If I got through two interviews and they asked to schedule a third, I'm done. It's not that hard to make a decision

“Why are you back into training for a 5k?” Me:

Who really knows?

Still retired btw, I'm just playing stuff I want to play instead of casino simulators.

I mean, say what you want about sam altman, you have to admit this is absolutely the correct amount of garlic (minimum)

bro wtf LMFAO

My grandfather had a rule: Every grandchild got $500 on their 18th birthday. No exceptions. When my cousin turned 18, he gave her the money. Instead of using it for school, she spent almost all of it on clothes, parties, and a new phone. The family was furious. "You should have given it to someone who would use it wisely." Grandpa just shrugged. A few years later, another cousin turned 18. She was responsible, hardworking, and had already been accepted into university. Grandpa gave her the same $500. She complained. "Why does she get the same amount after wasting hers?" Grandpa replied:

当你开一个瞄准训练小组并用它来支持作弊和仇恨的人，这导致别人讨厌你，然后你跟他们闹事，叫他们邪教成员，并且表现得完全惊讶

Whenever a woman’s hinge profile says that she wants to visit all the continents, I tell her that I’m banned from returning to Antarctica because I tried to teach the penguins the difference between good and evil. This has worked exactly zero times but at least I’m amusing myself

Imagine an equation so small, yet so powerful that many mathematicians call it the most beautiful equation in mathematics. This famous formula is called Euler's identity, discovered by the brilliant mathematician Leonhard Euler. What makes it amazing is that it brings together five very important numbers in just one line: 0 — the additive identity 1 — the multiplicative identity π — the special constant that appears in every circle e — a number that describes natural growth and change i — a mysterious number defined by i = √−1 These numbers come from completely different areas of mathematics. One comes from geometry, one from growth and calculus, one from imaginary numbers, and two from basic arithmetic. Yet somehow, they all fit perfectly into a single elegant equation. That’s why mathematicians love it so much.

I can suggest an equation that has the potential to impact the future: P = NP + AI This equation combines Stephen Cook’s famous equation P=NP, which relates problems that can be solved in polynomial time (P) with those that can be verified in polynomial time (NP), with the addition of AI (Artificial Intelligence). By including AI in the equation, it symbolizes the way in which the ability to use RL post-training on solved problems means that any problem which is programmatically verifiable (NP) necessarily becomes one that can be algorithmically automated (P). My equation highlights the potential for AI to saturate all possible evals while still eluding capability in domains that lack straightforward verification.

Sweden, is this true?