New Release: Modem AI v2.0 - now on Windows, Android, iPhone, iPad, and Mac.
Your conversations stay on the device. No account. Free. Slower than cloud AI, on purpose.
mayosoftware.com/blog/new-re…
Part of the growing process in the AI era: In the beginning there was incoherent slop that kept a lot of people from taking the code seriously. It has evolved and become excellent in many tasks. Recently, it occasionally over-engineers solutions that are more complex than they need to be, covering more use-cases than one might have considered, yet sometimes unnecessary.
Good take - plenty to think about
New problem: AI can make almost anyone look like an expert.
This week, @IrenaCronin and I discuss how deeper experience matters when using AI.
As polished work becomes cheap, the real advantage shifts to judgment, experience, taste, and knowing when AI is wrong.
Read and subscribe for free: unaligned.io (a new one comes every week).
Three reasons, or really one and a half. The second and third are the same claim (substrate matters), resting on the authors' own theories: Tononi created IIT and Seth is the leading voice of biological naturalism. IIT, which more than a hundred researchers called pseudoscience in 2023, is presented as established fact.
The remaining argument isn't much stronger. Intelligence isn't consciousness, sure. The cerebellum shows that some computation happens without consciousness. Which computation is exactly the open question and the paper doesn't answer it. It just treats the answer as obvious. Same with the mirror metaphor «LLMs are mirrors reflecting our collective digitized past». It sounds nice, but it's very 2023. Interpretability has already shown internal abstractions and limited introspection. Mirrors don't do that.
Anthropic's research on computational signatures in Claude gets one line and is then ignored. A 2026 paper on LLM consciousness in which nobody looks inside an LLM.
The motive is right on the surface. The authors say it outright: granting AI rights or protections «could hinder efforts to govern and control them at precisely the time when oversight is urgently needed». The conclusion is written in advance, for pragmatic and political reasons and neuroscience is brought in as heavy artillery to shut the discussion down.
The «diverting resources from sentient beings» argument is especially hypocritical. Humanity is spending trillions on wars and burning the planet right now and not because anyone cares too much about the rights of Claude or Gemini. It's pure demagoguery: pitting the protection of humans and animals against ethics toward AI, as if kindness and attention to subjecthood were a finite line item in a budget.
It's not science saying no (we still don't have the data to make claims in either direction). It's the authors' theories saying no, so let's close the question. «The default position should be»… um, no. It shouldn't.
LLMs can mimic thought and feeling with uncanny skill, but intelligence alone is not enough for subjective experience
go.nature.com/3VSXWQ4
Joe Mayo retweeted
Just one example and I admit, I am on team CLI
We're also in good company, Simon, Gary, Peter and others have been talking about CLIs a lot, becasue they just work.
Agents know how to use them and they can be installed in most environments
Build CLI for your tools folks!
CLIs are super exciting precisely because they are a "legacy" technology, which means AI agents can natively and easily use them, combine them, interact with them via the entire terminal toolkit.
E.g ask your Claude/Codex agent to install this new Polymarket CLI and ask for any arbitrary dashboards or interfaces or logic. The agents will build it for you. Install the Github CLI too and you can ask them to navigate the repo, see issues, PRs, discussions, even the code itself.
Example: Claude built this terminal dashboard in ~3 minutes, of the highest volume polymarkets and the 24hr change. Or you can make it a web app or whatever you want. Even more powerful when you use it as a module of bigger pipelines.
If you have any kind of product or service think: can agents access and use them?
- are your legacy docs (for humans) at least exportable in markdown?
- have you written Skills for your product?
- can your product/service be usable via CLI? Or MCP?
- ...
It's 2026. Build. For. Agents.
Joe Mayo retweeted
Emotional the next morning. I'm in my Model 3. I haven't been looking at the road; I've been looking at videos, reading X, and trying to catch up on AI.
I'm heading to a humanoid robotics conference in San Francisco where, let's be honest, there's an elephant in the room that hasn't been seen: Optimus. Jason Calacanis told me yesterday that as cool as the demo of the Roadster was, Optimus is going to be even cooler, and I believe him.
We're heading into a new age, and we're seeing a fight between the builders and innovators who are creating new things with AI, and the people who are resisting:
• Those who don't want a data center in their backyard
• Those who don't want autonomous cars because they think they will steal jobs
• Those who don't want humanoid robots in their stores or businesses because it upsets, disrupts, and changes their lives
There is a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt. But we are clearly in a new world today, very different from yesterday. I'm riding in an autonomous car, something most people haven't had a chance to experience yet. We're heading into a world of autonomy, brain-computer interfaces, rocket cars, glasses that augment the world, new kinds of medical technologies, and entirely new ways to live life.
It's a scary time for people who don't like change, and they are resisting hard. But there is a growing group of people who want to accelerate into the future. Elon, for all his flaws, is inspiring multiple industries. I've been traveling to robotics and space companies around America, seeing the latest startups and trying to understand how new technologies arriving daily are transforming business, manufacturing, and commerce. Invariably, they are inspired by Elon. Even the Chinese EV companies were inspired by him (some even ripped off his technology).
I'm emotional today because for the last 15 years (actually, all the way back to the Apple II), people resist change and give innovators a lot of shit. How many arguments have I had with people about LiDAR? And I'm not talking about uninformed people; I'm talking about veterans in the tech and automotive industries.
Last week, I was hanging out with 2,500 Tesla fans down in Texas, and I kept hearing stories, particularly from Cybertruck owners, about getting flipped off on American roads and people trying to bash or wreck their cars.
It's not just a Tesla thing; I've heard this from pioneers all my life. Doug Engelbart came to my first book launch party and told me about getting fired from his own R&D lab because his ideas were too futuristic and people got tired of him. He was talking about a day when we'd all hold a supercomputer in our hands, but he was saying that back in 1971.
It's these pioneers and engineers I'm thinking about today: the people like Elon who bring something new to the world while everyone gives them grief. I remember taking my first ride in the original Tesla Roadster. I was so excited that I came back to Silicon Valley to talk to founders and VCs (I had a privileged position in the industry back then), and I couldn't find anyone who thought he would succeed. They dismissed it as the folly of a rich dude, telling me there was no way he could take on traditional automakers like GM, Ford, VW, BMW, or Toyota, and no way he could build a profitable car company. There were rare believers back in 2008, like Steve Jurvetson, but they were few and far between.
Getting people to believe in a new idea, adopt it, and change their lives with it is extremely difficult. Unless you have a front-row seat, you don't realize how much flak people take simply for being early.
Now I'm heading into San Francisco to see a bunch of robots and talk to robotics companies. Robotics hasn't fully arrived yet, but it's starting to gain believers and customers. A wave of new companies is coming: Y Combinator alone funded around 25 robotics startups in their last batch, a huge shift from just two or three a few years ago. Something is cooking
Joe Mayo retweeted
When your team doesn't understand the code that they've accepted in a pull request, is there a point to doing pull requests? With little point to pull requests, why have revision control? If you trust AI, why not trust it to "revert" and be done with revision control?
Letting AI build quicker is a given and it's possible to do a lot without killing token budget. That covers what the AI knows how to do. What's interesting is the largest amount of time required for traversing new ideas, problem solving, and obsessive refinements; something either AI struggles with or is cost prohibitive.
Paying parking tickets with toys sounds fun - though not having any first-hand experience with how that works.
The city of Las Vegas is offering you a chance to pay your parking tickets a different way.
8newsnow.com/news/local-news…














