Live From Studio 6B retweeted
A couple of FACTS for all the conspiracy theorists to digest:
1. The Biden Admin. naturalized about 3 million aliens from 2021 to 2024. Add them to the post-2020 eligible voter pool.
2. Every year about 4 million 17 year olds turn 18. My math says that since Trump was first elected in 2016, that's somewhere around 40 million new potential voters.
3. Trump received 46% of the vote from 18-29 year olds in 2024.
4. On Tuesday that demographic voted 31% for GOP candidates.
It's not hard to find the shift in the vote from 2024 to 2026.
Just because you don't know them doesn't mean they don't exist.
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
This type of post is starting to gain traction on conservative social media circles. “From where,” they ask, “did the Democrats get an additional 1.8 million votes?”
In fact, the point is not “fascinating” and there is no mystery. The U.S. citizen voting age population increased from 241 million to 250 million between 2022 and 2026.
Case solved. Let’s try to win back voters with better governance and better candidates rather than go off on baseless conspiracy theories.
This is a fascinating point.
If this was a “blue wave” election, then that generally means that tons of Republicans flipped their votes.
Not “stayed home.” Literally, flipped votes.
Because the data show that Republicans showed up at the same level as previous election cycles. You know, when they won.
It looks like Democrats were able to conjure up about 1.7 million more voters than the 2022 election. About 1.4 million from the 2018 election.
If you are thinking, “wait, wasn’t Trump president in 2018?” then congrats. You are starting to hone in on why this turnout makes no sense.
Because California transplants don’t account for it. There are only about 700,00 net Californian migrants, max.
H1Bs and permanent residents are not allowed to vote. Illegal aliens don’t legally vote, although people *could* vote for them thanks to our dirty voter rolls.
So, where did all these Democrats come from?
Let's touch on the given reasons why. The Iran War? Okay, where were all the anti-war protests in the streets?
The left was burning Teslas over modest DOGE cuts, for chrissakes.
Expensive gas? You mean, the same prices we saw at the end of Biden. Did these Dems flip for Trump over that in 2024?
Maybe to some degree, Latinos did. But not anywhere close to these margins.
ICE deportations? Those border counties that are being cited as the major surge in Latino voters for the Democrats went about +14 Trump in 2024.
That would be the presidential election when Trump said mass deportations were on the table.
But we aren’t as concerned about the 'why' as we are about the math.
Because there is reported to be about 2.9 million new voter registrations between 2022-2024. Texas doesn't demand proof of citizenship for these TPS registrations, but they are ultimately supposed to be checked against SAVE databases for non-citizen flags.
After all is said and done, however, there were a net 950,000 new voter registrations in Texas.
So, the Democrats would have to get all of this mathematically and then almost double.
Why would there be a "blue wave" mainly over the Iran War when there were few anti-war protests?
Why would Trump win in 2024 while promising mass deportations and all of a sudden modest ICE enforcement is causing a shift of 40-50 points for Latino voters?
Why would polls have a bias for Dem respondents that showed close races, but then this turned out to be a blue wipeout with GOP turnout about the same as past years when their candidates won?
These questions may have good explanations. As for me, I've got nothing.
Uh oh….a lot of people have been pretty consistent how great Data Republican’s insights are. I hope they’re not changing their mind now. Would seem weird. No?
The early voting analysis showed a 15 point shift to the blue, consistently, everywhere, when in-person voting starting.
At no point did any of the early vote analysts call out fraud. They were coming up with theories for high propensities voting on Election Day, something I disagreed with strongly behind the scenes.
I’m not ruling out the possibility of fraud, but the results were consistent with what early vote showed.
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
I ran the numbers.
With the exception of Ken Paxton*, Texas Republican midterm statewide candidates slightly outperformed historical expectations.
Democrats UNPRECEDENTEDLY outperformed them.
Prior to 2026, it was rare for a statewide race candidate to outperform the presidential candidate of two years prior.
In 2026, EVERY SINGLE STATEWIDE CANDIDATE obtained more raw votes than Kamala Harris.
This has never happened before.
Methods.
I asked: What average % of the presidential vote does each Texas statewide race candidate get in the midterms, for each party?
Then I compared what each candidate was expected to get, based on historical trends since 1992**, to what they actually got in 2026.
