Rust Trial

Yeah that was BS. I try to give credit where it's due even if I'm not a fan. Team Doughy all the way. This one is my fav.

From what I've heard, Expert guy graduated from law school. His wheels are spinning here as Emily gives her interpretation of 13B. I'm uncomfortable.

Your clips popped up in my feed and this one was intriguing! I started watching around when this clip ends. We might not agree on everything but we agree on this. Holy cow. I'm ten minutes in and she's called people stupid, dumbasses, and idiots at least seven times. She then proceeded to: Forgot the year of AK's indictment. "What is this...2024?" Mistakes Julie Albert for Julie Nagel in the 13B counts. The indictment clearly says Nagel. See attached. Misstates the total # of counts. Says there's 10 and omits the two 2025 13B D & E Chris and Colin Albert counts that were recently joined. Says Rachel Rollins got the same subpoena she got. WRONG. Diller's name was clearly on Rollin's subpoena. That's the wrongful death suit. Does she think Jen McCabe is a party in the wrongful death suit? Fails to comprehend the legal significance of impoundment orders. Thinks proof of changing testimony is required. Read the case law and model jury instructions. It's not. Her picketing analogy doesn't even reference a picketing event. She's apparently an expert on prison structure and rehabilitation. To be fair, Marble Mouth Expert tries to pipe up. She says: "Is there any part of prison that's structured to rehabilitate?" "It's been four years since he did this. Has he picketed anyone else? Is he rehabilitated?" UMMMM? As someone who has visited prisons and met with individuals serving life sentences to discuss prison reform, she's clueless. That's a post for another time. I haven't even gotten to her breakdown of 13B. Part 2 coming in another post!

She can't even bother doing a Google search to fact check. She's citing a 9/15/25 letter that Martin withdrew on 9/24/25. That same day Martin wrote a second letter saying there was no investigation of Mattei or his client. See Mattei's statement about it.

Oh oh I've got one!

From his BSL yesterday. Class assignment interrog brainstorming session! "I could have my lawyers do all the research on their own...it's cheaper this way." "I need your help putting this list together...we have to remember everything." "We need to get Samantha Benigno on here like ASAP." NOTE: Actual paralegals must adhere to the same ethical rules as their supervising attorneys. What about the volunteer "paralegals" on his criminal case? Have Bradl and Bederow trained them on ethical requirements?

Written answers to interrogatories are sworn under the pains and penalties of perjury. They are NOT a class assignment or group project like Aidan conducted on two lives earlier this week. Grok actually gave a good "explain like I'm five answer" for those seeking context. Sharing here since it was buried in the comments on Julie's post. @JulieCar94

At least two women who attended the turtle festivities this weekend used AI to produce a picture with Lord Turtle. So I thought I'd give it a try! Which Rusty do you prefer? Credit to @ScottKirch27 for creating the original muppet Rusty.

Brenda needs to read the WI statute several times along with the statute specific definitions. She probably ignores the definitions just like Aidan.