Pinned Tweet
Replying to @CDCgov
@CDCgov we have simple question. Where are the statistics on #VAERS reports found to be causal? Why are there unrelated reports that remain in the public facing data? @JeffereyJaxen @AaronSiriSG @CDCDirector @VigilantFox @JesslovesMJK @SenRonJohnson @HighWireTalk #2SetsofBooks
Jacobson vs. Mass. has not only been the basis for much of the mandatory vaccination bad rulings in this country it was also the basis for Buck vs. Bell, one of the most disgusting laws on the books. Ever.
Justice Holmes cited Jacobson to justify forced sterilization, writing that “the principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” Critics of expansive readings of Jacobson (and of modern vaccine mandates) often invoke Buck precisely because of this, treating it as a cautionary example of how public-health deference can be stretched too far.
We have much shame to lay at the feet of the Jacobson ruling in this country.
On the second of May 1927 the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a twenty-year-old Virginia girl should be sterilised against her will on the grounds that she, her mother and her baby daughter were all feeble-minded, and four years later the baby daughter was on the honour roll at school.
Carrie Buck had been taken from her mother at three and given to a foster family in Charlottesville, who kept her out of school from the sixth grade to do their housework. At seventeen she was raped by the family's nephew and fell pregnant, and the family, rather than have the thing spoken of, had her committed to the state colony for epileptics and the feeble-minded as incorrigible and promiscuous. Her mother was already in it. Carrie's baby, Vivian, was taken from her and given to the same foster family that had covered up the rape.
The colony's superintendent had a new law he wanted tested, and Carrie was the test. Virginia's sterilisation statute needed a case to go all the way to the Supreme Court so that it could be copied by every other state, and the colony chose the quiet girl with the illegitimate child and the mother in the ward. It gave her a lawyer, who had sat on the colony's board and was a close friend of the superintendent, and who called no witnesses and put up no fight. A social worker testified that the baby, at seven months, had a look about her that was not quite normal. That was the evidence for the third generation.
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the opinion for eight of the nine justices, and the sentence in it is the most notorious in the Court's history: three generations of imbeciles are enough. Carrie was sterilised at the colony that October. Over the following fifty years the number of Americans sterilised under laws her case had upheld climbed past sixty thousand, and Nazi defendants cited it in their own defence at Nuremberg.
Vivian went to school in Charlottesville, was marked average or better, and made the honour roll in 1931. She died of an illness the next year, aged eight. Carrie was released, married twice, read the newspaper every day, and was traced in 1980 after she and her husband had been found malnourished in their home near Charlottesville, lucid and ordinary, and angry to the end. They done me wrong, she said. They done us all wrong. Her sister Doris had been sterilised at the same colony at sixteen and told it was an appendix operation, and had spent her marriage trying for children and wondering.
Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. It is still cited.
The father figure who should have protected her was a foster home that handed her to the state. The expert was a superintendent with a law to test. The daughter who was the proof of the family's defect brought home a report card, and it was good.
OpenVAERS retweeted
On the sixteenth of December 1960 a twelve-year-old boy was put on a table in a San Jose hospital, given electric shocks until he was unconscious, and had an ice pick hammered through the thin bone above each eye and swept from side to side through the front of his brain, because his stepmother had told the doctor he was defiant. The doctor's fee was two hundred dollars.
Howard Dully was a big, clumsy, daydreaming boy whose mother had died when he was five, and his father had married a woman called Lou who could not stand him. She took him to six psychiatrists. All six told her the problem was not the boy. The seventh was Walter Freeman, who had performed more lobotomies than any man alive, who drove between state hospitals in a van he called the lobotomobile doing them by the dozen in an afternoon, with no gloves and no surgical training, and who had once done twenty-five in a day. Freeman's notes on Howard, which Howard did not read for forty-four years, record the symptoms. He objects to going to bed. He turns the lights on when there is broad daylight. He does not react to love or to punishment. He has a savage streak. On that evidence, and Lou's signature, and two hundred dollars, Freeman wrote that the boy would benefit from a transorbital lobotomy and did it four days later.
Howard remembers the table. He remembers waking with two black eyes and a fever and no idea what had been done to him, because nobody told him, then or ever. His father never spoke of it. Lou put him into a state institution the following year, and the boy with the holes in his brain spent the next forty years in and out of asylums, juvenile halls, a jail, halfway houses and the street, drinking, drifting, never quite able to say why he was the way he was, with a photograph that existed somewhere of a doctor in a suit standing over a child with a steel spike in each eye socket.