The present figure is after adjusting for which party had a president in office; midterm turnout is on average higher for parties who lost the presidency.
The unadjusted version is in the next, threaded post, for completeness.
* Paxton would have lost even if he had performed at slightly above historical expectation, as other Republican candidates had, as you can see in the right-hand figure.
** Texas and national politics worked very differently before the 1990s, with many conservatives voting Republican for president and Democrat for state office. They are not comparable.
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
The Midterm is Not the Endterm
It is too soon to calibrate the direction of the post midterm Democratic and Republican Parties.
But if the first 72 hours are any indication—and despite the soon to be Speaker’s denials—the Left is already bragging about subpoenas, and it is intoxicated by the notion of investigations and impeachments.
Heady Democrats have entirely forgotten the politically suicidal fashion of the 2021-4 five civil and criminal courtroom circuses, the Mar-a-Lago raid, and the blue state deballoting efforts.
All that and more fueled the Trump recovery.
Wild talk of multi-trillion-dollar new agendas grows, like socializing the health care system, a renewed Green New Deal, student loan forgiveness, and illegal alien amnesties, along with new punitive income and estate regulations and taxes.
This socialist dream is reminiscent of the 2021 giddy splurging that gave the country a 9.1% inflation rate by midterm year 2022.
Along with the Afghanistan disaster (the Left’s correction for a Middle East ‘forever war”) the inflation would ensure Biden a 40% popularity.
The idea that the Left, which cannot do much real lawmaking without a veto-proof Congress, will try to reach deals with the White House, adopt a 1995 Clinton-like realist agenda, simply claim credit for the growing Trump economy, or moderate its rhetoric is highly unlikely.
Instead, we hear crazy talk of confiscations, new billionaire and millionaire punitive taxes, imprisonments, changing the Constitution—all in full suicidal 1972 McGovern style.
Republicans are blame-gaming each other, which can be constructive if over issues and reforms rather than social media ad hominem. But they need to message far better, about both the administration’s successes and the dangers of a socialist future.
There will be likely be no planned presidential succession, or gentlemanly agreement on a front runner. That’s likely good news. More likely as of now a triangular race between front-runners De Santis, Rubio, and Vance emerges—all of whom are far preferable to any ticket with a Newsom, Harris, AOC, Mamdani, or el-Sayed.
If the Republicans can stay reasonably united, they can ensure permanent presidential vetoes of crazy leftwing legislation, fight back on the Democratic committee inquisitions, and see the economy in the final two years become an asset in recovering their popularity.
Absent in all conversations is that there is increasing evidence that the economy is actually expanding and has the potential to boom in 2027, or at least the data indicate such potential.
The jobs report came out yesterday with a stunning 165,000 jobs created in October (accompanied by the usual journalists’ adverb “unexpectantly”), dropping unemployment to 4.1%.
Revised 3rd GDP stats now show a robust 3.4% growth—likely ensuring at least 3%+ growth for the year.
Third Quarter consumer spending soared 3.8%.
Private domestic investment surged with 19.4% growth.
Just reported last week: median family income in 2025 hit a new record ($87,460)—the highest in 60 years adjusted for inflation. And poverty dipped to its lowest rate (ever 10.2%).
In October manufacturing activity grew faster than at any time in the past five years.
Yes, prices are too high, and final 2026 inflation, given gas hikes, is scheduled to increase by one point (3.7%) from last year’s (2.7%). But it is still lower than the pan-European average (ca. 4+%)—and much lower than the Biden average over four years of 5.1%.
Gas prices are already falling. On November 6 prices fell to a $4.06 average—as global oil transit is mostly back to prewar levels and refineries scramble to handle the increased deliveries.
U.S. companies are dominating all the top 10 rankings in market capitalization/usage in key area such as software, AI, digital media, space, satellite launches, and bio/genetic engineering.
Note that today gas prices are not that much higher than 4 years ago at the 2022 midterm time ($4.06 vs. ca. $3.80), and haven’t once spiked to $5 a gallon as they did in 2022, just four months before the Biden midterms.
Yet oddly, the red wave sputtered in 2022 when the U.S. was in far worse economic shape than this week when the blue wave became a tsunami.
Messaging, media, and communication count, so note:
Four years ago GDP growth was lower than today—even though the pandemic was about over and there was a dramatic return to work and spending.
