✝️ 🇺🇸 Never lose your beginner spirit. America First. Fan of golden retrievers.
Texas, USA
Joined September 2011
- Tweets8.6K
- Following925
- Followers193
- Likes44.9K
1913 retweeted
I analyzed eleven New York Times reports on the Jensen Huang story.
Most notably, NYT makes the "spy" claim 30 times in these 11 reports.
The original report cites unnamed officials who had been "briefed" on the intelligence. Not who had seen it themselves -- but who had been "briefed".
This is a game of telephone with plausible deniability.
Nobody named. No specific details of the intelligence used to draw the conclusion that the woman was a spy.
Anonymous "officials" "briefed".
This was used to try to take Jensen Huang down.
When that didn't work, journalists resorted to viciously digging up and scandal mongering about Jensen Huang's other alleged affairs.
Then he was removed as CEO.
Without an investigation.
Without due process.
And now officials and intelligence agencies are contesting the New York Times characterization.
This is unethical. It is unjust.
It is an absolute disgrace.
If anyone should resign now, it is Nvidia's board who aggressively removed Jensen Huang without an investigation, after he gave decades of his life to make the company what it is.
And any investigation that proceeds from here should involved not just the "spy" claim, but the New York Times -- who has engaged in potentially unethical behavior.
Jensen Huang deserves due process -- not mob justice.
He deserves respect for everything he has done for technology and America -- not a disgraceful removal after anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations, several parties removed from the source.
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already.
Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy?
- AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”).
- CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”).
- DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”).
- Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed.
Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.”
This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”?
At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why?
An investigation should be opened.
1913 retweeted
BREAKING: Multiple sources in the US intelligence community say that the intelligence collected on Alice Huang, the suspected spy targeting Jensen Huang, does not prove she was acting as a spy for China, per CNN.
Some officials at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have said the characterization of Alice Huang as a Chinese spy is "not entirely accurate and over-torqued."
Officials at the CIA also are "not yet convinced" that the intelligence collection on Alice Huang so far, including intercepted communications, proves she was knowingly funneling information back to Beijing.
The FBI has reportedly been investigating this affair for at least a year.
We maintain our view that Jensen Huang and Nvidia prematurely parted ways.
A complete investigation is necessary.
1913 retweeted
🚨 JUST IN: Left-wing climate activists are SPEECHLESS after seeing Greta Thunberg break out into hysterical laughter at people still doing climate marches in 2026
"It's the Fridays for Future demonstration in Berlin..."
THUNBERG: "Is it! 🤣🤣 Really? They still do that?! Cut!"
IT WAS A MASSIVE SCAM ALL ALONG to steal BILLIONS OF DOLLARS for globalists
And now their new "thing" is Palestine and "human rights" against the West.
It's never freaking ending.
Trump was right!
1913 retweeted
🚨THE BIDEN TAPES THEY FOUGHT LIKE HELL TO BURY JUST DROPPED — AND NOW WE KNOW WHY
70 hours of raw audio the Bidens and Democrats spent a fortune trying to keep locked away.
Jesse Watters played the receipts: a full decade ago, while he was still VP, Biden was already a blithering mess who couldn’t even remember the names of his own staff.
This is the cognitive decline they gaslit the entire country about for years. This is why Special Counsel Hur called him a “sympathetic elderly man with a poor memory” to dodge charges. The tapes prove it started way earlier — and they knew.
They covered it. They protected it. They let an incapacitated man sit in the Oval while the media lied to your face.
No more hiding. The truth is out in full.
1913 retweeted
So let me get this straight…
The FBI has been investigating Alice Huang for at least a year, yet STILL cannot establish whether she was acting as a Chinese spy.
Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that neither the DOJ nor the FBI has reached a conclusion.
Multiple intelligence sources say there is no evidence proving she knowingly funneled information to Beijing. Even CIA officials aren’t convinced, and officials have reportedly called the spy characterization inaccurate and overblown.
