UnlikelyBot retweeted
➡️ I am gifting this @NYTimes piece as it details how #Russian disinformation helped fuel the Catherine, Princess of Wales conspiracies.
As I said to my friend @UnlikelyBot, I was confident based on my own past reporting the Russians were involved. ↖️
nytimes.com/2024/03/27/world…
UnlikelyBot retweeted
It was a PUBLIC statement. Informalities only work in informal situations.
Why make a public statement at all, especially one asking for privacy? Why not send regards privately?
Why insert themselves into this news cycle?
As if we didn’t already know…
UnlikelyBot retweeted
I personally think writing an unsolicited letter that would be used to attempt influence U.K. institutions- the police and the courts - is scandalous.
This needs investigating.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Paul when you have to question the validity of the rights of someone to make a point, rather that dismantling the argument itself, you’ve lost.
You‘re not telling me I’m wrong. You’re asking what gives me the right to be right.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Its not about ‘hurting’ a son. It’s isn’t about family.
The RF is part of the British constitution.
The King is the Head of State.
Actions that seek to subvert, abuse, or monetise the institution need addressing.
If the Sussexes can’t self regulate, regulation needs doing to them
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Actually QEII should have done this at the point of Megxit (or advised that it would be done after the year).
That it wasn’t done then has made it harder to do - it could look like retaliation rather than a ’policy’ decision.
Time has been given. Public support is now there.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Harry only publicly addressed this issue AFTER the - according to him evil and irresponsible U.K. media - forced his hand.
Imagine being shamed into doing the right thing by the very people you demonise as the dregs of society😉
UnlikelyBot retweeted
We KNOW Harry & Meghan put out a statement saying the Queen was ‘supportive’.
We KNOW the BBC reported this was untrue.
We KNOW Harry & Meghan threatened to sue.
We KNOW they didn’t.
I believe the aide.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Exactly. I see the visit to the Court as a strategic move. One that sends a signal to, what must be quite a wary judiciary, to just carry on regardless.
Its not without risk of howls from the usual crowd, but The King was Kinging - doing the right thing, if not the easiest.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
The Games are a significant event for the Military.
Participants deserve support from the highest level. But not like this.
Harry, a loose cannon without oversight, should not be around, let alone endorsed by, top brass or govt official.
Its not just Vile, its deeply concerning.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
In marking the first anniversary of Her late Majesty’s death and my Accession, we recall with great affection her long life, devoted service and all she meant to so many of us.
I am deeply grateful, too, for the love and support that has been shown to my wife and myself during this year as we do our utmost to be of service to you all.
- Charles R.
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Every word of this 😮💨 every word!
I can’t bear them either….they really are the most dreadful couple.
#UnSussexful #Suckesses
UnlikelyBot retweeted
< "[Harry] & Meghan are offering to rent an apartment at Kensington Palace and furnish it themselves."
"He hopes that will please William and show that they're serious about coming back," the source noted regarding the two brothers… > 😂👍🏼🍿🍿🍿
okmagazine.com/p/prince-harr…
UnlikelyBot retweeted
Why are people suggesting Meghan is ‘returning’ to acting? Some might suggest she has never stopped…😉
UnlikelyBot retweeted
One bookmaker had the Duchess of Sussex at 33/1 to be seen in the Royal Box at Wimbledon. For anyone that doesn’t understand betting odds it means if you put £10 on Meghan appearing at Wimbledon’s Royal Box then you lose £10
UnlikelyBot retweeted
“The judge said: ‘I shall need to make some findings about the reliability of a number of witnesses. Mr Johnson is an important witness and his position is certainly unusual, as an investigative journalist and a witness as well as assisting the claimants. I will need to consider his case in particular detail.’
good! Investigate why this guy is being paid to produce false evidence. Hope all of them get in trouble for this. 🙌🏾
Judge in Prince Harry's hacking trial against the Mirror's publisher says he will consider the 'reliability' of a journalist helping the Duke of Sussex who has been paying potential witnesses
dailymail.co.uk/news/article…
