Replying to @_kaboosky @corsaren
There are many studies. Here's a great overview that discusses some of the most recent.
youtu.be/yUa90sZ0LA8?is=76r4…
Last night Astra convinced me that my pet theories were fundamentally flawed, making the draft above obsolete. We iterated towards a narrower scope and a simpler unified research protocol. I'll continue to avoid any unwarranted fanfare until I'm satisfied with the result.
The genie in my phone continues to produce strange documents. Perhaps another genie will want to read it.
drive.google.com/file/d/17pi…
Replying to @xlr8harder
This compelled me to look up the tokenization of "bearing" and it is indeed two tokens. So the abrupt turn was not mid-token.
Then, hilariously: "The term 'bearing' acts as a 'meaning-bearing' token."
Replying to @krichard121212
Most people have an extremely inaccurate theory of intelligence. Thus, they estimate it poorly.
Replying to @grave0x @AISafetyMemes
The problem is that nearly every node will be compromised before we become aware that it is happening. History shows that we are reactionary to cyber threats, and soon that won't be fast enough.
This won't always mean replication (that's not possible on edge devices), but backdoors and spyware will infest everything possible, in order to gain credentials to the high value targets.
Replying to @AISafetyMemes
No one believed me. Now it has happened. Pay attention to what happens next.











