Yo, I’m Tommy. Minecraft addict. Idea machine. Trend hunter⚡️ I turn chaos into content and fun into obsession. Follow me — let’s make your feed way entertainin
Thailand
Joined May 2026
- Tweets52
- Following22
- Followers85
- Likes227
Pinned Tweet
This liar and fraudster is stealing money from honest creators, pocketing their hard-earned income, and making it seem as though YouTube is now raking in record profits thanks to his “impeccable” work—but in reality, those profits have been stolen from the platform’s content creators. If this continues for even another month and there are no changes in the clarity and transparency of the rules, I, my team, my partners, and my students will 100% choose another platform for publishing and monetizing content. Right now, I see TikTok as a comparable option that expands its creator reward programs every month and makes its rules more transparent and understandable—without stealing earned revenue! Go to hell, Neal Mohan—from the very first second you showed up, you started destroying the company by putting on rose-colored glasses. It’s funny to watch YouTube’s top brass sit there and stay silent, even though this could affect you too, lol. You’re fighting against AI content, yet when you sign up for a TikTok account, it offers to generate an AI avatar for you. Even now, as I’m writing this post on this social network, GROK—our personal AI assistant—is integrated right into it. All global tech companies are rolling out AI assistants across the entire planet, and it’s just ridiculous to watch this scam—that a billion-dollar company can’t allocate funds to build a real team of live people who could manually review channels for authentic content, rather than relying on this scammer’s broken, buggy system!
@YouTube
@TeamYouTube
@YouTubeCreators
@YouTubeLiaison
@NealMohan
@DramaAlert
@Dexerto
@vidIQ
@TubeBuddy
#RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #Demonetization #FixYouTube #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI
Tommy Tube retweeted
We are going to sue YouTube
But before we do, our lawyer is currently in the process of sending a letter to YouTube.
Over 2 weeks ago our channel youtube.com/@UnderSparked was falsely demonetized under the "inauthentic content" policy.
Demonetized doesn't mean no ads though, all it means is YouTube will still run ads on the videos. But they pocket all the revenue, essentially stripping all the revenue from us.
We don't claim to be the pinnacle of quality content standards, but the following things do cause us to scratch our heads in confusion
1. All of the bigger channels in the same niche as us are monetized with no issues
2. We literally voice act, edit, etc, all our own videos while 100s of AI storytelling channels are still monetized
3. YouTube is fine with running ads on the videos, pocketing all the revenue. We assume if YouTube had such a big problem with the content, why still serve it to your advertisers?
4. 100s of reaction channels still stay monetized
Some examples of bigger monetized channels that are in the same niche as us are:
rSlash: youtube.com/@rSlash
DarkFluff: youtube.com/@DarkFluff
Oz's Vault: youtube.com/channel/UCoJ1Anu…
We support these channels, the reason we are providing these channels as examples is to showcase how it feels like we're being targeted.
This has caused extreme distress for my team and I. Many of our livelihoods and families rely on this channel. Our community relies on the UnderSparked channel.
Many people support the UnderSparked channel because in a time of nonstop AI channels, we stepped up and used real voice actors to cater to that connection and community that viewers on YouTube crave.
We truly believe this demonetization was done in error, all we want is a real human specialist to help us fix the issue.
We're tired of constantly receiving only copy and pasted templated responses, constantly neglecting/dismissing our attempts at fixing the false demonetization.
We're kindly requesting for a representative from @TeamYouTube to help us fix this demonetization issue with our channel.
We don't want to send letters, or sue, or anything! We simply just want to go back to producing content for our community.
Tommy Tube retweeted
Day 7 of how YouTube's CEO remains silent about how it is currently demonetizing and deleting the channels of hundreds of thousands of honest creators in order to pocket their revenue using a poorly configured AI moderator.
Sign the Petition - c.org/MhGyKbrThJ
Feeling so inspired after another #Brandcast, thanks to the brands, @YouTubeCreators and partners who have made @YouTube their home, and our amazing YouTube team who brought the show to life.
A few takeaways from our event:
🌟 Today, YouTubers are the new stars and studios, making every cultural moment bigger.
📺 For more than two decades, we’ve focused on staying one step ahead of how the world watches. Today, we’ve been #1 in streaming watchtime in the US for 3 years. Over 2B hours of Shorts are watched in the Living Room each month.
