cedo (@cedosalah) header
cedo (@cedosalah) profile picture

yap @exliquidity | motion @initia | opinions are my own

Joined January 2021
where are the @Polymarket odds for a nuclear strike on Iran? I’m looking to at least see positive upnl when my skin melts as I hold my family and burn. cc @HugoMartingale
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
3
165
Fire @USAmbIsrael Huckabee. Then jail him.
Ambassador Huckabee, this is unreleased video of an American who was beaten almost to death last week by Israeli settlers. You know his name because he came to you for help, but you blew him off. That’s disgraceful. Do your job. @GovMikeHuckabee @SecRubio @davidamilstein @WhiteHouse
127
1,850
14
12,332
172,636
all good
With the help of the Initia Foundation, the backing of affected assets from the October 23rd security incident will be fully restored when the chain is resumed.
1
20
579
do you think God likes btc
2
130
As of Oct 23, 2026, 3:41:30 PM UTC, the Initia L1 and Rollups have been halted due to a security incident. Our team is actively investigating the situation and working to establish the full scope of any impact with security teams, validators, and exchanges. We will share verified information through our official channels as it becomes available. Please remain cautious of unofficial links, messages, or claims circulating during this time.
50
27
56
235
75,694
fun lore fact: i was the fastest kid in my class from 1st to 4th grade.
fun lore fact: I once won a scrambled egg making competition.
5
150
Richmond Virginia is the new NYC
4
135
black monday
210
deep down everyone is a fund manager
5
133
If we’re leaning into revenue generation and real ownership of companies through tokens, who’s going to be the onchain Carl Icahn?
2
115
most of you guys i have met need to believe in yourselves a lot more i meet countless idiots who have raised, extracted and built everything on pure smoke and mirrors ironically the most self-aware and smart dudes i have met struggle to get out of their own way and think less
108
169
31
2,522
78,382
hey everyone on ct with a following, sequoia is leading the round, do you want to write a 5k check? I mean this sounds cool but this doesn’t sound abnormally cool. I don’t care and no qrt will get me to care.
Introducing Catalyst. What do you believe? How would you trade on it? You notice data centers are popping-up everywhere, gold will skyrocket, or just know that Labubus will go out of fashion. Catalyst researches your ideas, builds the optimal strategy, monitors events, and executes trades. Autonomously.
1
175
goodnight everyone
3
172
activist investment funds but onchain
69
tulip king is the Tim Dillon of crypto
1
79
peter thiel but for muslims
27
13
7
217
37,759
Done trading memecoins. Crypto is ruined forever with the current state of on chain. The constant vamps, PvPs, scams, etc. have totally ruined this space. I’m pretty much quitting after 10 years here I actually no longer care to participate. Peace out it’s been real. Sold all my memes. Will be emptying my @fomo later.
1
8
797
my neck hurts sprained my ankle round tripped a fat bag and now they stabbed lucki nobody knows the pain i am in right now
409
59
3,463
49
34,710
416,879