SC First (@SC_First_) header
SC First (@SC_First_) profile picture

šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø SC Native • Conservative • America First For the people, not the politicians. Defending freedom.šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

South Carolina, USA
Joined July 2024
Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)Photo by SC First (@SC_First_)
It’s going to be interesting to see the results. We have seen this dog and pony show before, but more people are defecting from Darline than ever did Graham. She’s not getting the same results as Wilson that’s for sure, but the question is how far behind. I think it’s actually inside the margin of error, so under 5%, maybe 3.5%. Either way it’s super intriguing to me.
šŸ”µ Fox News ratings change US Senate South Carolina Lean R---Toss-up
3
3
10
702
Vote for @mburkhold !
Page 146 of South Carolina’s 2022 annual financial report contains an ā€œError Correctionā€ of $3.5 billion to the state’s main account. For ten years, the report overstated how much cash the state had. No money was missing. The report was wrong. I read the note. Now you can read the full story in the newest edition of The Man Who Counts: count.burkhold.net/p/three-t…
1
2
115
The Constitution cannot protect you, if you don’t protect the Constitution with your votes against anyone who violates it. Those government officials who want more power are not going to stop unless they get stopped. ~Thomas Sowell
8
23
429
Good let it be a toss up. Let it be a reminder to the scumbag state politicians and DC that they chose the worst possible person to run. Should’ve let Ralph win. He was obviously the better candidate but the senseless lies and mud slinging hurt his reputation for no reason!
🚨WOW: Fox News just shifted its South Carolina Senate race rating. LEAN R → TOSS-UP
2
27
545
I’m going on a little rant this morning. You know what really irks my nerves? The fact that the only issue Republicans seem to attack their opponents on is gender issues. I’m agnostic on boys competing in girls’ sports, transgender surgeries, etc., but let’s be realistic here. Most voters have bigger concerns right now. Yes, these issues matter to some people, but they aren’t necessarily at the top of everyone’s priority list. People want answers. How are you going to lower costs and make life more affordable? How and when are we going to end this war? What are you going to do about the current financial situation? People have legitimate questions, and the last thing many of them want to hear is another campaign ad about how an opponent supports transgender surgeries. They want to know what YOU are going to do to improve their lives. This is what irks my nerves about Darline. All I seem to hear anymore is, ā€œMy opponent supports transgender surgeries,ā€ and so on. Okay, but what are YOU going to do to help us? What is your plan to make life more affordable? What are your conservative solutions to the problems Americans are facing right now? Come on, man! I’m a conservative, and I want to hear conservative answers to the issues affecting our lives today. Transgender surgeries are the least of my worries right now. Again, let me make this very clear: I do not support transgender surgeries for minors or boys competing in girls’ sports. But the messaging Darline is putting out seems to focus so heavily on these issues that it leaves me wondering what her actual plans are to help everyday Americans. Meanwhile, Andrews seems to have a better grip on the messaging, despite her positions on the issues I mentioned. Voters want to hear solutions, not just attacks on the opposition. This is why I believe Darline could end up in a very close race or even lose outright. If she loses, I believe the blame will fall on @SCGOP and @WhiteHouse for backing a candidate they wanted rather than one the voters wanted. And let’s make one final thing clear: I do not support either candidate because I believe both are horrible options. I’m simply giving my analysis of the situation as it unfolds. I will be voting for neither. I will #WriteInRalph.
3
3
1
14
576
SC First retweeted
Replying to @Swamp__Watch
Darlene is a hypocrite because she takes their money. On Tuesday, Andrews accused a pro-data center super PAC of giving nearly $5 million backing Graham. Andrews said the money is coming from a super PAC called Building the Future, which she said has not disclosed its funding sources. ā€œDarline Graham has repeatedly said we have to have data centers and we need to build data centers here. She said we need to get with the program,ā€ Andrews said. Andrews also pointed to broader outside spending in the race. ā€œAnd that’s just the tip of the iceberg. More than 27 million dollars. Thats how much outside super pacs have spent backing darline Graham,ā€ she said.