At fifty-six, driving a school bus, he went to find out. He found his file in Freeman's archive at a university in Washington, in the doctor's own handwriting, and read for the first time what his stepmother had said and what the doctor had agreed to. He went to see his father, who was eighty, and asked him why he had let it happen, and his father said he had been bullied into it. Howard told the story on the radio in 2005 and five million people listened to a man weep over a piece of paper.
Walter Freeman was not a quack. He was a professor of neurology, the man who had brought the lobotomy to America, and the operation had won its inventor the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1949. The journals published him. The hospitals booked him. The newspapers called it a miracle. He did it to three and a half thousand people, nineteen of them children, and he kept doing it until 1967, when a patient died on the table and the hospital took his privileges away, and he spent his last years driving the country in the van looking up his old patients to prove it had worked.
That is what settled science looked like from inside, to a twelve-year-old. A mother's complaint, an expert's confidence, a procedure with a prize behind it, two hundred dollars, and a lifetime nobody could give back.
The same institutions now tell you what your child should eat, in the same voice, with the same certainty, and the leaflet has a logo on it. Howard Dully is in his seventies and still cannot say what was taken. Nobody ever apologised.
Someone finally saying the quiet part out loud. Effectiveness rates have ALWAYS been inflated by maternal antibodies from natural infection in the larger population. As we increasingly vaccinated a larger and larger percentage and the people with natural immunity died off, effective rates had to wane. In fact, the unvaccinated were protecting the vaccinated and not the other way around, as is often claimed. The bulwark of naturally “immunized” people are almost entirely gone now.
The solution is not monclonals. The solution is to restore natural immunity in the population.
OpenVAERS retweeted
Replying to @JohnBeaudoinSr
They absolutely knew deaths were occurring yet chose to hide behind methodological loopholes to protect the public narrative. Obfuscation of facts was their playbook. My son died of an aortic dissection but had I not done histological, serum and DNA analysis the cause of his dissection would be unknown and ascribed to a natural death. It was anything but. The work of his grieving parents over years via forensic investigation found myocarditis, pericarditis, and spike protein in the aorta which decimated it and led to his dissection. Negative nucleocapsid test confirmed spike was vaccine derived and these findings were ultimately part of a peer reviewed and published case study linking his death to the vaccine. Despite frantic calls to the CdC after not following up my Vaers report ( full data not known at the time) and testifying before Dr. Peter Marks of the FDA about my sons death, these agencies did nothing to find the true cause of death despite assuring us that all deaths were thoroughly investigated. This was a lie- Cursory review of paperwork does Not constitute deep forensic investigation. Looking at data without looking at tissue and serum allowed these regulatory agencies to maintain “plausible deniability “ - after all you can’t find what you don’t look for. These failures caused the death of my son and countless others as had they forensically investigated immediately these deaths they would have found the link to the vaccine that his grieving parents found. Not only did they not investigate, but Fauci and others actively discouraged autopsies and histology. These actions were reckless endangerment with depraved indifference to human life; they were complicit by omission knowing deaths were occurring. It is time they be held accountable as plausible deniability can only be used so far. People died needlessly to protect their precious “safe and effective “ narrative.
@JohnBeaudoinSr @SenRonJohnson @ChildrensHD @AdhesionsOrg @Amothersanthem @React19org @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra
opastpublishers.com/open-acc…
Maybe if you focussed less on “public trust” and more on fraud and censorship, conflict of interest and admitting mistakes and negative consequences you wouldn’t need to have talks about public trust.
🧐What is the scientific community’s role toward restoring the public’s trust in health sciences research following the COVID-19 pandemic?
@HHSGov Chief Science and Data Officer Dr. Martin Kulldorff and I will examine this and other issues on Oct. 28 at 1:30pm ET, during the next NIH Scientific Freedom Lecture.
Webcast link in the replies.
This is so BAD @SecKennedy @jeffreytucker @NIHDirector_Jay @CDCgov
Working with the V-Safe data and discovered the following confirmed by @SiriGlimstad:
The CDC "accidentally" left some of the free text fields too long, but when they discovered that they truncated them. The CDC lets us know this in the motion with @ICANdecide . But here's the thing. The CDC either redefined the table column that collected the data OR sent ICAN truncated fields when exporting. But what they didn't do was change the field definition in the collection form. So people didn't know that what they were writing was being cut off. Here is an example of someone who clearly had more to say about an obviously severe adverse event.
