Australian Army Veteran trying to spread common sense, truth and return a sense of patriotism and community spirit to a country being overrun by the far left.
New South Wales, Australia
Joined November 2024
- Tweets11.7K
- Following2.7K
- Followers5.4K
- Likes12.7K
Pinned Tweet
WHAT ARE MY AIMS?
My primary aim is to bring about significant change in Australian Governance and Bureaucracy. Ultimately I’d like the below ideas implemented. These are just my opinion and I am willing to compromise or have my mind changed by rational discussion and debate.
⁃Our laws need a complete overhaul because they are overly restrictive and not enforced equitably.
⁃Our police need to be redirected as they have become fundraisers and enforcers for our corrupt government and its narcissistic politicians.
⁃We should also withdraw from international globalist organisations that do not have the interests of Australia and its citizens as their primary focus.
⁃We must also stop giving away our money to help fund organisations that spread hatred towards us and our values. We are currently in debt of about $1 trillion.
⁃Immigration should be severely restricted until ALL Australian citizens have been taken care of to the best of our ability. And then only the brightest and most capable people should have the privilege of joining us, and they must TRULY join us by integrating with our society and pledging allegiance.
⁃We should deport those who refuse to adopt our values or integrate with society, and refuse entry to refugees from countries that are ideologically opposed to our values.
⁃Our Christian heritage should be embraced and reintroduced into our educational system, whilst maintaining separation of church and state.
⁃We must introduce a Bill of Rights that reinstates the personal freedoms that have been systematically stripped away from us. (Free speech and expression, the right to bear arms, the right to privacy etc etc)
⁃Our restrictive gun laws should be abolished and new regulations introduced that allow people without violent criminal records to purchase firearms after being taught safe practices PROPERLY. Assault type weapons should remain banned, there is no need for the general public to possess them.
⁃The interests of the Australian People come first and foremost in all considerations both foreign and domestic.
⁃We acknowledge there are only two genders.
⁃We support the LGB community, but believe it has been hijacked by entities that do not have our best interests in mind.
⁃We acknowledge and accept that there MAY be some individuals that are genuinely transgender, but utterly oppose any sort of irreversible medical treatment for minors. Minors who claim they are transgender should not be immediately affirmed, they should be treated with the utmost care but also have these beliefs challenged. Biological truth must be explained to them as well the long term consequences of “transitioning”.
⁃We do not discriminate against any race, sex or religion. We do discriminate against ideologies that are not in line with our values.
⁃We should invest in Nuclear Power Plants, and until they are online we must continue to use fossil fuels.
⁃Solar Power works, they should be installed on existing residential, commercial and industrial buildings along with battery storage and return to grid functionality, plus reliable safety features in the event of battery failure.
- We are One Nation and we have One Flag that represents all of us equally.
⁃ALL citizens must pledge allegiance to Australia and forsake all other national allegiances. The Pledge should be one of the first things taught in our schools.
⁃The Pledge below should be legally binding and those that act against it should be prosecuted.
THE PLEDGE:
“From this time forward, (under God),
I pledge my loyalty to Australia and its people, whose democratic beliefs I share, whose rights and liberties I respect, and whose laws I will uphold and obey.”
These ideas would be a good place to START AGAIN.
🇦🇺 Save Australia 🇦🇺 retweeted
Of course the guy that cheated is Albo’s ‘friend’
What happened after the Judge that was Lula da Silva’s former personal lawyer extended voting in the Brazil election…
Nothing suspicious at all to see from the time the voting was extended 🙄
Can’t vote your way out of a corrupt, rigged system.
TIME IS RUNNING OUT!
The Free Speech Union of Australia @FSUofAustralia has created an automated submission tool to help oppose Albo’s censorship bill.
It can be found here:
alborithm.app/stop – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
🇦🇺AUSTRALIANS🇦🇺
STOP THE CENSORSHIP BILL!
Here are some paste-ready options (2–4 sentences each), that you can attach to the template in the attached post.
Copy the relevant block and paste it directly after “I recommend the Committee reject the Bill.” in the template.
Please share and help to stop the increasingly authoritarian Labor Party.
