Digital Civil Liberties CEO: https://xitter.cf/t.co/n8cTk3YM5R

Joined February 2023
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
The Democrats have led the charge on this type of censorship!! They’ve gone to bat repeatedly at almost every level of government to argue that content that’s vaguely political aka “harmful to children” should be censored/banned. This is the world that *YOU* want to live in.
Meta has suddenly suspended the No Kings Instagram account in the middle of the No Kings' national day of action. This shocking censorship comes just weeks before the midterm election.
2
32
16
278
16,003
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
This was collated and fed to journalists after Helen Haines had rightfully called out Albanese’s blatant unprecedented handover of 6 million dollars of taxpayer money to a golf course next to one of his properties. Albanese then told parliament the money was for sewerage work. It wasn’t. He is a serial liar. He used taxpayer money to try to smear and silence Helen Haines. It didn’t work because she isn’t corrupt. After the horrendous attack on her by an unhinged maniac, Albanese did a press conference calling Haines a woman of ‘the highest integrity’, ‘a beacon of light’. Albanese must resign now for the sake of Australia. The electorate is on to his disgusting behaviour and no number of sad fools still defending him will change that.
As someone who was critical of Albo’s golf funding deal (pork barrelling by both sides is a joke), I can tell you this PM briefing about Haines is categorically not any sort of dirt file. Anyone who calls this a dirt file, as Peter Van Onselen did, does not have a single clue about how public sector briefings to Ministers work. Either that or they are a rusted-on bleacher-screeching barrow-pusher for one side of politics. Van Onselen’s pieces read like a cadet who has read an offical document for the first time. All the information is completely legitimately gathered, including an attempt to ascertain a pecuniary interest. There are hundreds of these things written every day at state, federal and local government level for ministers of every colour. Stock. Standard. Briefing.
148
420
28
2,814
56,559
“Prime Minister Pauline Hanson” is no longer a punchline but a real prospect in contemporary Australia. So why are Labor and the Greens handing a potential One Nation/Coalition government an advanced censorship and surveillance apparatus? @DavidShoebridge @sarahinthesen8 substacktools.com/sharex/QO8…
1
3
267
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Helen Haines lost both legs after being run down outside her Wangaratta office. Within days, the Prime Minister, Governor-General, AFP, ASIO and a line-up of ministers were reading from the same script. Social media is the problem, and the ‘Digital Duty of Care’ is the fix.
146
397
44
1,369
24,691
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Australia’s Communications Minister Anika Wells is lobbying governments around the world to adopt her Digital Duty of Care bill as a model. It isn’t law yet, and it may not survive the Senate. The 90-page text never mentions free speech once, lets regulators run fake “sock puppet” accounts, and tells platforms the cost of compliance must not be taken into account. Fines reach A$109.2 million. To keep under-16s away from feeds and likes, every user will have to prove their age first. Meanwhile, her existing under-16 ban is so widely ignored that she is preparing to sue five platforms over it. Exporting a disgraced law that doesn’t even work at home is a bold sales strategy. reclaimthenet.org/australia-…
11
81
4
198
3,821
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Australia banned under-16s from social media last December. A University of Chicago study found about 73% of the 14 and 15 year olds it covers are still on the banned apps. The platforms have already closed more than 5 million accounts and set AI loose on people’s posts looking for mentions of birthdays and school grades. It didn’t work. So the government doubled the maximum fine to A$109.2 million. That didn’t work either. Now it’s preparing to sue Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube. The eSafety Commissioner has new powers to summon current and former employees and question them under oath. Anyone who refuses to answer faces 12 months in prison. Nobody in charge has stopped to ask whether the law is the problem. Kids keep getting around it, and the only way to close the gaps is to check the age of every Australian, adults included. That was always where this was heading.
79
354
33
1,205
44,285
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
I recently spoke with @NAffects, journalist and founder of @liber_net, about Australia’s proposed Digital Duty of Care Bill and its implications for free speech and privacy. We examined vague definitions of online harm, potential government surveillance through AI-powered "sock puppet" identities, plus the @AlboMP government’s failed world-first under-16 social media ban.
5
3
8
499
With absolutely zero knowledge as to the motivations or circumstances of Helen Haines' alleged attacker, the @guardian waited zero seconds to blame social media and call for more censorship and state repression, how "progressive" - theguardian.com/australia-ne…
4
10
33
1,596
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Tune in to America This Week on Election Night! Join @walterkirn and me for an America This Week Reunion Special, as we watch returns and ponder the coming end of the world open.substack.com/pub/taibbi…
394
180
47
2,204
114,733
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
According to the @eSafetyOffice you are a dangerous far right incel if you either A. hate women or B. are fiber-maxxing.
