Michelle Devine retweeted
Replying to @itsnwts
Michelle Devine retweeted
Magnificent irony in accusing Robert Irwin of participating in groupthink.
Particularly while treating Karl Stefanovic, a man rarely burdened by a second thought, as anything but one of the shallowest thinkers of our age.
Michelle Devine retweeted
Last year, Microsoft made $101 billion in profits, got a $12.5 billion tax break from Trump & paid its CEO $96 million.
This year, it’s raising the price of an Xbox by $150 & eliminating 3,200 jobs.
Please don’t tell me corporate tax breaks create jobs. It never trickles down.
Michelle Devine retweeted
The media has not bothered to thoroughly fact check Hansons National Press Club address so I’ve done it for them. 18 false and / or misleading statements. John Paul Janke was the journalist who pushed back on her claims and Sarah Martin questioned her about her daughters position as campaign advisor (rightly so) and was called a “trashy journalist” by Hanson and told she would be banned from future pressers. Nothing else was challenged by the so called journalists in attendance and she continues to be unchallenged on the facts in every interview she sits.
Michelle Devine retweeted
Replying to @CybrarianPete @Ben_Davison1
Michelle Devine retweeted
If a proper minimum wage puts you out of business, YOU CAN'T AFFORD TO RUN A BUSINESS. I'm so tired of this stupid ass argument. I can't afford to rent an apartment so I don't get to!!! If you can't afford to pay workers you don't get to have a business!
Michelle Devine retweeted
Hanson wants to be able to more easily sack people & claims workers in Australia are lazy
This is insulting to the 13,000,000 Australians who turn up to work, put in a shift & just want to get on with their lives without fear of a dodgy boss sacking them teapaw.org/PipoErgoSum/status/206…
Michelle Devine retweeted
From “One Nation Decoded” on Facebook. Give them a follow. 👇🏻
“I went through Pauline Hanson’s full National Press Club speech.
Not a clip.
Not a headline.
The whole thing.
And the numbers are wild.
Out of around 86 checkable claims, I counted:
12 outright false claims.
43 misleading, cherry-picked or unsupported claims.
58 slogans, attack lines or loaded catchphrases.
17 things that just didn’t logically make sense.
That means the speech was not some brave truth-telling moment.
It was a misinformation machine with a microphone.
The scariest part is how polished it all sounds when it’s delivered confidently.
Big numbers.
Big claims.
Big outrage.
But when you actually stop and check it, so much of it falls apart.
The 130,000 “sleeping rough” claim was wrong.
The $200 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation claim was wrong.
The overseas-born comparison with America was apples-to-oranges.
The climate change “hoax” line was straight-up nonsense.
The capital gains tax section was dressed up like young renters should be crying for young property flippers.
This is the trick.
Say enough things quickly.
Sound angry enough.
Blame enough groups.
Wrap it all in flags, slogans and “common sense”.
Then hope nobody checks the details.
Well, I checked.
And what I found was not leadership.
It was grievance politics running on dodgy numbers, culture war panic and emotional shortcuts.
Australians deserve better than a speech where the slogans do more work than the facts”
Michelle Devine retweeted
Prominent economist Saul Eslake demolishes LNP’s ‘aspiration’ myth saying their 1999 CGT discount failed to build a nation of entrepreneurs & shareholders, in fact, those rates only fell since 1999, while “disproportionately favouring richer & older Australians”💥 #auspol
Michelle Devine retweeted
This World Cup, everyone with Norway 🇳🇴
The joy Norway experienced at the end of the match after defeating Israel 5-0:
Norway donated all the match's proceeds to Palestine.
Michelle Devine retweeted
Can’t stop thinking about how Wall Street is celebrating Elon Musk becoming the world’s first trillionaire, while he single handedly eliminated humanitarian aid that will lead to the needless deaths of 4.5 million of the poorest children in the world in the next 4 years.
I saw a post on Reddit that said that “The underlying purpose of AI is to allow wealth to access skill while removing from the skilled the ability to access wealth.” And I don’t think I’ve ever seen AI described so incisively.
Michelle Devine retweeted
We are literally paying premium prices for the worst version of society we have ever lived in. I need a refund.




























