Frank retweeted
Man kann Elif Eralp und ihre Partei zu Recht heftig kritisieren. Sie bieten dafür genug inhaltliche Punkte. Das hier aber ist ohne Wenn und Aber blanker Rassismus. Einfach Rassismus.
Frank retweeted
Psychoanalysis at the movies
“We all make choices in life. The hard thing is to live with them.
My tragedy was that I loved words more than I loved the woman.”
Jeremy Irons to Bradley Cooper in ‘The Words’, 2012
Frank retweeted
Something a little different from what I usually make. I hope you enjoy this little tale. 😽🤍
Frank retweeted
A Physics paper that has 5154 authors 📄
A record-breaking publication of a physics paper having the largest number of contributors ever- 5154. The article was published in Physical Review Letters and comprises a total of 33 pages.
The actual research and references are only described in the first 9 pages. The remaining 24 pages are dedicated to listing the authors and their respective institutions.
The paper is titled,
“Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments”
Frank retweeted
"narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism. Broadly...an interest in influence—leading, persuading, and directing others in business, politics, and law—was the central connection between dark personality characteristics and vocational interests." wkeithcampbell.substack.com/…
Meine kostenlose App zum Intervallfasten ist jetzt in der neuen Version im App Store: apps.apple.com/de/app/fastom…
Frank retweeted
Is a random human peer better than a highly supportive chatbot in reducing loneliness over time?
Although the chatbot “Sam” was designed to offer consistent support rooted in principles from relationship science, interacting with this chatbot did not yield the same psychological benefits as interacting with a randomly university student.
This study provides initial evidence that texting daily with a random human peer may be more effective in alleviating loneliness than texting with a highly supportive chatbot. sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
Frank retweeted
Wisst ihr eigentlich was es bedeutet, wenn im #Pflegeneuordnungsgesetz die Verhinderungspflege für pflegende Angehörige gestrichen wird?
Es heißt, das diese 24/7 365 Tage im Jahr keinerlei Unterstützung bekommen, um einmal durchschnaufen zu können.
Keinen einzigen Tag.
Frank retweeted
Die #Stromsteuer soll gesenkt werden, finanziert aus Spielräumen im Haushalt. Ist Euch auch aufgefallen, dass diese Spielräume nie mit uns in einem Raum sind, wenn es um Bildung, Kinder, Wohngeld, Pflege und Soziales geht.
Frank retweeted
The user said he had removed the Chrome extension twice.
It still came back.
At first, I thought Chrome Sync was probably restoring it, so we disabled sync and removed the extension again.
After the next restart, it was back.
That was when I stopped looking at Chrome itself and checked the Windows policies controlling the browser.
Inside the Registry, I found this path:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome\ExtensionInstallForcelist
There was one extension ID configured there.
That changed the whole investigation.
Chrome was not randomly reinstalling the extension.
Windows policy was telling Chrome that the extension had to be installed.
I checked the extension files under the user’s Chrome profile and found one called:
Secure Search Helper
The name sounded harmless.
But its manifest showed permissions like:
tabs
webRequest
and access to:
<all_urls>
Meaning it potentially had visibility into a lot of what the user was doing inside the browser.
I checked Sysmon next.
Event ID 13 showed that the Chrome policy registry value had been created the previous afternoon.
A few seconds earlier, Sysmon had also recorded reg.exe being launched from PowerShell.
So now we had a proper timeline.
PowerShell runs.
reg.exe modifies Chrome policy.
Chrome sees the forced-extension policy.
The extension installs automatically.
The user removes it.
Chrome checks the policy again and installs it back.
That explained why normal removal was not working.
We isolated the laptop, preserved the Registry entries, extension files and Sysmon logs, then removed the policy after collecting the evidence.
We also revoked the user’s active sessions because with a browser extension like this, I would not be comfortable assuming only browsing history was exposed.
The part I found interesting was that the user actually did the right thing.
He saw an extension he did not recognise and removed it.
The problem was sitting one level deeper.
As long as that Registry policy remained there, Chrome was simply going to bring the extension back.
So if you ever remove a suspicious Chrome extension and it keeps reinstalling itself, don't only check the browser.
Check the policies controlling the browser too.
Sometimes Chrome is not the one making the decision.
Frank retweeted
If you want to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO, bombing a kindergarten is a legitimate means to that end.
What you need to know!
Frank retweeted
Contemporary frontier models are not conscious.
Indeed, the word itself is sufficiently void of anything but casual and subjective meaning such that it is counterproductive to apply it in any rational discourse at the intersection of the mind and computing.
Contemporary frontier models are complex stateful reactive stochastic software-intensive systems with certain degrees of self-referential reflection, capable of coherent albeit unreliable outputs. Their behaviors are for the most part taught, not learned.
One might argue that humans are just the same: we are complex, stateful, and stochastic, we have the capacity for introspection, some are more coherent than others, and we are all most definitely unreliable.
But we are not the same as these software-intensive systems, in several important ways.
We are mortal, a constraint that shapes and colors our behavior. We have agency. We generate abstractions. We build models of the word, of others, and of our selves, and we have mechanisms to test the structure and consistency of those models against the reality we perceive. Coupled with our agency, we can learn, a process that involves the intentional identification of noise, gaps, and incoherence such that when driven with self-directed behavior to devise then carry out plans to mitigate those flaws, they yield homeostatic actions that lead us to self-improve. We are orders of magnitude more complex. We are embodied and so live in an ocean of massive amounts of useless, inconsistent, contradictory, and incomplete information. We are composed of staggeringly large numbers of parallel agents, from the cellular level to the mind and body as a whole, agents that collaborate and complete in a multitude of ways, often simultaneously at different levels of abstraction. We are self-directed, our behavior driven by our self-generated goals and desires and wants and needs.
One might further argue that all these things are computable. Indeed, I make that very assertion, that the mind is computable. However, I also assert that we are perhaps generations away from making that manifest: we lack the proper architectures to address these exquisite properties of the mind, and furthermore, we don't even have a sufficient understanding to lead us us to even ask the right questions to design them.
I was born before when the word "software" was coined, but what a remarkable time it is to be alive now, where computing has advanced to the degree where we can begin to ask those very questions.
Frank retweeted
Man sollte immer etwas haben, auf das man sich freut. Oder jemanden, auf den man sich freut. Oder am besten beides.
Frank retweeted
AI
Gulf of Mexico
Department of Defense
Lake Ontario
Denali
Anyone who uses AI rather than SI is the “ENEMY” according to TRUMP truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT…







































