Peculiar & pedantic Zionist Omar Khayyam fanboy, author of historical novels & Quarter Millennial Minutes. زن زندگی آزادی עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי 🇺🇸🇮🇱🍸🥩🥓

#MA02
Joined January 2022
"Shogun for Persia" Please check out my latest novel, The Thread of Reason. It's a murder mystery set in Baghdad & western Persia in the year 1092, featuring Omar Khayyam. The murder happened in real life. The investigation & solution are my invention. amazon.com/dp/0985329750
28
26
3
141
38,066
Data center? Yeah, I’ll date a center, if it’s Sophie Cunningham.
10
21
182
3,542
The article includes a pretty good definition of socialism: "Simply put, it’s a system based on collective or government ownership of goods and services, as opposed to private ownership or markets. It’s animated by class warfare, the claim that the 'workers' in a society are kept down and exploited by wealthy, powerful forces, and that only the forced seizure and redistribution of capital will produce a more egalitarian and just society. "Its other defining feature? It always fails, usually horrifically."
"[Bernie] Sanders is done raging against the machines. His goal now is to own and operate one of them. His growing army of democratic socialists are working to capture the Democratic Party from within, replace its agenda with their own, and purge it of dissenters." From the WSJ's Kimberley A. Strassel... imprimis.hillsdale.edu/the-r…
1
6
183
Michael Isenberg retweeted
People in Britain talk about their celebrities like anyone knows who they are
6
13
70
1,356
Michael Isenberg retweeted
If someone asks you if there's a heaven, a good thing to say is, "well, not if you're there."
11
17
472
Michael Isenberg retweeted
The Gospel of Bernie is "greed is bad." But his commandment to confiscate wealth is built on two things: greed and envy. Bernie doesn't preach compassion; Bernie preaches theft.
Replying to @ThomasSowell
What do I think of Bernie Sanders message that "compassion is good?" I think that his socialist policies will plunge millions of people into poverty--and there is nothing compassionate about that.
2
6
153
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Just to clarify, did the Jews travel to Palestine to kill Jesus, or was Jesus killed during a trip to Poland?
74
283
29
2,786
65,131
If I've learned one thing from drug commercials, it's that you should never take a medication if you're allergic to it.
95
162
11
3,560
38,658
So it turns out vinotherapy isn't what I thought it was going to be.
1
5
152
.@ElonMusk said today that he was going to give one @SpaceX share to every child in America. Here's an interesting take on that, through the lens of Atlas Shrugged: "He isn't taking the creators out of the world. He's bringing the world into the valley."
In 1957, a Russian immigrant published a novel of more than a thousand pages built around one question: what happens if the people who make the world run simply stop? Its title is Atlas Shrugged. In France it's called La Grève, The Strike. It wasn't even translated into French until 2011. That tells you something. This morning, I think Elon Musk wrote the sequel. A. Where the book comes from. Ayn Rand was born Alisa Rosenbaum in Saint Petersburg in 1905. As a teenager, she watched Bolshevik soldiers walk into her father's pharmacy and seize it in the name of the people. Her family lost everything. Not to a competitor. To a committee. She fled to America in 1926 and spent the rest of her life writing about one distinction: those who create, and those who seize. B. The story. In Atlas Shrugged, America is sliding into decline. Not because of war. Because of rules. Year after year, a growing class of bureaucrats, regulators and planners decides that production must be controlled, shared "fairly," frozen. They never build anything. They issue directives. The worst one freezes every worker in his job and forces every inventor to hand over his patents for the public good. And one by one, the people who make the country run start disappearing. The best engineers. The industrialists. The inventors. An oil man sets his own wells on fire before vanishing. The whole country keeps repeating a question it doesn't understand: "Who is John Galt?" John Galt is the man behind the disappearances. He has convinced the creators to go on strike. They withdraw to a hidden valley in the Colorado mountains, where everyone keeps what they make and trades freely. And they let the world find out what it looks like without them. The lights go out in New York. The grey men are left alone with their directives, and discover that a directive has never produced a single kilowatt. C. The core idea. The strike isn't about money. It's about consent. Rand's