MUST Chair (@MUSTChair) header
MUST Chair (@MUSTChair) profile picture

Chair of @MU_ST, @ManUtd's official supporters’ trust & largest *independent* representative voice of #MUFC fans in the world. ST holder in the Stretford End.

Joined April 2022
Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)Photo by MUST Chair (@MUSTChair)
I hear plenty of noise online about what matchgoers “ought” to do to force change, most notably demands that we leave Old Trafford empty or throw missiles onto the pitch to stop games. If you don’t attend games regularly, it’s easy to look at things from a distance and assume it’s simply a matter of willpower. Here is the reality on the ground: 1. The “Boycott / Empty Seats” Myth - The money is already banked: Around 46,000 seats belong to Season Ticket holders who pay in advance in May and June—before the previous season has even finished. Whether an ST holder sits in that seat or stays home, the Glazers already have the cash. - Season ticket holders don’t control the stadium: If, on average, 20% of Season Ticket Holders forward or resell through official channels, you’re left with roughly half the stadium’s capacity. The remaining half of the capacity is filled by hospitality and general members paying premium prices, people who aren’t walking out or boycotting. - Strict attendance enforcement: Season Ticket holders must physically attend or officially transfer at least 16 out of 19 Premier League home matches. If you fail to hit that threshold, the club revokes your ticket for the following season. - You don’t create an empty stadium—you create a corporate one: With over 100,000 people on the waiting list and massive international tourism demand, any seat permanently vacated isn’t left empty. The club simply reclaims it and flips it into extortionate single-match membership prices or hospitality packages. - The European comparison doesn’t work: Pointing to Serie A or the Bundesliga ignores the fundamental economics. Many of those clubs have cheap tickets, standing sections, and 50+1 fan ownership models. Old Trafford operates in a hyper-commercialised, sold-out market. Asking a local supporter to sacrifice a seat their family has held for 20, 30, or 40 years, only for it to be sold to a tourist five minutes later, gives the owners zero financial leverage. 2. Throwing Objects onto the Pitch - It’s a specific criminal offence: Under the Football (Offences) Act 1991, throwing any missile onto the pitch or surrounding area is illegal. - It ruins lives, not ownership: Old Trafford is blanketed by modern high-definition CCTV and facial recognition. Anyone caught doesn’t just face a club ban; they face mandatory court-issued Football Banning Orders (FBOs), the surrender of their passport during European fixtures, a criminal record, and potential loss of employment. Furthermore, with modern automated flagging and blanket ticketing investigations, which have been very poor on United’s part, when disorder breaks out, bystanders and innocent people nearby often get swept up in the fallout, losing access to tickets while lengthy club appeals grind on. - Demanding that local matchgoers take on criminal records and jeopardise their livelihoods while you watch in a pub, on TV, or via an illegal stream isn’t a protest strategy; it’s completely detached from reality. What Non-Matchgoers Can ACTUALLY Do to Hit the Model: The club’s ownership model is built on one thing: commercial monetisation of the global audience. That is where you have direct leverage. - Hit the vanity metrics: Unfollow the club's official accounts on X, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. The club pitches these raw follower numbers to prospective commercial partners every day. - Direct consumer feedback to commercial partners: Brands invest heavily for positive sentiment. When supporters collectively make it clear across sponsor channels that partnering with negligent ownership carries a reputational cost, commercial teams take notice. - Starve the Megastore: Stop buying official kits, training apparel, and club subscriptions. If you want United gear, buy retro or support independent fan-made apparel. - Back fan-led advocacy: Support independent fan media, fanzines, and the Supporters Trust. Collective, legal, and political pressure moves the needle; reckless armchair advice does not. If we want change, it requires collective discipline across the entire fanbase—not asking matchgoers to commit financial or legal suicide just to make a 30-second point on television. There’s no divide here: it isn’t matchgoers versus non-matchgoers; it’s all of us. If we aren’t united, we achieve nothing, and that failure rests on every single Manchester United supporter. A better-formatted version of this post is here: cheesesofnazareth.substack.c…
40
150
21
513
48,177
"I'm more anxious for this interview than play the game..." 🤣 Matheus Cunha shares his thoughts on Man Utd's performance tonight, but it's the UCL Today crew making him nervous 🎤
122
1,783
102
18,516
2,786,544
MUST Chair retweeted
The Romans have fallen once again in Manchester.
52
543
7
7,390
93,478
MUST Chair retweeted
Love to see it!
3
19
1
259
7,802
MUST Chair retweeted
Yay
6
47
3
796
12,755
MUST Chair retweeted
No they didn’t. They put up £200m of their own money to buy United, the rest of it was debt leveraged against the club. Very VERY important to keep clear they have not invested a SINGLE PENNY into Man Utd.
