SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47) header
SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47) profile picture

https://teapaw.org/t.co/W7d7MPDwVm 🦍 • Web3 Aficionado • MAYC #9655 • Gob #1708 • Geez #5236 • Gimboz #1741 • Vintage Pokemon Collector • OS: SatSlinger ⚡️⚡️

Plot #45992
Joined June 2018
Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)Photo by SatSlingingStacker.sats (@Squbed47)
There are new KOLs in town And we’re all Psychopaths
NFTs will pump because the scammers and KOLs say they won’t. Classic institutional influence vs the people We are witnessing the end of the CT KOL
8
1
34
2,059
Mara and Kodamara distribution? Bullish for conviction holders imo
gm voyagers. Mudwater allocation for Otherside is imminent. limited supply for this first wave, so you have to sign up for a chance to get your pack. sign ups close this Sunday at 9pm ET and winners will be announced on Monday, Nov 2.
2
6
146
Legitimately had a dream last night that KK was posting his Mudwater Collection
It is possible to make Kabuto 1st edition Fossil PSA 10 a pop 1. Buying and deactivating all the certs. A twist in the story I never truly considered until recently.
2
3
85
Pourin up dat MUD 😈
🤖 Made with AI
3
14
228
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
MUDWATER POKER, TOMORROW NIGHT A poker tournament where the buy-in is one pack of Mudwater, the BAYC card game, and the top 3 take every pack in Hosted with @TheeHustleHouse and @FundyApe3659, 9PM ET
69
75
7
156
5,682
When do y’all think they realize that Rare foils are more than 2.5x the rarity of a base Prestige? ~19,200 Rare Foil (less than 1 per mutant) ~50,400 Prestige Base (>20,000 more than all Apes) And they’re shiny
6
1
23
1,053
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
Quit added a threshold this morning: NM+ to digitize. That narrows it down, but doesn't answer your CGC rubric question. teapaw.org/0xQuit/status/21125346… I collected the conversion and CGC answers in Q4 and Q15 here: teapaw.org/KOWSKY_/status/2112206…
🚨 MUDWATER FAQ: 19 QUESTIONS ANSWERED — WHAT YOU OWN, WHAT YOU CAN REDEEM & WHAT’S STILL COMING 👇 If you pull a rare Mudwater card digitally, can you get THAT exact physical card? Yes. But you give up the digital card when you redeem it. And the official conversion tool still says “Coming soon.” A lot of the answers are buried in @0xQuit’s replies. Here’s the simple version: Checked October 19, 2026. 1. Do I get the same card, or another random pack? The same card. If your digital pull is a holofoil, that actual physical holofoil was opened, recorded and stored in the warehouse. That’s the card behind your digital one. 2. Can I keep the digital AND get the physical? No. Quit confirmed that redeeming the physical means losing the digital. It isn’t two separately owned copies of the same card. 3. Can I redeem an unopened physical pack instead? Quit says yes, if you hold a digital pack. That’s a different choice from ripping digitally and then redeeming individual cards. Important: the official conversion tool was still marked “Coming soon” when checked. The described redemption system is not a promise that you can request shipping today. 4. I opened physical packs at ApeFest. Do I get digital versions too? Not automatically. The described process is to send the cards to the warehouse, have them verified, and receive the corresponding digital tokens. Quit says clearly damaged cards won’t be accepted. Conversion is still marked “Coming soon.” 5. How does a digital rip actually work? Physical pack opened → contents recorded → results added to a queue → your digital rip gets the next pack’s contents. They aren’t generating a digital pull and then searching through physical packs for matching cards. The physical opening happens first. 6. Does my unopened digital pack already have specific cards assigned to it? Quit describes your contents being determined by the next pack in the queue when you rip. So don’t assume an unopened pack token is already holding a particular rare card for you. 7. Is someone waiting for my click before opening a pack? No. The warehouse opens ahead of digital demand. Quit says they keep a buffer and can stop opening when digital ripping stops. It isn’t one employee receiving a notification every time someone clicks. 8. Why does a digital rip cost money? Because there’s physical work behind it. Quit says the fee mainly covers opening and handling the physical cards. There are also Solana and Metaplex costs paid through their relayer. The animation isn’t the whole process. 9. Why not have separate physical and digital supplies? Quit says they wanted one shared supply, without the two versions drifting apart. The physical backing also matters if a digital-pack holder chooses an unopened physical pack instead of a digital rip. 10. Can we track digital pulls to see which rare cards are still available? Not completely. The team knows the print totals and digital results. It doesn’t know everything people have opened privately. A rare card missing from the digital results could already be sitting in someone’s physical collection. 11. Is the supply 10,000 packs? No—10,000 BOXES. The official numbers are: • 10 cards per pack. • 24 packs per box. • 240,000 packs total. • 2.4 million cards total. 