___________________________________________
Option 1 – Veteran / service background:
As a former member of the Australian Defence Force I took an oath to defend the freedoms of this country, including the ability of citizens to criticise government policy without fear of arbitrary suppression. The Bill’s vague definition of “seriously harmful material and conduct,” combined with penalties large enough to force platforms into over-compliance, creates a clear risk that lawful discussion of national security, veterans’ issues, immigration and accountability will be demoted or removed. Existing criminal laws already deal with illegal content; this measure is not required for that purpose and will chill the open debate that a free society depends on. ___________________________________________
Option 2 – Parent:
As a parent I support strong action against illegal material that harms children, but this Bill goes far beyond that. Its broad Digital Duty of Care and extreme civil penalties will incentivise platforms to remove or restrict ordinary parental discussion of education, health, gender and culture simply to reduce regulatory risk. The result will be less information for families, not more protection, while the Commissioner’s expanded powers increase the chance of viewpoint-based decisions about what parents may see and share. ___________________________________________
Option 3 – Small business / self-employed:
My livelihood depends on reliable access to online platforms for advertising, customer communication and ordinary commercial speech. The Bill’s combination of vague “serious harm” standards and penalties up to $109 million will push platforms to err on the side of removal, raising costs and uncertainty for small operators who cannot afford compliance teams or legal challenges. Existing criminal laws already cover illegal content; this additional duty is not necessary and will disproportionately burden legitimate business and political expression. ___________________________________________
Option 4 – Ordinary citizen / free-speech focus:
I have already seen platforms throttle or remove lawful posts on elections, public health, immigration and religious topics under existing rules. Expanding that pressure through a broad statutory duty, extreme penalties and wider Commissioner powers will make it even harder for ordinary Australians to engage in open political debate. Criminal law is the correct tool for illegal content; a vague duty of care is not, and it risks turning routine disagreement into something platforms treat as a compliance problem. ___________________________________________
Option 5 – Religious or traditional viewpoint:
Traditional religious and cultural views on family, sex and moral questions are already frequently treated as “harmful” by platforms and activist groups. The Bill’s vague definitions and high penalties will intensify that pressure, giving platforms a strong incentive to demote or remove lawful religious and political expression to avoid risk. Protecting children from illegal material does not require giving regulators and platforms this degree of discretionary power over contested but lawful speech.
___________________________________________
Choose the closest match, paste the sentences into the template, add your name and any brief personal detail at the start if you wish, then submit as a Word or PDF file via the inquiry page or by email to [email protected] before 30 October 2026.
___________________________________________
These blocks are written for formal parliamentary submissions and contain no calls for unlawful action.
CHRISTIANS MASSACRED AT A FUNERAL. WHERE IS THE INTERNATIONAL OUTRAGE?
At least nine people murdered and 40 injured for the crime of attending a funeral at St George’s Greek Orthodox Church in the village of Hamoud, Karak Governorate, Jordan, on Friday 23 October 2026.
Gunmen (described by Jordanian authorities as a “group of extremists”) arrived by vehicle and opened fire on mourners. Jordan’s King Abdullah II and Interior Minister called it a terrorist act driven by extremist ideology. Witnesses reported sustained gunfire; some accounts mention attackers shouting “Allahu Akbar.” No group has officially claimed responsibility, though unverified material has circulated linking it to takfiri/Islamist extremism. A manhunt continues.
This was not a battlefield. These were ordinary, mostly older mourners, gathered at a Christian church to bury a loved one. Between 150–200 people were present when the shooting started.
Imagine attending a funeral and running for your life from gunfire inside a place of worship.
The obvious question? Why is this not at the centre of the international news agenda?
Where are the marches, the hashtags, the “solidarity” protests that appear within hours for other incidents?
The ongoing persecution and brutal murder of Christians across the Sahel and sub-Saharan Africa, together with the persistent violence against white farmers in South Africa, receive little attention from worldwide news media.
The selective silence is noted. – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
ALT Image of gunmen attacking St George’s Greek Orthodox Church in the village of Hamoud, Karak Governorate, Jordan, on Friday 23 October 2026.
Australia keeps adding people faster than it builds homes for the people already here.
The official numbers show three of every four new residents in the year to March 2026 arrived through net overseas migration, and treasury still plans hundreds of thousands more each year. The homes that were promised have not kept pace. The Labor government announced 1.2 million new homes in five years. After two years the completions are well behind, and the target has already slipped to late 2030.