Yet Jensen Huang was forced to resign?
Are you freaking kidding me? This is an absolute disgrace.
1913 retweeted
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing.
cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/…
1913 retweeted
Why the deep state is desperate to seize control over Nvidia by ousting Jensen Huang - they don't want decentralized, local computer that can allow people to see through the fake narratives upon which the artificial U.S. empire was built.
We are now transitioning into DIGITAL FASCISM, where the government owns the means of digital surveillance and digital control over the people, enforcing its ignorance and censorship to keep humanity enslaved and dumbed-down. THIS is why Jensen Huang, a strong supporter of open source AI, was targeted for removal.
1913 retweeted
This interview by @pmarca explains what is really behind Jensen Huang's ouster as Nvidia CEO.
1913 retweeted
Make no mistake. The Jensen Huang scandal isn't just a story about someone's private life.
It's a lever. And it's going to be used for one thing: taking control of AI.
I'm not saying the facts are made up. Jensen admitted the affairs, and the investigation should run its course. I'm saying: look at what's being built on top of it.
Look at the sequence.
Early November, Democrats win both chambers of Congress. Right after, they announce a flood of AI bills.
One congresswoman calls for a pause on advanced AI development and a ban on superintelligence, on day one. A bill introduced in the House would create a federal Department of AI with the power to decide which companies are allowed to build advanced models. A senator wants a federal AI Safety Board with mandatory standards. Others want mandatory testing before any model is released.
Translation: tomorrow, to release a model, you'll need permission.
And who was standing in the way? Jensen.
He fought export restrictions he saw as counterproductive. He fought the state-by-state patchwork of AI laws. His very first post on X was a letter signed by Nvidia on a single topic: why open models matter. Safety, innovation, sovereignty. The world needs both closed models and open models.
Nvidia is one of the most powerful companies on the planet publicly defending open weights.
And now, in Washington, analysts are saying it out loud: the scandal has broken Nvidia's ability to slow those bills down.
For those who want to lock everything up, the timing is perfect.
Why does this matter so much? Because open source is the only thing standing between AI and a tool of control.
If AI stays open, anyone can download a model, inspect it, modify it, run it on their own machine. A student in Lagos. A small business in Ohio. A dissident in Hong Kong. No one can switch it off. No one can decide for them what the machine is allowed to say.
Kill open source, and what's left?
A handful of closed models. Licensed. Tested, approved, monitored by a federal agency. And when an agency decides what an AI is allowed to say, it decides what billions of people will read, learn and think.
That's not a technology anymore. That's a Ministry of Truth with an API.
And don't believe for a second these rules will hurt the giants.
George Stigler, Nobel laureate in economics, showed it: regulation almost always ends up captured by the very players it claims to rein in. A multimillion-dollar license? The giants pay it without blinking. A ten-person open source lab can't. Bureaucrats write the rules, the biggest players write them alongside them, and everyone else disappears.
A caste of bureaucrats, backed by a few billionaires rich enough to buy their ticket in. That's what the closed world looks like.
Europe already went down this road. The result: models launch in the US and China, and reach Europe months later. If they reach it at all.
And while America gets ready to handcuff itself, China is shipping open-weight models one after another and giving them to the whole world.
My read: the Huang scandal will be the first pretext. Not the last. Every incident, every fear, every headline will be used to close one more door.
If AI stays open, it belongs to everyone.
If it closes, it belongs to whoever hands out the licenses.
And that day, it's game over.
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter.
AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country.
Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty.
The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.
images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-W…
1913 retweeted
I don't know how many Americans realize what they just lost.
This isn't a CEO. It's a national treasure.
And I'm going to prove to you, step by step, that the Nvidia board's decision goes against the interests of the United States. And that if America wants a future against China, it has to fight to bring Jensen Huang back.
