Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale) header
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale) profile picture

Co-founder @resolveBIM - accelerating construction 🏗️ - backed by YC

New York
Joined March 2012
Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)Photo by Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 (@RussellVarriale)
solutions change. outcomes live forever.
1
17
Looking out the window now feels like looking into the past.
15
If you know what P6 is, God help you.
22
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
Sorry guys. Software engineering and programming are dead. You just need to have perfect specs, unchanging requirements, an agentic deployment framework for high frequency releasing, and engineers with good taste and judgement.
107
402
40
6,904
230,999
See you in the stars, Admiral ✨ 🫡
Patrick Stewart has sadly passed away at the age of 86.
2
71
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
Today, I’m excited to share that we’ve raised $55M in Series A funding at a $1.25B valuation, led by @IVP, with support from @a16z, @ForerunnerVC, and an incredible group of founders and investors including @Benioff, @tobi, @dickc, and @marissamayer. Everyone has an operating system for their phone. We’re building one for your life. Right now, life is scattered across apps, group chats, calendars, and tabs. You’re the one connecting the dots and keeping everyone on the same page. @wabi is a personal AI that helps you get your whole life organized. It brings your people, context, and apps together so you can coordinate plans, share the mental load, discover new things, and show up for each other. Because AI shouldn’t just help us get things done. It should help us do more of what we love, with the people we love. Join us 👇
308
148
132
1,740
785,937
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
Surprise 1: Anthropic acquired a one-person biotech . . . Surprise 2: that person is me Surprise 3: I’m here to tell you all about it Yes, this is what you think it is; after 6 yrs of increasingly loose anonymity: the Professor Oak reveal post …and yes, it has gotten so boring around here that I’m literally doxxing myself to spice up the timeline ------- Ok, allow me to introduce myself. My name is Cody Tranbarger. I mostly tweet, but occasionally find time to dabble in drug dev & starting/building biotechs. My past lives span the VC, crossover, startup continuum; Prof Oak has been my way of keeping a digital foot in those worlds, despite having my physical feet planted elsewhere. The past 18 mo, ‘elsewhere’ was Mithril Medicine, a co. I founded to develop bsAbs for LAMA2-CMD & other ECM-related genetic diseases. Mithril was born out of hands-on building with @MikeNGladstone, @JasonPaulRhodes, @LifeSciVC, & team @atlasventure. Somehow, I made enough half-decent calls along the way (even a broken clock is right twice a day, eh?) to convince them Mithril/I warranted a small seed. While I can hardly rationalize such an outrageously cavalier bet, I’m grateful for it, & I'd partner with Atlas again in a heartbeat. In typical AV fashion, Mithril’s primordial form was virtual, decentralized, & ultra-lean. This stage tends to be short-lived, but for Mithril, it worked surprisingly well, for surprisingly long, thanks in part to the rapid maturation of the AI tools I used liberally. Eventually, Mithril became a bit of an experiment itself - to find the upper bound of how far it could scale as a single operator + a bunch of Claude (+ a stellar bench of part-time consultants). In parallel, I started spending time with @nc_frey, @an1lam, & @CoefficientBio team; and promptly experienced, for the 1st time, AI at the frontier. Soon thereafter, Mithril stopped looking like an experiment, & started looking like a preview of an entirely new operating model. From that spark came “Pipeline-in-a-Person.” The idea immediately resonated when we shared it here back in April; and it was central to the shared vision that led to Anthropic’s acquisition of Mithril, & my joining the team. Why join Anthropic? Three reasons. (1) For Mithril, the programs continue, with more resources & infrastructure behind them, and as much Claude as I can put to work. (2) For me, the chance to start several more programs, & find out how many one person can actually run in parallel - an almost unprecedented luxury for a curious drug hunter. (3) For our mission, a path to institutionalize & scale this new way of working, then put it in the hands of all of biopharma, all over the world - which, candidly, I find the most energizing. Will AI x Bio cure diseases? Unequivocally yes, imo… but not by the route that gets the most airtime. Rather than timeline acceleration & compression, I see orchestration & parallelization as today's low-hanging fruit. Most drug hunters see a handful of go/no-go calls in a