Rob

🚨 @TeamYouTube Neal Mohan publicly talks about YouTube making “record profits,” but forgets to mention where a huge part of that money suddenly came from. Since the 2025 policy changes, YouTube didn’t introduce any revolutionary updates that massively increased platform value: • No huge new audience influx • No groundbreaking creator features • No major innovations bringing record growth Yet somehow profits exploded. Why? Because thousands of creators were demonetized while YouTube continued running ads on their videos and keeping 100% of the revenue. That’s the part nobody wants to talk about. The most absurd part is this: The same content YouTube labels as “inauthentic” continues getting pushed by the algorithm. ➡️ It still gets recommended ➡️ Still finds new viewers ➡️ Still gets likes, comments, engagement ➡️ Still earns money for YouTube So if the content is supposedly “bad,” “spam,” or “inauthentic,” then why does the algorithm continue promoting it? And then creators are told: “Wait 90 days and appeal again.” But during those 90 days: • The creator loses income • The channel continues generating ad revenue • YouTube keeps all the profit • And by the time monetization MAYBE returns, the channel is often already exhausted by the algorithm Meanwhile large creators with repetitive formats, repeated thumbnail structures, recycled series concepts, compilation channels, and mass-produced entertainment formats continue staying fully monetized without problems. So where exactly is the line? Why are smaller creators punished while massive creators doing extremely similar content structures remain protected? And before anyone twists the point: Most creators were never trying to replace humans completely. People simply used modern tools to improve editing, visuals, workflow, storytelling, thumbnails, or production quality. That is still work. That is still creativity. That is still content creation. So YouTube, what exactly are the real rules anymo