Retired and recommend it. Politics photography, birds, weather, tech & engineering, O&G, etc. Fiscal conservative, Zionist & CAGW skeptic. Albertan “turncoat”.

Calgary, Alberta
Joined April 2009
Mark O’Henly retweeted
🇬🇧 just rejected Carney's defense bank. Only 8 countries have joined including Ukraine. Nothing to see here. 🤪
The "middle powers" joining Carney's Defense Bank by GDP ranking: 💰Turkey (16), Belgium (24), Romania (39), Greece (52), Ukraine (57), Luxembourg (79), Latvia (99), Albania (119) 🚫No G7 country. 🇺🇦 has received >$26 billion from 🇨🇦 & >$360 billion total. Some "contributor." 📉Carney's GFANZ banking alliance collapsed last year. As will this "bank." ➡️ Neither Carney, Champagne nor David McGuinty will provide details on 🇨🇦 defense budget given the huge spending announcements made this year.
7
19
1
60
1,317
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Egypt’s parliament has reportedly authorized Egyptian military support for Saudi Arabia to defend against the IRGC-backed Houthi terrorists.
2
6
77
7,747
I wonder if Carney’s “defense bank” will fail like his GFANZ scheme. This rejection by the UK must have stung.
17
64
241
2,731
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Carney’s “prudent banker” brand is dead. The PBO just showed the books are being cooked Debt-service costs are now the fastest-growing federal expense: $25B five years ago → $59B this year (already larger than the Canada Health Transfer) → $83B in five years. Pure interest, paid before anything else PBO Annette Ryan: the government’s fiscal “anchors” are “more like traffic lights.” Capital spending gets a green light; operating spending is a yellow at best. “Limited fiscal discipline. It’s not stopping spending.” Real cash borrowing over five years: $733B. New debt from deficits: only $333B. The ~$400B gap is being parked with Crown corporations, loans and special funds—“a step removed from parliamentary oversight.” New risks, she said, and less transparency The former Bank of Canada/Bank of England governor who once policed balance sheets is now redefining accounting so the headline targets stay pretty while the actual liability grows off-books. Taxpayers get stuck with the interest bill @PBO_DPB
140
1,295
59
2,889
62,856
Mark O’Henly retweeted
She would know
#REPORT: Former Deputy Mayor Under Olivia Chow, Now Liberal MP Jennifer McKelvie, Endorses Brad Bradford For Mayor. ✅ “He Is the Mayor That Toronto Needs.”
18
57
718
27,665
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Full interview where CBC introduced Camosun instructor Daniel Reeve as a neutral political science expert to analyze BC’s new Conservative premier Lorne Doerkson. What they left out: Reeve is a former NDP candidate who worked as a ministerial aide under an NDP government Here’s the “non-partisan” analysis: He opens by calling Doerkson’s tone “humble” and “sincere,” then immediately undercuts the majority: more than half of voters didn’t support him, so the numbers “don’t quite back that up.” Classic framing of a Conservative win as less legitimate than the seat count On the campaign, he contrasts Eby’s Trump-focused pitch with the Conservatives actually talking about the deficit, emergency care, and the economy—implying the NDP missed the mark while the right read the room Then the money quote on Doerkson’s plan: they’ll walk through the budget, declare “it’s worse than we thought,” and impose “a whole bunch of cuts so that we don’t raise taxes and so that we don’t cut health care.” This, he says, is the message meant to “hold that center right to kind of far right coalition together and also kind of pin the problems of his government on the past.” He later describes Carney as closer to the NDP on fiscal questions, notes the provincial NDP had shifted toward the center, and flags energy/forestry expansion as creating problems with DRIPA and Indigenous consent. On the snap election, he relays an “NDP kind of leaning supporter” who refused to “walk across hot coals” to vote NDP, frames Eby’s call as “here’s the fire. Follow me,” and points to 200,000 previous NDP voters who stayed home All of it delivered as dispassionate academic insight from a former NDP candidate and government aide. Disclosure by CBC was apparently optional. This is not journalism @CBCOmbud
CBC platformed Camosun political science instructor Daniel Reeve to analyze Premier-designate Lorne Doerkson and somehow forgot to mention the tiny detail that Reeve himself ran as an NDP candidate (and worked as a ministerial aide to NDP Health Minister Corky Evans) Here’s the “neutral expert” take they ran: “I thought one of the things that jumped out to me is that they are going to go that one of the first things that the premier elect suggested is a financial basically walking through of the budget. And I think that from that analysis, they're going to say, oh, my God, it's worse than we thought. And now we're going to have to impose a whole bunch of cuts so that we don't raise taxes and so that we don't cut health care. And that. That's going to be the financial message that's going to hopefully, from his perspective, hold that center right to kind of far right coalition together and also kind of pin the problems of his government on the past.” Just another dispassionate academic, right? The same lifelong NDP activist who spent years organizing campaigns and working inside an NDP government is now on the public broadcaster framing the new Conservative government as a cynical cut-and-blame operation aimed at “center-right to far-right” voters. Disclosure optional, apparently CBC’s mountain of omissions continues @CBCOmbud @BrodieFenlon
30
105
9
395
12,678
Mark O’Henly retweeted
