The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa) header
The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa) profile picture

tweet or retweet =\= endorsement or employer view. 🇺🇸🇮🇳

Joined January 2021
Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)Photo by The_Peshwa (@TPeshwa)
Pinned thread of random cool stuff that I find important.
9
4
1
29
After Sri Rama slays Ravana, he still praises his valor. The Valmiki Ramayana doesn’t treat Ravana like a marvel villain. Ravana has some admirable qualities such as his valor, skill in battle and so on. But plenty of adharmic qualities as well. He is against the rituals and the gods, a cannibal, carried off his brothers wife, and all this is before he even kidnaps Sita and comes into conflict with Lord Rama. Anyways, what is a hero without a powerful enemy?
For those crying about rAvaNa being glorified:In sundarakhANDa, baDabAnala says that, if not for adhArmic acts, rAvaNa would have been like a protector & also gets called mahAtma. So UK(+VR interpolation) has to invent new katha to make him look even bad that what he already is.
1
5
63
Happy Diwali folks 🪔!! May Sri Rama bless us with strength and vigor, and may we follow his example.
9
189
Hindus, especially those who grow up outside of India generally lack masculinity. Inb4 someone brings up the Visa bs, no other race on Visa would ever stand for this. An illegal Mexican who has ICE hunting him would’ve fought back. The first change Hindoo parents in America (and globally) need to do is stop emasculating their sons with Kumon and Spelling Bee nonsense and instead make them box, wrestle and play football. These incidents are only going to increase. We should harden up.
Lol this is embarassing ... More white women ran to kick out the troublemakers than Indians who simply sat scared and confused
1
2
8
286
Spics with ICE on their back who are in the country with no Visas will not take stuff like this lying down. We are just a cowardly bunch…that’s all.
Replying to @AgentSaffron
No. Most Indians here are on visas. We shouldn't be involved in any kind of protests or stopping protests. It is not embarrassment.. it is just illegal for us to do that.
1
105
All across European folklore, Goblins appear with different names, temperaments, and local customs. In Scotland & Northern England, you have the Redcaps: malevolent, murderous spirits in ruined border castles who dip their caps in the blood of travelers they kill. 🧵 [1/4]
40
324
24
2,768
80,215
I think a lot of the symptoms of ptsd would have been advantageous in the past, such as having a hair trigger, or waking up ready to fight in the middle of the night due to loud sounds. Raids in the past could come out of nowhere.” Now we are trying to adjust men accustomed to war, to an extremely safe way of life, which was not common in the past
I think PTSD is created by making people softer and expecting a soft and predictable world. Psychological effects definitely arent new though. Egil, a mercenary and viking, broke down and became suicidal when two of his sons died close in time.
2
124
You could just as easily hand the boy Homer or Thucydides.
It’s not about if boys want to read Hatchet. First of all, school reading lists are dominated by male authors and protagonists. Second of all, it’s the presenting books in a gendered binary that is the problem. Maybe your son could stand to read some romantasy idk!!!!
1
17
445
🇮🇹🏛️👑Etruscan King 6th Century BC Art by Giuseppe Rava
3
10
137
1,255
The plate is very much legitimate and was published a few years ago by the reputed German indologist Harry Falk. His interpretation that the plate shows ghaTotkachagupta-II crowning skandagupta could be questioned because there is no corroborating inscription. However, the key point which he makes is that headgear shown on the plate is precisely the kaumAra head gear worn for by skanda or vishAkha. The kaumAra mantrashAstra mentions a headgear of the god known as hemachUDa -- it lends him one of his names -- later forgotten and misinterpreted. I believe that headgear depicted in this image is indeed that and the younger figure is likely receiving the senApatyAbhiSheka by being conferred the hemachUDa of skanda. However, Falks makes some erroneous statements like: " Hindu mythology regards him as a son of Agni, the god of fire – later amalgamated with Śiva. Skanda is also known as Kārttikeya, Vaiśākha, or Guha. The great unification process incorporated Skanda inside Śaivism where he soon disappeared." (!) skanda far from disappeared after the kaumAra tradition was incorporated within the shaiva fold.