The shortfall is a direct result of policy that stacks planning rules, environmental approvals, heritage overlays, density controls and local conditions on top of one another. Each layer adds cost, delay and uncertainty. Projects stall while the reckless migration program continues. Young Australians and families already living here watch rent and prices rise and wonder why the system that claims to care about housing keeps making it harder and more expensive to build.
New South Wales makes the failure clearest. It gained tens of thousands through overseas migration while losing existing residents to other states. Its housing share is only a fraction of the way to the target, and the finish line has moved to 2032. The same red tape that slows approvals and raises the cost of every dwelling is part of the reason people already here decide to leave.
Nearly three million temporary visa holders are in the country, including hundreds of thousands on bridging visas. Other countries have cut their temporary numbers and set clear limits while Australia continues the same demographic experiment that is, in my opinion, the root cause of the riots across Europe.
The housing target was announced by the Labor government.
The migration program was run by the unelected bureaucracy.
The rules that slow construction and raise its cost were written and enforced by the same systems.
Adding people faster than homes are finished, while the regulatory burden continues to increase time and expense, leaves Australians already here paying the price in higher rent, longer waits and fewer choices.
#SaveAustralia #AustraliaFirst #SecureOurBorders – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
ALT Satirical depiction of government and bureaucratic interference hampering house building.
Europe is burning and the elites still pretend it is a mystery.
Recent riots across Paris, Marseille, Lyon, Milan and Brussels were not “spontaneous protests over living costs.” Masked groups looted shops, torched cars and public buildings, attacked police and firefighters, and left hundreds injured. French authorities and reporting have repeatedly noted the heavy over-representation of migrant-background youths among those arrested.
This pattern is not new. Official European crime statistics for years have shown certain migrant cohorts from incompatible cultural backgrounds dramatically over-represented in knife crime, sexual violence, gang activity and homicide relative to their share of the population. The same governments that imported the problem now police the language of those who notice it.
At the same time the cultural foundation is being dismantled. Christian heritage is treated as an embarrassment to be sidelined or vandalised. History is rewritten so that Europeans are perpetual villains. Monuments and symbols of the civilisation that built the rule of law, scientific inquiry and individual rights are removed or reframed as oppression. Parallel societies enforce their own norms while demanding the host population accommodate them.
This is not enrichment or integration. It is the classic pattern of demographic pressure followed by cultural displacement. The people who built these nations are being told their attachment to their own heritage is the real problem.
Australia is watching the preview. The same combination of mass low-skill, low-assimilation immigration, elite denial, and institutional hostility to Western foundations is already operating here. We must secure the borders, enforce genuine integration or removal, restore pride in the Christian Western inheritance that made high-trust societies possible, and stop pretending the violence and the erasure are unrelated.
The alternative is the European trajectory: declining cohesion, rising no-go realities, and a native population increasingly afraid to speak plainly. The facts are already on the table. The only question is whether we act on them before the same outcomes arrive.
ALT AI image of European culture in ruins.
The data in the graph below is exactly why I am especially opposed to wind turbines.
They are expensive, intermittent, and an ugly waste of land.
Australia holds the world’s largest known uranium resources, roughly one-third of the global total, making nuclear power generation the best option for the reliable base-load electricity required for manufacturing and industry. – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
🇦🇺 Save Australia 🇦🇺 retweeted
The horrific fatal stabbing of 33-year-old father Joshua Smith in Mount Druitt by a roaming gang is a heart-wrenching reminder of the dangers on our streets. No parent should be hunted down, and no innocent person should be left entirely defenceless.
Under current NSW legislation, law-abiding citizens are completely disarmed. Carrying effective, non-lethal self-defence tools like pepper spray remains illegal, leaving everyday people powerless against violent attacks.
Criminals naturally ignore weapon bans. The only people these restrictive laws disarm are ordinary, law-abiding Australians who just want to return home safely to their families.
The NSW Libertarian Party stands firmly for your fundamental right to personal security. You should have the legal freedom to carry reasonable self-defence items to protect yourself when danger strikes. When seconds count, the police are minutes away. Self-defence is a basic human right, and it is long past time NSW laws reflected that reality.
Excellent idea!
Though I reckon Aussie feral pigs, Razorbacks, would be even better! – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
ALT AI image of an Australian Razorback.
OIKOPHOBIA:
Coined and popularised by philosopher Roger Scruton.
Oikaphobia is the repudiation of one’s own home, culture, and inheritance. It is the felt need to denigrate the customs, institutions, history and people that are identifiably “ours,” and the reflexive habit of siding with “them” against “us.” It is the precise opposite of xenophobia.
