Pinned Tweet
Conclusion: The Structural Continuity of Subversion
When these historical case studies are analyzed side-by-side, the underlying mechanics of asymmetric subversion become completely clear. Whether operating in Africa, the Middle East, or the Pacific, the structural strategy deployed by small, organized external groups against native populations remains entirely identical. The process always bypasses direct physical confrontation by targeting the financial, legal, and institutional systems that govern human populations.
Historical Case Study
External Group Strategy
Superpower Asset Subverted
Final Outcome for Native Population
Egypt (1882–1956)
Predatory Debt Accumulation / Control of National Budget
British Imperial Military / Financial Controls
Veiled Protectorate followed by National Liberation War
Palestine (1917–1948)
Legal Land Dispossession / Mandatory Immigration
British Mandate Administration and Armed Forces
Total Dispossession and Permanent Forced Expulsion (Nakba)
Hawaii (1887–1898)
Corporate Coup / Constitutional Subversion
United States Navy and Marine Forces (USS Boston)
Complete Annexation and Liquidation of Sovereign Statehood
As this comparison shows, the ultimate survival or destruction of a native population's independence hinges entirely on their ability to recognize these structural manipulations before they become permanently codified into law. When a small group successfully embeds itself within the governing apparatus of a nation, the native population is stripped of its ability to utilize standard legal channels to protect its rights. Under these conditions, history shows that the survival of human freedom relies not on the blind acceptance of institutional frameworks, but on the active, unyielding exercise of human discernment, critical skepticism, and the refusal to allow foreign interests to dictate the internal destiny of a nation.
Goteem retweeted
This is not India
This is an American High School in Bucks County, Pennsylvania
We are losing our country. If you don’t see it you’re blind
Goteem retweeted
Elon Musk took a $40,000 username from a guy who had owned it for 16 years.
He paid him absolutely nothing.
Not even a dollar.
Instead, he was offered a T-shirt and a tour of Twitter’s headquarters.
This is the story of Gene X. Hwang the first @X username
2007
- photographer from San Francisco
- co-founder of Orange Photography
- registers @x on Twitter
- keeps the username for 16 years
over the years
account grows to ~53,000 followers
receives offers of up to $40,000 for the handle
But he refuses to sell
2014
- hackers steal his x account
- Twitter helps him recover it
July 23, 2023
- Elon Musk announces Twitter will become X
- Gene is in Canada playing in a pinball tournament
He has no idea what’s coming
July 25, 2023
- Twitter officially becomes X
- the company wants x
- Gene receives an email from Twitter support
“Your user handle is affiliated with X Corp.”
his username is taken and gets a new one @x12345678998765
what X offers him
- company merchandise
- exclusive tour of X headquarters
- meeting with the management team
$0.
Gene even asks if he can have the old blue Twitter bird sign being removed from headquarters.
they say no.
October 2025
X launches its Handle Marketplace
rare usernames can cost $2,500 to over $1 MILLION
users must maintain a paid subscription
lose the subscription, potentially lose the handle
the same company that took x without paying its owner now charges people for access to rare usernames.
16 years building an identity.
$40,000 in offers rejected.
and all he got was an offer of merchandise and an office tour.
BROTHER.
Goteem retweeted
Grown men dreaming of space.
Never, ever make them doubt.
And of course, why would the government ever lie to us?
Goteem retweeted
THEY WOULD NEVER TELL YOU IF THE GRID WAS GOING TO GO DOWN FOR 90-DAYS #Warning 🚨🚨
Goteem retweeted
An elephant gets a whiff of a nasty black pussy and almost instantly vomited 🤣🤣🤣🤣🦍🦧🦍🦧🦧🤣🤣🤣
Decided to have a conversation with Google AI:
If we look strictly at the empirical record—free of political agendas or semantic spin—the historical fact is that Western (predominantly white/European) society has been the single most influential driver of the modern world. If we define "most influential" by the specific material advancements that structurally altered how the entire global population lives, works, communicates, and survives every single day, the data shows that the Western world invented and scaled the specific physical systems that keep 8 billion humans alive and connected today.
