Politics, democracy, freedom, community, education, life generally, #TeamTerf #ToryTerf @CforWomenUK Tory Candidate for Fulham Reach Ward Hammersmith
Terf Island
Joined January 2011
- Tweets34.9K
- Following5.8K
- Followers9.7K
- Likes20.3K
Caroline ffiske retweeted
- Admitted 80 counts of theft
- Granted bail
- Breached bail and kept stealing from the same shop
- Banned from Lambeth
- Ankle bracelet was never fitted
- Breached the ban
- Failed to attend three sentencing hearings
- STILL spared jail
This makes a mockery of all of us.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Great data analysis here.
Per capita, people ‘born on 1st January’ are significantly more aggressive and sexually criminal than those born on 2nd January.
Why? Turns out for lots of illegal migrants - when the state can’t determine their precise birthday - the default becomes 01/01.
An interesting way to decipher migrant crime statistics even though the government refuses to publish migrant crime statistics.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Why do people born on 1st January seem to commit so much more crime?
They are nearly four times as likely to be arrested for a sexual offence.
My new piece looks at what's going on. Link below 👇
Caroline ffiske retweeted
"A favoured tactic of predatory adults is to isolate children from the care of their parents".
The proposed Conversion Practices bill risks an authoritarian government usurping the role of parents in their children’s lives. It may also be the biggest threat to gay rights since Section 28: my column in @heraldscotland
heraldscotland.com/politics/…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
This video bears watching in its entirety. It is chilling. A Reform member of the Welsh parliament has been banned from speaking in the chamber until he apologises for a previous contribution in which he raised concerns about the pace and scale of demographic change taking place in the country.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
It's tangential to the main story but not for the first time, I feel furious on behalf of the talented children's authors who missed out on contracts or got only meagre publicity because all the budget was going on Walliams.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
John Lydon from the Sex Pistols has his say on Kneecap.
"If you're advocating the death of another human being then you have no cause whatsoever. You are my enemy from here on in for the rest of your mediocre existence."
(Video sourced from Alejandro Basso on YouTube)👇👇👇
Caroline ffiske retweeted
“More than 170 previous offences, including 80 offences against vulnerable people.”
With that record, this scumbag should never have been free to commit such an appalling crime. Let him rot.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
I’ve been thinking a lot about the time that Brand was fired from the BBC over ‘Sachsgate’.
The fuss, created by the Mail on Sunday, became a sort of culture war moment before the phrase ‘culture war’ was talked about.
The idea of being shocked by what Brand and Ross had done and said (left messages for a famous actor about Brand sleeping with his grand daughter) was deemed right wing.
And that gets to the bottom of the permissive culture of that time. To say what they did was wrong was deemed right wing.
And that’s partly why Brand was so easily embraced by the left. Why they were so willing to ignore what he had been publicly sacked for.
Lucy Powell on the Ed Miliband Russell Brand interview
Sophy Ridge: In 2015, Ed Miliband was interviewed by Russell Brand. And he was invited over to his house to do it. It's been reported that you were the one who set up the interview. Is that true and do you regret it?
Lucy Powell: Look, I mean, it wasn't quite like that. It was a long time ago, obviously. And had I or Ed Miliband or anybody at the time had any sense at all that this was someone who was a sexual predator, who was involved in these sorts of crimes or any allegations that were known at the time, then, of course, that interview I'm sure would not have happened, history would have been very, very, different. Those things unfortunately, weren't known at the time. But I think, like anybody who paid to go to his show or watched him on TV, or who was his employer at the time, who had interactions with him, anybody, including those of us who were involved in that at the time,would look back and really regret that, knowing today what we now know
Sophy Ridge: You were campaign chief, did you set it up? Were you involved in the process?