A. The AI race is won on compute.
That's not an opinion, it's physics. The most powerful models are the ones with the most compute. And most of America's compute runs on Nvidia chips.
B. Nvidia's lead is one man's judgment.
Jensen is the one who bet on CUDA when nobody believed in it. He's the one who understood before anyone else what deep learning would become. He's the one who pivoted the entire company toward AI, years before ChatGPT. Thirty-three years of decisions nobody else would have made.
C. The board prepared no successor.
It admits it itself: it's now considering searching for a CEO from the outside. That means months of searching, internal power struggles, cautious decisions. At the exact moment Huawei is accelerating with the entire Chinese state behind it.
D. The market has already delivered its verdict.
The stock dropped another 10% or so on the announcement. Hundreds of billions of dollars gone. And those dollars are also the retirement savings of tens of millions of Americans.
Conclusion: who benefits from this decision?
Not America. Not shareholders. Not employees. China.
Now let's look at what he's accused of.
Yes, Jensen messed up. Twice. That's real. I'm not defending his private life.
But he isn't accused of any crime. No one has shown that a single secret leaked. The board itself wrote that it had no reason to believe national security or Nvidia's secrets were compromised.
You don't destroy the pillar of America's technology strategy over a moral failing. You sanction it, you tighten oversight, and you keep the man the country needs.
And we know exactly how to do it. There's a precedent.
In 2018, the SEC went after Elon Musk. Many demanded he leave Tesla. The solution? He gave up the chairmanship, Tesla added independent directors, and he stayed CEO. You know the rest: Tesla became one of the most valuable companies in the world.
Nvidia just appointed its first-ever board chair. The oversight structure is there. The only thing missing is the founder.
Because founders aren't managers like the others.
Peter Thiel laid it out in Zero to One: founder-led companies are capable of long-term planning, of making decisions nobody else would dare to make, and of inspiring a loyalty no hired manager can ever buy. Paul Graham called it "founder mode": when a founder runs the company, the rules of conventional management don't apply. They see things nobody else sees.
Steve Jobs is the living proof. Apple's board fired him. Twelve years later, Apple was months from bankruptcy. Jobs came back and made it the most valuable company in the world. How many years were lost? How many products never launched?
And recent history has even shown us that a comeback is possible.
Three years ago, OpenAI's board fired Sam Altman. Within five days, more than 700 of its 770 employees threatened to leave. Investors applied pressure. Altman came back, and the board was replaced.
What was undone in five days at OpenAI can be undone at Nvidia.
Employees need to speak up. Shareholders need to speak up. Washington needs to understand what's at stake. Everyone who believes America must win this race needs to say loud and clear that this decision is a historic mistake.
You will never find another Jensen Huang. Not in ten years. Not in thirty. There's only one.
Bring him back.
#BringBackJensen
NVIDIA announces CEO transition. Read the release: nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/n…
1913 retweeted
This is the biggest irony of the whole Alice Huang / Nvidia saga: the Chinese government actually doesn't want Nvidia chips and is actively keeping them out of the country.
Last year it even ordered Alibaba and ByteDance to cancel their Nvidia orders (bloomberg.com/news/articles/…) and sent customs teams to the ports to check every advanced chip coming in (ng.investing.com/news/stock-…).
And right now 600,000 Nvidia H200s are stuck in Hong Kong because Beijing won’t let them into the country (reuters.com/world/china/nvid…)👇
Nvidia also explicitly frames this as a threat to its business in its latest annual report to the SEC: "The Chinese government has encouraged customers to purchase from our China-based competitors and discouraged customers from purchasing, importing, or using our data center products" (sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…).
Why does China do that? Because every Nvidia chip a Chinese company buys is one that Huawei or Cambricon doesn’t sell, and domestic chips can only catch up if people actually buy them (which means money for R&D, etc.).
Which means that the notion that Chinese intelligence was running honeytraps to get more Nvidia chips into China gets the whole thing exactly backwards.
