Paul Horn 🇨🇦🥍🇨🇦🥍🇨🇦

@NLL and @VanWarriors I understood that there was a 50% discount for season ticket holders. Is that accurate and, if so, how does that work?

1/5 I don’t understand why in professional lacrosse some executives and players seem to bristle at criticism from fans. Believe me it’s a good thing they are paying attention.

Fans get to make financial decisions for their families, too. When people tell someone on the NLL’s Broadcast Committee that Flo costs too much, that’s feedback worth hearing. The league’s job is to make box lacrosse easier to get into. How many tickets a reporter bought is beside the point.

The new home of NLL Streaming. Limited Time Offer. Sign Up Today! flosports.link/nll

NEW - “There has been a purge of 10 “long service, non-political” Surrey city hall employees on a “without cause” basis at incoming mayor Doug McCallum’s request prior to him and the new council being sworn in on November 2” #bcpoli surreynowleader.com/2026/10/…

BREAKING: This event has now been cancelled because all three @Conservative_BC candidates (@BruceBanman, @KorkyNeufeld and Darryl Kropp) withdrew their participation in the event. More to come

For answers to frequently asked questions about our new partnership with FloSports and where to watch NLL games, visit our FAQ page. nll.com/watch-the-nll/

Video taken yesterday September 17, 2026 of two dump trucks illegally dumping demolition waste in a farm property in the back of Mission, BC.

This is how media should work. I interviewed Pierre Poilievre. Some people wanted a more confrontational interview, with more interruption, debate, and pushback. I understand that. But that has never been my approach. My goal is to create a comfortable space for a free-flowing conversation where honesty can emerge. When a guest feels attacked, they often become defensive. That is not unique to politicians. It is human nature. In my view, some interviews become so focused on confrontation that we end up learning very little about how the person actually thinks. That is not the role I am trying to play. My role is to conduct thoughtful, calm, fair, long-form interviews. Then writers, journalists, commentators, and citizens can take those answers and analyze them further. People like @TristinHopper, who just wrote about the interview in the National Post, @dsimieritsch, who made a video referencing it, and many others can break down what was said, challenge it, agree with it, criticize it, or build on it. That is healthy. If you disagree with what Pierre Poilievre said in my interview, write about it. Make a post about it like @jessecmccormick and many others have done. Record a video about it. If you agree with him, do the same. The point is not that one interview should do everything. The point is that good interviews should create more conversation. Personally, I feel I gained a greater insight into how Pierre sees the media landscape, Mark Carney’s leadership, the impact politics has on his family, and what he believes he is up against as Conservative Leader than I have seen in many other interviews. People are free to disagree with my approach. They can say it was a softball t or that I should have done it differently. That's fine and also apart of this process. I am proud of the interview, grateful for the role I get to play, and committed to continuing long-form conversations that help Canadians better understand the people, issues, and choices shaping our country.

It’s Game 7 of the World Series, bases loaded, 2 outs, tie game, in the bottom of the 9th. You can choose any batter in baseball in their prime to get you a hit… WHO DO YOU CHOOSE?

When the math is mathing, but looks like it isn't