🎙️The Glazers invested about £200m of their own money in Man Utd but are already £1.5bn up and still own half the club. It’s been a fantastic investment. For them. For United, it’s been a disaster. Feat. the usual gang plus ex-Man Utd exec Tim Williams. pod.fo/e/709e8d
13
149
1
1,241
66,415
I don't discount or dismiss anything that any supporters' group is doing. I completely echo the sentiment that we should all be standing together, united in our approach. But for that unity to mean anything, the whole movement needs to be inclusive. Whether you're a regular match-going supporter, someone who occasionally attends games, or someone who follows United from home or watches in the pub, everyone should feel part of it. If we aren't inclusive of all supporters, then ultimately, we'll always be representing a minority rather than the wider fanbase. Over the last month, I've shared some thoughts with a number of people about developing a strategy that genuinely makes our feelings known, not just to the Glazer family, but also to INEOS, which now controls the club's footballing operations. For me, visibility is one of the most important aspects of any protest against the club. We have plenty of ideas to explore, and several stages to what I've been proposing. But throwing everything out there at once risks diluting the message. We need to keep the issue visible, keep raising it and build momentum over time. Ultimately, though, if we do nothing, what is the point? My proposal is that we bring Green & Gold back. Start wearing those colours again. Make a visible statement that you are unhappy with the current state of our football club and the direction it is heading in. It's simple. It doesn't require much organisation, financial commitment, or effort. But collectively, it can make a powerful visual statement. Bringing Green & Gold back into the stadium, around the ground, and across social media would show unity and make it clear that supporters still feel the same way. It can start with two simple things: - Wear Green & Gold to the match. - Update your social media profiles to show your support for Green & Gold. This is just the first step. It's about visibility, raising awareness and, above all, unity. We don't all have to agree on every approach or action, but we should be able to stand together on something that reflects how we feel about OUR club's current state. Shoot me down if you want, but if you do, at least come forward with an alternative that is realistic and achievable. This is about bringing supporters together, not creating further divisions between us. We have one common enemy here. That's where we should focus. Not on each other. @MU_ST @The__1958 @TraMufc @muyscofficial
So here’s where we are at….. @The__1958 cannot fight this battle against the owners on their own, that’s plain to see. Unless ALL major supporters groups of MANCHESTER UNITED come together and start singing from the same song sheet then we are totally fucked. It’s a now or never moment in my opinion. it’s time for every supporters club, fan group and offical trust to work towards a greater good. Fuck dialogue with the club, it’s pointless and has been for years. I believe the only way forward is for the FAB and FF to cut the club off with a vote of no confidence. That’s the start. Then…. Let your feet do the talking, however that looks. Any details of protests, be it a walk out, sit in, boycott or whatever the plan may be will be utterly pointless unless everyone supports it. Thats the sad reality here, time to wake the fuck up or…… Enjoy Ratcliffe and the Glazers for the unforeseeable It’s up to you
25
44
1
204
29,666
MUST Chair retweeted
The sad truth is probably the only person who cares about the club is the one who’ll be sacked in the morning. Meanwhile, these cowardly players and parasitic owners will continue to get away scot free.
19
187
2
1,936
19,156
He’s certain got every fan-related decision wrong.
Hard to see how Berrada survives this too. He’s the ceo of an organisation that has got almost every football decision wrong since he’s been in the building. Apparently hired because he had expertise across both commercial and football.
1
1
10
3,676
MUST Chair retweeted
“You can stick your new stadium up your arse…”
43
711
33
4,788
229,651
MUST Chair retweeted
They are going to sack the manager, and the manager can’t survive this. He’s not been good enough this season. But this will never get better while INEOS and the Glazers are in situ. For the good of @ManUtd, they must now begin to relinquish their ownership of the club.
33
84
3
452
11,397
A blood-letting of unprecedented scale in the Stretford End in that second-half. “Sell United and fuck off home.” “You can stick your new stadium up your arse.” Bonfire chant for Glazers + Jim Ratcliffe. Jason Wilcox also a target. Players booed. #MUFC
150
1,164
57
8,962
277,150
MUST Chair retweeted
Omar Berrada and Jason Wilcox should have no future at Manchester United. They have spectacularly failed at building a squad or appointing a manager and should be replaced.
99
1,288
40
6,748
146,101
MUST Chair retweeted
Hard to see how Berrada survives this too. He’s the ceo of an organisation that has got almost every football decision wrong since he’s been in the building. Apparently hired because he had expertise across both commercial and football.
126
695
47
5,241
170,568
MUST Chair retweeted
All the chaos at United starts and ends with the ownership. We all know this. Everything in between - the standards dropping, the football falling apart, the culture eroding - has just been the inevitable fallout. Until that changes, nothing will.
32
102
5
786
67,792
With respect, we knew exactly how rubbish the Glazers would be. What we underestimated was how rubbish INEOS and the new mgmt would be. Been no better in terms of the football and miles worse with the fans.
"I think we all underestimate how rubbish the Glazers are." A scathing assessment of Manchester United's owners from @mjshrimper.
2
9
35
1,249
Glazers fucked our finances but even they weren't stupid enough to compound that by directly targeting our matchgoing fanbase especially at a time when the team were failing on the pitch. Price hikes and aggressive ticketing policies just at the time we should have been circling the wagons. They were warned, but were convinced they knew better – at Urmston, England
17
15
2
68
16,829
I remember an article from @MU_ST who said with the Glazers in charge we will become useless like their NFL team. I didn’t believe it back then but they were sure fucking right about it
5
17
85
16,640
Ownership Matters: Football Must Put Integrity Before Wealth In recent days, MUST has been asked by a number of media organisations to set out our view following reports that Manchester City have been found guilty of the overwhelming majority – reportedly 114 out of 115 – of the Premier League charges brought against them. Manchester City continue to deny wrongdoing and are expected to appeal. They are entitled to do so. But if these findings are upheld, this cannot be dismissed as an accounting error or an accidental breach of complex rules. It would amount to industrialised cheating on an unprecedented scale. For years MUST has argued that ownership matters in football. At Manchester United we have seen one form of bad ownership: the Glazers loading the Club with enormous debt while extracting hundreds of millions of pounds through dividends, interest and associated costs. Read the full statement here: imust.org.uk/Blog/Entry/owne…
8
44
6
108
36,846
9/ The Club must now rebuild trust: Manchester United needs to demonstrate what it has learned and ensure genuine supporter consultation before any comparable exercise is undertaken again. Full MUST Statement: imust.org.uk/Blog/Entry/must…
4
5
14
7,226