TomiSzn (@OluwaVision) header
TomiSzn (@OluwaVision) profile picture

@ChelseaFc | @ChelseaFcw fan . | Football Enthusiast . COYBπŸ’™. | Cruise | Good Vibes.

Lagos, Nigeria
Joined May 2025
Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)Photo by TomiSzn (@OluwaVision)
πŸ‘- Chelsea’s new away jersey and training kit is more than just a kit. It’s a chance to carry the club’s history, identity and pride onto the pitch. New kit! Same Chelsea pride !! Let’s make history !!! COYB πŸ’ͺπŸ”΅. β€”β€”β€”@ChelseaFC
29
29
595
9' Atheletico Madrid take the lead 1-0 #ATMFCB
2
1
6
281
2 minutes, 40 seconds of prayer between Wout Weghorst and Tolu Arokodare after the match today. Twente vs Ajax
4
9
409
Barcelona level at the break 1-1 HT Who's going to win the match?
2
1
3
422
67' Barcelona take the lead against ATM 1-2 #AtletiBarΓ§a
Barcelona level at the break 1-1 HT Who's going to win the match?
2
7
348
TomiSzn retweeted
πŸ—£οΈ~ Chelsea back to inconsistency again. πŸ’” 68% possession but very little creativity, urgency or attacking threat. Sunderland wanted it more, competed harder and punished our defensive mistakes. We cannot keep dropping points in games like this. Serious improvement is needed.
4
5
52
πŸ—£οΈ~ Chelsea back to inconsistency again. πŸ’” 68% possession but very little creativity, urgency or attacking threat. Sunderland wanted it more, competed harder and punished our defensive mistakes. We cannot keep dropping points in games like this. Serious improvement is needed.
4
5
52
TomiSzn retweeted
Foolishness k!lls faster than a bvllet. Ask me how.
3
8
1
15
388
TomiSzn retweeted
the day I leave this country, my first post would be: β€œOh, thank God I finally escaped the fear of being kidnapped.” What would yours be?
9
49
61
684
Replying to @OluwaVision
Draw won't bad
1
1
2
21
TomiSzn retweeted
Replying to @TheHumanNature0
It's best to avoid people like that
1
1
29
TomiSzn retweeted
Never lose hope because of the difficult days you're experiencing. Your life still has beautiful moments waiting for you, and happiness will find its way back to your heart
5
9
326
Between Nigeria and Ghana, which country offers better educational opportunities for its citizens? Let's hear from people who have experienced both. – at Lokoja, Nigeria
5
19
3
23
336
TomiSzn retweeted
EPL is the most publicised and popular league. It is not the most entertaining.
529
1,049
301
8,356
259,137
TomiSzn retweeted
Sleeping peacefully at night is a real wealth. You won't know until you know
6
19
36
448
Even after VAR reviewed it, they decided no penalty. They didn’t even call it as a foul, please what’s your usefulness?? @PLMatchCentre
1
5
12
275
TomiSzn retweeted
PGMOL IS A DISGRACE TO PREMIER LEAGUE FOOTBALL! They are always against Chelsea. The inconsistency in VAR decisions is becoming ridiculous, and today’s game against Sunderland is another example of it. First of all, Cole Palmer won a penalty for Chelsea after being kicked from behind, around the back of his knee. The incident happened inside Sunderland’s penalty area, yet VAR decided that there was no contact. No penalty was awarded. The footage is there, the pictures are there, and the evidence is there. How can VAR look at an incident like that and conclude that there was no contact? Under IFAB Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct, kicking or attempting to kick an opponent carelessly, recklessly or with excessive force is an offence punishable by a direct free kick. When such an offence is committed by a defender inside their own penalty area, a penalty kick should be awarded. The fact that the contact was from behind does not make it any less of an offence. Then, just a few minutes later, we have the Brobbey incident. Sunderland’s striker was pulling Marc Cucurella’s? No, Marc Cucurella is not involved, it was Levi Colwill. Brobbey was pulling Colwill’s shirt and dragging him while running, before appearing to trip himself. Yet VAR awarded Sunderland a penalty. Under IFAB Law 12, holding an opponent is an offence when the contact impedes their movement. A shirt is part of a player’s equipment, and pulling or dragging it to restrict an opponent’s movement can constitute holding. So why was Brobbey’s own involvement in that incident not properly considered? Chelsea cannot be denied a penalty for one incident and then watch a questionable decision go against them shortly afterwards. That is exactly why the consistency of VAR needs to be questioned. We need to examine why the contact on Cole Palmer was dismissed, yet the incident involving Brobbey and Colwill resulted in a penalty. VAR is supposed to ensure fairness, not create more controversy. Unfortunately, the inconsistency always seems to become a major talking point when Chelsea are involved. PGMOL needs to explain these decisions. Chelsea deserve better.
15
41
2
78
8,044
TomiSzn retweeted
What they hate in you is missing in them πŸ“Œ
15
67
80
810
TomiSzn retweeted
As much as the referee's decision in giving that penalty was absolutely wrong, I can't stop blaming Colwill. He has gone up against Brobbey and knew he can't beat him, why allow that ball to bounce? Why allow him to meet you? These guys are proving to be spineless.
1
6
7
171
TomiSzn retweeted
I’m curious, shey IBEDC in charge of electricity distribution everywhere else or you also stay in Ibadan.
1
1
1
27