The inflation rate was almost three times higher in 2022 than now.
Median family income was $14,000 lower than now. The poverty rate was higher in 2022.
The Dow was 20,000 points lower. Foreign investment will likely end the year 30-40% higher than in 2022.
Real wage growth (nominal wages minus inflation) while not great in 2026 is likely to end the year far better than in 2022 (when real wage growth fell 2-3%).
So why would “affordability” have been decisive in the 2026 midterms when it was not in 2022?
The 21% aggregate inflation rate Trump inherited force-multiplied the average 3.15% Trump inflation rate of 2025-6— yet in a way the aggregate first-term Trump inflation rate (7.7% just a third of the Biden total) did not exaggerate all that much the 9.1% inflation rate in 2022.
Messaging, however, matters. The administration did not explain adequately that a 21% rise in prices cannot be lowered without radical deflation or recession, but only ameliorated by medium family income growth and lowering the inflation rate from the Biden 2021-5 averages, both of which occurred in 2025-6, but were forgotten.
Media coverage of the Biden 2022 weak economy were muted, while Trump’s 2-year inflation rate was exaggerated during 2026.
The Iran war became the culprit as a war of choice that made the inherited Biden 21% high prices and the inability to lower were them solely Trump’s fault. Again, there was inadequate explanation of either the economic reality or why the gamble to denuclearize Iran was defensible–with the caveat that stopping the bombing at day 38 and talking with theocrats for seven months was an unfortunate mistake.
The domestic and foreign policy activism of the lame-duck Clinton (1998-2000} and Obama (2014-2016) presidencies increased after their loss of Congress. Indeed, their popularity climbed from a once nadir of below forty to sixty percent approval or above.
There is no reason why the Trump administration cannot have a successful last two years. The economy is growing.
The crime rate is at historic lows.
The border is closed shut. The radical pro-Western political transformation of South and Central America has remade the entire Western Hemisphere.
European NATO is rearming.
Oil and gas production is at highest levels of any nation in history.
The bloated federal work force has been trimmed by over 270,000 jobs.
There is no longer a 40,000-50,000 shortfall in military recruitment. The forced reforms in higher education were long overdue.
The verdict on Iran is still out.
If it is denuclearized, the crippling sanctions continued, the Strait kept open, the provincial opposition armed—and our military gone home— the regime will face an increasingly restive population
2026 was an unequivocal defeat, but 2028 need not be.
If the administration and Congress stay disciplined and united, and can message better, while the Left goes utterly berserk, drunk on their midterm successes, socialism/Islamism, and Trump Derangement Syndrome 2.0, the tide will soon radically turn— as the economy already has.
WATCH: Live From Studio 6B | November 6, 2026 teapaw.org/i/broadcasts/2zkAJbREa…
😂😂😂 of course. Thune endorsement incoming.
Days after Republicans suffered major losses in the midterms, President Trump on Friday endorsed Joe Gruters to continue to chair the Republican National Committee. trib.al/Au812ta
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
There is this myth about "going back to the old guard." But I have news for you. Thanks to 5 cycles of Trump endorsements, almost every Republican governor and Senator, and a clear majority of the House members are old guard. Some of them might put on the red hat and mimic the trained con inc twitter mannerisms, but they are in bed with the special interests fighting us today every bit as much as the people 20 years ago were in bed with the special interests of the time.
So now the Republican party is split in 4.
1. Old guard Republican corporatist party-Nikki Haley types
2. True Conservatives-Ron DeSantis types
3. Groyper and Groyper adjacent-JD Vance types
4. MAGA-Trump and his psycophants.
We cannot go back to the old guard. Some good should be taken from it, but the Old Guard did not work, i.e. Mitt Romney and McCain. We need to try to get back to basics of True conservatism and begin the process of educating and getting them on the ballot. Do we have the stomach to take this on, is my question.
But the big issue is the MAGA and groyper side of the party. We know Independents shun this and because the growing Independent arm, the GOP needs to get shed of these types.
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Florida APPROVES Amendment 3 — phase out homeowner property taxes with 62% PERCENT of the vote
DESANTIS: "Had Amendment 3 not been on the ballot, I don't know that we'd turn out the voters that we turned out...many of them voted Republican."
