Franklin Templeton’s clients are institutions, RIAs, wealth managers, and family offices the same people buying BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF. Goldman and other firms have already disclosed XRP ETF positions in 13Fs. Calling it “just investors buying ETFs” so it doesn’t count as institutional is pure cope. The <2% of supply is true, but that doesn’t magically turn a Franklin product into retail degen bags. The hype around XRP is real, but so is the vehicle you’re pretending isn’t institutional.

How many bitcoin millionaires do you personally know off the internet

👇🔥🚀

Im ALL IN $XRP

Existing models price XRP like a stock or a high-velocity token. Both miss the inventory a real bridge has to hold. This paper adds the missing term: economy-scaled demand on a locked float. No ceiling in the math. Only in the economics.

People said the same thing about the people building the internet, too. Look at Chris Larsen’s philanthropic record: more than $120 million reported through climate philanthropy, a $25 million university gift with his family and Rippleworks, and a $1 million donation supporting services for women affected by violent crime, including human trafficking. Ripple itself has reported donating over $250 million to charitable causes since 2018. These people are building financial infrastructure while putting substantial money into education, humanitarian work, research, and social causes. Does that guarantee XRP holders get rich? No. But the argument that wealthy people will never be allowed to accumulate enormous wealth ignores the reality that wealth is already created, held, reinvested, and donated at extraordinary scale. The question isn't whether they'll allow someone to get rich. It's whether you understand what you're holding, what it's being built for, and what the long-term opportunity could be.

Back in 2017 Jeffrey Epstein might have been the first one to call Bitcoin a "Store of Value" 😒🥸 #XRP #BTC

👇

XRP > XRPN ... XRPN is for people scared of direct exposure to XRP