Pinned Tweet
'it’s not the case that institutions have been taken over by radicals, but that radicalism has been conquered by mainstream institutions'
musaalgharbi.substack.com/p/…
Judaism *as we know it today* (i.e. as a basically non-proselytising religion that thought of Jews as being part of a 'people' or at least a 'group', something you are born into) really dates from roughly the 5th C. AD. That's AD, not BC.
Dr. Yonatan Adler has demonstrated that it's only from ~150 BCE onwards that we find Judeans practicing a set of dietary restrictions (!) Salafis do not realize the Jewish practices they appropriated and criticize us for are far younger than they have imagined @dawahxdialogues
Sammael's_Party retweeted
В 1960-м ГДР ввела советскую живую вакцину и первой в Европе за год помножила полиомиелит на ноль. В ФРГ от вакцины отказались по идеологическим соображениям - мол, коммунистическая зараза. Итог: на западе тысячи парализованных детей, пока восток забыл про болезнь
Sammael's_Party retweeted
In 2017, Jared Kushner showed Saudi Prince MBS classified information that included who the dissenters were
He used this information to kill Khashoggi in Turkey and others at home
Jared was paid $2 billion, and he allegedly hired a hitman with some of that money
Wild times
Sammael's_Party retweeted
Dr. Yonatan Adler has demonstrated that it's only from ~150 BCE onwards that we find Judeans practicing a set of dietary restrictions (!) Salafis do not realize the Jewish practices they appropriated and criticize us for are far younger than they have imagined @dawahxdialogues
The United States and the United States alone has been responsible for maybe 75 million deaths post WW2. If you include the other Western 'capitalist' 'democracies' the total is of course much higher.
As soon as Polanski raised the prospect of a Labour-Green alliance it was obvious that Labour could and probably would try and weaponise this to 'discipline' the Greens.
Green councillors face Labour deadline to disown Zionism policy
Labour is set to decide whether to end power-sharing with Green councillors after demanding they disown their party's policy that Zionism is a form of racism.
The BBC has been told Green groups have been given until Sunday to respond to the demand, after which Labour's ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) will decide whether the party will continue with local deals to share power.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c81d…
Just a reminder that for the vast overwhelming majority of its existence, Marxism was seen as a Jewish plot. And now, it's 100% anti-semitism.
Apparently.
unavailable
Sammael's_Party retweeted
I'm not sure we need any more evidence that the UK government serves Israel!
The question is what we are going to do about it.
#ResistZIM
Sammael's_Party retweeted
While I see no panacea in "male dominance," - at least over women, I value male strength, safeguarding, honor, and valor. The rest of this post is solid.
I spent years in feminist circles, sometimes heavily engaged, and other times removed for sheer exhaustion at the inability of so many feminists to examine their own rhetoric or analysis, or even feign interest in perspectives that were not their own. The energy spent infighting about what feminism was and wasn't, who was holding the line, and who was a better feminist, was an invitation to depletion. I read the books, made feminist arguments, utilized the analysis as one lens through which to view the world, and listened to misandrist dialogue I had never heard outside feminist circles, until the last decade, including that which targeted boys, simply for being male.
Then, I started to investigate the gender industry. I followed the money. I found the rich men funding it. I looked further and found the rich women funding it. I found the mothers indoctrinating their children to gender ideology, the female foot soldiers, female politicians, and the world's most powerful women driving it.
I kept going, kept examining, and what I ran into was feminism. The call was coming from inside the house.
Replying to @bjportraits
The Ideological Boomerang: How Feminist Subversion of Male Authority Created the Transgender Paradox
The Strategic Embrace of Subversion: Mainstream feminist theory and gender activism spent decades dismantling traditional masculine archetypes, viewing biological and social male power structures as the primary obstacle to liberation. When modern transgenderism and radical gender theory emerged, sections of the feminist movement eagerly aligned with them. Why? Because redefining, fragmenting, and deconstructing "manhood" served as a powerful tool to neutralize, embarrass, and delegitimize traditional male authority. By promoting a framework where biological maleness could be bypassed, ridiculed, or rendered socially obsolete, it offered an ideological weapon to upend patriarchal hierarchies.
The Irony of the Backlash ("Egg on Their Face"): This tactical alliance has now backfired spectacularly. Having spent years championing the complete erasure of biological sex boundaries in favor of fluid gender identity, institutional feminism now finds itself cornered by the logical conclusion of its own victory. When biological males claim access to women’s private spaces, sports categories, and institutional protections, radical and mainstream feminists alike are suddenly forced to defend the very biological reality they spent years helping to deconstruct.
