Hijacked?
No! Legitimately bought. It’s not the domain owners fault Meghan & her team failed to purchase the domain name in advance of announcing it.
I mean they sought to protect a child’s name, so…🙄😆
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
A judgment is due in Harry/Various case vs NGN tomorrow.
Likely on the application made to include claims that his mum, dad & Camilla‘s phones were intercepted that meant his private info was revealed.
Counsel will know already. Maybe thats why we‘ve heard ‘settle‘ noises..😉
<[Harry] is subject to the same issues…that offers have been made [to settle] that makes it impossible for them to go ahead.>
Surely not!!😉
Settling is grubby I thought. And it’s his lifes work, a David & Goliath thing. For us all & bugger the cost…No?
mol.im/a/13321143
Lemons again. Lots of Lemons.
I’ve got to hand to to her - this time Meghan has got the branding bang on:
Sour. Bitter. Acidic. Tart….😉🍋
Peak Meghan!
Sometimes, viewed in the abstract, you have to almost admire the sheer size of the ego… 🤯
mol.im/a/13319931
Since it’s topical, I’ll ask the question again -
What does Travalyst actually DO? (besides preach)
Anyone?
The ‘lucky’ recipients of the jam (who are willing to do Meghan‘s PR) has been seriously underwhelming, no?
<Communities are the beating heart of travel, and we must do better by the people who are the custodians of the places we visit.'>
Agreed Harry. Now about those #AfricanParks communities and victims… mol.im/a/13319153
So Hugh Grant settled his claim against NGN (The Sun)
We don’t yet know about Harry’s claim, but let’s summarise what this means and what it potentially means for Harry…
archive.ph/oxpYr
Civil claims are about Justice - correcting a wrong, not punishment for that wrong. If a settlement would have corrected that wrong, it is incumbent on parties to consider accepting it (rather than fight for headlines)!
In Feb this yr Harry told @GMA when asked how Harry was as a DAD “I can’t tell you that, it’s classified. Top secret.”
In Nov last yr Harry was emailing randoms actual court determined confidential information.
He’s not just a fool. He’s so foolish, he IS the security risk…
Harry was forced to apologise to the court for sharing confidential info.
This was only discovered as one of the people he sent it to worked at Schillings.
The question is - HOW many other times has Harry breached this order?
Have his communications been checked?
They should be.
Harry (& others) unlawful information gathering claim against NGN (News Group Newspapers), is back in court again tomorrow.⬇️
A timely reminder for those who still need it -
Harry did NOT have his security removed.
He removed himself from his security.
End.