Amro retweeted
1/ We discovered something totally unexpected about the neural structure of consciousness that overturns decades of thinking on its biological basis and brings us significantly closer to the recipe for generating conscious awareness.
New preprint: biorxiv.org/content/10.64898… (led by @HesseJanis, with @FrankLanfranchi, @_conor_mcgrory, @Yuelin_Shi, and @EngelTatiana)
CPU metaphor for identity theory consciousness: the transistor pulses are the causal basis of the computer display, but it would be absurd to claim that they are identical to each other. They are distinct related events, and you still need to show how you go from one to the other
Amro retweeted
"why do u have a gap in ur resume" idk why do u have a gap in ur staff. worry about that
Amro retweeted
The man who can walk away from what he desires, for the sake of what he must become, is a man no one can own.
— Epictetus
Is illusionism a unique proposal/theory or just an anti-thesis? AFAICT they are materialists who get extra triggered when they hear the word qualia. If there are no unique predictions, can’t we just call it “confrontational functionalism?” @keithfrankish @Philip_Goff
Amro retweeted
Osho on seriousness,
“I don't think existence wants you to be serious. I have not seen a serious tree. I have not seen a serious bird. I have not seen a serious sunrise. I have not seen a serious starry night. It seems they are all laughing in their own ways, dancing in their own ways. We may not understand it, but there is a subtle feeling that the whole existence is a celebration.”
Amro retweeted
“First, anyone who seriously intends to become a philosopher must "once in his life" withdraw into himself and attempt, within himself, to overthrow and build anew all the sciences that, up to then, he has been accepting.”
— Edmund Husserl
Amro retweeted
"Think of yourself as dead. You have lived your life. Now take what's left and live it properly."
— Marcus Aurelius
Highly Nietzschean
This is one of the most famous paintings in America, and most people have no idea what they are actually looking at...
The painting is Christina's World, made by Andrew Wyeth in 1948, and the woman was real: her name was Anna Christina Olson, Wyeth's neighbour in Cushing, Maine. Since childhood a degenerative condition had slowly taken the strength from her legs, until walking was no longer possible. She refused a wheelchair, and for her entire adult life she chose to drag herself across the ground with her arms instead, going wherever she wanted to go under her own power.
Wyeth saw her one afternoon from an upstairs window, alone in that vast field, crawling slowly toward the house on the hill. He said the painting was an attempt to do justice to her extraordinary conquest of a life which most people would consider hopeless. Her world, he said, was limited physically but by no means spiritually.
That is what turns this painting from a portrait of frailty into one of the most triumphant images ever made...
Look at it long enough and it stops being about what her body took from her, and becomes about what she would not stop doing anyway. The field is enormous and she is small and the house is far away, and still she goes, because the alternative, to be carried, to give up, to let the distance win, was something she simply would not accept.
There is one more thing: Christina loved this painting. Pink was her favorite color, and Wyeth had placed her exactly where she most wanted to be, out in the open, in her own field, under her own sky. Late in her life, when she could no longer even crawl out to that field, she said something that holds the whole meaning of art inside it:
"Andy put me where he knew I wanted to be. Now that I can’t be there anymore, all I do is think of that picture, and I’m there."
Amro retweeted
Me reading philosopher A: ”yeah this makes total sense”
Me reading philosopher B absolutely ripping A to shreds: ”wow I can’t believe A is such an idiot”
Me reading A again: ”yeah this makes total sense”.
Amro retweeted
"Come see our artificial bird!"
"Impressive, but that's a tower."
[Later]"What about this bird?"
"A fine tower."
[Later]"This one reaches the stratosphere, higher than any bird."
"Still a tower, not a bird."
"Bah! Stop moving the goalposts! How high must it reach convince you?"
Amro retweeted
“Most people are subjective toward themselves and objective toward all others, frightfully objective sometimes but the task is precise to be objective toward oneself and subjective toward all others.”
"The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you."
― Werner Heisenberg
Amro retweeted
has anyone made the mike levin/bodhisattva critique of e/acc?
(e.g. "accelerating self-organizing complexity without expanding sphere of care/cognitive light cone is just cancer")
via: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
Beff Jezos says acceleration is downstream of physics.
"Systems tend to self adapt and complexify in order to capture work from their environment and dissipate heat. That is the fundamental driving force behind all of progress, all of acceleration."
"Whether we yell at it or disagree with it, it is happening. It's like gravity. You can argue with thermodynamics. It doesn't care. It keeps going."
@beffjezos @GillVerd @a16zcrypto
Amro retweeted
If you see the world as computation you are guilty of seeing it through the zeitgeist of our time, just as most of us in generations past have done. I’m much more interested in what ideas we can generate now that can help our descendants than I am interested in claiming victory that our generation explains it all


