The Ultimate Reversal: The current scramble by feminist commentators to distance themselves from gender extremism—insisting that feminism was "never about men or transhumanism"—ignores the reality of their own complicity. They welcomed an ideology that promised to humiliate and dismantle traditional male dominance, only to discover too late that tearing down the definition of a man also meant tearing down the safety and definition of a woman.
Sammael's_Party retweeted
Elon wants chip fabs on the Moon now. Lunar soil is 20% silicon, he says, so you just mine it, refine it, stamp out solar cells and chips. Next level of the video game. His words.
He's a walking 1954 Popular Science cover. "Moon Factories by 1975!" You can picture him red-faced at some poor SpaceX engineer, jabbing a finger at a render: "I saw this in a magazine! Why can't you guys do this?" Because the magazine was fiction, Elon. That's why.
Boring question one: water. A single leading-edge fab burns through millions of gallons of ultrapure water every day, the kind filtered and polished until it turns chemically aggressive and rips ions out of anything it touches. Making it takes an industrial plant of its own. On the Moon you'd be chipping ice out of permanently shadowed craters at minus 230 C and feeding it through a purification chain that doesn't exist, powered by energy that also doesn't exist.
Boring question two: shaking. Lithography machines sit on tuned vibration isolation, springs and masses and counterweights engineered around Earth's gravity down to the millimeter. Lunar gravity is one sixth of that. Every spring rate and tuned mass in the stack assumes 1 g, and the Moon has its own moonquakes nobody has fully mapped. So forget shipping a fab up there. You'd have to redesign the entire physics package from scratch, in a hailstorm of charged abrasive dust that eats seals and bearings for breakfast.
And here's the part that makes it funny instead of just dumb. NASA studied all of this while Elon was still in college. Ignatiev and Freundlich published the actual paper in 1991: waste silicon from regolith processing, vacuum-deposited thin-film cells laid right on the surface. Serious work, fifteen years of it, and by 2005 the best anyone could promise was 5-8% efficient cells sprayed on melted moon glass, economical only at megawatt scale. Chips? Never in the plan. Not once, in thirty years of study. Then a 2006 follow-up walked back even the crude version, because melted regolith is too lumpy and dirty to make a decent substrate. The 2025 research gave up on purifying lunar silicon entirely and just ships the semiconductor layer from Earth.
Thirty years of papers saying "hard pass" and this guy shows up with the crayon version of a 1991 NASA study, calls it visionary, and the fanboys clap like he invented the Moon. He isn't a genius ahead of his time. He's a man who skips the reading, and it shows every single time he opens his mouth just to pump his cult stocks.
Elon Musk explains how to build AI satellites on the moon from lunar silicon and aluminum, and says 500 to 1,000 terawatts a year cannot be launched from Earth
“Well, the lunar soil is 20% silicon or something like that. So you can mine the silicon on the moon, refine it, and create the solar cells and the radiators on the moon. So get the radiators out of aluminum. So there’s plenty of silicon and aluminum on the moon to make the cells and the radiators. The chips you could send from Earth because they’re pretty light. But maybe at some point you make them on the moon, too."
"Like I said, it does seem like a sort of a video game situation where it’s difficult but not impossible to get to the next level. I don’t see any way that you could do 500 to 1,000 terawatts per year launched from Earth.”
Zionists really can't stand it when they end up in a debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about and their invariable response is either to start shrieking about anti-semitism or just to run away (as below).
Sammael's_Party retweeted
El 25 de octubre de 1922, acababa la agresión imperialista contra la Rusia bolchevique, con la entrada del Ejército Rojo en Vladivostok, aplastando a los últimos remanentes del Ejército Blanco y las fuerzas imperialistas de 17 países capitalistas.
Seguro que lo leíste en sus libros de historia occidentales, pero solo un año después de la Revolución Bolchevique, EEUU, Reino Unido, Francia, Checoslovaquia, Grecia, Rumania, Alemania, Austria-Hungría, Italia, Canadá, Turquía, Polonia, Serbia, Finlandia, Australia, China y Japón invadieron Rusia... pretendían acabar con la revolución obrera y devolver el poder a la burguesía zarista, en lo que se llamó como "Intervención Aliada" para restaurar el orden capitalista.
