Dale Sinclair

Vote RED to protect the Judicial Branch of Government, Under our Constitution! The Senate controls the confirmation process. ⚠️ The active Article III judiciary breaks down into 492 judges appointed by Democratic presidents and 411 judges appointed by Republican presidents. Soros funded Democrat appointees have flooded the district courts. You’ve seen their Judicial Activism! SCOTUS is the only branch of government with the ability to rein them in! Liberal radicals want to Abolish the Supreme Court. Mainstream Democrats push to expand or reform the Supreme Court.

🚨ABDUL EL-SAYED’S MULTI-TRILLION DOLLAR RADICAL AGENDA POSES THE REAL THREAT TO MICHIGAN While political opponents expend immense energy hunting for a paper trail of links to the Muslim Brotherhood, voters should recognize that Abdul El-Sayed's actual, proudly stated policy agenda poses a far more immediate and destructive threat to Michigan families. It is not an unverified connection to a decades-old Egyptian student movement that will cripple the state; rather, it is his extreme $36 trillion Medicare for All scheme that guarantees crushing middle-class tax hikes, skyrocketing hospital deficits, and endless medical wait times. Combined with an economic platform that seeks to strangle domestic tech innovation with an unprecedented federal AI ban, El-Sayed's explicit governing vision is far more dangerous to the average citizen's pocketbook than any ancestral tie. But, I'll let you be the Judge...... 🛑CAMPAIGN PLATFORM 1. Healthcare Expansion (Medicare for All) El-Sayed’s premier policy proposal is a comprehensive, single-payer "Medicare for All" system that covers all medical needs (including dental and vision) with no premiums, co-pays, or deductibles. 💰Financial Cost to the U.S. Government: Independent fiscal evaluations of comprehensive Medicare for All frameworks estimate the federal price tag at $32.6 trillion to $36 trillion or higher over the program's first decade. 💰💰Cost to Citizens & Middle-Class Taxes: Funding a program of this magnitude would require a sweeping restructuring of the U.S. tax code. Opponents like Republican nominee Mike Rogers warn it would constitute a massive middle-class tax increase. Proponents argue this tax increase is offset because citizens would completely eliminate private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket deductibles, and co-pays. TAXPAYERS WOULD BE FUNDING ILLEGALS, ABORTIONS & "GENDER AFFIRMING CARE. ⚠️Risk of Increased Wait Times: Transitioning the entire population to a single-payer system significantly increases utilization by removing financial barriers to care. In comparable single-payer national systems, this surge in demand frequently results in longer wait times for non-emergency surgeries, specialized care, and diagnostic imaging as medical infrastructure strains to keep up. ⚠️Systemic Plan Failures & Hospital Strain: Shifting all reimbursement to a government-set fee schedule (typically lower than commercial insurance rates) risks forcing financially vulnerable rural and community hospitals into deficits or closure, potentially creating "care deserts." Additionally, if private health insurance is phased out, it would lead to widespread disruption and job losses within the private insurance and administrative healthcare sectors. 2. Economic Relief & Tech Regulations ("AI Under Control") As part of his economic platform to protect jobs and address voter anxieties, El-Sayed introduced the "AI Under Control" proposal, which calls for a mandatory freeze on training advanced artificial intelligence models and data center expansions until federal guardrails are enacted. ⚠️Costs to the U.S. Economy: Placing a blanket regulatory freeze on advanced data centers and AI models could result in billions of dollars in deferred or lost technology investments. This risk delays broader productivity gains that AI integration is projected to bring to the wider U.S. economy. ⚠️Plan Failures & Technological Flight: Critics point out that a localized U.S. freeze cannot stop foreign adversaries from continuing rapid development. A major implementation failure risk is that domestic tech companies may simply relocate their research labs, data infrastructure, and high-paying engineering jobs to international jurisdictions with relaxed regulations. 💰Citizen Cost & Regulatory Overhead: Creating a new, Cabinet-level federal agency to inspect labs and monitor data centers introduces continuous, multi-million dollar administrative costs borne by taxpayers. 3. Environmental and Natural Resources Policy El-Sayed’s platform prioritizes aggressive federal action to secure clean air and water, limit corporate pollution, and speed up the transition away from fossil fuels. 