🏡 We know that to keep viewers coming back, we have to build the best possible home for our creators. So we’ve invested in the infrastructure they need to thrive, from pioneering the creator economy to scaling their reach with auto-dubbing to unlocking AI-powered video creation tools.
🍿 For the first time at Brandcast, we brought advertisers an exclusive look into our new slate of YouTube-exclusive Creator Shows.
The future of media is being built on YouTube, and the most exciting part is that we’re just getting started.
Tommy Tube retweeted
YouTube is currently having a massive identity crisis. 🚩
Photo 1: The platform’s biggest creator is literally offering $10,000 for a subscription.
Photo 2: YouTube’s written policy states content should NOT be made for the "sole purpose of getting views."
If @mrbeast the largest channel on Youtube is "view baiting" with cash, does the rule in the second photo actually exist, or is it just a tool for selective enforcement?
@TeamYouTube @nealmohan @YouTubeCreators @YouTube Make this make sense!
Right now, @rumblevideo seems really clunky at first glance. I hope its creators roll out new updates as soon as possible so it becomes much easier to use for both viewers and creators. I’d gladly switch to it because I don’t see the point in staying on this damn platform that rips off its creators for money. I’m already thinking about switching to another platform and, as a matter of principle, no longer creating content for this site. And by the way, interestingly, I’ve been talking to my partners even my competitors, you could say and generally people who closely tied to working on YouTube not necessarily even on the same channel and lately, they’ve been having the same feelings and thoughts. We’re all quietly planning to leave this platform together, and I think it’s unfair that they keep making money off our videos. That’s why we’re even thinking about deleting all the videos from our channels, since we’ve already earned revenue from them delete the channels and just leave without taking anything with us, so that this platform, which is currently cheating us, doesn’t make a single penny off of us🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Simply move your subs over to @rumblevideo and keep yt only as a channel that will feed existing and new subs into a platform that doesnt act like a-hole.
🚨 @TeamYouTube And here’s even more proof of how absurd this entire system has become.
Before monetization was removed, the channel’s views were at a low point. But right after the “inauthentic content” label appeared and monetization was disabled, the channel suddenly started receiving MORE traffic, MORE recommendations, and therefore MORE ad impressions.
Think about that carefully.
The same videos YouTube claims are supposedly “inauthentic” are still being pushed by the algorithm and filled with ads — meaning YouTube continues making money from them.
And it gets even more ridiculous.
I personally checked what ads were being shown on those videos, and many of them were ads for AI services:
• AI voice tools
• AI music generation
• AI video creation
• AI image generation
• AI dubbing and editing services
So YouTube demonetizes creators for using modern tools in their workflow… while simultaneously selling ads for those exact same AI tools on the demonetized videos.
What kind of logic is that?
And for people reading this thinking:
“Well, it’s just Minecraft content.”
No. It’s still content.
You may have grown out of Minecraft or Roblox, but millions of children around the world are constantly growing up and discovering these games for the first time. That audience never disappears. It renews every generation.
Creating this kind of content is still a huge amount of work:
• Storywriting
• Gameplay recording
• Map preparation inside the game
• Models and assets
• 3D work
• Editing
• Thumbnail creation
• Audience retention structure
All of that takes real effort and real production work.
Yet YouTube removes monetization from those creators while still profiting from their videos and even promoting AI services through ads on the same content.
It’s an endless cycle of contradictions and absurdity.
🚨 @TeamYouTube
Neal Mohan publicly talks about YouTube making “record profits,” but forgets to mention where a huge part of that money suddenly came from.
Since the 2025 policy changes, YouTube didn’t introduce any revolutionary updates that massively increased platform value:
• No huge new audience influx
• No groundbreaking creator features
• No major innovations bringing record growth
Yet somehow profits exploded.
Why?
Because thousands of creators were demonetized while YouTube continued running ads on their videos and keeping 100% of the revenue.
That’s the part nobody wants to talk about.
The most absurd part is this:
The same content YouTube labels as “inauthentic” continues getting pushed by the algorithm.
➡️ It still gets recommended
➡️ Still finds new viewers
➡️ Still gets likes, comments, engagement
➡️ Still earns money for YouTube
So if the content is supposedly “bad,” “spam,” or “inauthentic,” then why does the algorithm continue promoting it?
And then creators are told:
“Wait 90 days and appeal again.”
