Pinned Tweet
This is incredibly well stated.
A large and growing segment of the contemporary left has done real damage to liberalism—and to the country—by allowing itself to be shaped by an education and political culture that produces emotional dysfunction. In this framework there are only two relationships that matter: oppressor and oppressed…and anger is the core emotion. Everything else is either irrelevant or actively suspect. People are not primarily individuals who can be harmed, helped, or judged on the basis of their actions; they are representatives of categories whose moral standing is determined by their position relative to the designated oppressor.
The result is that these leftists lack genuine compassion. What looks like compassion is almost always downstream of hostility toward the “oppressor”. If the designated enemy is straight white conservative men, then moral concern is extended to groups framed as standing in opposition to them. That concern does not reliably extend to black people, women, or immigrants who reject the required opposition; those people are frequently treated as traitors to their category precisely because they refuse to play their assigned role. The feeling is not primarily about the well-being of the people involved. It is about their usefulness against the enemy.
This is why the selectivity is so consistent. All these people who treat the historical evils of slavery as a central moral fact show no interest in the ongoing slave markets in Libya. They don’t actually care about slavery. They’d happily enslave anybody they deemed “MAGA”. They only care about slavery as it fits their narrative against their enemy.
Violence against Nigerian Christians receives no attention from the leftists who mobilize intensely against other forms of religious or ethnic violence, because Nigerian Muslims are not positioned as the relevant oppressor. If the “oppressors” aren’t their enemy then oppression is sanctioned. Without an enemy to drive the reaction, there is no reliable mechanism for recognizing and responding to suffering on its own terms.
Ordinary liberals and ordinary conservatives can look at a situation, recognize that people are being harmed, and feel concern without first needing the harm to serve an oppositional agenda. Leftists are emotionally incapable of doing that.
Once the current oppressor is defeated or discredited, anger and hate doesn’t go away. That is their driving force so they have to find a new target. The emotional and ideological need for an enemy remains. This is one reason intersectionality has proven so durable: it supplies an open-ended supply of new oppressors so that the binary can be maintained. The anger and blame were never primarily about any particular group. They are products of the framework itself, which was taught and reinforced long before any specific target was selected. It can be race, class, gender, etc. It’s also why Leftists will always eat themselves once there is nobody left to eat. It’s why they’re always racing to be the most oppressed in their meetings and intersectionality hierarchies. The most oppressed has the strongest “justifications” to kill the others once the hunger games start.
Nucking Futs retweeted
They're telling you something.
And if you're not listening, you're going to be hurting later.
Is this their subtle way of telling the public without trying to cause panic? Read between the lines...
It's never too late to prepare for hard times.
Nucking Futs retweeted
If Democrats get power, they will:
1. Lawfare Trump officials;
2. Pack SCOTUS;
3. Go after Elon, SpaceX, and Tesla--then billionaires, then millionaires;
4. Crush free speech;
5. Make voter ID illegal;
6. Flood the country with illegals.
It sounds insane. It *is* insane.
Yep.
“In the Middle East every single society that had existed prior to Islam has been eradicated”—professor @GadSaad 😢
Nucking Futs retweeted
Replying to @AlexanderSoros
Some one let @realDonaldTrump know that Alex Soros just enthusiastically approved of naming your personal lawyer to the Supreme Court, and then asking them to extend voting hours in friendly counties after your opponents good counties shut their polls. Sounds like he’d be cool with Trump doing the same thing Lula did to steal this election!
Nucking Futs retweeted
You will see the “legitimacy” propaganda pushed constantly from this point forward. They are coming for the Constitution.
Nucking Futs retweeted
I just want to warn Texas that if Talarico wins we'll be forced to put this on shelves.
Nucking Futs retweeted
On Tuesday at 7 PM Central, I'm going live with @Schwalm5132 (CW4, Special Forces, ret.) and @RealDustinM (former Psychological Operations) on how color revolutions work and how to defeat them.
Link in next post.
Correction: "Things a guy, other than @kritterks, will never say."
My apologies to any who were adversely affected by the preceding post.
Nucking Futs retweeted
The Butchers – The Men Who Ran the Soviet Terror.
