You can neither have too many bikes nor run too many PCR cycles https://xitter.cf/t.co/5BAJhYBb16

Joined December 2016
For all those saying something about PCR not determining who is infectious, I have a challenge: I need a cutoff that you'd happily stand by in court for professional liability and product liability purposes whereby you can state "Cts above this number will be non-infectious"
74
1
3
63
19,156
Parody?
The biggest threat to Humanity is MRNA , MRNA does not belong in humans and animals
5
1
38
535
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
So our puppy died and this struck off gp who is @DBSgovuk barred from working with kids 🤔 banned from refereeing by @FA and generally vile, pathetic excuse of a failed human decided to post this? 🤮 #puppy #dog #stburyan #cornwall #dogsoftwitter
Not posted much about the puppies the last few days because tingaling the pup in the first pic with the mostly white face got out and was hit by a moped (that didn't stop) didn't look bad but it caused a brain injury, she couldn't hear or see and she passed away tonight 💔🐶😢
26
11
4
58
3,568
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Replying to @GreereMedeea
Dalgleish is a superannuated former doctor trying to make a retirement income by lying to the gullible and poorly educated. He previously said that the King and Princess Kate got cancer as a result of Covid vaccination, and received massive pushback from professional virologists.
2
3
258
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Yep. Even with their updated dataset, around 35% were +ve (according to the polynomial fit to the data). Looking at week 1, ~6% of samples with Ct>=30 (103/1700) were culture +ve. What should always be stressed with any studies correlating culture with Ct is, there is always /1
2
5
8
197
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
1/ ​Remember the endless obsession with PCR "cycle thresholds" (Ct)? ​The internet was flooded with claims that if you ran enough PCR cycles, you could get a positive COVID test from pure tap water or a piece of fruit. ​Let's put this biological illiteracy to rest. 🧵👇 ​#PCR
3
18
38
837
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
RFK Jr: The polio vaccine “killed many, many more people” than polio ever did. What absolute garbage I still can't believe he said this
415
1,106
101
5,686
53,106
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Mullis in that clip is trying to justify his fuckwitted belief that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. Idiots like you quoting it cracks me up everytime.
1
4
71
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
All these "PCR skeptics" fixing themselves to AIDS denialism is peak social media lunacy.
1
2
57
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
As ever, it’s the edited clip (ca. 90 seconds). I doubt they’ve ever seen his full reply (from ~48'35" below), where it’s quite obvious his remarks concern HIV, not PCR in general youtube.com/watch?v=Xpcdq9jh…
1
1
5
116
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Replying to @KenCaptn20114
Nope, cancer is not exploding.
1
5
153
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
COVID-19 and sudden cardiac death: A new potential risk - PMC share.google/xlSbORvX08C3tl8…. Global rise in #OHCA linked to #SarsCov2 multiple mechanisms see Table 1 #myocarditis #coagulopathy #hypoxia #dysrythmia #VTE
1
1
1
115
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Replying to @DrNeilStone
Maybe she should gave accepted a recently developed intervention that prevents COVID. Seems pretty stupid to let yourself get infected by a bioweapon. 🤔
1
6
138
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
That is how it’s worked the last 3 decades for me & every other diagnostician in the world. We have a symptomatic patient. We determine a diagnosis based on the history, symptoms & results of various diagnostic tests. The PCR results help to confirm or eliminate Covid-19. It is a diagnostic tool not a standalone test. You’re obviously not a diagnostician.
2
1
8
106
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
It's the same for all of them. Virus deniers, DNA deniers, PCR deniers, flat earthers, creationists, chemtrail followers, etc
1
1
1
8
222
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Covid is real and the virus has been identified & sequenced millions of times. PCR identifies the individual has been exposed and either active or recovered from Covid-19. It doesn’t tell you if you are sick. The presence of a symptomatic patient with a positive PCR confirms, along with other diagnostic tools, my diagnosis that Covid is the cause of their symptoms. Are you a diagnostician or ever even treated a patient? With both know you have not. If you had, you would not sound unlearned.
1
2
6
100
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
I got this joke when I was 8. The internet revealed to me that there are now 20 years old who don’t get it.
382
3,013
77
99,506
4,610,818
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
“And then Reform’s polling numbers imploded. Which was nice.”
4
32
1
262
2,341
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Replying to @DeniseInCanada
I think that people who believe that were weird before mRNA shots were available.
2
1
24
1,035
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Sorry, but as soon as you cite Peter McCullough, Ethical Skeptic, Erin Elizabeth, Nic Hulscher, Ed Dowd, Kelly Victory, Harry Fisher, Mary Bowden, Dr Drew, Steve Kirsch or a handful of other AV accounts, you’ve already lost the debate. Not sorry.
22
22
1
182
2,781
No Such Thing as Too Many Cycles 🐭🌸 retweeted
Replying to @Nice_Yonkus
Evil? Here’s a man who has devoted much of his professional life to developing vaccines against diseases that disproportionately afflict the world’s poorest and most neglected populations. You are welcome to challenge his science, question his conclusions, or disagree with his public statements. That’s entirely fair. But calling him “evil” without offering a shred of evidence tells us remarkably little about Dr. Hotez and quite a lot about the quality of your argument. When your strongest rebuttal to a lifetime of scientific service is a two-word insult, you’ve revealed the poverty of your argument, not the character of the man.
3
11
119
707