55
32
31
329
69,566
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Australia’s Digital Duty of Care Bill gets a rewrite. The government retreats on parts of its power grab while slipping in troubling new provisions. @MikeNayna and @NAffects assess the damage. networkaffects.substack.com/…
2
4
489
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
"Worst job in the world" $530k salary, 200 taxpayer funded staff. But OMG "personal abuse and growing workload" 😭
Does Australia’s eSafety Commissioner have the worst job in the world? Amid personal abuse and a growing workload, Julie Inman Grant’s job is set to be split up politico.com/news/2026/10/15…
24
46
576
8,812
#tyranika Wells unveiled Australia's Digital Duty of Care Bill on Thursday, routinely comparing it to the introduction of seat belts - if only it were that simple. Despite walking back some aspects due to public backlash, the Bill remains fundamentally incompatible with free speech and a democratic society. @MikeNayna and I explored the changes. More at: substacktools.com/sharex/4aW…
3
10
1,071
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Australia’s new Digital Duty of Care bill threatens platforms with fines of up to A$109 million if they fail to keep users “safe,” and it never defines where safe ends. Section 26A(3) even bars them from weighing the cost of compliance. The minister says she gave up the power to define new harms. Section 25E(1)(f) still covers anything that “may cause serious harm to children,” and that list has no end. Platforms must also switch off feeds, likes and stories for under-16s. They can only do that by checking the age of every user. The eSafety Commissioner gets to run fake accounts under rules it writes with the federal police. It can also summon people for private questioning, and anyone who stays silent faces 12 months in prison. The government says this is not censorship. The bill is built to produce it anyway. reclaimthenet.org/australia-…
15
102
2
230
3,619
RT @shellenberger: Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly an…
This quoted post is unavailable.
72
38
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
The Digital Duty of Care Bill is now before Parliament. The detail of legislation like this matters. It should be referred to a parliamentary committee to ensure we get it right. Important questions about human rights and fundamental freedoms - including freedom of expression - deserve careful consideration before legislation of this significance is passed.
9
1
30
1,263
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
Australia’s Prime Minister called his new online censorship bill “change from the bottom-up, my Government listening and acting.” The campaign group standing beside him at the launch had lobbied his office for it in a private letter. That same group gets 89 percent of its funding from his government. Its revenue jumped 975 percent in a single year, and Canberra has since handed it another $4.4 million. The bill lets the eSafety commissioner run fake accounts, order content removed, and fine platforms up to A$109.2 million. The government paid for the public demand and then answered the call. reclaimthenet.org/teach-us-c…
17
131
9
397
26,458
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
This is exactly the way journalists should interview government officials when they spout blatant bullshit and refuse to answer the most basic questions. The British PM claimed that Russia interfered in the Brexit vote, but his foreign minister can't and won't say how. Listen:
This was one of the most PAINFUL CAR CRASH interviews you’ll ever see with Labour foreign minister Stephen Doughty on @GMB about Andy Burnham saying Russia interfered in the Brexit referendum. Susanna Reid grows increasingly frustrated as he refuses to answer her questions, and even Ed Balls eventually tears into him for the “embarrassing waffle”. Doughty is asked again and again about the Prime Minister’s claims but he just keeps ignoring the questions and repeating the same empty line: that Russia has been attempting to interfere with our democratic processes for many years. Susanna tries to force him onto the 2016 vote itself. She asks what Russia actually did, whether it influenced voters, and whether it affected the result. He refuses to give any specifics and just repeats the line. When she asks “Why are you not getting into specifics when the Prime Minister has just got into the specifics?”, he claims Burnham was only speaking more broadly. She keeps pressing. He keeps repeating the line like a robot. She asks if the Prime Minister was wrong. Doughty: “The PM has been very clear about Russian attempts to interfere in our democratic processes.” By now Susanna is openly angry and accuses him of “muddying the waters not clarifying them”. He almost laughably says the same thing again. He isn’t listening. He might as well have come on just to read a statement. Susanna points out that if the result of such a huge decision was influenced, the public deserves answers about what the interference actually was. Doughty claims the PM only said “attempted to interfere”. Susanna cuts in immediately: “He doesn’t say ‘attempted to interfere!’” They play Burnham’s actual comments. Doughty goes straight back to the identical line. Susanna tries one final time. Same response. It is at this point that Ed Balls, clearly fed up, lays into him: “This is EMBARRASSING. It’s really bad for politics when you just blatantly don’t answer the question on something so important and go back to a nonsensical line, which is contradicted by what the Prime Minister just said!” He goes further: “Either answer Susanna’s question or just say I’m not going to. This waffle is embarrassing!” Doughty: “It’s not waffle at all Ed!” Then repeats the line yet again. It is waffle, and I never thought I’d say this but well done Ed Balls for bluntly calling him out. It was embarrassing. Andy Burnham should never have said it. We’ve been through all this. Russia did not in any way, shape or form influence the outcome of that referendum. Dragging this nonsense back up is reckless and a disgrace.
129
722
15
3,791
147,751
Andrew Lowenthal retweeted
As Australia’s new Digital Duty of Care Bill heads to Parliament, liber-net CEO @NAffects & I dug into the PR campaign behind it. What we found was one of the strangest pieces of political theatre in recent Australian history. 🧵
37
321
44
944
67,814
Another worrying indication around the so-called 'Digital Duty of Care'.
Government-funded NGOs and flawed studies front the Australian Labor Party’s new censorship push, the Digital Duty of Care. With thanks to @MikeNayna substacktools.com/sharex/A-u…
3
71
312
4,182