Red Floridian retweeted
Florida's Amendment 3 is a great opportunity for Socialists to show us how serious they are.
Vote Yes to allow those of us who own a home to reduce our tax burden. If you are serious about being a Socialist, all you have to do is remove YOUR Homestead exemption and pay the full amount of taxes.
It's a win-win. Vote YES on #3
Red Floridian retweeted
It's not a revenue problem. It's an out of control spending problem.
Thanks @Patience911x! Hillsborough’s public pay goes well beyond County Hall. Airport CEO: $750K salary + $150K bonus. Port CEO: $657K base + $300K bonus + $50K retirement. Different funding pots, same question: what do we get for it? Big paychecks deserve big scrutiny.
Red Floridian retweeted
You have to crawl before you can walk. VOTE YES on Amd #3 and force them to put the funding on priorities. Not foolish pet feel good projects for special interest groups. All of the things you mention can be addressed but AMD #3 needs to be the foundation for reform. YES ON 3
Replying to @dittohead4life @Soulflame
I'm not forgetting about waste, fraud, or abuse. I'm all for holding local governments accountable for every taxpayer dollar. But here's what you're overlooking: How exactly does Amendment 3 eliminate waste, fraud, or abuse? Does it require audits, prosecute corruption, eliminate excessive salaries, or hold anyone accountable? No.
And cutting local revenue doesn't automatically eliminate wasteful spending. It could just as easily put pressure on essential services while the questionable spending continues.
I also don't want Tallahassee holding the checkbook and deciding how our local communities operate. That's not my idea of smaller government.
But let me ask you a question: How much do you personally pay in property taxes each year? I'm genuinely curious.
Red Floridian retweeted
I'm ok with them cutting frivolous spending; in fact, I demand it. My county put 5 new positions on hold for admin assistants to each of the 5 commissioners at a cost of about $400k salaries/benefits. All thanks to Amendment 3.
This is the way it should be.
I'm ok with them cutting frivolous spending; in fact, I demand it. My county put 5 new positions on hold for admin assistants to each of the 5 commissioners at a cost of about $400k salaries/benefits. All thanks to Amendment 3.
This is the way it should be.
Red Floridian retweeted
Because of the school district exemption, property tax will not be eliminated even if your home is valued under $250,000. We need to find a different way to fund school districts, one that holds them accountable for their spending. (I worked in a district IT Dept; I've seen it.)
The MN Vikings are the last remaining undefeated team this morning in the NFL. 💜💛
Fun stat: The kicker, @WillReichard, has 63 points in FG and extra points this season. The entire rest of the team has scored only 62. 😂
Good job, Will!! You're keeping the dream alive!
Red Floridian retweeted
Replying to @aykmwt
My Op-Ed @SunSentinel today!
I struggled with Amendment 3. Then my assessment arrived | Opinion sun-sentinel.com/2026/10/25/……
For me, the combination of what the research found and what happened to my own tax bill is enough. I will vote yes in November. Others can look at the same evidence and decide differently. But before voting, every Floridian should ask their city and county a simple question:
As property values rose, how much did you lower the tax rate — and what did you do with the additional revenue?
@FloridaTaxWatch @Browardinfo @FLCities @VoteYeson3FL @FLChamber @FLChamberFDN @BrowardGOP @FloridaGOP @FTLauderdaleYR
@FTLauderdaleYR @yrnational @Republicans @HouseGOP @FloridaGOP @NRSC @MiamiDadeGOP @emiliotgonzalez @NewTimesBroward
Red Floridian retweeted
Replying to @almrod64
I'm ok with that. Here's why:
1. I can shop in other states for products I need to pay less tax. (Like a car.)
2. The county can't take my home away if I don't shop, and therefore don't pay the taxes.
Strange analogy because you are wasting an egg and probably ending up in jail for assault. Here's my analogy:
You really just don’t get it. Let me simplify it for you.
It is basic math taught in 1st grade. You have 2 buckets. One has 2 eggs. The other has 3 eggs. You are holding 1 egg. Instead of putting that egg in one of the buckets, you decide to throw it at the most obnoxious person telling you what you should do with it. Did either bucket lose one of their eggs? No. Did either bucket gain an egg? No. Did it feel awesome to nail the obnoxious person between the eyes and stay true to your conscience? DAMN STRAIGHT!
Red Floridian retweeted
The state flagged Palm Beach County for $1.2 billion in wasteful spending. Now they want $455 million more in bonds from you.
Red Floridian retweeted
Replying to @SIGzero989 @aykmwt
There in lies your problem, counties don't fund themselves, TAXPAYERS DO!
taxpayers have had enough of the depravity and massive waste of OUR money.
Simply cut the budget.
We had every service before taxes doubled and service didn't
VOTE YES ON 3!
Red Floridian retweeted
Replying to @aykmwt
Give them $10m, they spend it
Give them $20m, they spend it
Give them $30m, they spend it
No oversight, no accountability
My home is not your piggy bank
Red Floridian retweeted
FL voters need to get out of the mindset that budgets MUST grow each year.
Gov @RonDeSantis lowered the state budget each year. Local government can and will do the same if you'll VOTE YES ON 3✅️
Take your power back on Nov 3!
What a disingenuous answer. Ask Sheriff Rosie about wasteful spending, since she seems to be the only one who is publicly admitting that it exists and is willing to do something about it.
Replying to @CupCupBaconBox
In many Florida cities, police and fire already consume roughly half the General Fund. So which half are you calling waste?
Are you cutting cops and firefighters? If not, explain how you eliminate half the budget from what’s left.
Declaring 50% of government spending waste without identifying a dollar of actual savings isn’t fiscal conservatism. It’s fiscal illiteracy.
Sheriff Rosie was able to cut $12 MILLION from her IT budget without any loss of service. That has zero effect on roads, safety, firefighters, etc. That's the kind of stewardship I expect my county/city elected officials to have with my tax dollars.
Amendment 3 isn't a tax cut. It's a $12 billion tax shift.
Cutting property taxes for some homeowners doesn't make the cost of roads, deputies and firefighters go away. Someone still has to pay billions a year. Under Amendment 3, it's renters, young families, small businesses and new buyers, who are the people who never got the tax cut.
The Tax Foundation's new analysis shows who pays:
🔴 Renters. They get no tax cut. A third of Floridians rent, and nearly half do in Miami-Dade. When landlords' taxes go up, research shows half or more gets passed on in rent.
🔴 Young families and first-time buyers. Picture two identical houses on the same street. One owner gets a $250,000 exemption. The other bought in 2027 and gets $50,000 for five years. That gap can easily mean $2,000 or more a year, for the same house and the same services.
🔴 Police, fire and EMS. They get zero guaranteed funding. Rural counties like Bradford, Dixie, Lafayette and Union are already at the constitutional tax limit, so they can't raise rates. They'll have to cut services or add fees.
🔴 Everyone, eventually. The $12 billion figure doesn't include the Legislature's new power to exempt homesteads entirely. State economists say that cost can't even be estimated.
🔴 Future voters. This goes into the constitution, so fixing the damage will take another statewide campaign.
Homeowners, even if you'd save, the money comes back around. You'll see it in new fees and special assessments, higher prices from local businesses, and fewer deputies and firefighters when you need them.
Yes, local government spending deserves serious scrutiny. But reducing property taxes doesn't automatically reduce government spending. Without corresponding spending cuts, the costs may simply shift to renters, young families, and small businesses through higher taxes, fees, and assessments.
This isn't tax relief. It's a tax shift.
Read the research: taxfoundation.org/research/a…




















