
India's most thought provoking science tech society conference. Founder & Curator @ShomaChaudhury 🗓️ 20-21 Feb' 2027
- Tweets1K
- Following73
- Followers447
- Likes206

ALT Sonia Kennebeck – Award-winning filmmaker examining remote warfare Questions: Why the scale of collateral damage in Gaza? Was it AI precision failure or policy tolerance? Does remote warfare create moral distance?

ALT David Spirk Jr. – War Transformer & Senior Operator at Palantir Technologies Response: AI is decision-support, not autonomous judgment. It increases precision vs past wars. Not carpet bombing — targeted defense against Hamas. Compared it to credit-card style data analytics and framed it in a defensive WWII context.

ALT Instead of directly defining precision thresholds or collateral limits, he broadened the frame to history and defense strategy. Core issue remains: Was it system limitation — or human-set tolerance?

ALT Shoma Chaudhury’s questions cut straight to the core: • What are the measurable precision parameters of AI targeting? • Who defines acceptable collateral damage thresholds? • If AI isn’t morally intelligent, why embed it into lethal decisions? • Is this technological advancement — or scaled automation of violence? He stayed composed and strategic. He didn’t directly confront the moral framing. Instead, he: • Reframed questions into operational context • Emphasized “precision vs past wars” • Compared AI to commercial data analytics • Positioned the operations as defensive necessity When pressed, he broadened the scope — history, security doctrine, Hamas threat — rather than narrowing into technical thresholds. It wasn’t evasive in tone. But it was controlled and carefully framed.



























