The prime minister is expected to include his Brexit plan in Labour's manifesto, meaning ministers will have to back the plans even if they have concerns
One senior government source said the issue was likely to be the subject of a motion at the next Labour conference, which meant the party was more likely to support rejoining the EU
Ministers will also be bound by collective responsibility once the options for closer alignment with the EU have been announced on November 20, meaning that they cannot publicly express a view
thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
James Starkie retweeted
Andy Burnham sold an utterly false prospectus to his own electorate just weeks ago👇
This was, sadly, always the plan.
If there was one single aspect of the EU that the majority who voted to leave objected to most, it was surely free movement, and yet that’s what he wants.
🔺 EXCLUSIVE: Andy Burnham has opened the door to Britain readopting the European Union’s free movement rules, arguing that an “honest discussion” is needed, reports @benrileysmith
Reaction to the Vivek advert should be a warning to UK politicians as our politics heads increasingly into the mud. Likely given partisan identity/polarisation are lower in the UK, that British voters would react even worse and punish even more attacks/slurs that cross the line.
NEW: We convened a group of ten Ohio Trump voters.
Half were supportive of Vivek. Half were luke warm.
We played them the ad.
You will not wanna miss the results
thebulwark.com/p/how-ohio-tr…
Even HMG / Cabinet office would wince at these payouts, and that’s saying something…
🚨 Man Utd's manager compensation payouts since Ferguson
- Moyes: £5.2m payout after 2014 sacking
- Van Gaal: £8.4m paid out in May 2016
- Mourinho: £19.6m, biggest single payout on list
- Solskjaer: £10m compensation after Nov 2021 exit
- Rangnick: £15m despite short interim/consultant role
- Ten Hag: £17m reportedly owed after Oct 2024 exit
- Amorim: £10m paid out following Jan 2026 sacking
- Total spent on payouts: £85.2m across all seven managers
James Starkie retweeted
A reminder that the billions of defence spending the Treasury are briefing today uses a loophole in the fiscal rules.
Still only goes a fraction of the way towards meeting the 3% of GDP defence spending target for 2030. That remains a £10bn pressure for the spending review.
Putting a little marker down.
Rachel Reeves' change to target PSNFL has made the PuFins (Public Finance Institutions like the British Business Bank, National Wealth Fund, National Housing Bank) a free lunch for politicians.
The new game in Whitehall is to get your policy financed by a PuFin because it doesn't hit the fiscal rules.
Who knows - maybe some of this stuff may end up being great. But sometime in the 2030s there will be a scandal and several Public Accounts Committee investigations into poor returns and low value for money from PuFin spending...
The Makerfield test slips further and further in they rear view mirror.
A gift to anyone fighting Labour in those red wall seats.
A pretty incredible exchange when you consider that technically the 15 years is government policy. 👇
Normally wouldn't post an interview transcript of this length, but if you're interested in keeping tabs on Cabinet support for Shabana Mahmood's immigration reforms, this is worth a read from Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh
Sophy Ridge: Just to be crystal clear: Do you support plans for people to have lived in the UK for 15 years before they can get permanent residency?
Miatta Fahnbulleh: The first thing I'd say, because there's been a lot of speculation, Shabana has got a really tough job and I think a home secretary getting a grip on small boats crossings is something that all of us want to see.
SR: Can I just come in? I really just want a straight answer. Do you support plans for people to live in the UK for 15 years before they get permanent residency?
MF: Look, we have got to reform our immigration system and my view is that we need a system that is based on the principle of compassion, contribution. And so there is a package of reforms the Home Secretary has been consulting on, she's looking at the range of responses and she will come out with the measures that we take forward. But the key thing I would say is no one can look at our immigration system, and I say this as someone that came into this country as a refugee, and not believe that it's broken and not believe that we need to fundamentally reform it. But our principle has to be a system where we've got control, but ultimately a system that when people do come to this country, they are able to integrate, they are able to contribute, and that we both respect but also value that contribution.
SR: Okay. You haven't, in any part of that answer, said that you agree with these reforms. I'm just going to read you the definition of collective responsibility: "Decisions made by the cabinet are binding on all members of the government. This means if a minister disagrees with the government policy, he or she must still publicly support it". So I'm going to ask you a third time, do you support plans for people to have to live in the UK for 15 years before they can get permanent residency?