💰Financial Costs to Industry and Consumers: Transitioning infrastructure to meet strict carbon-neutral or zero-emission metrics requires immense public and private capital. Opponents argue that rapid enforcement of green energy mandates drives up compliance costs for utilities, which are frequently passed down to citizens in the form of higher residential electricity bills, heating costs, and energy prices. ⚠️Plan Failures & Grid Reliability: A primary risk of aggressively phasing out traditional fossil-fuel baseload power before battery storage and renewable grids are fully mature is grid instability. This can lead to rolling blackouts or energy shortfalls during peak demand spikes (such as extreme winter freezes or summer heatwaves). ⚠️Job Inefficiencies and Wait Times: Forcing quick transitions in heavy industrial sectors, like Michigan's automotive and manufacturing corridors, can cause structural unemployment, requiring extensive taxpayer-funded worker retraining pipelines. Furthermore, stringent environmental review processes can create bureaucratic wait times, delaying the construction of critical infrastructure like new transit lines, housing developments, and clean energy grids. 🛑CONTROVERSIAL CONNECTIONS 1. Unearthed Social Media Posts from El-Sayed's Sister The controversy has been heavily driven by a series of unearthed social media posts from 2012 and 2013 written by El-Sayed’s half-sister, Eman Abdelhadi (an assistant professor at the University of Chicago). Her posts explicitly detailed the family's historical experiences and maternal ties to the organization in Egypt: ▶️Family History: On June 24, 2012, Abdelhadi wrote, "My family has long been MB [Muslim Brotherhood]." ▶️Maternal Activism: On the same day, she added, "Had an amazing talk with my mom about her activism in the Muslim Brotherhood during the early 70s while she was in college #respect." ▶️Political Imprisonment: Following the 2013 military coup against Egypt's Brotherhood-backed government, she posted on July 3, 2013, "I don't support the #MB, but I have had family jailed for being a part of it." On the same day, she added, "Praying for all my family that supports the #MB in #Egypt. Lie low, stay safe." ▶️Personal Political Stance: The records show that while Abdelhadi acknowledged family ties, she noted her own political distance, stating, "Although I lean towards the Leftists; conversations with my #MB family in Egypt revealed respect for individual liberties & secular state." 2. Maternal Workplace and Terrorist Designation History Public records highlight that El-Sayed's birth mother, Fatten Fathy Elkomy, worked from 1999 to 2004 for the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA-USA). In October 2004, the U.S. Department of the Treasury officially designated IARA as a terrorist-supporting organization, citing evidence that it funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars to Osama bin Laden, the Taliban, and Hamas. While Elkomy was named in 14 federal court exhibits during a subsequent 2007 Department of Justice 33-count indictment against the charity, she was never personally charged or named as a co-conspirator. She maintained she was entirely unaware of any illicit financing and was solely focused on aiding orphans. 3. Father-in-Law’s Leadership and PAC Funding El-Sayed's father-in-law, Dr. Jukaku Tayeb, has drawn intense focus due to his past leadership roles, including serving as president of CAIR-Michigan (Council on American-Islamic Relations) and sitting on the Founders Committee of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Both organizations were named as unindicted co-conspirators by federal prosecutors in the historic U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial, where prosecutors presented evidence connecting their foundational infrastructure to Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas support networks. Dr. Tayeb has heavily supported El-Sayed's bid, donating $300,000 to the Fighting for Michigan PAC. 4. Campaign Influx and Individual Donors ▶️CAIR-Linked Contributions: Federal Election Commission (FEC) records show that the CAIR-linked Unity & Justice Fund gave $175,000 to the pro-El-Sayed Fighting for Michigan PAC. Additionally, more than $115,000 in campaign contributions came directly from CAIR staff and leadership. ▶️Mohamed Soltan: Financial disclosures reveal that El-Sayed's campaign accepted money from Mohamed Soltan, an Egyptian-American human rights activist who was sentenced to life in prison in Egypt in 2015 for alleged Muslim Brotherhood ties before being released due to Obama administration intervention. Soltan contributed the individual maximum of $2,900, while his advocacy group, ACMER, routed $25,000 to the pro-El-Sayed super PAC. ▶️Abdul Mawgoud Dardery: Records also show a $500 campaign donation from Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, the former foreign affairs spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party, in Egypt.