My reflections on Monday’s referendum—and the road ahead for Alberta More than 500,000 Albertans—over 25% of everyone who voted—supported moving Alberta toward a referendum on independence. That is more than one voter in four, and it is a remarkable achievement. We reached that level of support despite every established political party deploying its infrastructure and resources against us, well-funded third-party campaigns defending the status quo, and the Stay side enjoying the support of the publicly funded media. In my view, the playing field was not level. Serious concerns remain about the consistency of Elections Alberta’s enforcement of election and campaign-finance rules which allowed Thomas Lukaszuk and Forever Canadian to receive out of province donations and donations over the limits applied to the rest of us. Nevertheless, more than half a million Albertans stood up and said that the status quo is no longer acceptable. They represent a substantial and growing constituency that wants constitutional change, economic freedom and a better future for Alberta—and their voices cannot responsibly be dismissed or ignored. We must respect Monday’s democratic result. We must also recognize that our work is far from finished. There is much more to do to help a majority of Albertans understand that, by every objective measure, our children and grandchildren can have a more prosperous, secure and hopeful future if Alberta controls its own destiny. We must take the time to explain the opportunity, answer legitimate questions and demonstrate that a better future is both achievable and practical. My focus will continue to be on persuading more Albertans—not merely speaking to those who already agree with us. At the same time, I will continue encouraging Premier Danielle Smith and the UCP government to pursue meaningful structural and constitutional reforms without delay. That means demanding statutory and structural changes in Ottawa that address Alberta’s fundamental weakness within Confederation, including: • reforming equalization; • securing the immediate repeal of the remaining nine federal laws damaging Alberta; • requiring Ottawa to respect the constitutional division of powers and Alberta’s exclusive areas of jurisdiction; • insisting that the federal government comply with the Alberta Court of Appeal’s latest ruling concerning the unconstitutional Impact Assessment Act; and • defending the resource-development rights Peter Lougheed secured for Alberta under section 92A of the Constitution. Alberta needs more than temporary political promises. We need structural reforms that create lasting economic certainty and protect future generations from another National Energy Program, another series of laws like those imposed under Justin Trudeau, or a new federal export tax on Alberta oil arising from the current trade dispute with the United States. I do not personally support creating a separate independence party at this time. I do not believe gathering people who already support independence into a smaller political party will persuade the majority of Albertans who remain uncertain that independence is the right and achievable path. Instead, I intend to continue supporting Premier Smith and the UCP while strongly encouraging them to expand Alberta’s autonomy and pursue genuine structural reform. I also believe it is essential that the UCP remain a broad conservative coalition. I encourage Premier Smith to make it clear that Albertans who believe our province has a more prosperous future as an independent nation have a welcoming place within the party. Supporting independence should not exclude anyone from contributing to the conservative movement or working toward our shared goals. At the same time, I encourage Alberta independence advocates to recognize the importance of maintaining conservative unity and working with the UCP to prevent an NDP government from taking office. Such an outcome would risk setting back the progress we have made and delay another referendum for many years. We can continue advocating for independence, growing public support and making our case to Albertans while remaining united in our determination to defeat the NDP in the next provincial election. These objectives are not mutually exclusive. In my view, this is the most realistic path toward greater freedom for Alberta—and potentially toward independence in the future if Ottawa remains unwilling to undertake meaningful reform. Monday’s result was not the destination, but neither was it a defeat of the idea. More than 500,000 Albertans have given us a strong foundation upon which to build. Our responsibility now is to remain united, learn from the campaign, improve our case and earn the confidence of more Albertans. This chapter has ended. The work of building a freer, stronger and more prosperous Alberta continues.
291
488
58
1,739
41,233
Mark O’Henly retweeted
“Hail is getting bigger.” Okay, so why is that not actually happening?
Across the country, hail causes billions of dollars in damage every year, and scientists believe that climate change will make things worse. Hail is getting bigger, and hailstorms are becoming larger and more frequent. wapo.st/4hYHp5N
32
162
6
1,107
19,290
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Jasmin is absolutely right about rural connectivity. After 34 years of farming in Manitoba, I know how often rural Canadians were left behind by traditional internet providers. Starlink delivered a practical solution where others failed. Elon Musk deserves credit for that. Canadian governments should be encouraging innovation and competition, not turning successful technology into a political football because they dislike the man behind it. Judge the technology by what it delivers, not the politics of its creator.