This pathology now dominates large sections of Australia’s political class, media, academia and bureaucracy. It appears in the constant framing of the nation as uniquely illegitimate, “colonialist,” “racist,” forever requiring apology, and in rituals such as “Welcome to Country” that treat the historic majority population as guests in their own country.
It drives policies of high, low-selectivity immigration that place foreign identities and cultures ahead of Australian cohesion, while treating ordinary national pride as the primary social danger.
Existing “hate speech” frameworks, the Racial Discrimination Act and the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Act 2026, are applied selectively.
They expand penalties and powers against certain expressions and groups while leaving oikophobia untouched and, in practice, rewarded.
If the state insists on legislating against “phobias,” oikophobia must be listed as the primary one. It is the ideology actively dismantling the high-trust, high-capability society that makes free speech, prosperity and social peace possible.
#SaveAustralia #SaveTheWest – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
ALT Satirical cartoon depicting “Oikaphobia”.
The level of government interference and bureaucratic red tape imposed on businesses is unacceptable.
Every unnecessary rule and regulation created solely to justify bureaucratic positions increases business costs that customers ultimately pay.
This creates multiple layers of taxation for the public: income tax, higher prices to cover compliance (which also increase the GST collected), and the taxes that fund the bureaucracy generating still more red tape.
Australia needs fewer bureaucratic impediments if we are to have a thriving economy and a higher quality of life. – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
🚨
The NSW Government this week passed new rules on takeaway cups that will add yet another compliance burden for cafes and small businesses. More bureaucrats will be needed to police them.
We are being slowly strangled by government meddlers with saviour complexes.
Vote Libertarian to reverse the ever encroaching state.
@LibertariansNSW
@GemmaNoiosi
🇦🇺 Save Australia 🇦🇺 retweeted
“This post needs to go viral – NOW!
So, as you might have heard, Australia’s controversial Digital ID bill was recently passed in Federal Parliament.
And no, this isn’t about logging into Medicare “more easily.” This is the wet dream of every power-drunk bureaucrat who’s ever fantasised about tracking what you eat, watch, spend, say – and even think.
Labor rammed it through with help from the Greens and Jacqui Lambie, while the likes of Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Matthew Canavan, Ralph Babet, Alex Antic and Gerard Rennick strongly opposed it.
Experts lined up to say it was dangerous. Legal groups shredded it. Privacy advocates screamed. The public wasn’t consulted. But they damn well passed it anyway.
This bill is not about “protecting your identity” – it’s about owning it.
Without a digital ID, you will eventually have no access to a bank account, cash, Centrelink, MyGov, flights, fuel, medication, voting in elections, and even receiving parcels in the mail.
And you can kiss goodbye to ever renting a home, owning a car, using social media, shopping online, accessing the internet at all, having a phone number, and buying groceries.
They say it’s “voluntary” – just like MyGov was “optional” until 10 million Aussies were forced into it just to access basic services.
Just like the COVID-19 vaccine was “optional” until those who resisted found themselves locked out of society for months for not being up-to-date with their boosters.
It’s coercion and blackmail with a friendly smile.
And now that this thing’s been jammed through Parliament, the tech giants are lining up like pigs at a data trough. They’ve already got your search history, your online purchases, your late-night Instagram habits, and every whispered “Hey Siri” or “OK Google.”
Now they get to attach all of that to your real name, address, and government-approved ID. That “anonymous data” you thought was floating harmlessly in the cloud? Not anymore.
Your Woolies reward card is now part of your permanent “consumer profile.” Your YouTube comments? Traceable. That shady dating app you thought was private? Good luck with that when your real ID is stitched to everything you do online.
Privacy’s gone, and it’s not coming back. And let's not pretend this data won't be regularly hacked, leaked, or sold to the highest bidder.
And when the system inevitably fails? One blackout, one outage, one “oops” from some contractor, and you’re digitally locked out of your own life, while some AI bot in a call centre tells you to try turning it off and on again.
The committee that was supposed to scrutinise this bill was a total joke. They ignored almost every expert submission, skipped past glaring privacy failures, human rights concerns, and technical red flags, and still gave it the green light.
It wasn’t an inquiry – it was a rubber stamp for the surveillance state controlled by foreign nations.