Moscow, a winter night in 1937. Long past midnight in the Kremlin, a man with a pipe sits at his desk under a lamp. In front of him, a stack of typed lists – names, one per line. He runs a blue pencil down the pages. A tick. A note in the margin. Sometimes a name crossed out, sometimes one added. The same pencil he uses to edit film scripts and poems.
His officials stay awake at home, next to the phone, in case he calls before dawn.
Hundreds of lists. Tens of thousands of names. On a single day, December 12, 1937, he and Molotov approved more than three thousand death sentences. Then, historians tell us, they went to watch a film.
But Stalin didn't invent the machine. He perfected it.
In August 1918, Lenin sent a telegram to his comrades: hang at least a hundred kulaks – hang them so that people see it for hundreds of kilometers around. Trotsky, the "good communist" of Western nostalgia, ordered the families of officers taken as hostages.
The founders gave the orders. Then the machine needed men – men who would build the apparatus, fill the camps, write the confessions and pull the triggers. And sooner or later, it devoured many of them.
1. Dzerzhinsky – the Founder. "Iron Felix," a Polish noble's son, who built the Cheka in 1917.
2. Trotsky – the Myth. The revolutionary Western intellectuals still romanticize, who wrote a whole book defending terror – until the machine he helped build killed him with an ice axe.
3. Stalin – the Editor. The man at the desk, with the blue pencil, long past midnight.
4. Yagoda – the Builder. The Gulag as an economy: canals dug by prisoners who died by the tens of thousands. Then shot by his own machine.
5. Vyshinsky – the Prosecutor. "Confession is the queen of evidence" – so he got confessions. "Shoot the mad dogs!" at the show trials, then the Soviet seat at the United Nations.
6. Yezhov – the Butcher. The Great Terror, the quotas, the Polish operation – then shot, and erased from the photographs.
7. Beria – the Strategist. Katyn, the atomic bomb, the deportations – and a predator. Shot by his own colleagues three months after Stalin's death.
8. Blokhin – the Executioner. In the spring of 1940, at Kalinin, he personally shot thousands of Polish prisoners over a few weeks, in a leather apron and cap.
9. Serov – the Hunter of Poland. He crushed the Home Army, lured the leaders of the Polish Underground State to "talks" and had them tried in Moscow. Then Hungary in 1956, and the first chairman of the KGB.
10. Andropov – the Modernizer. Dissidents sent to psychiatric hospitals instead of camps: softer, quieter – same goal: erasing people. The first secret police chief to rule the country.
11. Epilogue – The Chekists Never Left. From the KGB to the FSB to the Kremlin.
Why name them? Because their whole work was erasure – of people, of records, of memory. Remembering is the opposite of what they did.
And erasure didn't die with them. Today it rarely needs a bullet. It is called cancelling, deplatforming, debanking, lawfare. The inconvenient person isn't shot – he is removed: from his job, his bank account, his platform, the conversation. Yezhov needed a retoucher. Today a terms-of-service update does the job.
For Poles, these are not names from a history book. They are the names behind our grandparents' graves – and that is why we recognize their heirs.
Give Me the Man, I'll Find the Crime – How the Soviet Terror Machine Worked.
"Give me the man, and I'll find the crime." The line is attributed to Lavrentiy Beria, head of Stalin's secret police. Whether or not he said it, it describes the whole machine.
1. It began in December 1917, six weeks after the revolution: the Cheka, the "Extraordinary Commission." Its founder was Felix Dzerzhinsky – a Pole by birth. Twenty years later, the machine he built would make Poles its largest group of national victims.
2. The principle was set from the start. In 1918 a Cheka chief instructed his men: don't look for evidence of what the accused did. Ask what class he belongs to, what his origin, education and profession are – that decides his fate. Guilt was no longer a matter of acts. It was a matter of categories.
3. The machine changed its name – GPU, OGPU, NKVD – and kept growing. And it ran like the rest of the Soviet economy: on a plan. Regions received quotas of people to arrest, shoot or deport, and local chiefs asked Moscow for higher ones. Three-man tribunals passed sentences in minutes. Terror by quota – a planned economy of death.
4. In 1937 Nikolai Yezhov – a small man, barely five feet tall, later known as "the bloody dwarf" – took the machine to its peak. He would not survive it. Confessions were extracted by torture, officially permitted. Neighbors denounced each other for an apartment, colleagues for a promotion. Being accused was proof enough: the accused confessed to plots that never existed, and named others, who confessed in turn.