career, & spend entirely too much of the rest trading emails (my inbox can attest). Give them the bandwidth to run several programs at once, and the time to focus on scientific judgment, and I’m willing to bet they’ll make better calls. And at scale, better calls translate to more drugs, higher hit rates, broader patient impact, & likely, a disease or 10 or 100 cured. I couldn't be more excited to build toward that future @AnthropicAI. Finally, a heartfelt thank you to BioTwitter/X. The end of anonymity is bittersweet, but if anyone’s earned a proper introduction, you all have. It’s difficult to overstate how much this app has done for me: a decade of education, plenty of friends, many job opportunities, several mentors, a few investors, even a co-founder (fmr). It was the generosity of this community that inspired me to start posting 6 years ago, after just as many years lurking. I hope I’ve been able to pay it forward, in my own small way. But, to be clear, Prof Oak isn’t going anywhere. Same beat, same themes, and now, a front-row seat to drug development at the frontier. Stay tuned for dispatches from the trenches; and remember... Gotta Cure 'Em All
535
1,067
388
14,430
1,765,010
👀
Recursive self-improvement while building Mutiny BIM. We use the app and talk through what we wish it did and what it still isn’t doing right. The video goes directly to Opus 5.5, which creates screenshots like these to interpret what we’re showing it. It then breaks the work into distinct tasks and delegates them to subagents. Every two hours or so, we have new features shipped. Then we use it again and repeat. We’re almost done building our Autodesk Revit replacement. It’s been less than one week, with less than $5,000 spent on tokens.
1
58
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
it’s been an honor using the computer with you all
129
2,563
66
27,441
395,028
Temporal factor is necessary for conscious awareness
Replying to @doristsao
7/ These findings show that representation of conscious and suppressed content alternates every ~ 60 ms. Thus conscious perception does not reside in a specific brain region, but rather a specific temporal phase.
37
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
in just over a month, we've had - flying cars - AI solving a Millenium Math problem - A new antibiotic discovered by AI lab - 722 AI written Math papers released at once - A solution to AI alignment - Google reducing errors 40× in quantum computing, making it practical - Opus 5 level AI running fully offline - Opus 5.5 solving motion graphics and automations. And that's just in the last 5 weeks. IYNYK. Incredible time to be alive
every week during the singularity is just utterly insane
97
399
37
3,769
245,883
bless again
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works already-clean.goodfire.com/
20
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works already-clean.goodfire.com/
892
2,655
1,464
19,990
4,797,601
bless
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news about it. I co-authored early work in mechanistic interpretability at OpenAI and came away pessimistic, because neural networks appeared to fold into arbitrary tangled knots. years later, I started openai's first large-scale automated interpretability project, finding about 2% of neurons legible with the primitive tools we had with modern agentic tools and a much closer look, the picture looks totally different. the vast majority in models up to trillions of parameters are legible, and their circuits beautiful. many famous examples of tangled neurons turned out to be misunderstood. The roadblocks I expected mostly aren't there. I now think ambitious interpretability will be solved by the time we need it most, and possibly quite soon, as automated scientists keep improving. it may be a bitter lesson for interpretability: the simple thing, at absurd scale, works already-clean.goodfire.com/
21
Everything decompiles. Not just games or CAD.
19
The moat has always just been whatever is hard. Is writing code hard? That (was) a moat. Is building a network hard? Moat. Building high capex infrastructure? Moat. It’s hard for people to change. Just be good at changing and you have built in advantage whatever environment you find yourself in.
21
The moat is how slow we think
20
Russell Varriale 🧠 🏭 retweeted
Hardware is dead It's now the era of personal semiconductor fabs and everyone just establishes international supply chains whenever they need them I think
Software is dead It's now the era of personal software and everyone just builds what they need whenever they need it I think
75
52
23
975
36,716
The only moats are things that are hard to do. Always has been.
Technical moats are mostly over at this point. If you’re building something that is meant to be durable, the only moats now are: • Proprietary data • Network effects • A physical component
1
22