Every politician who voted for this has just helped build the scaffolding for digital tyranny. This is the infrastructure for a fully centralised, always-on tracking system.
They’ll say it’s for your safety. They’ll say it’s about efficiency. What they mean is: now they know who you are, where you are, what you’re saying, who you’re saying it to, and how to shut you up when you speak too much truth.
#This isn’t progress – it’s control, plain and simple.
What we’re seeing isn’t some harmless upgrade – it’s China-style social credit wrapped in an Aussie flag, and you can bet the CCP is watching on proudly, noticing how we've finally caught up.
#StephanieMessenger
🇦🇺 Save Australia 🇦🇺 retweeted
Why leftist ideology is a manicured doom loop destroying the youth and society.
The long march strategy of entering and then dominating education, media, and related institutions produced a self reinforcing system whose primary output became ideological transmission rather than neutral skill formation or open inquiry.
Once a strong left skew was locked in, especially in humanities, social sciences, and teacher training programs, hiring, promotion, and curriculum decisions selected for compatible frameworks, students encountered these frameworks as settled premises rather than contestable claims.
Required courses, grading standards, and campus social norms rewarded alignment and penalized dissent. The result was credentialed graduates who carried the same interpretive lens into schools, nonprofits, corporate compliance roles, and government agencies.
This process acts on people who are still forming their basic views of the world. Adolescents and young adults have incomplete historical knowledge, limited life experience, and high susceptibility to peer and authority pressure. When institutional authorities present certain accounts of society (systemic oppression as the central fact, identity as the primary political category, existing norms as illegitimate) as the only legitimate starting point, the effect is closer to formation of a worldview than to education that equips students to evaluate competing evidence.
Students who have not yet worked, formed families, or lived under the practical constraints of adult life are asked to treat those constraints as optional or unjust. The same cohorts are then available for mobilization.
Protest networks, campus groups, and affiliated organizations draw heavily from students and recent graduates who have spent years inside the framework. Older organizers and institutions supply narrative framing, training, funding channels, and institutional cover while the younger participants supply numbers, energy, and the appearance of broad generational support.
When actions involve disruption, property damage, or violence, the institutional actors can treat the youth as both the moral vanguard and a low cost enforcement mechanism, the career and legal risks fall more heavily on the young participants.
The cumulative effect on the social fabric is measurable and negative. Declining trust in institutions tracks the expansion of explicitly ideological training inside those institutions.
Family formation, fertility, and social cohesion metrics have deteriorated alongside the spread of frameworks that treat traditional social units and obligations as optional or oppressive. Polarization increases when large numbers of young adults exit education with a shared vocabulary of grievance and a reduced capacity or willingness to engage opposing evidence.
The system sustains itself by continuing to produce the next cohort of staff, activists, and clients for the same interpretive industry. Education’s original function of transmitting usable knowledge and habits of independent judgment is subordinated to the maintenance of the institutional consensus that justifies the activists continued relevance and employment.
🇦🇺 Save Australia 🇦🇺 retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: JORDAN PETERSON DROPS MAJOR TRUTHS ON PIERS MORGAN UNCENSORED 🚨
Jordan Peterson perfectly highlights the dangerous reality of the energy crisis. With brilliant sarcasm, he unmasks the policies making environmental problems
worse while pushing millions into food insecurity.
"It's not that you love the planet, it's that you hate humanity." 🎯
Watch him completely expose the logical flaws in Western policy:
#JordanPeterson #PiersMorgan #EnergyCrisis #BreakingNews
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This is a clip from a September 2022 Jordan Peterson interview with Piers Morgan, not recent or breaking.
x.com/PiersUncensore…
youtube.com/watch?v=SsW_Fl…
youtube.com/watch?v=BTv5fe…
🇦🇺AUSTRALIANS🇦🇺
STOP THE CENSORSHIP BILL!
Here are some paste-ready options (2–4 sentences each), that you can attach to the template in the attached post.
Copy the relevant block and paste it directly after “I recommend the Committee reject the Bill.” in the template.
Please share and help to stop the increasingly authoritarian Labor Party.