I’m a Canadian who loves Starlink. In fact, on our rural property, there were no Canadian providers who could provide us with internet due to the location/tree coverage. So we applied for Starlink on the trial when it first launched. Best thing we ever did for the farm. All of the neighbours now have it as well, and it literally connected everyone with no service for decades to full bars and the ability to call on wifi/check the news and weather online for literally the first time. I think it’s disgraceful that the Canadian government is trying to score political points and villainize such an effective product made by a Canadian citizen. Thanks @elonmusk for how much your product improved our quality of life.
3
9
38
675
Mark O’Henly retweeted
I’m a Canadian who loves Starlink. In fact, on our rural property, there were no Canadian providers who could provide us with internet due to the location/tree coverage. So we applied for Starlink on the trial when it first launched. Best thing we ever did for the farm. All of the neighbours now have it as well, and it literally connected everyone with no service for decades to full bars and the ability to call on wifi/check the news and weather online for literally the first time. I think it’s disgraceful that the Canadian government is trying to score political points and villainize such an effective product made by a Canadian citizen. Thanks @elonmusk for how much your product improved our quality of life.
678
1,439
81
10,354
182,850
Mark O’Henly retweeted
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Canadians love - want to be governed. There is such a dependency on the state. In the Alberta referendum, majority of voters voted to keep the unelected senate. They voted for unelected people to have legislative powers over them. They literally voted against a democratic choice thus they voted against a democracy. You couldn't even begin to convince an American that unelected people should have powers over them before you get thrown out. The average Canadian supports basic dictatorship.
321
246
42
1,110
28,659
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Couple of days ago - gathering ahead of the Jamieson Cattle Co weaning and preg-check. Beautiful day but a little snowier and colder today!
3
6
84
3,282
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Carney is right that single-provider dependence creates risk. But by the time Telesat Lightspeed is actually built—if it ever is—Canada will already be left out of the communications, compute, and power stack that is being scaled right now Starlink went from 2.3 million users at the end of 2023 to 13.6 million after adding 1.6 million in the most recent quarter alone. Starlink Mobile is already at 22 million monthly users and grew 37% in Q3. New V3 satellites deliver a terabit per second each; Starship can launch 60 of them at a time. One recent flight added 26 terabits—more than eight times Viasat’s entire new fleet. At the end of 2025 the constellation had roughly 450 terabits; weekly (and eventually daily) Starship flights put it on a path to exceed the world’s total undersea-cable capacity. SpaceX is simultaneously ramping compute from 1.7 GW toward 2.5–3 GW by year-end and has said it is highly confident of adding 10+ GW next year, while building its own power capacity to support it. Major players are already contracting large blocks of that capacity Canada’s planned system is years away, government/enterprise-focused, and still needs SpaceX launches. At the very least Canada should be securing a real partnership in the system that exists and is scaling, while it continues to pretend it can fund a proprietary alternative that will somehow catch up Read this 👇@markjcarney @elonmusk
Mark Carney on Musk/Starlink for Ukraine: “We as Canadians do not want to be caught in a situation where we are reliant on one provider that may change their view or may be forced to change their view by one nation state that puts Canadians at risk or compromises our sovereignty.” The concern about single-point dependency is legitimate. The rest is the same as Carney's previous GFANZ fantasy Carney correctly notes the slowdown had “real consequences, human consequences, direct casualties.” Then he pivots to the idea that Canada can simply diversify and “build up sovereign capabilities” There is no legitimate near-term alternative that matches Starlink/Starshield’s combination of scale, low latency, terminal size/weight, and cost for the battlefield role Ukraine is using it for EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, same week: “Starlink is really necessary for Ukraine and unfortunately in the short term Europe can’t replace this capability.” OneWeb is the closest operational option. Fewer satellites, heavier/more expensive terminals, lower capacity. Not a drop-in replacement for frontline or drone use. Amazon Leo is still building out. EU IRIS² targets ~2029. Canada’s own planned Telesat Lightspeed is aimed at 2028, is government/enterprise focused, and is still needs to be launched on SpaceX rockets This tracks the GFANZ pattern: announce a vast pool of capital and a clean path away from the existing system, then discover the constraints (antitrust pushback, continued fossil financing, diluted rules) were larger than the press release. The $130 trillion figure Carney claimed was assets under management, not money committed to the transition. It was Carney fantasy Strategic diversification can be a real long-term project. Pretending the world already has, or will soon have, a workable alternative when the evidence says otherwise is just the same overclaim in a different domain. Deal with the system that actually exists What happened to Carney taking "the world as it is"? @MarkJCarney @elonmusk
41
67
4
239
7,856
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Replying to @cbcwatcher
This is why he is there. To get Brookfield in on Turkiye's "accelerated transition" to renewables announced a month and a half ago.
