cricket-lover, foodie, transport urbanist and general academic-y type person - interested in urban development, regeneration, liveability and sustainability

Leeds/Manchester/Durham
Joined May 2013
Just to be clear your driving habit is heavily subsidised. This is especially true for the 46% of London households and the 22% of UK households who don’t own a car In summary for every mile a motorist drives, taxpayers subsidise 21p outside London, up to £1 inside.
192
171
38
884
94,744
Kit Allwinter retweeted
this was my entire masters thesis at berkeley, “the supply and demand of human-scale neighborhoods in america” the data absolutely supports this. if we don’t build more walkable neighborhoods, the few that we have become luxury items—not because they are any more expensive to build or maintain (the opposite, in fact) but because they are artificially scarce and highly desirable
I think a lot of rural folks don't get why the whole "it's illegal to build this type of walkable dense urbanism" thing ultimately impacts rural places. If our few walkable dense city areas are "museumized" by regs that make it illegal to build new ones, they become luxury items. Living in Chelsea is a global luxury product partially because you can't build a new Chelsea-shaped neighborhood anywhere in the US. If STL, Albany, and Bakersfield had similar neighborhoods, Chelsea would only be the best of many. But because they don't, it's simply the best the US has to offer. Consequently, you have people clamoring to get there because it is the most objectively desirable iteration of urban life ever created in North America. If Peoria had a "Chelsea-style" neighborhood, maybe Peoria's brightest kids wouldn't run off to NYC or whatever. The market very clearly wants more walkable dense urbanism, but because it's illegal to build now, people flock to the few places where such urban design is now grandfathered in. This is one major factor in rural and small-city "brain drain" if I were to guess. Furthermore, if the cost of desirable urban neighborhoods goes up, people get priced out. What do they do? They often wind up living in less-desirable parts of cities, barely hanging on -- until they say "screw it" and go for the next-best-thing after Chelsea: Walkable dense "quaint country towns." If you can't afford Chelsea, Montpelier ain't so bad, and Boulder CO will do. I.e. if cities like Des Moines could have a truly dense, walkable portion of the city that was pleasant and beautiful, maybe Vermont wouldn't have turned into a giant yuppie haven where you the median home price is $300k.
85
727
32
5,303
398,021
Kit Allwinter retweeted
I love cars so much I wish they were much larger and carried like 50 people and went on a set route every few minutes.
21
201
4
2,987
46,619
Kit Allwinter retweeted
"Elevated railways with a capacity of 40,000 people per hour are being torn down while elevated highways with a capacity of 6,000 per hour are being erected" -Transit Journal, 1935
9
493
9
4,531
75,231
After eleven years, it's time to update my London Underground concentric-circles-and-spokes map. Completely redrawn from centre to edges, it's so much better than before, and more geographically accurate than the official map.
543
2,059
445
17,410
1,375,337
Kit Allwinter retweeted
Pedestrian commercial streets are wildly popular in every corner of the globe. #Paris
1
33
3
288
8,648
The best way to remake a city is through transport. By changing how people move, Montréal is changing the spaces they use; transitioning from hostile, asphalt- and car-dominated places to ones that are more vibrant, welcoming, and resilient to the challenges of the 21st century.
14
148
31
629
44,678
Kit Allwinter retweeted
There is zero private car parking for Olympic events in the city of Paris. (And yet—through the magic of walking, rolling, biking, and transit—thousands and thousands of people got there just fine.)
34
291
38
2,216
102,912
Hear me out. We could simply make traffic-free routes accessible..
42
87
4
892
37,893
You NEVER forget your first bollard. #WorldBollardAssociation
19
224
21
2,670
139,501
Kit Allwinter retweeted
Your periodic reminder that town planning used to be an Olympic event. John Hughes won gold for Team GB in 1932.
129
1,397
437
15,153
1,562,380
Kit Allwinter retweeted
Jennifer Lopez is the perfect advocate for normalising cycling. Glamour magazine claims J.Lo’s outfits are not practical for cycling, but with a comfortable step through bike, chain guard and mudguards, you can very easily dress for the destination, not the journey.
19
51
11
299
24,608
1/12 Exciting news: I have been appointed Professor of Transport Data Science @ITSLeeds Absolutely stoked, honoured and inspired. A small change in job title but a big step in my career 🎉🙏🚀
36
10
1
264
11,654
Kit Allwinter retweeted
6. This wasn't just 'nice to have' by taking these moves expert transport modellers @ITPtweet found this would mean 🚶‍♂️9,300 more walking and cycling trips 🚗Less congestion on local roads with 12,000 fewer vehicle trips 🌳Resulting in 2,000 tonnes less of CO2 being emitted
1
5
28
1,556
Kit Allwinter retweeted
🧵With targets to build 1.5m new homes @createstreets today call for a new approach to planning new town extensions For too long we've defaulted to concreting over the countryside with sprawling housing estates driven by prediction-led transport planning thetimes.co.uk/article/we-mu…
13
100
30
280
92,639
Stadiums may be the single the best showcase for the space inefficiency of cars versus people. Look how much space is dedicated to car parking vs how much space the people in the stands actually occupy. – at St Louis, MO
100
437
49
4,985
126,366
Kit Allwinter retweeted
Not long ago, the street outside Valencia’s Cabanyal public market was an absolute dumping ground for cars. Now it’s an inviting public square. Change is possible!
3
65
7
434
34,225
Replying to @BrentToderian
Put. Children. First.
6
1
45
2,628
Athens by night. Do you think the shop & restaurant owners would make more money if they let the cars back in? What your eyes and what common sense tells you is true, is. If…
6
37
2
202
22,181
💨 In large cities, in advanced economies poor air quality costs the equivalent of approximately 2% of GDP. For Paris that’s 19.6 billion USD. These costs show up in taxes, life expectancy, productivity, everything. It’s well worth improving. 🚲
Air pollution is the transportation elephant in the room, and beyond the bitter fights to curb motor traffic in Paris, one essential fact remains: Nitrogen dioxide levels have been steadily declining across the city; reducing rates of premature mortality and respiratory disease.
2
7
723