This person had issues from dose 1, was trying to report on a pulmonary embolism after dose 3. And then they kept getting vaccinated and no one told them to stop! After the 4th dose they almost died.
WHY did you stop people from telling you what happened?? Why would you limit free text and symptom fields to so few characters. It's almost like you didn't want to know what people were experiencing. There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for this!
@React19org @aravindmohanoor @NickKottenstet1
registrant XLH-71429-16616
Winner of the internets! 🥇
Replying to @RxRegA
Having just seen "You Can See Everything," I asked ChatGPT to use your post to write a comedy bit in the style of Who's on First:
COSTELLO: I hear NIH just opened a new vaccine-injury clinic.
ABBOTT: That's right.
COSTELLO: What's it called?
ABBOTT: The Vaccinology and Immunology Center.
COSTELLO: So it's a center?
ABBOTT: No, it's a study.
COSTELLO: What's a study?
ABBOTT: The center.
COSTELLO: You just said it wasn't a center!
ABBOTT: It's a study called a center.
COSTELLO: Where's the center?
ABBOTT: Inside the Vaccine Research Center.
COSTELLO: There's another center?
ABBOTT: That's the original center. It's been there since 1999.
COSTELLO: So the new center is inside the old center?
ABBOTT: The new study is inside the old center.
COSTELLO: Fine! When does the study open?
ABBOTT: It already opened.
COSTELLO: When?
ABBOTT: October 5. They even had a ribbon-cutting.
COSTELLO: They cut a ribbon for a study?
ABBOTT: No, for the clinic.
COSTELLO: WHAT CLINIC?
ABBOTT: The new one.
COSTELLO: Inside the new center?
ABBOTT: Inside the old center.
COSTELLO: And it's open?
ABBOTT: Officially.
COSTELLO: So patients can enroll?
ABBOTT: Not yet. They're still finalizing the protocol.
COSTELLO: They opened a clinic before deciding what the clinic is going to do?
ABBOTT: They know what it's going to do.
COSTELLO: What?
ABBOTT: Study people with symptoms following vaccination or infection.
COSTELLO: Infection? I thought it was a vaccine-injury clinic!
ABBOTT: That's what they announced.
COSTELLO: So they'll treat vaccine injuries?
ABBOTT: They'll investigate symptoms, explore treatments, and connect patients with care.
COSTELLO: Connect them with care where?
ABBOTT: Appropriate care.
COSTELLO: AT THE CLINIC?
ABBOTT: That's not clear.
COSTELLO: So let me get this straight. NIH held a ribbon-cutting to open a new clinic that's actually a study called a center, located inside another center that's been open since 1999. The new clinic isn't enrolling patients, the study hasn't started, and nobody knows whether the clinic will actually treat anyone?
ABBOTT: That's the current plan.
COSTELLO: What's the ribbon for?
ABBOTT: The opening.
COSTELLO: WHAT OPENED?
ABBOTT: The center.
COSTELLO: WHICH CENTER?!
ABBOTT: The study.
COSTELLO: I thought the study hadn't started!
ABBOTT: Now you're confused.
COSTELLO: NOW I'M CONFUSED?!
ABBOTT: Don't worry. NIH says everything should be underway by the end of the year.
COSTELLO: What should be underway?
ABBOTT: The study.
COSTELLO: In the center?
ABBOTT: At the clinic.
COSTELLO: I'm going to need medical attention.
ABBOTT: I know just the place.
COSTELLO: DON'T YOU DARE.
OpenVAERS retweeted
The government opened a historic new NIH clinic! Scratch that, a center. Actually, a study with “Center” in its title, under an existing center.
OpenVAERS retweeted
🚨The FDA knew the vaccine safety early-warning system was disabled because of masking (hiding safety signals).
🚨They were shown a fix.
🚨They ordered the FDA doctor (Ana Szarfman) who presented it to "cease and desist."
In my interview with pharmacovigilance researcher @AdhesionsOrg Dr. David Wiseman, he walks through the explosive internal FDA emails showing that from early February 2021 Dr Szarfman warned CBER about the method used to detect safety signals was broken. She told them how to fix it. They told her to "cease and desist."
People who were mandated by their government or employers to take their drug and lied to about safety.
$7.99 million in 6 years for covid vaccine victims from the CICP.
People who at some point made a bad drug choice voluntarily knowing full well the dangers involved.
$96 million for homeless addicts.
Recovery starts with treatment. Every American deserves a path to a better life.