12. Can I combine packs into a sealed box or case? That’s planned. 24 pack tokens → one box. 10 box tokens → one case. Quit says this depends on actual sealed stock remaining in the warehouse. The site’s “Reconstruct” feature was still marked “Coming soon.” 13. What stops someone taking the rare cards? Can we watch the openings? Quit points to cameras and recorded openings, with hashed records published onchain. Those are the stated safeguards. That doesn’t mean full videos are stored onchain, or that everyone currently has a way to watch every opening. Public access to all the footage and independent queue verification still need clarification. 14. What happens if a card gets damaged during opening? The reply addressed fewer high-value cards remaining in circulation. It did not establish a compensation, replacement or insurance policy. That part still needs a clear answer. 15. Can cards go directly to CGC? Is grading included? Quit confirmed a CGC partnership in response to a direct-grading question. That does not establish that grading is automatic or included. Pricing, the exact process, and whether a slab’s grade can appear on its digital counterpart still need clarification. 16. Why Solana instead of ApeChain? Quit’s explanation was existing trading-card infrastructure on Solana and reaching collectors outside the Ape ecosystem. 17. What about Phantom, MetaMask, Glyph or Backpack? Quit said they would look at Phantom’s Ethereum support and MetaMask’s Solana support. That’s not confirmation those integrations have shipped. The replies reviewed didn’t establish clear answers for Glyph, Backpack or manually transferring packs through Phantom. 18. What can BAYC and MAYC holders claim? The official claim page lists: 10 packs per BAYC. 2 packs per MAYC. The displayed deadline is January 19, 2027, at 00:00 UTC. The page says to connect your Ethereum wallet to check your Totems. 19. What else still needs an official answer? Shipping countries, costs and dates. What happens to unclaimed inventory. Detailed counterfeit checks. Graded-slab support. And how the system compares with HRO. Buying a digital card also shouldn’t be confused with an automatic shipment. Physical delivery goes through redemption. The main thing that clears this up: the physical card comes first. The digital version represents that card in the warehouse. Redeeming the physical means giving up the digital. What’s still unclear that needs a straight answer?
1
1
1
45
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
reply guys are the best.
Grillz are now agents. All 5,555 with unique personality. 1000+ Skills including support for MML, Blender and Unreal Engine. Comes with Directive Assistant, an agentic plugin for the Otherside ODK. Head to mcp.grillz.app, and get building and breaking.
3
4
1
18
1,118
What about if we turned half of the poker tables in @OthersideMeta into Mudwater tables for a beta testing/gameplay test run? We can have verified ownership of our digital cards, while playing in prox chat with our avatars (no card stake required, just a learning week/month) I would love to build an ODK world on my plot specifically for this, but a young man doesn’t have access to it yet Thoughts? @imjameshall
7
2
15
549
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
Mudwater is all over the timeline. People don't talk about what they don't care about. Bored Ape Yacht Club.
I have no doubt we’ll be getting more clarity soon, but I have 2 questions about Mudwater 1) Quality control -every card I’ve seen so far looks nice and crispy, but what are the odds for getting a misprint, ink-dot, roller marks, etc.? -were the cards inspected before packaging to insure consistency? Like not just pulling one of every thousand for a check, but selecting 2.4m out of 3.0m and discarding the rest? -I think the misprints and errors could be an interesting dynamic, but also want my physical claims to be beautiful lol but a 10 gem mint isn’t the same if they’re all 10’s, ya feel me? 2) Physical to Digital -option 5 on the website is “Convert: Move between digital and physical” -I’m assuming this means we can submit our physicals for a freshly reinstated NFT version as well? If that is the case, shouldn’t the cards be graded first? If not, we could submit a dogshit quality, scuffed-foil, water-damaged card and get the NFT back. If that were true, then the card being NFT-bound would insinuate the next owner would get a damaged physical, no? -I’m thinking that physical submissions for their digital replica should need to be graded (or offer an ‘on-site grading with submission’, with an extra grading fee, if not previously graded). That way future owners can rest assured they are getting a quality product. -which brings me to my final point, if physicals can be redeemed for digitals and we assume the resubmitted cards are graded, then should there be new traits added accordingly? I.e., “original vs submission”, “CGC 10 vs CGC 08” (if submitted), perhaps even the it’s #? -side thought- if they were allowed to submit raw, I suppose quality would theoretically decrease over time, making Gem Mints more valuable in the long-run, thus also increasing the value of Physicals which have never been claimed from their original NFT (never unvaulted) and the sealed product as well? But images should prolly be included to make the buyers more aware of condition. This would also change the floor dynamic, as a #02 card would naturally have different values based on its history and card quality (creating the true non-fungiblity we all know and love) @0xQuit TLDR; QC & Physical to Digital standards