Is this legit? This is way higher quality than the majority of artefacts people show us from native Indian kingdoms. Is all the good Indian stuff just hidden on wikipedia?
5
11
39
1,271
First of all “would be incels”…lol. Secondly there’s entire pieces of literature throughout the world where the hero achieves his goals through the use of a magical/mystical weapon. It’s a part of the heroes journey and is even a central point of many rituals, especially royal rituals. Saying that isn’t literature is basically assuming that literature began in the late 1800s and everything before was just chicken scratch.
The first novel I ever loved was the survival classic Hatchet, but recently I’ve learned that a *lot* of women despise this book, and see it is as something they were forced to read in school to entice the idiot illiterate boys in their English class. I dove into that tension!
5
149
The_Peshwa retweeted
Forget soccer practice or music lessons, early medieval royalty raised their kids in a literal "School of Vengeance." This 1861 masterpiece by Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema captures a terrifyingly real moment in French history.🧵 1/
3
28
4
327
21,107
I'm going to harp on the "would-be incels" thing some more and point out: Nice, respectable liberal women will talk about little boys the way the most despised lunatic fringe fascist men talk about little girls, and this is treated as normal.
The first novel I ever loved was the survival classic Hatchet, but recently I’ve learned that a *lot* of women despise this book, and see it is as something they were forced to read in school to entice the idiot illiterate boys in their English class. I dove into that tension!
25
163
5
1,862
21,481
The problem with how English is taught in schools is that the books we are forced to read are way too boring. Even when we are introduced to books that should be interesting like the Iliad, the Odyssey, Shakespearean plays and Beowulf, we are forced to read “excerpts” (because of violence or whatever) which remove the context and make the reading just a very disjointed exercise. I read all these books on my own outside of class and enjoyed them. When I read it in class, it was boring. Anyways, all this reinforces my view that men and women should have a different curriculum, at least when it comes to literature.
The first novel I ever loved was the survival classic Hatchet, but recently I’ve learned that a *lot* of women despise this book, and see it is as something they were forced to read in school to entice the idiot illiterate boys in their English class. I dove into that tension!
1
135
Early medieval Central Asia be like
25
3
316
16,356
RT @Argonaut1535: ⚔️🏛️Late Roman Heavy Cavalry 2nd-5th Century BC: Cataphractarii & Clibanarii Artwork by Andrey Evgenevich Negin https://…
5
3
November 6, 1792. A French revolutionary army, full of volunteers who had been civilians eight months earlier, attacked regular Austrian troops in a prepared position and drove them off it. The man who broke the Austrian centre was a prince of the blood, a cousin of the king they had just imprisoned, serving under the name General Egalité. Fifty-eight years later he would be the last king France ever had. Jemappes is the battle that turned the French Revolution from a thing that survived into a thing that expanded, and it is far less known than Valmy, which it matters more than. Valmy on September 20 was a defensive success. The French army stood under artillery fire and did not break, and Brunswick withdrew out of France. That saved the Revolution. Jemappes is what the Revolution did with being saved. With the Prussians gone, Dumouriez turned north to invade the Austrian Netherlands, roughly modern Belgium. His original three-pronged plan collapsed when the promised resources never arrived, so he concentrated everything in front of Valenciennes and marched on Mons and the road to Brussels. Duke Albert of Saxe-Teschen had well over 20,000 Austrians in the region but spread thin. At Jemappes he fought with