5. Then came the anti-Polish operation – the clearest proof that the machine was never looking for the guilty. Order 00485, August 1937, targeted a "Polish Military Organization" that had been dissolved in 1921. The categories were written so that almost any Pole would fit, and in Leningrad officers combed the address registers for Polish-sounding names. A Catholic prayer book was evidence. A letter from a cousin in Warsaw was espionage. Interrogators wrote the confessions, torture got the signatures, and the verdicts came in "albums" – a few lines per person, signed in Moscow by the hundred. Killing as paperwork. Nearly four in five of those sentenced were shot: about 111,000 people. A Pole in the Soviet Union was some forty times more likely to be shot than an average citizen. The goal was not to find the guilty. It was to erase inconvenient people from existence. And the Poles, with their unyielding character and love of freedom, were always inconvenient for any totalitarian system.
Reminds you of anyone today?
6. The machine devours its own. Yezhov was arrested in 1939 and shot – and then erased even from the photographs, the same erasure he had applied to others. His successor, Beria, proposed in March 1940 the execution of Polish officers, policemen and intellectuals held as prisoners. Around 22,000 were shot – Katyn. At the same time, in the West, the Germans were murdering Poland's elites too. On this, the two totalitarian systems fully agreed. When Stalin died, Beria was arrested and shot too.
7. And the apparatus never really died. It became the KGB, then the FSB. Russia's security officers still celebrate "Chekist Day" every December 20. Its president is a former KGB officer.
The method outlived the regime as well. Find the man first – then search his life for the crime. In the West, the soft version is called lawfare: the process is the punishment.
The West reads about this in history books. In Poland, it is family memory. That is why we recognize the method instantly – in any language, under any name.
——
The picture below says it all. Literally erasing people: Nikolai Yezhov, the "Bloody Dwarf" – small and bloody in more than one way – walking beside Stalin. Then the same photograph, a few years later.
Now you see him. Now you don't.
Nucking Futs retweeted
Che Guevara – The T-Shirt.
Is there a sillier sight than a Westerner wearing a Che T-shirt?
The face is everywhere: the beret, the star, the faraway gaze. A photograph taken in Havana in 1960, now printed on shirts, mugs and posters, manufactured in factories and sold for profit.
The great enemy of capitalism became one of its best-selling brands.
So let’s look at the man behind the T-shirt.
Ernesto Guevara was born in Argentina in 1928, into a comfortable family, and trained as a doctor. Before the revolution, he toured South America on a motorcycle. Hollywood later made a film about it. The romance practically writes itself.
In the Sierra Maestra, a peasant guide was suspected of informing on the rebels. Che shot him himself. In his diary, he recorded: "I ended the problem with a .32 caliber pistol."
After the communist victory in Cuba in 1959, he was put in charge of La Cabaña, the fortress prison in Havana. Revolutionary tribunals. Firing squads at dawn. Dozens, possibly hundreds, were executed under his authority. At the United Nations in 1964, he said it plainly: "We have executed, we are executing and we will continue to execute."
He founded Cuba's first forced-labour camp, for "re-education" – the forerunner of the camps where the regime later sent homosexuals, priests and dissidents.
Then they gave him the economy: first the central bank, then the Ministry of Industry. He signed Cuban banknotes simply "Che." In 1962, Cuba introduced the ration book. It still has one.
That same year, during the missile crisis, he said that if the Soviet missiles had stayed under Cuban control, they would have used them – against the heart of the United States, New York included.
In his essay Socialism and Man in Cuba, he praised hatred as an element of revolutionary struggle, describing it as what turns a man into "an effective, violent, selective and cold killing machine."
In 1967, he was captured in Bolivia and executed. He was thirty-nine.
Castro is remembered as a ruthless dictator. Che is remembered as a hero.
The difference? Che didn’t live long enough to rule Cuba for decades. We will never know whether he would have been worse than Castro.
Trotsky was the "good communist" who lost. Che is the other kind: the one who died young. Death froze him at the age of the poster.
Next time you see the T-shirt, remember what it represents: the portrait of a man who helped build a revolutionary system of executions and forced labour, printed by capitalism and worn by useful idiots, the very people he would have sent to the camps.