MF: I support reforms that say that people have to contribute and make a contribution to this country, in order to get citizenship. We are consulting on the package of reforms that we'll put forward and the Home Secretary, as you can imagine, having looked at all the responses, will set out what the final position is.
SR: Do you support the plans or not? It's my fourth time asking.
MF: So I absolutely support the plans to reform our immigration system. It is broken
SR: I'm asking you something super specific here. Do you support plans for people to live in the UK for 15 years before you get permanent residency?
MF: The Home Secretary is consulting on those plans, and she will set up the government's final position.
SR: You can't say whether you support that or not?
MF: The Home Secretary is consulting. Look, we absolutely need to reform our immigration system. I support the reforms. And by the way, it is not easy to reform our immigration system. So I 100% back Shabana Mahmood and everything she is trying to do, but there is a package of reforms. We are consulting in the way that government always does. And the Home Secretary, rightly having looked at all the responses to the consultation, will set out the final package that ultimately will do the job of reforming our immigration system based on the principle of control, which we absolutely must do. But critically, a system that ensures that people make a contribution and when they make a contribution, they are integrated into our communities so that we can have diverse communities, like my one in Peckham, in which people can live together and can ensure that they are making the contribution to get to the country and the society that we want.
SR: I know you've got to go, but I think from what you've said, it's pretty clear that you don't support waiting 15 years for permanent residency. So I'm just going to give you one chance to correct that if that's not your view
MF: Don't put words in my mouth. The key point is we are consulting...
SR: I'm not. I'm saying, this is your chance to correct that if that is not your view, because this is the impression you've given. So if you don't think that, tell us now.
MF: We are consulting on the package of proposals that were put forward. The Home Secretary is looking at the consultation and she will set out our final position. But what I absolutely back Shabana on is the need to reform our immigration system, because it is fundamentally broken. And I also fundamentally support the principles that we have got to control our borders, because everyone expects us to do that, and critically, that we have to have a system in which people contribute and when they contribute, they are able to become citizens and they are able to be integrated into our community. That is an immigration system that makes sense. That is an immigration system that will build public concern. And she's absolutely right to try and deliver that immigration system.
Enjoyed discussing parking charges and much more on @RidgeandFrost with @SophyRidgeSky and @kitty_donaldson this morning.
James Starkie retweeted
Replying to @JeevunSandher
The document claimed a Leave vote would plunge the UK into immediate recession and cause 500,000 job losses. Which didn't happen?
We now have courts deciding rent. Madness.
Bad for the courts - zero capacity for this
Bad for property market - less will be willing to rent
Bad for renters - less property on the market
Just bad.
James Starkie retweeted
Replying to @toadmeister
I just like the environment mate, and also am pro-leaving the ECHR and am on record on it too. Party is united behind Kemi as they should be.
This issue is going to come up again & again.
Conservative estimates put an annual fee around £30bn a year, and this time they’ll be zero rebate.
Clearly a main driver for many countries to allow UK back in is ‘they need the money’.
Hardly compelling…
It’s always the cover up…
Sheikh-gate
Massive story from @thomasgodfreyuk tonight
Burnham had two dinners with the Man City chairman, according to a register of interest which has since been deleted from the internet
PM has previously said he had one formal meeting with Al Mubarak, and then met him “informally in the stands” in 2019
But this reveals the true extent of their relationship 👇
thesun.co.uk/sport/40675222/…
James Starkie retweeted
Burnham’s rash comments on Russian interference in Brexit ref gave a free hit to pro-Putin talking heads
As DG of MI5 said just now: “I’m a little bit anxious that we don’t play into our adversaries’ hands by making these trolls look 10 feet tall”
Wild
Emily has always looked down on voters, little wonder she wouldn’t want to allow them to vote.
'Get over it': Labour MP Dame Emily Thornberry's message on concerns about reopening 'divisive' Brexit debates.
Thornberry tells @CathyNewman that the UK could re-join the EU without a second referendum if it was included as a manifesto commitment at a general election.




