In fact, it looks like Megaspeed - Alice Huang's company - was a counter-reaction to official Chinese policy: a private sector workaround to these efforts by the Chinese government to curtail Nvidia.
As was widely reported - including by Western media - Megaspeed built data centers in Southeast Asia and rented their computing power to Alibaba, which the New York Times called "a backdoor way of getting access" to Nvidia chips (nytimes.com/2026/11/06/us/po…).
That is a backdoor not only - allegedly - around Washington’s export controls, but also around China's own efforts to wean its companies off Nvidia.
I can’t believe the Chinese government was too thrilled about it: it'd make just about zero sense for it to run countless domestic measures to prevent Alibaba from using Nvidia chips, yet at the same time have its top spy agency help the same Alibaba get Nvidia chips through the back door in Southeast Asia 🤷
At the end of the day, as with all such stories, you always need to look at "cui bono?": who benefits? Who benefitted is pretty clear:
- Nvidia itself: it's in the business of selling chips so a customer willing to spend billions of dollars on chips in Southeast Asia is a godsend. Again, as they themselves state in their SEC filings, not being able to tap into Chinese demand would have "a material and adverse impact on our business" (sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…).
- Chinese companies like Alibaba: facts are, 1) Chinese chips haven't yet caught up, 2) Chinese chip companies' production capabilities are still limited and 3) Chinese tech firms' historical tech stack runs on Nvidia’s CUDA ecosystem, and rewriting years of code for Huawei chips is painful. Renting Nvidia chips in Southeast Asia is the easy way to stay competitive and serve customer demand in the meantime.
- The US, according to core members of the Trump administration: back in July last year, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explained that the point of letting Nvidia sell more chips to China was to get Chinese developers "addicted to the American technology stack" (techradar.com/pro/china-coul…).
Who does NOT benefit, according to official Chinese policy, is the Chinese state, which has made tech self-reliance one of its foremost priorities.
Which means that, to believe the spy story, you have to believe that a person - Alice Huang - was effectively a spy paid by her own government while simultaneously sabotaging its tech self-reliance drive, which it has spent years and trillions of dollars on - pretty senseless.
Stranger things have happened, I guess, but it doesn't pass the smell test.
And there is another absolutely major contradiction in the media story. According to a Financial Times article published yesterday (ft.com/content/3238d92b-4074…), "a person who knows [Alice Huang] said they had been asked by MSS for information about her earlier this year after news emerged that Singapore was investigating the company in relation to chip-smuggling allegations. The agency wanted to find out more information about Huang, including the nature of her business and connections, the person said."
Which raises a damn obvious question: if she were indeed an MSS asset, why on earth would the MSS need to ask the people around her who she was and the nature of her business?
It's a complete contradiction with the spy story - but very much not a contradiction with what I described above: a private businesswoman running a workaround to Beijing’s own policy, which the Chinese security apparatus would naturally want to look into.
Especially since, around about the same time, Shanghai police detained her business partner, reportedly her husband, in a stock manipulation case (caixinglobal.com/2026-11-10/…): also coherent with Chinese authorities looking into her network, and much harder to square with her being a prized MSS asset.
And, to top it all, there is - to this day - not a shred of evidence that's been published that she is, in fact, a Chinese spy: just anonymous intelligence officials, repeated by journalists who never verified it, as I detailed here (teapaw.org/RnaudBertrand/status/2…) and here (teapaw.org/RnaudBertrand/status/2…) with one of the key FT journalists on this story actually admitting that he has no idea what evidence US intelligence actually has.
So the claim went to print without anyone seeing the evidence, without anyone being able to check it, and without anyone knowing whether it even exists.
And given everything above, from Beijing blocking the very chips she was supposedly recruited to help get into China, to the MSS asking around about her, to her partner being detained in Shanghai, my bet is that the evidence doesn’t exist at all. If anything, everything we can check points the other way.