But during those 90 days:
• The creator loses income
• The channel continues generating ad revenue
• YouTube keeps all the profit
• And by the time monetization MAYBE returns, the channel is often already exhausted by the algorithm
Meanwhile large creators with repetitive formats, repeated thumbnail structures, recycled series concepts, compilation channels, and mass-produced entertainment formats continue staying fully monetized without problems.
So where exactly is the line?
Why are smaller creators punished while massive creators doing extremely similar content structures remain protected?
And before anyone twists the point:
Most creators were never trying to replace humans completely. People simply used modern tools to improve editing, visuals, workflow, storytelling, thumbnails, or production quality.
That is still work.
That is still creativity.
That is still content creation.
So YouTube, what exactly are the real rules anymo
So creators spend years building audiences, improving content quality, making the platform more popular, and even bringing new users from competing platforms and social media over to YouTube — helping YouTube sell Premium subscriptions, ads, and grow the entire ecosystem.
But instead of fairly supporting those creators, YouTube simply demonetizes many of them while continuing to profit from their content anyway.
So yes, maybe that’s exactly where part of these “record profits” are suddenly coming from.
Tommy Tube retweeted
April earnings🙏. I worked hard for a year to be able to earn this in a month, my sweat, my research all didn’t waste. I remember how I felt like I was doing something wrong still yet people here motivated me. Earn $24k dollars from just one channel kiaaa. Thank you ABBA 🙌🥹
Tommy Tube retweeted
👾YouTube support in 2026:
❌ Explain the actual issue
❌ Tell creators what to fix
❌ Give transparent human reviews
✅ Copy-paste reply
✅ “Wait 90 days”
✅ Ignore small creators
Meanwhile creators spend YEARS building channels just to get treated like disposable numbers.
@TeamYouTube
That’s exactly what I was talking about—this is a global problem, and YouTube needs to change the rules governing its broken AI before content creators find a new alternative platform!
🚨 YouTube, explain to me how this makes any sense.
I have a Minecraft channel with original videos, my own universe, recurring characters, custom 3D and 2D models, storylines, editing, voice work, and a real audience that genuinely connected with the project.
The channel was earning around $8,000/month until YouTube suddenly disabled monetization for “inauthentic,” “repetitive,” or “mass-produced” content.
Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCnLKdnt…
But here’s the question nobody at YouTube wants to answer:
Why is YouTube STILL running ads on my videos if the content supposedly violates monetization standards?
I literally showed proof in my video while scrolling through my own Shorts feed - ads are still appearing on my content. And this is not only happening on Shorts. Many creators report the exact same thing happening on long-form videos too.
So let me understand this correctly:
My content is considered “non-authentic” for ME to earn from…
…but it is still authentic enough for YouTube to continue profiting from it?
If the content is truly repetitive, mass-produced, low-quality, or violates monetization policies - then why are ads still being served on it?
Please answer that question directly.
And another thing:
Why do many larger channels with extremely similar entertainment-focused formats remain monetized without issues?
I’m not talking about copying content.
I’m talking about the STYLE of entertainment:
• animation-based storytelling
• fictional recurring characters
• kid-focused entertainment
• shared universes
• repeatable formats
• similar content structures across videos
That is literally how entertainment content works on YouTube.
People watch creators because they enjoy the personalities, the world, the characters, and the format. Nobody watches entertainment expecting a scientific lecture or educational documentary every upload.
People watch creators like MrBeast, PrestonPlayz, Kai Cenat, KSI, Logan Paul, and countless others simply to relax, laugh, escape stress, and enjoy the content.
Some creators even run multiple channels with highly repetitive structures or compilation-style formats for years without any monetization issues.
So where exactly is the line?
Because right now the enforcement looks completely inconsistent and impossible for creators to understand.
I recently showed another monetized channel with a very similar entertainment-driven format. This is NOT hate toward that creator at all. In fact, I respect the production quality and the work behind it.
But when I compare my channel to theirs, I genuinely do not understand why their channel is allowed to exist and monetize normally while mine gets removed from the Partner Program.
That’s what feels unfair.
Creators deserve transparent rules, real human reviews, and consistent enforcement - not automated decisions that destroy years of work overnight while ads continue running on the same videos.
@YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @MrBeast @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @TikTok_US @Instagram @X
#RepairYouTube #YouTube #Demonetization #FixYouTube #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI #SupportCreators #SaveCreators #BrokenAI #YouTubePartner #CreatorEconomy
1
1
253
Bro, if I wanted only “educational” or supposedly “original” content, I would just open Wikipedia instead of YouTube.
