Kay Clarity

I wrote about shoplifting, but this also applies to cheating. Most of the people defending cheating have no real reason to do so except to justify their own desires. They live in a kaleidoscope of constructed values. Once the desire change, they just shake the kaleidoscopic and their entire value system reorients itself around the present whim. That's it. Any constructed argument is made post-hoc. They already decided they wanted to do it and had to come up with some half-assed justification to give themselves permission. In other words: They've essentially got a little ugly orange haired monkey with their fist wrapped around their spinal cord, making them jerk around and use their advanced intelligence to come up with more and more sophisticated arguments, going so far as to write entire books and speak to sold out symposiums, as to why it's okay to wrench a banana out of someone's hands.