1913 retweeted
Japanese Professor Delivers Stunning Message Everyone Needs to Hear
“The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world.”
He says the fraudulent use of “experimental gene therapy to healthy people” was not only an “extreme violation of human rights,” but “the result was the induction of the terrible drug-induced injury that has never [been] seen in human history.”
- Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School.
1913 retweeted
🚨🚨NETANYAHU'S POLICE INTERROGATION TAPES JUST LEAKED AND THEY REVEAL HE PERSONALLY FUNDED HAMAS. THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.🚨🚨
1,000 hours of secret police interrogation footage of Benjamin Netanyahu.
Now public. Banned in Israel. Going viral globally.
Here's what's on those tapes:
💀 Netanyahu personally arranged for Hamas to receive $35,000,000 EVERY MONTH from Qatar
💀 This was done IN SUITCASES OF CASH — because even banks refused to cooperate
💀 He personally begged Qatar, a country with no ties to Israel, to give money to his "enemy"
💀 He was doing this while ACTIVELY under corruption investigation
💀 His own words: "under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally"
💀 Total transferred to Hamas with his blessing: OVER $1,000,000,000
Let that sink in.
The same man who stood up after October 7 and declared "Hamas is a monster, we will annihilate them" was the one keeping Hamas alive with suitcases of Qatari cash.
⚠️ His strategy, from his own transcript: keep Hamas in Gaza, keep Fatah in the West Bank, PREVENT them from uniting — so there would NEVER be a Palestinian state
⚠️ Without a Palestinian state, Netanyahu stays in power — no peace deal means endless war means he stays "Mr. Security"
⚠️ He needed Hamas to survive so he could keep winning elections by being the only man who could "handle" them
Now watch what this means:
→ Netanyahu funds Hamas for years → Hamas grows stronger → October 7 happens → Netanyahu declares war → 46,000+ Palestinians die → War delays his criminal trial → He seeks a pardon
→ The monster he fed attacked his own people
→ And he's using that attack to escape justice
The corruption trial? 3 charges. Bribery. Fraud. Breach of trust.
His court just REJECTED his request to delay hearings — TWICE in one day.
The ICC issued an arrest warrant for him for war crimes in Gaza.
His own aide was arrested for taking Qatari money.
And now his police interrogation tapes show he was the one sending Qatari money to Hamas.
The same Qatar he "hates." The same Hamas he "fights."
⚠️ He publicly called Hamas the enemy
⚠️ He privately funded them for years
⚠️ His bombing of Gaza kills tens of thousands
⚠️ His war delays his own criminal conviction
This isn't a war on terror.
This is a man running out the clock on his own criminal case using 46,000 Palestinian lives as cover.
And the world is just starting to understand it.
1913 retweeted
If Kamala Harris had won in 2024 the Republicans AND the Groypers would be in a better position.
He hopes the Democrats shut down the government, and investigate the criminals in the Trump administration.
>The Democrats are going to do us a favor
1913 retweeted
According to the Washington Post, Laura Loomer has been paid by private clients for political posts since May 2025.
This is when her posts stopped mentioning Ukraine, after years of attacking it.
By June 2026 she was pro-Ukraine.
Her Ukraine posts, before and after:
1913 retweeted
WaPo: Laura Loomer has been taking undisclosed payments from private clients to post political content on X—reportedly $3k–$5k per tweet, with bank records showing >$60k to her and her company King Breaker Media. Trump campaign adviser Alex Bruesewitz confirmed paying her for policy posts.
Just like we’ve all been saying: she’s not an independent America First voice. She’s a paid operative for big corporate interests—and most likely Israel. The receipts are finally here, and she can’t spin this one away.
1913 retweeted
Laura Loomer, a right-wing activist, allegedly received payments for political posts on social media without disclosure, according to a former campaign aide to President Trump and three others familiar with the arrangements. wapo.st/4BPQbL5