This is HISTORY! ☀️
This coming year, the value of a home 100% EXEMPT from property taxes goes to $150,000, then $250,000, then the legislature is directed to have a plan in place to phase it out entirely
MANY people with homes $250K and under will no longer pay ANY primary property tax rent to the government, and residents in the $300K-500K range see MAJOR tax cuts
Live From Studio 6B retweeted
Young white men (ages 18-25) swung from +28 for Republicans in 2024 to +17 for Democrats in 2026. That's a 45-point swing in 2 years that can't be blamed on demographics. They have massive debt, few jobs, high prices, a scary future, and there's nothing for them in the Iran War.
WATCH: Live From Studio 6B | November 5, 2026 teapaw.org/i/broadcasts/2jPQOEqlb…
When you hear people argue that we’re overreacting to Tuesday, ask them what they think about this.
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact changes how participating states award their electoral votes, so that the candidate who wins the national popular vote is guaranteed to get at least 270 electoral votes.
How the system works today.
The Constitution (Article II) lets each state decide how to appoint its electors. Almost every state uses winner-take-all: the candidate who wins the most votes inside that state gets all of the state’s electoral votes.
Maine and Nebraska are the exceptions (they split some by district). The candidate who reaches 270 electoral votes becomes president, even if they lost the nationwide popular vote (as happened in 2000 and 2016).
What the NPVIC changes.
States that join the compact pass a law saying: once enough states have joined to control at least 270 electoral votes, we will award all of our electors to the candidate who won the most votes nationwide (the national popular vote total), regardless of who won in our own state.
• Until that 270-vote threshold is reached, nothing changes. Member states keep awarding electors the normal way.
• Once the threshold is hit, the national popular-vote winner is guaranteed the presidency because the compact states alone control a majority of the Electoral College.
• The Electoral College still formally exists. Electors still meet and cast votes. The difference is that the compact states have agreed to appoint electors pledged to the national popular-vote winner.
This is done entirely through state laws exercising the power the Constitution already gives state legislatures.
Current status (as of early November 2026)
18 states plus D.C. have already joined, totaling 222 electoral votes. They still need 48 more to reach 270.
Tuesday’s results gave Democrats full control of government (legislature + governor) in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Those five states have 61 electoral votes combined. If all of them pass the compact in 2027, the total would rise to 283 and the compact would activate for the 2028 election.
In short: the NPVIC does not delete the Electoral College from the Constitution. It is a coordinated state-level workaround that, if it reaches 270 electoral votes and survives legal challenges, would make the national popular vote the effective deciding factor for the presidency.
What the….
Scoop: The White House delivered a warning to conservative groups on Thursday: We’re watching you wsj.com/politics/elections/w…
Not if we don’t have actual primaries and actually have the free market and competition play out for the best conservstive candidates and stop the “loyalty endorsement pledge” from the top.
Voters worried about bills and gas prices got ballroom boasts, a ‘golden economy,’ and more excuses.
Now, after the midterm wreckage, the right must decide whether loyalty to one man is worth the price.
theblaze.com/columns/opinion…
It’s quite amazing that everybody in the comments of this post are saying “Congress is the problem, Republicans are the problem”.
Do you not understand the whole point of the article is that 99% of the people IN CONGRESS, the reason were stuck with these losers, is that they were endorsed by him, against real conservstives??
Why is this so difficult?
LIV Golf burned through $5 billion since 2022, and now its lawyers have told a bankruptcy court the league is winding down.
Slick has already asked if the golf carts are in the liquidation sale so he can Rhinestone one to keep and drive.
Harmeet Dhillon out as DOJ civil rights chief, two days after the midterms. The lame-duck exit line forms to the left.
Somebody remind the White House the confirmation window closes in January, not whenever they get around to it.
Wow….geez.
BREAKING: Harmeet Dhillon resigns as DOJ assistant attorney general for civil rights, sources tell @davidspunt
One of the most under-the-radar trends on Tuesday was the astonishing record of success for ballot initiatives barring men from competing in women’s sports.
Voters in Nebraska, Arizona, Washington, and Colorado all passed common-sense measures upholding basic biological reality and restricting male athletes who claim to be transgender from invading women’s sports and private spaces.
amac.us/newsline/key-conserv…




