17 ejércitos con llegaron a tener a 1 millón de soldados invadiendo Rusia, en apoyo a la oligarquía capitalista y su ejército zarista, el cual también fue armado por todo Occidente... a esta flagrante agresión imperial de Occidente en Rusia lo llamaron "guerra civil" y murieron al menos 7 millones de rusos, hicieron todo lo posible para aplastar la revolución bolchevique que era un peligro para el capital mundial.
El Ejército Blanco armado y financiado por Occidente, además empleó la brutalidad más infame, en los Urales, más de 100.000 campesinos fueron exterminados en campos de concentración por el Ejercito Blanco por el "delito" de apoyar a los bolcheviques, exterminó a 150.000 judíos en el sur de Rusia (pogromos que más tarde imitarían los nazis) e hicieron limpiezas étnicas de más de 300.000 indígenas... metían a los sospechosos de ser bolcheviques en las calderas de sus trenes blindados para que se quemaran vivos.
La Rusia que quedó después de la cruenta agresión imperialista mal llamada "guerra civil", fue una de las naciones más pobres del mundo, sumida en el hambre y en las enfermedades... murieron al menos 3 millones de personas de hambruna y otras 2 millones de enfermedades como el tifus, la gripe o el cólera... en solo 40 años, esa misma Rusia devastada y con una guerra mundial por medio, seria una potencia mundial equipada con bomba atómica gracias al socialismo.
No somos conscientes del sacrificio del pueblo ruso para defender su revolución, primero tuvieron que luchar contra 17 países capitalistas, más muchos otros que apoyaron indirectamente la invasión económicamente y con armamento.... pero no contentos con eso, unas décadas más tarde, Occidente le financió a Hitler para acabar con la URSS y le montaron una guerra mundial que costó la vida a 27 millones de soviéticos.... y ni así, tampoco pudieron tumbar la revolución, es el ejercicio de resistencia mayor de un pueblo que ha conocido el mundo.
Sammael's_Party retweeted
“In order for our industry - or indeed any industry - to function properly and effectively, it must be controlled by those who want to see it succeed.
It cannot be left to civil servants in Whitehall, or to entrepreneurs from outside. It must be in the hands of people who are committed to the principle of nationalisation and to the long-term interests of the British people.
When the Tories came to power 12 years ago, they set about creating mass unemployment, and destroying effective trade unionism by anti-union laws. Any sign that trade unionism is not yet totally subservient, and this Government will rush in with new laws to plug the gap.
Sooner, rather than later, the British trade union movement will have to make up its mind. It will either have to acquiesce all the restraints imposed by unjust laws - or it will have to resist as did the pioneers who built our movement over a century ago.”
Arthur Scargill July, 1991.
In 1935, "neutral" Finland's future commander sat down with Hermann Göring at a secret conference on joint action against the USSR.
Also at the table: Hungarian Prime Minister Gyula Gömbös and Tytus Komarnicki, head of the Polish parliament's foreign affairs committee (The Times, October 15, 1935). A year earlier Mannerheim had lobbied London to fortify the Åland Islands, despite Finland's 1921 pledge to keep them demilitarized. By 1939 he was personally showing German Chief of Staff Franz Halder around Finland's northern airfields and depots.
Helsinki asked Britain and Germany for permission to fortify Åland, and both happily agreed. The one country it never asked was the USSR, the country most directly threatened.
And since the 1920s, Finland had been quietly helping Germany rebuild its navy in open violation of Versailles. The Finnish submarine Vesikko, launched in the 1930s, was the prototype for Germany's Type II U-boats, the backbone of Hitler's early submarine fleet. Finnish submarines of this program later fought the USSR. Vesikko still sits in Helsinki as a museum ship, a monument to Finland's part in Germany's secret rearmament years before 1941.
Sammael's_Party retweeted
If a Russian attack really was imminent, we would be withdrawing our forces from faraway places and concentrating them where the supposed threat is.
But we aren't - in fact, we've just sent RAF planes to help the authoritarian Saudi regime fight a war in Yemen.
They take us for fools.
Source: Strategic Defence Review (2025).
Britain must be ready for war within 1,000 days, Defence Secretary warns
lbc.co.uk/article/defence-pr…
Sammael's_Party retweeted
It’s weird how normalized this is.
If a bunch of random dudes with giant beards and silly hats and black clothes just showed up out of nowhere one day and started ordering us to start foreign wars, we would all flip out, like who the fuck are these guys?






