In Houston, Texas, @SecKennedy announced 8 communities selected to receive $96 MILLION through HHS' new STREETS program to confront homelessness, addiction, and serious mental illness.
Under @POTUS, HHS is taking treatment directly to Americans living on our streets, connecting them with recovery support, housing, and the resources they need to rebuild their lives.
Through the Great American Recovery, we're working to restore hope, dignity, and independence to Americans who need it most.
OpenVAERS retweeted
How DARE Ben Shapiro speak on autism to a room full of college kids and tell them vaccines do not cause autism. My son and millions of children around the world REGRESSED after vaccines.
I, as a mother to a son with autism IS NOT WRONG, nor are the countless other parents out there wrong. @SecKennedy is not wrong. The science is not wrong- as the SCIENCE shows vaccines can cause autism.
I am so tired of the gaslighting!! F%& off @benshapiro and your pediatrician wife who is massively brainwashed and refuses to actually READ the science on aluminum and mercury and the mechanisms that cause biological harm.
At last night’s @TPUSA event, @benshapiro told a brainwashed pre-med student that the Covid shot was efficacious for the elderly and declared vaccines do not cause autism.
This is the correct take. And even if that clinic actually existed when you opened the door, do you really trust the people who broke you or your kid to fix you? After all the lies? Guinea pigs dont get to travel to a magical farm where they frolic after they are done being studied.
🚨. it is an incentive program for doctors to report data and a system to study the reports, not a program to treat or compensate the injured. ⚠️Watching the federal government package a data-harvesting network as a "victory"—while completely ignoring the immediate financial and medical devastation of the people actually living with these injuries—is deeply infuriating. They are celebrating a database while families are left holding the bills.
hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-stren…
OpenVAERS retweeted
You always see the same pattern with vax safety monitoring systems. They are heralded as a way to prove safety, then once they show the opposite, they get ghosted and swept under the rug. V-Safe was used to justify an EUA & no testing for the vaccines b/c it overcame VAERS's "shortcomings."
I've spent 10 hours in public reading from the most horrifying nonfiction text I've seen: Cries for Help from V-Safe data. This was the CDC's vaccine safety monitoring system, meant to assure people that the government cares. Defenders of the CDC have said that it was never designed to provide care. But the website said the exact opposite. They lied. Thank you @React19org
brownstone.org/articles/crie…
OpenVAERS retweeted
My latest Substack article:
What is the true under-reporting rate of serious v-safe AEs to VAERS?
Even serious adverse events are heavily under reported
@Jikkyleaks
@carl_jurassic
@open_vaet
@OpenVAERS
vaccinedatascience.substack.…
Taking bets on who he will be hosting next:
Poul Thorsen, Neil Ferguson or Sapan Desai (surgisphere).
Last year, as part of a comprehensive review of NIH’s intramural policies, I announced that NIH was adopting an updated agency-wide framework to embed principles of academic freedom within our Intramural Research Program. This framework recognizes that intramural researchers must be free to share their scientific viewpoints and to communicate their scientific findings through manuscripts, presentations, media interviews, and so on. This includes hosting outside lecturers for events focused on their scientific work.
Today, NIH reaffirms this commitment to academic freedom as members of the intramural research community host Kristian G. Andersen, MPhil, PhD, as a guest lecturer.
Dr. Andersen is a co-author of a March 2020 paper published in Nature Medicine titled “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.” The paper’s authors assert: “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” They further write that “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”
The paper was cited extensively by members of the media, social media companies, and government officials to refute or suppress lab-origin hypotheses and to discredit anyone who publicly dissented from the dominant natural-origins narrative. As then-NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins wrote, “this study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for COVID-19.”
Yet before and after the paper’s publication, Dr. Andersen himself expressed substantially more uncertainty. In January, he wrote in an email that some features of the virus “(potentially) look engineered.” One month after the paper’s publication, he wrote privately that he was not fully convinced that every lab-based scenario could be ruled out.
In January 2025, the Central Intelligence Agency released the results of an assessment conducted during the Biden administration that found a “research-related origin” of SARS-CoV-2 was “more likely than a natural origin,” while assessing both theories as plausible. Given the evidence I’ve seen, I think the preponderance of evidence supports the theory that the virus leaked from a lab.
I am keenly aware that no hypothesis about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 has been conclusively proven. When it comes to open scientific questions like this, our ability to pursue truth depends on our freedom to explore various hypotheses, weigh all available evidence, and deliberate openly. This freedom was denied to many scientists during the pandemic. 𝗜 𝗮𝗺 𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗡𝗜𝗛 𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗴𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀—𝗻𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗦-𝗖𝗼𝗩-𝟮—𝗲𝗻𝗷𝗼𝘆 𝗶𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄.