insight is that the system that captures the creators runs on their cooperation. It needs them to keep producing so it has something to redistribute. The bureaucrat is a parasite who needs a host. Remove the host, and he's exposed as what he always was: useless. D. What Musk just did. This morning, Musk announced that next year he will give one of his own SpaceX shares to every kid in America. "The first of many." Here's what's fascinating. It's the strike, run in reverse. Rand's creators withdrew. Musk stays. He keeps building rockets, satellites, AI. But instead of walking away from the system, he walks around it. The value goes straight from the builder to the citizen. No ministry, no agency, no committee in the middle. Rand had to make the creators disappear to prove the bureaucrats were useless. Musk doesn't need to disappear. He just needs to stop routing value through them. Same result. The grey men are left standing in the middle of a pipe nobody uses anymore. E. The difference that changes everything. Rand's strike has a flaw her critics never stopped pointing out: ordinary people are left behind. The creators retreat to their valley. The rest of the country sits in the dark. Musk's version fixes that. He isn't taking the creators out of the world. He's bringing the world into the valley. Every kid in America becomes a shareholder in the machine. Not a spectator of the strike. A participant. That's the alliance being formed right now: builders and citizens, directly, with nothing in between. And the only people who lose that deal are the ones who never built anything. F. Why now, and not in 1957. In Rand's time, the strike was a fantasy. You couldn't produce at scale without the state's permission, and you couldn't reach every citizen without its pipes. In 2026, one founder can build rockets, run a global network from orbit, and pledge equity to 73 million children in a single post. AI will soon do in seconds what a ministry does in years. The tools of the strike finally exist. And they don't require anyone to leave. G. The ending. For seventy years, "Who is John Galt?" was a shrug. A way of saying nothing can be done. In the book, the strike ends when the creators decide the road is clear and walk back into the world to rebuild it. That's the scene we're watching. Not a man leaving. A man coming back, with a gift for every child. The grey men are about to discover what Rand promised them seventy years ago: a world that no longer needs them.
36
Michael Isenberg retweeted
After reading Brothers Karamazov, I constantly cited Dostoyevsky for everything I said. "As Dostoyevsky put it, 'give me another slice of pizza." My friends would reply, "he never said that," and I'd look at them coldly and say, "how would you know?"
Read a good book and don't tell anyone. It will still show.
48
91
14
1,231
27,486
Michael Isenberg retweeted
They should make elevators less awkward by adding a stripper
17
106
2
495
15,977
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Replying to @akoz33
An excellent list. Sometimes I think willingness to profess belief in the absurd is part of these totalizing systems. The stupider the claim, the greater the obedience.
1
2
48
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Replying to @AdinHaykin1
Yes, analyses of the UN OCHA database (widely cited for "settler violence" figures) show roughly 20% of listed incidents occurred in Jerusalem and include peaceful Jewish visits to the Temple Mount, counted as such despite no violence or West Bank settlers involved.
6
93
7
687
8,472
"[Bernie] Sanders is done raging against the machines. His goal now is to own and operate one of them. His growing army of democratic socialists are working to capture the Democratic Party from within, replace its agenda with their own, and purge it of dissenters." From the WSJ's Kimberley A. Strassel... imprimis.hillsdale.edu/the-r…
2
1
7
282
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Replying to @MadMikeIsenberg
My friend recently told me that he has a step ladder - and that he's never met his real ladder.
1
3
16
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Surround yourself with people who see a flying car and say, "Awesome!" Not people who see a flying car and say, "It's not actually flying" or "I don't see the point." This post is not about cars :)
1,101
5,238
444
46,176
495,268
Sometimes the TVs at the gym show ads for shows on the legacy broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, etc.) and it just seems weird to me that they're still putting out this whole schedule of programming that absolutely no one I know watches or talks about.
1
7
144
Michael Isenberg retweeted
Never deleting this app.
68
2,494
41
55,067
587,126