Jeffrey McMurtrie retweeted
Want a chance to win 1 full bitcoin? Yeah, you do. Repost and reply with #WealthsimpleCrypto and #contest to be entered into our all-time highest giveaway.
I heard there are 3 new campsites on Fox Creek. Would you be able to share the locations and campsite numbers?? Thank you!!
1
19
Replying to @cloudj @canadaposthelps
While I ship hundreds of pieces in the summer (a few per day), I ship very few in the winter. For my business it does not make sense to pay for a meter, so I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do if the LVD stamps are no longer being manufactured.
1
10
Replying to @canadaposthelps
@canadaposthelps Thanks for getting back to me!
What’s the plan for oversized lettermail/letterpost going forward? Canada Post does not sell stamps valid for 200g-500g domestic/USA/international, so I currently use LVD stamps + P stamps.
1
68
Replying to @cloudj @canadaposthelps
@canadaposthelps Just looking to follow up on this. Thanks! =)
1
14
Replying to @cloudj @canadaposthelps
For what it's worth, for the order of 5/25 cents stamps I just received, the invoice indicated 'ITEM IS OFF SALE'. That note was not on previous invoices.
Sometimes retail clerks at 3rd party stores (i.e. Shoppers) can be misinformed, but that note on the invoice made me wonder
1
17
Replying to @canadaposthelps
The 10 cent ones have disappeared from the website and from retail.
A couple of retail clerks have indicated that all Low Value Denomination stamps are being discontinued.
Thats why I'm wondering if it's correct that they're all being discontinued (or if this is temporary).
1
16
Replying to @canadaposthelps
@canadaposthelps are the low value definitive stamps discontinued? If so, what is replacing them? In particular I'm looking to puchase 10 cent stamps
1
35
Jeffrey McMurtrie retweeted
From Twitter Slack: “sorry to @- everybody on the weekend but I wanted to pass along that we have the opportunity to ask folks that were left off if they will come back. I need to put together names and rationales by 4PM PST Sunday.
Replying to @TheLawofWork
Thx Prof Doorey! I’ve followed your blog for a long time, I believe since the 2008-2009 CUPE 3903 strike, and I just wanted to send you a quick note of appreciation for the time and effort you’ve put in to sharing your knowledge =)
Replying to @dmrider
Just a heads up, the city delayed that closure teapaw.org/markhmills/status/1407…
POSTPONED.....due to the forecast of rain, the scheduled maintenance closure of the FGGE (Gardiner Expressway) for this coming weeknd (June 25 to 28) has been postponed until the weekend of July 9 to 12.
@680NEWSweather @680NEWStraffic @CP24Breakfast
Replying to @OccupiedCanada @jeffsmap
Eric Kim. See the JM Facebook page for more info (read the comments)
Replying to @OccupiedCanada @jeffsmap
FYI I (Jeff) left JM over 2 years ago. The guy who took control of it seems to be taking people's money but not shipping out maps.
I get a number of messages each week from ppl in your exact position :(
I'd highly recommend contacting your cc and letting them know what happened
1
1
Replying to @k_dinnage @jeffsmap
Jeff here (left JM 2 years ago unfortunately). FYI you’re not the first person to find yourself in this position :(. I the last 4 days I think you’re the 5th person I’ve heard from. Would highly suggest contacting your cc company and letting them know JM isn’t shipping orders.
@StanChoMPP From the sound of things I’m guessing the Premier has legislated away your right to free speech =( #topoli
Replying to @StanChoMPP
@StanChoMPP Would it be correct to say that you support the use of the Notwithstanding Clause because of the fact that the government has the legal right to do so?
1
No
They intentionally chose to override as much of the charter as they could, not just the freedom of expression part. They also chose to override the Human Rights Code
Since Bill 31 quite literally states you do not have those rights, it's not possible for them to be breached
1
Replying to @TOAdamVaughan
The bill to be introduced tomorrow will be completely new and distinct from Bill 5, correct? So presumably, the legislation would have to address this?
i.e. just because someone was nominated under Bill 5, I don't see why they'd be auto-nominated under the new, unrelated bill?