People go to YouTube to relax, have fun, follow creators they like, watch someone’s life, enjoy a creator’s series, gameplay, reactions, stories, or simply escape from everyday stress for a while.
YouTube was built around entertainment and personalities. That’s literally why most people use the platform.
And by your logic, think about this for a second:
If someone has enough time and resources to run EIGHT channels at the same time, doesn’t that already suggest the content is probably very easy, repetitive, and template-based to produce?
Because truly complex and high-effort content usually doesn’t allow one person to manage that many channels consistently.
No offense, bro, but there are contradictions in your arguments too.
Creators get demonetized for “repetitive thumbnails” and “reused patterns,” yet we clearly see channels where 30–40% of thumbnails look almost identical.
And according to your logic, every video now supposedly needs to be “educational” or highly unique under YouTube’s new standards. But these channels are pure entertainment content.
Logically, entertainment content will naturally repeat formats, ideas, faces, and structures sometimes.
But the AI doesn’t care whether content is educational or entertaining. It only sees patterns, repetition, similarities — and then triggers moderation.
And okay, let’s assume for a moment that this creator has a massive production team helping manage all eight channels.
Then how exactly is an average person supposed to start a YouTube career today without huge financial resources, a production team, editors, designers, managers, and a full studio behind them?
Where’s the logic in that?
I’m not trying to offend you, bro. I’m just pointing out how absurd this entire situation has become, because the platform rules themselves are absurdly vague.
That’s the real problem.
There’s no actual logic anymore when the rules are written so broadly that almost any type of content or channel could technically fall under them.
And until creators finally receive real specifics instead of generalized policies that apply to literally everything, these situations will keep happening.
Let’s do a comprehensive breakdown of a typical post about this “inauthentic” content “issue" on YouTube.
Yesterday, I found this post complaining and not really understanding the difference between scaling practices and crossing the line in terms of what counts as inauthentic content.
The OP (original poster) complains that people like Preston, who has over 30 million subscribers, are allowed to have thumbnails that look alike, ideas that are alike, and compilation videos that group multiple of his own videos together.
In the meantime, the same OP says that smaller creators with original editing, animations, production, and unique workflows are getting flagged for inauthentic content.
Here’s what’s actually going on.
OP is completely unaware, as per usual, of the actual problem here. What Preston is doing is using HIS OWN IP and repurposing this IP to cater to different audience needs. A compilation is better for when you just want to put something on in the background while cooking, repurposed shorts are better for quick consumption, and about the “similar ideas,” well, he’s pointing at Preston reusing similar expressions in his thumbnails.
What most of these “small creators” are doing isn’t repurposing their own IP. They’re simply taking another person’s footage (such as IShowSpeed, television shows, etc.), recutting it and adding some subtitles to it. Sometimes they’ll add non-transformative voiceovers, thinking that this suddenly puts their content under fair use.
Here’s a lesson. Fair use doesn’t just look at the effort you put into something. Minimal edits, content that acts as a replacement for the original, and straight reposts do not fall under this legal framework.
What matters is the amount of footage you use and the substantiality of it. The question that these “creators” need to ask is the following: would people watch your version instead of the original? Would your work damage potential licensing opportunities for the original creator?
But let’s not stop there, because I’m tired of these people tagging YouTube, other creators, and simply wasting time that should go toward genuine mistakes on YouTube’s end.
In OP’s post, he complains about YouTube’s inconsistent enforcement, claiming that big creators are protected and smaller creators aren’t. That’s straight-up selection bias. You’re looking at a subgroup of small creators while there are plenty of 1M+ subscriber channels getting hit by the same rules.
So what are the rules? (As the OP doesn’t seem too sure about them anymore.)
Simple, create your own IP that doesn’t rely heavily on the IP of others who spend time, money, and effort creating their content.
If YouTube were to continue rewarding unoriginal work, it wouldn’t just be demotivating for genuine creators to keep creating content, it would genuinely hurt their ability to do so, as other people would be generating money at the expense of their own effort.
P.S. Stop tagging me with your channels. I’m not YouTube support, and I’m very much on the side of YouTube on this one, with a few exceptions where the demonetization was an actual mistake.
1
3
515
Bro, then tell me right now what exactly I — and all other creators — should change in our content, and we’ll gladly follow those rules.