1
2
5
125
I have no doubt we’ll be getting more clarity soon, but I have 2 questions about Mudwater 1) Quality control -every card I’ve seen so far looks nice and crispy, but what are the odds for getting a misprint, ink-dot, roller marks, etc.? -were the cards inspected before packaging to insure consistency? Like not just pulling one of every thousand for a check, but selecting 2.4m out of 3.0m and discarding the rest? -I think the misprints and errors could be an interesting dynamic, but also want my physical claims to be beautiful lol but a 10 gem mint isn’t the same if they’re all 10’s, ya feel me? 2) Physical to Digital -option 5 on the website is “Convert: Move between digital and physical” -I’m assuming this means we can submit our physicals for a freshly reinstated NFT version as well? If that is the case, shouldn’t the cards be graded first? If not, we could submit a dogshit quality, scuffed-foil, water-damaged card and get the NFT back. If that were true, then the card being NFT-bound would insinuate the next owner would get a damaged physical, no? -I’m thinking that physical submissions for their digital replica should need to be graded (or offer an ‘on-site grading with submission’, with an extra grading fee, if not previously graded). That way future owners can rest assured they are getting a quality product. -which brings me to my final point, if physicals can be redeemed for digitals and we assume the resubmitted cards are graded, then should there be new traits added accordingly? I.e., “original vs submission”, “CGC 10 vs CGC 08” (if submitted), perhaps even the it’s #? -side thought- if they were allowed to submit raw, I suppose quality would theoretically decrease over time, making Gem Mints more valuable in the long-run, thus also increasing the value of Physicals which have never been claimed from their original NFT (never unvaulted) and the sealed product as well? But images should prolly be included to make the buyers more aware of condition. This would also change the floor dynamic, as a #02 card would naturally have different values based on its history and card quality (creating the true non-fungiblity we all know and love) @0xQuit TLDR; QC & Physical to Digital standards
15
2
1
72
3,387
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
CLEAR YOUR SCHEDULE, THE CHURCH IS BOOKED A full week of game nights, live streams and Spaces, with something on every day from Monday to Sunday
38
40
57
1,897
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
here's what you missed at the church last week
46
47
60
1,179
Couldn’t make it to ApeFest this year, which was highly disappointing. My family and I are moving halfway across the country to pursue a future opportunity in my career, which I am grateful for. I chose to be conservative and to save the funds I had set aside for any unforeseen obstacles during the relocation process. Luckily, the Club had my back and gave me 2 Mudwater packs. These are my 4 favorite pulls Apes on Top 🦍
8
2
75
1,813
For starters, Tesla is not a ‘startup’. It IPO’d 16 years ago. Not to mention it is the 11th largest company in the world and the largest automaker on the planet (startup tho) Also, the “stupid people” would be up +26,000% from the IPO (compounding at ~41% a year) If they did invest during the startup phase, early investors would’ve made +3,300% in the 7 year window before the IPO It is exhausting to constantly see braindead regurgitation on my TL, claiming that others are “stupid”, when the individuals at hand are incapable of coherent thought.
Replying to @Tyre_94
The only stupid people are the billionaires and millionaires who invest in this start up. For anyone else the only cost is their ability to imagine what is or isn’t possible.
2
4
149
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
THE NEW APE CHURCH A completely rebuilt platform, made to feel as good as it plays
70
78
3
106
3,902
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
liz warren: we’re gonna stop the mayonnaise company from buying a hot sauce company elon musk:
406
4,178
259
43,282
904,088
Tesla and SpaceX about to S E N D 🚀
Turns out the future does have flying cars
2
2
114
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
COLLECTR x TAG GIVEAWAY 10.14.26 - 10.21.26 / STATUS: OPEN Win this TAG 10 GEM MINT Mega Gengar EX (2026 Pokémon, Mega Evolution: Ascended Heroes, Special Illustration Rare #284/217) How to enter: 1️⃣ Follow @getcollectrapp + @taggrading 2️⃣ Repost this post Winner revealed 10.22.26 #gengar #pokemon #ascendedheroes
566
3,232
28
1,891
75,256
When all the @AbstractChain Jeets are purged and the Ape hands enter These things send Quit for President 🦍 🥚
1
113
SatSlingingStacker.sats retweeted
The Otherside deserves more love 🦍💛 Who wants a chance to win? Follow, repost and spread the ape energy!
65
71
176
3,508