NDF

You think the need for "accountability" stops at social trading? Wrong. The much bigger problem, and the need for accountability on a much larger scale, is that our tokens are completely flawed. The retail investor, through buying a token, gets absolutely no rights or value capture in the underlying business they are invested in. Fundamentally, this is one of the main reasons for the historical embrace of memecoins. Why invest in a tech product's token when its holders have no rights? If these tokens, sold down to us by VCs at such a premium, are completely worthless, then memecoins actually make some sense as a tradable asset class. This industry is flawed, with the vast majority of tradable assets sharing this same flawed token structure. True accountability means building businesses with tokens that govern the business, with rights and value capture in that business. The token should be the lifeline of any business, and that only happens when the token holder has true, verifiable rights. Overall, this demand for accountability is a positive development, but it needs to stretch beyond social-trading heuristics and into changing how we invest as an industry. For the very few serious folks left here who remain attentive, start paying attention to MetaDAO and its ecosystem right now. If you want an actual playground of assets that are not valued at an uninvestable premium, with verifiable rights within the business, then this is the only place to meet that demand. If you want to long accountability, I would suggest paying attention to the one place that offers it. optimistic on the future of good tokens doing good things.