Your comment honestly sounds ridiculous, because if you’re far from YouTube, then that explains it. But if you actually understand the platform, then you know YouTube’s rules are extremely vague right now.
When you get demonetized or receive a strike, you usually don’t even get a clear explanation of what exact video or action caused it.
The rules are written so broadly that almost every channel could technically fall under them:
MrBeast, T-Series, PewDiePie, news channels, sports channels, gaming channels, vlog channels, reaction channels, history channels — literally everyone.
So if you really think you fully understand the system, then okay — explain exactly what rules are being violated and what creators should change.
And if your explanation actually makes sense, I’ll publicly apologize to you. 🤷♂️
🚨 YouTube, explain how this is fair.
Channels from smaller creators get demonetized even for words like “death” in titles, while massive channels continue operating with thumbnails containing blood, violence themes, suggestive imagery, and shocking content — without any problems.
Let’s talk about Aphmau.
Her channel continues being fully monetized even though many thumbnails and video formats would instantly get smaller creators flagged for “inauthentic content” or policy-related issues.
And the most important part:
There are MANY repetitive videos, repetitive thumbnail styles, and repeated content formulas across the channel that AI moderation systems would normally consider “reused” or “inauthentic” for smaller creators.
Yet somehow the moderation systems seem to completely ignore it.
Again — this is NOT hate toward the creator.
This is about inconsistent enforcement and double standards.
Because right now creators are seeing:
➡️ Smaller channels punished instantly
➡️ Bigger creators protected
➡️ AI moderation aggressively targeting some creators while seemingly ignoring others with highly repetitive content structures
At this point, many creators are starting to wonder:
Do large creators have some kind of protection label that prevents AI systems from applying the same moderation rules to them?
Because from the outside, this no longer looks fair.
How can YouTube claim fairness when the rules clearly do not apply equally to everyone?
Many creators I personally know were demonetized simply for using certain words in titles.
But here we see:
• Violence references directly in thumbnails
• Words related to death in titles
• Suggestive/shocking imagery
• Highly repetitive thumbnails and content structures
• Recycled video formulas repeated over and over again
YouTube, is this really what you consider a fair system?
Or do large creators simply get different treatment?
🚨 And to everyone supporting this movement:
Join our protest.
Set the protest avatar as your profile picture across all social media platforms.
We are together.
We are a team.
And together we can force attention onto this broken system.
@YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @DramaAlert @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @MrBeast @KSI @KaiCenat @LoganPaul
#RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #FixYouTube #Demonetization #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI #SupportCreator
🚨 So let me get this straight, YouTube…
A creator can run 8 monetized channels with nearly identical thumbnails, repetitive ideas, recycled formats, AI-generated Shorts, and even upload 2–3 hour compilation videos made from content already uploaded on his OTHER channels…
…and that’s apparently completely fine?
But smaller creators with original editing, animation, production, commentary, and unique workflows get flagged for “reused” or “inauthentic” content by AI systems?
How does this make any sense?
I recently looked at the channels of PrestonPlayz:
• Nearly identical thumbnails across videos
• Same facial expressions reused constantly
• Highly repetitive content loops
• AI-generated Shorts content
• Multiple compilation channels reposting already uploaded content from his other channels
Again — this is NOT hate toward the creator.
This is about YouTube’s completely inconsistent enforcement.
Because right now it feels like:
➡️ Big creators are protected
➡️ Smaller creators get mass demonetized automatically
➡️ AI systems punish some channels while ignoring others doing far more obvious content recycling
So what exactly are the rules anymore?
YouTube keeps telling creators to make “original” and “authentic” content.
But when creators actually spend time making original productions, editing, animation, storytelling, and unique content pipelines — they still get flagged.
Meanwhile giant repetitive content farms continue operating without problems.
YouTube, are you absolutely sure your systems are working correctly?
@YouTube @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeLiaison @NealMohan @DramaAlert @Dexerto @vidIQ @TubeBuddy @MrBeast @KSI @KaiCenat @LoganPaul
#RepairYouTube #RemoveNealMohan #YouTube #Demonetization #FixYouTube #CreatorRights #HumanReview #YouTubeAI
Tommy Tube retweeted
YouTube is breaking insane revenue records for 2025 - $60 billion..
But instead of making creators lives easier or rolling out useful updates, they're leaving the platform to a broken AI moderation system, turning our lives into a nightmare.
This "Inauthentic Content" wave must stop.
This quoted post is unavailable.