Wow, did you even read the paper? It is a critique of industry standards for measuring dSDNA. Hence the use of the word “flawed” in the title. You linked the paper written by Kevin McKernan, David Speicher and Jessica Rose; it is a critique of Achs et al. (2025) and argues that the methods used in that study (and similar industry/regulatory assessments) systematically underestimate residual DNA in mRNA vaccines.⁠ McKernan et al. identify specific technical problems in Achs et al.’s work: use of full-length plasmid molecular weights for calculations when sequencing showed short fragments (leading to 1.5–10× underestimation), primer designs that preferentially detect non-spike sequences, thermal degradation during library prep, detection limits higher than regulatory thresholds, inability of the platforms to capture longer DNA fragments, and failure to account for RNA:DNA hybrids that protect DNA from degradation.⁠ You presented the paper as evidence that McKernan’s claims are flawed, but the paper’s explicit conclusion is the opposite: Achs et al.’s findings of “no excessive residual DNA” are invalid for regulatory purposes because of these methodological biases toward underestimation. Not only that but now there is evidence that even the measurements they were producing at the time this paper was published were undercounted as newer qPCR methods have been invented since that time which are more accurate than what was available at that time. xitter.cf/Kevin_McKernan/status/…

What are we doing here? Do people care about truth and facts in reporting? Or do they just want baseless accusations spoken into the realm of discourse? There is absolutely not a shred of evidence that Jalen Hurts’ blood clot was from the COVID vaccine - a vaccine taken over 5 years ago. I am a big fan of Robby’s work but this is just irresponsible. If he has proof of this, then he should show proof. Otherwise such speculation is duplicitous and reckless, and most importantly, untrue.