1
8
26
162
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Replying to @frankiemacd
@frankiemacd your prediction was bang on! Fort McMurray got a pile of snow and still coming
3
11
1,619
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Media taking subsidies “absolutely harms our credibility. It’s like any conflict of interest thing that we’re usually the first to point out. If you’re leaving people in the position of credibly wondering whether that is affecting your coverage, then you shouldn’t be doing that.” But, as noted above, the industry is doubling down on harming its credibility.
“So, expect more money for Canadian media in the years ahead, which means those in media will have to deal with a lot more eye-rolling from the public when they argue for fiscal prudence.” (Link in comments)
5
22
3
56
2,368
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Replying to @dowbboy
It remains jaw-dropping that the nation’s media still refers to this clearly regional project as a national project simply because that’s what the government calls it. That’s not journalism- it’s stenography
1
3
5
82
Mark O’Henly retweeted
Carney in Turkey, snippy when a Canadian reporter brings up his own NYT comments: Reporter: A month ago you told the NYT you were preparing for the possibility of a U.S. invasion. You just spoke with the President — did that come up? Carney: The New York Times has the transcript. That is not what I said. Quote the transcript, don’t change things Then he pivots to “we will never be the 51st state… we’re preparing… strong and getting stronger.” Carney said the “extreme tail risk / irresponsible not to look at it” thing to the Times. He just doesn’t like when Canadian media is asking him about it @MarkJCarney @AbigailBimman
248
461
44
1,858
192,360
Mark O’Henly retweeted
CBC is running cover for Alto, Ottawa’s multi-decade high-speed rail money pit Official construction range: $60–90B. Independent PBO: $75–113B just to build. Internal docs put the full 40-year cost around $150B once operations and maintenance are counted. Every year of delay adds ~$1.5B Quebec’s new premier, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, is opposing the province’s share and wants the money redirected to roads, schools, and hospitals instead. Farmers are already objecting because the line would cut through their land CBC leads with a poll showing abstract support, then treats the cost explosion and rural opposition as the problem. Classic CBC framing
14
52
4
155
5,319
Mark O’Henly retweeted
CBC finally admits — a full week late — that France’s student protests were hijacked by non-student groups. Their own correspondent now says “radical militants” took advantage to spark violence, Yellow Vests joined, two people died, luxury stores looted, museums closed, 70,000 police + army deployed What they still refuse to say: the Marxist and jihadist elements that were obvious from day one Asra Nomani’s investigation identified dozens of communist parties, revolutionary socialist groups, labor unions, and Palestinian-solidarity organizations driving the ecosystem — only about one-third pure student groups. Qanta Ahmed called the commonality between far-left extremists and Islamists “grievance exploitation” aimed at dismantling societies. Local French reporting and video showed Palestinian flags, “October 7 Day of Celebration” graffiti, banlieue gangs joining leftists, and LFI/Mélenchon’s long push to radicalize the movement CBC’s on-scene propagandist Chris Brown stuck to teacher shortages, rats, and “kids want better schools” while the Hôtel de Ville in Limoges burned, schools and vehicles were torched, and the red-green alliance was already framing it as legitimate discontent. Now they concede violence and “radicals” but still won’t name the Marxist and Islamist networks that organized, amplified, and escalated it Sanitized coverage isn’t journalism. It’s cover @AsraNomani
Deliberate CBC omissions on France protests. CBC on the French high school protests (and the broader October 17 mobilization): teacher shortages, rats in classrooms, tear gas, “kids want better schools,” and now “some unrest.” What they leave out: * On October 17, during the national day of action (students + yellow-vest/cost-of-living elements), hooded individuals deliberately set fire to Limoges’ historic 19th-century Hôtel de Ville after burning police cars and forcing entry. The campanile collapsed, much of the roof and structure was destroyed — a “catastrophe patrimoniale.” The prefect and mayor described it as an intentional act by violent groups, not ordinary demonstrators. The building is largely lost * This sits on top of weeks of earlier violence: schools and fire trucks torched, teachers assaulted or doused with gasoline, hundreds of police injured, Merah/Bataclan-glorifying rap sung at blockades (including in a church), Palestinian flags and “October 7. Day of Celebration” graffiti, and Muslim gangs from banlieues joining leftist activists * LFI / Mélenchon’s role in escalating the movement. Mélenchon (Trotskyist background) has advocated Islamization and a “great replacement”/“new France,” recruited pro-Hamas figures like Rima Hassan, refuses to call Hamas terrorists, draws heavy Muslim support, and has long pushed anti-police rhetoric. The Gatestone analysis frames this as a leftist-Islamist alliance using school grievances as a vehicle to attack the Republic. CBC reports the grievances and the clashes. It erases the deliberate destruction of civic symbols, the terrorist glorification, the Islamist symbols and gang involvement, the LFI radicalization, and the explicit rejection of French institutions on display. The sanitized CBC version pretends this is still just about underfunded classrooms
13
61
5
228
4,959