OpenVAERS retweeted
To all those who minimize VAERS as ‘A SIGNAL-DETECTION system.’
Correct.
Ask yourself:
So what exactly is the purpose of detecting a signal if nobody investigates the signal?
CDC itself says that when VAERS detects a safety signal, scientists may conduct further studies through systems like VSD or CISA, and that CDC/FDA investigate further and act if needed.
Spare me the consistent mantra:
“it’s insanely rare” line unless you can show me the denominator and the follow-up investigation that established how rare it actually is.
You cannot simultaneously argue:
“VAERS cannot establish causation.”
and then leap to:
“Therefore the event functionally doesn’t exist.”
‼️That is not science.
That is skipping the investigation.
And history already proves why post-market signals matter.
🛑RotaShield was pulled after VAERS reports raised concern about intussusception; CDC then conducted large investigations, confirmed an increased risk, ACIP withdrew its recommendation, and the manufacturer removed the vaccine from the market.
🛑The Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine was also paused after a small number of serious clotting reports triggered investigation.
But here’s a more interesting one for you to ponder:
‼️Look at oral polio vaccine.
From 1980–1998, CDC documented 152 paralytic polio cases in the United States — 144 of them were vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP).
‼️A.k.a. the vaccine caused polio‼️
‼️CDC explicitly states that, since 1979, the 144 indigenous U.S. polio cases were associated with use of live oral polio vaccine.
What happened next?
🛑The United States changed the childhood schedule
🛑REMOVED THE ORAL POLIO VACCINE FROM THE SCHEDULE
and moved to the new inactivated, a polio vaccine - IPV-only in 2000 specifically to eliminate the risk of VAPP.
Let that sink in… They let 8 to 10 children get paralyzed from the Vaccine per year up until the year 2000… before they pulled it off the market… I guess 8 to 10 annually was two “rare”— they had to wait until 144 kids paralyzed to call it “not rare” enough define remove it
‼️That is literally how pharmacovigilance is supposed to work:
So yes — VAERS is “just a signaling system.”
Duh.
That is precisely the point.
‼️Signal → investigate → quantify risk → determine causation → act accordingly.
Not:
❌Signal → dismiss → declare it rare → move on.🙄
That isn’t how a safety surveillance system is supposed to work.
The people are not nearly angry enough about what U.S. public health authorities have allowed to be injected into children while those same authorities get to decide how much injury, disability, and death still counts as “rare enough” to leave a product on the market.
At some point, the question is not whether the harm is rare.
The question is:
how much carnage is acceptable before they finally admit the signal matters?
@SecKennedy
@POTUS
@McCulloughFund
@lifebiomedguru
@autismspeaks
@ae_society
@EncephGlobal
@encephalitis
@encephalitis411
@EdenDoraTrust
@encephalopathy
@DiedSuddenly_
@DiedSuddenlyNws
The CDC knows. The FDA knows. A new commission is more time wasted and nothing will come of it.
There is a new commission on vaccine injury. Study the strange and mysterious phenomena and its prevalence. Experts. Time. Money. Reports. Commissions to evaluate reports. More studies.
Meanwhile the CDC already monitored this question, real time among millions with vast responses. The work is done but the CDC hid it and only coughed it up with court order.
Commissions = more bullshit. People know.
brownstone.org/articles/crie…
The story of @TracyBethHoeg epitomizes the ‘deep state’ of science in our national institutions. She doesn’t even know who fired her. She uncovers what must be a decades long group-think cover up of vaccine injury and gets blamed.
There is no way this started with the covid vaccine. VAERS has been charged from the beginning with researching the SAEs and reporting on them.
It’s clear from Tracy’s experience they are doing that at the FDA, then reporting to itself (not congress) and then deliberately downgrading their own findings.
Then the water table of injury rises in the population (see GBS for example), and now we have a statistical method that makes the signal disappear.
Wash and repeat.
What she cant tell us must vastly outweigh what she can. That is the final bind, that NDA.
Dr. @TracyBethHoeg says FDA career staff under Biden found reports of children who died after #COVID vaccination.
Autopsies. Clinical records. Investigations.
But FDA buried this safety information.
She later walked into a meeting and asked why parents were never told.

