about 11,600 infantry, 2,170 cavalry and 56 guns, holding a five-mile ridge at Cuesmes with marshland behind him along two rivers crossed by only two causeways. A good position, properly chosen, held by professional soldiers. Dumouriez brought about 32,000 infantry, 3,800 cavalry and 100 guns, plus another 4,000 under Harville. And the composition of that army is the whole point. Large parts of it were volunteers from the levies of 1791 and 1792, men who had answered the call when the Revolution declared the country in danger. Most of the senior officers were still experienced professionals, many of them aristocrats who had stayed, which is a detail the republican legend tends to lose. The plan was to turn the Austrian flanks and cut the retreat. It mostly did not work. The flank attacks stalled, Harville failed to take Ciply, and the Austrians held their left. Ferrand took Quaregnon but hesitated in front of Jemappes itself. That hesitation accidentally helped, because Clerfayt moved troops to reinforce his right and thinned out his centre. At noon Dumouriez ordered a general attack. Eight battalions from Beurnonville's wing got in among some Austrian guns and were then ridden down and routed by Austrian cavalry, which is what happens to inexperienced infantry caught in the open. Dumouriez claimed afterwards to have personally rallied them, and his role in that got quietly reduced in French accounts after he defected to the Austrians the following year, so treat his version carefully. The centre is where it was decided. The Duc de Chartres, Louis Philippe d'Orléans, aged nineteen, commanding under the revolutionary name General Egalité because his father had renounced the family titles, formed his infantry into a single massive column and took the central ridge. That column is a glimpse of the next twenty years of European warfare. Not a line of trained musketeers trading volleys, but a dense mass of enthusiastic amateurs going forward and absorbing losses until the position fell. France could do that because France had numbers and political will, and the professional armies of Europe could not match either. With the centre gone and French troops across the Haine behind Jemappes, the Austrian right pulled back across the Trouille toward Mons, the centre followed, and the Austrian left held on long enough to cover the retreat. The French were too exhausted to pursue, and Harville sat still on the right, so the Austrian army got away intact. Casualties tell you what kind of victory it was. Austrian losses were 828 killed and wounded plus 413 captured. French losses were about 2,000. The French lost more than twice as many men and it was still a significant victory, because the fact that regular Austrian infantry had been pushed off a chosen position by a revolutionary army was the news. Mons opened its gates. Dumouriez went on to Brussels, fought a rearguard action at Anderlecht on November 13, and entered the city on the 14th. Within weeks the Austrian Netherlands was under French control. Then came the consequences nobody in Paris thought through. French control of the Low Countries, and the opening of the Scheldt to navigation, which France declared unilaterally, hit the two things Britain had gone to war over for two centuries. Britain and the Dutch Republic entered the war against France in February 1793. So the victory at Jemappes helped produce the coalition that fought France for the next twenty-three years. The occupation itself did not last either. The revolutionaries alienated a conservative Catholic population by imposing their programme on it, and in 1793 Dumouriez, unable to hold Belgium or his position in Paris, defected to the Austrians and fled. Louis Philippe went with him, into twenty-one years of exile, teaching school in Switzerland and travelling in America. He came back, and in 1830 he became King of the French. He was overthrown in 1848 and died in England. The nineteen year old who broke the Austrian centre for the Republic ended up the last monarch France ever had.
