retarded take

🙏

sumn sumn china valuations fake

my Muslim brothers and sisters at the end of the day remember what we are here for money is just a tool help your family, friends, donate to charity and impact the world don’t destroy yourself for the dunya we all want to make it out

my argument isn’t for NFTs as I mentioned, I’m pointing out the differences — the normies aren’t the ones that drive the price up that high so little impact imo

Beauty

pricing

i know you weren't! you dont get a lot of people who engage in good faith on X anymore you were one of them :P

i understand people are upset at this because im comparing digital monkeys to one of the most popular brands, but objectively i am talking about asset prices; pros and cons pokemon: - larger & more established collector base - decades of brand recognition - centralised and subjective grading - can be damaged or lost - more illiquid nfts: - transparent & verifiable on-chain supply - rich digital people want to buy digital assets - no physical condition or grading issues - better liquidity - not as much history as pokemon hence less staying power both assets are different, collectibles have existed forever but pokemon mooned in value *after* nft market died to learn from the nft market you have to take out personal bias, both can be true: pokemon will stay and have value & asset prices need to relax as someone who was deep in the nft market and saw the rise and fall, pokemon is at a state closer to the fall than the rise imo no one loses money taking profits!

money wont be taken out it’s in a secure wallet, but we are taking care of it yes

no, you lose more because the decision to not pay tax is dumb as unless you carefully act like this from the start you have some on chain connection to yourself (or will do when you want to spend) smart people pay their taxes, or just move somewhere else

gm to absolutely everyone woke up to AI hacking everything? the real black Monday?

people taking this $500k/yr spending as excessive when I’m talking about one time costs in the first year they make $5M so they’d buy a house, car, go on holidays etc and that’s 10%! reasonable in this case

Correct, but i think people think I’m saying 500K/yr. I’m saying they buy a home, car and spend a little.z

i like the meme and it’s just funny to me beyond the detail but implications init

do you think it goes backwards? like you can argue it gets dumber each cycle (memecoins we chucked it all out of the window) but existing coins have worked so the narrative stays dumb (or gets dumber) but privacy/ai/etc still works - just not as hype not replacing it

i created my account with no face, voice or credentials i wanted people to judge me on my words, not my status when i got to some status purely through my brand I realised I had to make decisions to change my words to make others happy however that is a dumb decision and the opposite of why it’s for politics is a good example, everything is political and staying away from it is a stance, at least have backbone to push what you believe in and also calling others out, you create haters but someone has to do it

what are you talking about you are the same your a scammer ? just because you don’t do as much as what he does, because you can’t, doesn’t mean your money is ethical everything he says applies

when you make $5M fast you don’t think about all the extra and even if you do it’s 10-20% of networth assuming 0 growth but yes a house, a car, holidays, etc. We are saying one time costs