SK retweeted
Your weekend listen from my friend @havivrettiggur
Adding on. In "legal" talk. Most (there have been some) have not been bold enough to say publicly that they intend/seek to make specific intent (dolus specialis) no longer required under Article II.
The fight in Gambia v. Myanmar is over the standard of proof the ICJ uses to infer that intent from a pattern of conduct. Under the court’s own precedent, genocidal intent must be the “only reasonable inference.”
Many states and legal personalities are pushing the court to use this case to ram through and adopt a looser assessment of facts and circumstances instead...so if they can't prove intent, they can infer it based on a collection of facts and data stripped of the other compelling facts and information showing what the accused intended to do, such as how legitimate military objectives and decisions made in the conduct of operations offer reasonable alternative explanations for pattern of conduct.
Whatever standard the court adopts in the Myanmar case will then apply to the later South Africa v. Israel and any case thereafter. Used against any country, to include the United States, and that is why @michaelgwaltz @AmbUNReform have said they are watching closely what all the agents involved are trying to do.
The real concern is not that the definition is being rewritten on paper; it is that the practical bar for proving intent is being lowered in a way that can turn any high-intensity urban combat against an enemy using human shields into a genocide claim. War is not genocide. @BrianCox_RLTW
SK retweeted
If people cared about competence, effectiveness, intelligence, integrity and actually creating meaningful accomplishments, Ron DeSantis would be president in 2028 with Reagan-era margins
SK retweeted
I'm a little confused: why could Gaza dig the world's most extensive military tunnel network, but not a sewage system?
SK retweeted
Apparently there’s a lady named Dana White who is an DoD public affairs assistant and I guarantee you someone recommended her to Trump and he thought they meant UFC Dana White and nobody is allowed to correct him lol
SK retweeted
Whoa. That’s because of our @FreeBeacon report. Lebanese consul Ibrahim Charara, who was at an event with Abdul El-Sayed last week, is being kicked out of US for calling the Marine barracks attack “heroic resistance.” freebeacon.com/democrats/leb…
Five days after October 7, before Israel’s ground operation, biased Wikipedia editor Buidhe created the “Palestinian genocide allegations” page.
His allies Iskandar323 and Selfstudier, later banned for anti-Israel bias, helped shape the surrounding coverage.
The "genocide" framing was ready before the war.
SK retweeted
If there's one shift that sums up 2026, it's Kansas's Golden Triangle of meatpacking (Liberal, Dodge City, Garden City, 61% Hispanic), focus of sweeping ICE operations in September:
2024: Trump 15,915 (68%), Harris 7,240 (31%)
2026: Marshall 9,537 (46%), Hamilton 10,411 (51%)
SK retweeted
“I never thought leopards would eat MY face”, sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces Party
SK retweeted
Unbelievable
#BREAKING: Somali daycare owner tied to an $18M fraud case flips Minnesota House seat.
SK retweeted
The ICJ may soon change its "only inference" test for genocidal intent, just as various "experts" have urged. The push to change it is an effective admission that the genocide allegation against Israel cannot survive the existing test. I expect little integrity from the ICJ.
SK retweeted
Democrats never have to answer these questions because the media will never ask them and risk hurting their party and political partners
SK retweeted
If you are struggling to understand what is happening in American politics right now, watch this:
"Palestinization" is a concept that I developed two years ago to explain the framework that most electoral candidates, especially Islamist-aligned ones, use to align voter bases in the United States.
We saw this so evidently in the campaign messaging of the current elections.
SK retweeted
בואו נדבר על הרעיון שהערבים בישראל הם מיעוט. יש נטייה להסתכל על האזרחים הערבים בישראל בקווי שביתת הנשק כמיעוט ואז לגזור השוואות ביזאריות ליהודים באירופה או לשחורים בארה״ב ומתוך כך לדבר על גזענות כנגד אותו מיעוט.
אבל אם כבר, ההשוואה המתאימה יותר היא לדוברי הרוסית בלטביה או באוקראינה, שלא ללכת להיסטוריה יותר רחוקה של הגרמנים בצ׳כוסלובקיה - כלומר מיעוט אתני, שפתי, לאומי, בתוך מדינה קטנה יחסית ששייך ואף מזדהה עם אוכלוסיה או מדינה ענקית ששוכנת על גבולות המדינה הקטנה יותר וגם מערערת על עצם קיומה.
הידעתם למשל שבלטביה, המפלגה המרכזית המייצגת את המיעוט הרוסי של כרבע מהאוכלוסייה תמיד נחשבה לא קבילה להיות שותפה בשלטון (למרות שהיא המפלגה הגדולה!) ולטביה מדורגת כאחת המדינות הדמוקרטיות בעולם?
במשך השנים גיליתי שדווקא למשלחות שבאו מהמדינות הבלטיות לא היתה לי שום בעיה להסביר את יחסי יהודים ערבים בישראל. הם הבינו.
בקיצור, מספיק עם ההשוואות בין המיעוט הערבי בישראל ליהודים באירופה או לשחורים בארה״ב. לכו על השוואה לרוסים בלטביה ותראו ישועות.
SK retweeted
BREAKING: CAIR has confirmed that it has suspended all operations in the State of Florida because Governor Ron DeSantis designated them as a terror organization.
SK retweeted
The fact Brad Lander calls Lapid a “minister” is just the perfect encapsulation of how the American left has no idea what it’s talking about when it comes to Israeli politics.
SK retweeted
Been thinking about this for 12 hours and my main takeaway is that Vance is just far too terminally online. You're the sitting vice president. You don't get credit for reply-guying your own administration
Unless Vance is going to resign and start a breakaway MAGA faction, stuff like this just reinforces his reputation for insincerity. It'll get a pat on the head from Don Jr. and Tucker but I can't imagine it plays well more broadly
Also, notice what he doesn't mention. Tariffs. Corruption. AI/data centers. Exit polls said all of these were big issues for voters. Vance doesn't even nod to them. Even immigration enforcement gets only a straw-man reference to amnesty
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.

