Trotsky – The Myth.
Ask a Western leftist which communist he admires, and you often get the same answer: Trotsky. The intellectual. The orator. The true revolutionary, betrayed by Stalin. If only he had won…
Look at the young Trotsky in the picture: round glasses, wild hair, burning eyes. Many young leftists today would recognize themselves in him. The look hasn’t changed. Neither has the certainty.
So let’s look at what he did when he had power.
Born in 1879 in what is now southern Ukraine, Trotsky was a brilliant writer and a spellbinding speaker. In October 1917, he played a central role in organizing the Bolshevik seizure of power.
Then Lenin made him Commissar for War, and he built the Red Army, directing it from an armoured train that rushed from front to front.
Deserters were shot. Military discipline was enforced through executions. Blocking detachments were deployed to stop retreating soldiers, and former tsarist officers recruited into the Red Army were kept under surveillance by political commissars. Their families were sometimes held hostage to guarantee their loyalty.
Cruelty knows no limits when you have no doubts.
In 1920, the Red Army marched on Warsaw. It was stopped on the Vistula.
That same year, Trotsky published an entire book, Terrorism and Communism, explaining why revolutionary terror was necessary. He wanted labour militarized too: workers organized like soldiers, subjected to military discipline and compelled to serve the needs of the state.
In 1921, the sailors of Kronstadt – once hailed as the pride of the revolution – demanded free elections to the soviets. Trotsky supported the suppression of the revolt. Thousands were killed in the assault or executed afterwards.
Then he lost the power struggle to Stalin.
Expelled, exiled, forced abroad. From there, he wrote that the revolution had been betrayed – by Stalin, never by himself.
He ended up in Mexico City, where he stayed for a time with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. And so the Western romance took shape: the exiled prophet, the revolutionary betrayed, the road not taken.
In August 1940, a Soviet agent who had gained his confidence entered his study and struck him with an ice axe.
The machine Trotsky had helped build had come for him too. His killer later received the Soviet Union’s highest honour.
Trotsky was not the alternative to Stalin. He was the same machine – only with better prose. He never rejected the terror. He rejected losing control of it.
The "good communist" is always the one who lost.
Next: Stalin.
Nucking Futs retweeted
Trotsky – The Myth.
Ask a Western leftist which communist he admires, and you often get the same answer: Trotsky. The intellectual. The orator. The true revolutionary, betrayed by Stalin. If only he had won…
Look at the young Trotsky in the picture: round glasses, wild hair, burning eyes. Many young leftists today would recognize themselves in him. The look hasn’t changed. Neither has the certainty.
So let’s look at what he did when he had power.
Born in 1879 in what is now southern Ukraine, Trotsky was a brilliant writer and a spellbinding speaker. In October 1917, he played a central role in organizing the Bolshevik seizure of power.
Then Lenin made him Commissar for War, and he built the Red Army, directing it from an armoured train that rushed from front to front.
Deserters were shot. Military discipline was enforced through executions. Blocking detachments were deployed to stop retreating soldiers, and former tsarist officers recruited into the Red Army were kept under surveillance by political commissars. Their families were sometimes held hostage to guarantee their loyalty.
Cruelty knows no limits when you have no doubts.
In 1920, the Red Army marched on Warsaw. It was stopped on the Vistula.
That same year, Trotsky published an entire book, Terrorism and Communism, explaining why revolutionary terror was necessary. He wanted labour militarized too: workers organized like soldiers, subjected to military discipline and compelled to serve the needs of the state.
In 1921, the sailors of Kronstadt – once hailed as the pride of the revolution – demanded free elections to the soviets. Trotsky supported the suppression of the revolt. Thousands were killed in the assault or executed afterwards.
Then he lost the power struggle to Stalin.
Expelled, exiled, forced abroad. From there, he wrote that the revolution had been betrayed – by Stalin, never by himself.
He ended up in Mexico City, where he stayed for a time with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. And so the Western romance took shape: the exiled prophet, the revolutionary betrayed, the road not taken.
In August 1940, a Soviet agent who had gained his confidence entered his study and struck him with an ice axe.
The machine Trotsky had helped build had come for him too. His killer later received the Soviet Union’s highest honour.