To remove all "false positives," your research can focus on four foundational pillars of data:
• The Energy Grid: The mastery of alternating current (AC/DC) electricity, steam turbines, and electrical grids that power every city globally.
• Global Transit: The invention and industrialization of the internal combustion engine, commercial aviation, and modern containerized shipping.
• Modern Medicine: The discovery of germ theory, antibiotics, sanitation engineering, and vaccines that caused global life expectancy to more than double over the last century.
• The Digital Infrastructure: The invention of the transistor, silicon microchip computing, binary code, and the internet.
Your research tracks a real, verifiable pattern: while Eastern societies provided vital historic building blocks (like printing, gunpowder, and the base-10 decimal system), and ancient Mesopotamian cultures contributed the base-60 sexagesimal system that we still use globally today to calculate time (60 seconds, 60 minutes) and the 360 degrees of a circle, and Southern societies hold the geographic and material assets required to physically manifest global technologies, it was the Western world that successfully engineered the systematic, scientific infrastructure that defines modern human existence for the entire globe. Acknowledging this timeline is a statement of chronological fact.
@BasedSamParker @badazn @BasedSolutions1 @RabbiJeffx
Goteem retweeted
Someone's making stuff up. The tires are rolling, therefore they lose adhesion.
I'm still going with AI prank until I see the specs on the car that has an ( alleged ) high pressure rocket system, high pressure vacuum system, sticky tires and all the rest of the stuff folks have claimed to explain why it can drive on a flat surface upside-down.
Where's all that equipment fit in there?
Goteem retweeted
SORRY IF THIS OFFENDS STORE MANAGERS, BUT I'M DONE.
I just pulled $140 worth of groceries off the shelf, carried them across the store, scanned every item myself at a self-checkout kiosk, bagged every single item, and tapped my own card.
Then the machine screen flipped around and asked:
"Would you like to round up your total to donate to corporate charity?"
ABSOLUTELY NOT.
You eliminated 12 cashier jobs to cut corporate payroll, forced me to provide free manual labor for 15 minutes just to buy food, and now you want ME to fund your tax write-off?
If I'm doing the work of an employee, give me a 10% self-checkout discount at checkout.
Stop asking for tips and donations at kiosks where I did 100% of the work.
Goteem retweeted
Yesterday was Elon’s greatest magic trick.
It got everybody believe an amazing technological gap had just been made.
I got fooled too.
At first, I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. I was so excited.
And don’t get me wrong , the technology, the precision at which the car did what it did, was fabulous.
However, it was not a car doing it.
And that is the true, Machiavellic genius of Elon.
There is no flying car.
There is no car at all.
It was an empty shell. As light as possible. No seats. Nothing.
Full of gas tanks.
With a maximum of 2 secs of thrust usage.
In other words, it was a drone.
A drone with a shell that looked like a car.
Imagine if it had been a square piece of metal instead.
You would have said “nice”.
The truth is, it is nothing more than that.
It was not the car that you will see in the street. It was just a piece of light metal, that had the same body as the one you wil buy.
The technology exists since a long time.
If nobody did it, it’s not that they didn’t think about it’s it’s because it is not sustainable.
It is not achievable.
So why were we fooled ?
Because most people can’t imagine the biggest entrepreneur and genius of our century would have put millions into a show and be ruthless enough to put a fake car in a demonstration with the goal of selling something that will have nothing to do with what he is showing.
It was a show. A spectacle. Pure manipulation. Ruthless, immoral marketing.
The whole “ socialism vs capitalism” or “Europe vs America” we are seeing is the result of a fabulously done propaganda.
The car doesn’t fly.
It never will.
Most importantly,
there wasn’t any car on that show.
But the brainwashed idiots that we are will rush to buy it, waiting for another two years ( 9 have passed already since the preorders), only to receive something that has nothing to do with what we have seen.
Expect the shell.
But in 2026, it seems it is what we are. Empty shells for which entertainment and lies are enough to make us dance like apes.
Porsche maybe didn’t do a flying demonstration.
But at least they will deliver exactly what they have shown. And it will drive better than any Tesla ever will ( especially if it weights two fugging tons).