4
3
84
7,497
November 6, 1632. The most successful soldier in Europe got lost in fog on his own battlefield, rode into enemy cavalry with a handful of men, and was shot repeatedly at close range. His army won the battle. It did not matter. Sweden had just lost the only man who could hold its empire together, and the Thirty Years War ran another sixteen years. Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden had landed in Germany in 1630 with a small army and changed how European war was fought. He is one of the handful of commanders people argue about in the same breath as Napoleon. What he actually did was reorganise everything. He thinned out the deep infantry squares that everybody else used into shallower, more flexible formations with musketeers and pikemen supporting each other at close range. He made artillery mobile, including light regimental guns that moved with the infantry instead of sitting in a battery all day. He mixed cavalry with detachments of musketeers. And he paid and drilled a national army rather than relying entirely on mercenary contractors. By 1632 he had beaten the Imperial forces at Breitenfeld, wrecked Catholic power in north Germany, and marched to the Danube. Ferdinand II's answer was to recall Albrecht von Wallenstein, the Bohemian magnate who had built the Imperial army as a private business and been dismissed in 1630 for being too powerful. Wallenstein came back on his own terms, which were extraordinary, and raised a new army. In the autumn of 1632 Wallenstein moved into Saxony, threatening Sweden's most important German ally, and then did something that looked like he was settling into winter quarters. He detached Pappenheim with a large body of cavalry and sent him off on a separate operation. Gustavus saw the opening and came at him hard. Wallenstein found out in time to recall Pappenheim and to spend the night digging. He put his infantry behind the Leipzig road, deepened the ditches along it into a defensive line, and anchored his position on Lützen. Then on the morning of November 6 the fog came down. The Swedish attack was delayed for hours waiting for visibility, which gave the Imperialists more time to prepare and cost Gustavus the early start he needed. When it cleared enough to fight, the battle became exactly the kind of grinding, close-range struggle his tactical system was designed to win and his personal temperament was unsuited to managing. Pappenheim came back with his cavalry in the middle of it, at the gallop, after a forced ride, and threw it straight into the Swedish right. He was hit by a falconet ball almost immediately and died of the wound. And somewhere in the smoke and the returning fog on the Swedish right, Gustavus Adolphus became separated from his own troops. He had ridden forward to rally a wavering regiment with a small group of attendants, as he habitually did, and he was short-sighted and refused to wear armour over a wound he had taken years earlier that made a cuirass painful. He rode into Imperial cavalry. He was shot in the arm, then shot in the back, and went down. The men with him were killed or scattered. He was then shot in the head on the ground and stripped. The King of Sweden was found later, under other bodies, naked and unrecognisable except by the people who knew him. What happened next is the strange part. His army did not break. It got worse. The Swedes found out their king was dead and attacked harder. Bernhard of Saxe-Weimar took command, steadied the line, and drove the Imperial centre back off the road, taking the whole of Wallenstein's artillery. Pappenheim's infantry arrived late in the day, which gave Wallenstein enough cover to withdraw in order overnight rather than be destroyed. So it was a Swedish tactical victory. Both armies were wrecked, with losses usually estimated at around six thousand on each side out of roughly twenty thousand apiece, and the figures vary by source. One note on the date, because it confuses people. Sweden was still on the Julian calendar, so the battle is 6 November Old Style and 16 November New Style. Both dates are correct and you will see both. The consequences are what make this one of the genuinely decisive deaths in European history. Sweden's whole position in Germany rested on one man's reputation and judgement. His daughter Christina was six years old. Axel Oxenstierna, his chancellor, was a formidable administrator who kept Sweden in the war and held the alliance system together for years, which is a real achievement, but nobody could replace what was lost on that field. Sweden's German allies started drifting. The decisive Swedish defeat came at Nördlingen in 1634, and after that France entered the war openly, which turned a German religious conflict into a French-Habsburg struggle that ran to 1648. Wallenstein's own end came fast. He survived Lützen with his reputation damaged, began negotiating independently with the enemy, and in February 1634 was murdered at Eger by officers acting on the Emperor's authority. Two of the three most important men in the war died within fifteen months of each other. The war went on. The Peace of Westphalia, which I posted about on October 24, was sixteen years away, and the worst of the destruction in Germany was still to come.
5
13
1
199
16,278
People tend to avoid the sun in India while people spend more time in the sun in America. Especially Bay Area Jeets who live in a nice area. Also older people lose pigmentation as they age and get paler.
I keep saying this ... Many people abuse me for it Something is happening
4
367
A pair of Asiatic Wild Buffaloes (Bubalus arnee), folio from the Freer Bāburnāma (c. 1590-95) by Kānhā the Miniaturist and Ustād Mansūr-i Naqqāsh:
A Family of Cheetahs in a Rocky Landscape (c. 1580-85) by Basāwan (fl. 1580-1600), Mughal India.
1
5
1
23
949
Ummee Chund in the uniform of Skinner's Horse (May 1819), Company Style.
1
10
277