2
4
34
Well well well….no wonder she’s called Data Center Darline
NEW: GOP Sen. Darline Graham just got a $1.5 million rescue from a data center super PAC. Their ads for Graham never mention data centers.
5
18
441
SC First retweeted
It’s just one poll. But maybe people will stop treating SC as an afterthought in elections. We won’t be pushed around and have our votes taken advantage of.
1
3
24
614
Replying to @SCgirl111
Howard lied about going to the Island and brought both his sons, who were betting against tarrifs if they allowed it. Lutnick laughed about the innocent people of 911 who he called his victims while these Jews got paid off an insurance policy and started the foreign wars on lies.
1
2
2
25
Didn’t call him Ladybug for nothing!
I asked Darline Graham if she can be honest about Lindsey's alleged use of gay escorts, one of whom was 17. Her goons physically threw me out of the event!
2
12
373
This guy is still salty Norman beat his a$$. Always Reddy to cry about something.
As we approach the midterms, one thing is clear. The Democrats are united. The Republicans are not. This will have some serious repercussions. The US Senate race in South Carolina is a prime example. State law 7-11-210 requires a candidate running in a statewide primary to sign a pledge with the election commission to support the eventual nominee of the party. The candidate is specifically required to "abide by the results of the primary" and "not run or campaign as a write-in against the nominee." Ralph Norman and his family decided that they would ignore the spirit of the law and try to get by the letter of the law. How? Ralph says he will honor the law and vote for the nominee, but his family will not, and his son does an interview with "Crooked Will" of (Un)FITS News saying he will support Annie. Ralph goes on to call the nominee a fake and a fraud. All Ralph has to do is come out and say the voters spoke when 35 out of 46 counties picked Darline over him in the primary, and while he may have some differences with Darline, his differences with Annie are much greater, and he encourages all his supporters to vote for the Republican nominee. Career politician Ralph, however, who has been in politics for the last 25 years, cannot bow out gracefully and let go of power. His ego and his arrogance get ahead of the people of this state, his pledge, and just plain decency. Of course, he pulls out the same playbook he used against me when he called me (and my wife) a fraud, a fake, and "not from here." He is literally using the same words against the Republican nominee for Senate, Darline Graham. Amplified, of course, by Crooked Will of UnFITS News. Regardless of your views about the qualifications of Darline, this is not the time for payback. That time passed with the Republican primary. This is the time to compare her to Annie Andrews—yes, the same Annie who, after the 1/2023 mass shooting in CA, said, "It's the f*cking guns"; the same one who said, "Gender-affirming care for minors is not child abuse, it basically means not being an a$$hole to kids"; the same one who wants to codify Roe v. Wade with federal regulations. These are not "internet" attacks. Annie is stupid enough to have articulated these positions in her own words. So, to all Republicans, the time for infighting was over with the primaries. You may not like the result, but the nominee had to win greater than 50 percent of the primary vote. The losers don't get a do-over. That is our system of picking candidates. Codified into state law. The US House of Representatives, with a 4-seat Republican majority, is toast regardless of what poll or pundit you believe in. Losing the US Senate can be catastrophic not just for the next 2 years but for a long time. Let's start with the Supreme Court. Justice Thomas is 78. Another conservative judge, Justice Alito, is 76 and has admitted he may consider stepping down at the end of the current term in 2027. Democrats controlling the Senate will block not only Supreme Court judges but all conservative judges and any remaining Presidential appointments. For that matter, all conservative legislation will be gridlocked, and impeachments will gain oxygen. The Democrats controlling the House and Senate will introduce legislation like free health care for all, "tax the rich," which is code for tax increases for all, free college, free everything for their constituents, forcing the President to do nothing other than use his veto pen. They will then use the Presidential veto as a reason to elect a Democrat President in 2028. Nothing good will come out of losing both houses. So, to all Republicans, you may disagree with the President, or you may disagree with your Republican nominee. This is not the time to settle these scores. The alternative is much, much worse. Let's band together, ignore the losers like Norman trying to divide us, and get out and vote for ALL our nominees. If you have any doubt, I will leave you with one statistic that perhaps saved our nation—in the first 2 years of Biden, there were an average of 1.8 million border encounters in the Southwest with illegals. In the first 9 months of 2025, there were only 98k encounters—a greater than 90 percent reduction. Keep that 1 statistic in mind as you head to the polls. God bless!