Lucy Powell: Look, I mean, he approached the Labour Party, he approached the campaign team, and we’re in very different times now. We weren't in the social media age at the time - where you could maybe search things up and see allegations about somebody at the time. and as I say, if there was any suggestion at all, we were dealing with someone who was a known sexual predator at the time, then, of course, you know, no one would have done that. But as I say, he was a well known public figure. Lots of people from Hollywood to the BBC to many others gave this person a very, very powerful platform. And we didn't know at the time, unfortunately. It was a different era.
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Why did the National Trust "queer" the Ham House Chapel? I've written about this extraordinary treatment of a Christian place of worship @Telegraph in next post...
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Andy Burnham said: "I'm a big fan of David and feel honoured to have his support for my campaign to put Labour back in touch with millions of disillusioned voters." mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/da…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
I just got a note from a Jewish mother in Leeds who took her kids to the Vue cinema at The Light for a birthday on Remembrance Sunday.
The staff member checking tickets was wearing a Palestinian badge, and she told him she didn't think staff should wear political badges that can make customers feel uncomfortable.
She says two managers were called, her family was refused entry, and one manager told her she wouldn't get a refund if she kept complaining.
@vuecinemas, can you confirm your version? Are your staff allowed to wear political badges on shift, and what happens to a customer who comes in with her children and says a badge makes her feel intimidated?
Caroline ffiske retweeted
NEW: Five LGBTQ+ grants awarded by BBC Children in Need - totalling £495k!
charlottecgill.co.uk/p/five-…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
The proposed Conversion Practices bill risks an authoritarian government usurping the role of parents in their children’s lives. It may also be the biggest threat to gay rights since Section 28: my column in @heraldscotland
heraldscotland.com/politics/…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Baroness Cass told The Telegraph: “I am appalled to hear that both the National Lottery and Wellcome Trust are supporting an organisation that is producing materials that the DHSC has rightly described as irresponsible and unacceptable.
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
The @FCDOGovUK remains Stonewalled. This is from the 2023 Stonewall Workplace Equality Index Guidance. Grift, crankery, made up on the fly. Non-Binary People's Day... Weep...
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
Pleased that this has got traction. This is from 2020 when the utter crankery that was widespread across our public institutions was not exposed by the mainstream press - so we wrote about it. But has the now massive exposure shifted the dial at all?
The @britishlibrary paid @stonewalluk to deliver security training on the management of gender critical women :
conservativesforwomen.org/ho…
Caroline ffiske retweeted
THE CONVERSION PRACTICES BILL: WHEN THE STATE COMES KNOCKING AT YOUR FRONT DOOR
Here's what Labour isn't telling you about its proposed Conversion Practices Bill.
A parent doesn't have to be convicted of a crime for the process itself to become the punishment.
Imagine questioning your child when they claim a gender identity, asking hard questions about the direction they are taking, or seeking advice because you're genuinely concerned about their wellbeing.
Now imagine your child, or somebody, reports you for attempting to change that child's mind.
Suddenly, you could find yourself facing police enquiries, safeguarding referrals, social services assessments and potentially family court proceedings.
Your family life turned upside down. Your relationship with your child damaged. All before anybody has established that you've committed a crime.
And here's where it gets particularly Orwellian.
During parliamentary evidence on 2 November, campaigner Jayne Ozanne argued that even prayer directed at changing somebody's identity should fall within the criminal boundary, although she acknowledged the present draft does not go that far, it can still be investigated.
The Government assures us that ordinary parenting won't be criminalised.
But that's not the whole question, is it?
Who investigates the allegations? Who decides whether a parent's concern amounts to emotional pressure? And who puts a family back together when an investigation concludes that no crime was committed?
Nobody is defending abusive conversion practices. But protecting children from abuse must never become an excuse for making ordinary parents afraid to question, challenge or guide their own children.
When parents begin to fear the authorities more than they trust their own judgement, something has gone terribly wrong.
Parents must be free to ask difficult questions, particularly when children are considering decisions with potentially lifelong consequences.
We should be able to protect people from abuse without making parents afraid to parent.
Read the argument, and more importantly, read what the proposed law actually says.
👇
thetimes.com/article/20cad62…
#conversionpracticesdraftbill