Trotsky was not the alternative to Stalin. He was the same machine – only with better prose. He never rejected the terror. He rejected losing control of it.
The "good communist" is always the one who lost.
Next: Stalin.
The Butchers – The Men Who Ran the Soviet Terror.
Moscow, a winter night in 1937. Long past midnight in the Kremlin, a man with a pipe sits at his desk under a lamp. In front of him, a stack of typed lists – names, one per line. He runs a blue pencil down the pages. A tick. A note in the margin. Sometimes a name crossed out, sometimes one added. The same pencil he uses to edit film scripts and poems.
His officials stay awake at home, next to the phone, in case he calls before dawn.
Hundreds of lists. Tens of thousands of names. On a single day, December 12, 1937, he and Molotov approved more than three thousand death sentences. Then, historians tell us, they went to watch a film.
But Stalin didn't invent the machine. He perfected it.
In August 1918, Lenin sent a telegram to his comrades: hang at least a hundred kulaks – hang them so that people see it for hundreds of kilometers around. Trotsky, the "good communist" of Western nostalgia, ordered the families of officers taken as hostages.
The founders gave the orders. Then the machine needed men – men who would build the apparatus, fill the camps, write the confessions and pull the triggers. And sooner or later, it devoured many of them.
1. Dzerzhinsky – the Founder. "Iron Felix," a Polish noble's son, who built the Cheka in 1917.
2. Trotsky – the Myth. The revolutionary Western intellectuals still romanticize, who wrote a whole book defending terror – until the machine he helped build killed him with an ice axe.
3. Stalin – the Editor. The man at the desk, with the blue pencil, long past midnight.
4. Yagoda – the Builder. The Gulag as an economy: canals dug by prisoners who died by the tens of thousands. Then shot by his own machine.
5. Vyshinsky – the Prosecutor. "Confession is the queen of evidence" – so he got confessions. "Shoot the mad dogs!" at the show trials, then the Soviet seat at the United Nations.
6. Yezhov – the Butcher. The Great Terror, the quotas, the Polish operation – then shot, and erased from the photographs.
7. Beria – the Strategist. Katyn, the atomic bomb, the deportations – and a predator. Shot by his own colleagues three months after Stalin's death.
8. Blokhin – the Executioner. In the spring of 1940, at Kalinin, he personally shot thousands of Polish prisoners over a few weeks, in a leather apron and cap.
9. Serov – the Hunter of Poland. He crushed the Home Army, lured the leaders of the Polish Underground State to "talks" and had them tried in Moscow. Then Hungary in 1956, and the first chairman of the KGB.
10. Andropov – the Modernizer. Dissidents sent to psychiatric hospitals instead of camps: softer, quieter – same goal: erasing people. The first secret police chief to rule the country.
11. Epilogue – The Chekists Never Left. From the KGB to the FSB to the Kremlin.
Why name them? Because their whole work was erasure – of people, of records, of memory. Remembering is the opposite of what they did.
And erasure didn't die with them. Today it rarely needs a bullet. It is called cancelling, deplatforming, debanking, lawfare. The inconvenient person isn't shot – he is removed: from his job, his bank account, his platform, the conversation. Yezhov needed a retoucher. Today a terms-of-service update does the job.
For Poles, these are not names from a history book. They are the names behind our grandparents' graves – and that is why we recognize their heirs.
Nucking Futs retweeted
One of the things we here in America need to do, alongside banning the headdress is declared by law that Islam is NOT a religion which holds protection under the US Constitution. It is a theological terrorist organization wrapped in a religious jihad. They want to kill us. Period. There's none other like it. IMO in fact, I firmly believe that every western country should collaborate come together, divise strategic actions, and push these extremists out of our countries all at once. Blitz them, if you will, from all directions. Ban and get rid of every mosque, halal food, etc. which they built in our countries...make it very uninhabitable for them. Do not afford these degenerates any type of religious rights anywhere on God's Green Earth other than their own countries. Muslims are waging a global jihad. We don't have to take it...we are the United States. Together with other western countries, let's force their jihadist bullshit back to the desert where they belong.
We need to stand up against this evil.
