___________________________________________
Option 1 – Veteran / service background:
As a former member of the Australian Defence Force I took an oath to defend the freedoms of this country, including the ability of citizens to criticise government policy without fear of arbitrary suppression. The Bill’s vague definition of “seriously harmful material and conduct,” combined with penalties large enough to force platforms into over-compliance, creates a clear risk that lawful discussion of national security, veterans’ issues, immigration and accountability will be demoted or removed. Existing criminal laws already deal with illegal content; this measure is not required for that purpose and will chill the open debate that a free society depends on. ___________________________________________
Option 2 – Parent:
As a parent I support strong action against illegal material that harms children, but this Bill goes far beyond that. Its broad Digital Duty of Care and extreme civil penalties will incentivise platforms to remove or restrict ordinary parental discussion of education, health, gender and culture simply to reduce regulatory risk. The result will be less information for families, not more protection, while the Commissioner’s expanded powers increase the chance of viewpoint-based decisions about what parents may see and share. ___________________________________________
Option 3 – Small business / self-employed:
My livelihood depends on reliable access to online platforms for advertising, customer communication and ordinary commercial speech. The Bill’s combination of vague “serious harm” standards and penalties up to $109 million will push platforms to err on the side of removal, raising costs and uncertainty for small operators who cannot afford compliance teams or legal challenges. Existing criminal laws already cover illegal content; this additional duty is not necessary and will disproportionately burden legitimate business and political expression. ___________________________________________
Option 4 – Ordinary citizen / free-speech focus:
I have already seen platforms throttle or remove lawful posts on elections, public health, immigration and religious topics under existing rules. Expanding that pressure through a broad statutory duty, extreme penalties and wider Commissioner powers will make it even harder for ordinary Australians to engage in open political debate. Criminal law is the correct tool for illegal content; a vague duty of care is not, and it risks turning routine disagreement into something platforms treat as a compliance problem. ___________________________________________
Option 5 – Religious or traditional viewpoint:
Traditional religious and cultural views on family, sex and moral questions are already frequently treated as “harmful” by platforms and activist groups. The Bill’s vague definitions and high penalties will intensify that pressure, giving platforms a strong incentive to demote or remove lawful religious and political expression to avoid risk. Protecting children from illegal material does not require giving regulators and platforms this degree of discretionary power over contested but lawful speech.
___________________________________________
Choose the closest match, paste the sentences into the template, add your name and any brief personal detail at the start if you wish, then submit as a Word or PDF file via the inquiry page or by email to [email protected] before 30 October 2026.
___________________________________________
These blocks are written for formal parliamentary submissions and contain no calls for unlawful action. – at Bowral - Mittagong, New South Wales
🇦🇺AUSTRALIANS🇦🇺
STOP THE CENSORSHIP BILL!
The Senate is taking submissions on Labor’s Authoritarian Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026 until 30 October 2026.
This bill creates a vague “Digital Duty of Care” on online platforms, backed by penalties up to $109 million and expanded powers for the eSafety Commissioner. It pressures platforms to over-censor lawful political, religious and dissenting speech under the banner of “serious harm.”
Protecting children from illegal content does not require a blank cheque to suppress debate.
Make your own submission in under 10 minutes.
Template (copy, personalise the intro, and submit):
___________________________________________
Submission of Objection
Online Safety Amendment (Digital Duty of Care) Bill 2026
Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee
I am an Australian citizen writing to oppose this Bill.
The Bill imposes an overly broad Digital Duty of Care that will incentivise platforms to remove or demote lawful speech. Vague definitions of “seriously harmful material and conduct,” extreme civil penalties, and expanded eSafety powers (including pseudonymous accounts) create a clear risk of political and viewpoint-based censorship. Existing criminal laws already address illegal content.
I recommend the Committee reject the Bill.
[Add 2–4 sentences of your own reasons or experience.]
___________________________________________
How to submit:
1. Go to the inquiry page: aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Bus…
2. Click Upload Submission.
3. Create a free My Parliament account if needed.
4. Upload your Word or PDF file.
5. Deadline: 30 October 2026.
___________________________________________
Instructions:
• Write or copy the template into a Word document or PDF.
• Personalise the opening paragraph with your name and a brief reason (veteran, parent, business owner, ordinary citizen, etc.).
• Keep the body focused and factual.
• Upload directly on the official inquiry page (preferred method: fastest acknowledgement).
• Alternative: email to [email protected].
• Submissions are generally published under your name. Contact details are not published.
Share this. Flood the inquiry with clear objections. Free speech is not a privilege granted by the eSafety Commissioner.
#AusPol #SaveAustralia #censorship
ALT Stop the Censorship Bill