7
200
šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚ must’ve taken talking points from Trump. But in all seriousness no Bibi is just that bad of a person
Netanyahu claims Israel’s election was ā€œstolen by Arab parties.ā€
2
3
73
It’s time to start putting SC First. Please stop voting for establishment politicians before this state turns into North Carolina. That’s what happens when you keep electing lukewarm Republicans like Graham, Timmons, Scott, Kimbrell, and the list goes on and on. It’s time we start educating ourselves and taking a deeper look at everyone who runs for office. A good rule of thumb is to be skeptical of anyone in Washington telling you who to vote for. If they’re pushing you to support a particular candidate, that should raise a red flag and make you ask why they’re advocating for that person. Vote for the candidate who aligns with your values and principles, not simply the one who has the seal of approval from Washington. South Carolina should come first, not the political establishment. A write in vote for Ralph Norman is a good start to tell Washington F$&k You. #WriteInRalph
šŸ¤– Made with AI
12
15
3
57
1,598
SC First retweeted
Replying to @PatrickSvitek
As an SC native watching this Senate race unfold since July, this polling data reveals something I have long suspected — Republicans who hate Graham enough will either Write-In Norman or vote cross-ballot for @AnnieAndrewsMD — and that’s a reason why she’ll win come next week. šŸ’Æ
9
5
1
48
11,242
I'm not voting for either, but state law H.4624 hedges your validate concern as it prohibits puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones, or gender-reassignment surgery for anyone under 18 when the purpose is gender transition. One of the few things Columbia got right.
1
1
1
45
Lots of Republicans I’ve spoken to lately have voted Republican their entire lives, yet they’ve told me they’re going to vote for @AnnieAndrewsMD because they believe Darline Graham is that bad of a candidate. They simply cannot bring themselves to vote for another Graham and risk being stuck with her for decades. These are very telling signs……..hold on it’s going to get rough.
50
19
3
138
3,432
šŸ‘€šŸ‘€šŸ‘€
NYT/Siena poll | 10/19-10/26 LV US Senate South Carolina 2026 🟦Annie Andrews 48% 🟄Darline Graham 48% (incumbent) Link to poll: nytimes.com/2026/10/28/upsho…
1
4
9
457
South Carolinians dislike the president entering our state telling us who our senator is gonna be, especially over a petty grievance. We’re furious that an easily conservative seat may go to Democrats and that it’s somehow our fault for not falling in line. This lesson should have been learned before—see the Mark Sanford example! Our so-called leaders, Tim and Henry, offered zero leadership, perhaps because they too got their jobs through appointment. #WriteInRalphNorman
102
58
10
465
30,876
We really do deserve better. This is a no brainer for some but others can’t seem to comprehend it.
All this and more! Actions have consequences and it’s that simple.
1
1
11
306
(CNN) GOP Rep. Ralph Norman bashes Trump and Graham: South Carolina voters "deserve better" ā€œThe voters in South Carolina are not buying the argument that everyone has to ā€˜settle’ for a candidate that has been propped up by special interest groups and a Republican president spending millions of dollars spreading false narratives about why Darline Graham is qualified to be elected to the U.S. Senate for the next six years!!ā€ Norman wrote in a text message. Norman added: ā€œThis election is about attempts to ā€˜force’ a candidate on the voters of S.C. And regardless of the outcome, it didn’t have to be this way as the great people living in South Carolina deserve ā€˜better!’ Bottom line!! Elections have consequences!!ā€
55
222
33
897
110,660