Daily Freddo with Kasia
Joined December 2021
- Tweets1.5K
- Following57
- Followers10.7K
- Likes437
I'm curious about the X users' profiles with profile pictures of faces generated with AI. I'm noticing a theme here 🤔
⏰ 9:30 PM Cyprus | 2:30 PM CDT
🔴 JOIN ME LIVE:
youtube.com/live/UAF4iyyfH94…
The drama surrounding Candace Owens, Leah Files and Baron Coleman has sparked outrage, accusations and growing divisions online. But how much of the backlash is justified, how much is based on misunderstandings, and could some of it be deliberately fueled? A closer look at the full exchanges, the receipts and the bigger picture - without taking sides or losing sight of what matters: finding out what really happened to Charlie Kirk.
Told you all - be patient.
Not only did it never happen, but when I asked Leah for information to verify that claim specifically, that she was asked not to name Peter Thiel, she accused me of focusing in on Peter Thiel out of “confirmation bias”.
I’m not sure she knows what confirmation bias means.
She then did a 3am X space SEVERELY misrepresenting our private DM conversation, because she was upset I told her there were obvious errors in her glacier app substack. She called me an ai bot and an idiot for trying to explain to her that some of the stuff she is suggesting is conspiracy is literal federal law compliance.
I normally never share private DMs, but since she completely misrepresented what I said to her privately and then publicly called me a shill, I will share the below. I have since given her my explicit permission to drop the entirety of our conversation because I have nothing to hide. I had dinner with Shawn Ryan once— meeting him ahead of our interview. Keep in mind my interview where we discussed Peter Thiel was dropped the very same week she’s claiming she was not allowed to utter his name.
So what actually happened? My honest take is that if anyone questions Leah’s credentials or research she flies off the handle and tries to take them down with shoddy AI research presented as a deep dive.
From having looked into matter (by contacting a person who Leah told me would back up her claims and was present) I am confident stating that she misrepresented what happened.
It seems that after receiving producer notes, Shawn genuinely thought her research was dogshit. The producer then went and tried to politely and awkwardly see if he could find something of more interest for her to talk about beyond what anyone could easily find on google. In doing this, Leah genuinely believed that she was being censored because her research was SO controversial. It was the exact opposite.
What then transpired was effectively a really bad and awkward first date. Shawn was upset she was booked at all and that no one had done their due diligence enough to have prevented the occurrence of seating someone before him who claimed to be an economist with backgrounds in finance and accounting, but didn’t know what the petrodollar was.
A decision was made to shelve the interview. Shawn then made (in my opinion) a bad decision to refer to the shelved interview on another podcast—because even though the public did not to whom he was referring to, Leah did and she got angry. Out of that anger, she concocted a narrative, (again with publicly available information on LinkedIn), that she was actually censored because he was protecting his assets with Peter Thiel and Andreeson Horowitz, names that she knew would easily trigger the conspiracy crowd into believing the deep state was after her research.
Next came her targeting the glacier app— with more pithy, scraped research meant to make people think Shawn was colluding with the NSA and the Mossad to steal their data. Again, an easy sell with the conspiracy crowd, especially given Shawn’s background with the CIA.
All of this said, I would be happy to join Leah on her own podcast to explain to her more thoroughly why her substack research is tremendously flawed and at points, wholly dishonest. Truth doesn’t fear introspection and as always, I have nothing to hide.
"Kasia why do you care about US politics? Shut up, it's none of your concern"
BREAKING | 🇺🇸🇮🇷‼️‼️ Washington is reportedly bracing for Iranian attacks that could reach far beyond the Middle East, potentially threatening Americans in Europe and even on US soil. American officials warn that the threat from Tehran has reached its highest level since the February War.
According to US officials cited by The New York Times, Washington has raised security alerts for government personnel across the Middle East and begun reducing staffing at regional embassies and consulates. President Donald Trump is receiving regular intelligence briefings on threats extending beyond the region. Officials say intelligence suggests the possible presence of Iranian operatives inside the United States, although Tehran’s ability to conduct attacks on American soil remains limited. Potential Iranian plans reportedly also include targeting US personnel in European countries.
The warnings suggest that another confrontation with Iran could extend well beyond conventional military operations in the Middle East. Threats against American personnel in Europe or the United States would introduce an entirely different level of escalation, forcing Washington to confront security risks across multiple continents simultaneously. The reported embassy reductions indicate that US authorities are treating these threats seriously, even as the existence and operational readiness of the alleged Iranian networks remain uncertain.
See the latest updates with us: @visionergeo
Boosting this through the noise on this app 🕺
BREAKING: The FBI is *REFUSING* to turn over the ballistics evidence in the Tyler Robinson case for independent review & corroboration.
Via | @DiligentDenizen
Something I've noticed time and time again...
Accounts allegedly pretending to be someone's followers will slowly start planting doubt about a creator, for example. They'll dig up an old story about them or purposely "misunderstand" something the creator said, then publish a post expressing their disappointment.
It happens slowly, with multiple accounts doing the same thing. Suddenly, people start questioning that creator's character and intentions.
Then, seemingly out of nowhere, these accounts become outraged over one particular thing the creator supposedly said. Even though the creator didn't actually say it the way they're presenting it, their interpretation becomes louder than the actual substance of what was said.
They take over comment sections, live chats, and timelines. Posts about the controversy start appearing EVERYWHERE. And they're so convincing that their talking points begin to infect the real fan base.
The doubt has been planted.
Now the actual followers start joining in the outrage. Meanwhile, the accounts that started it all double down, increasing the number of posts, comments, and accusations.
Suddenly, the creator's credibility is shaken. And no matter what they say or don't say, hundreds of these accounts will jump in with the same arguments, twisting their words, dismissing their explanations, and making sure the outrage never dies down.
But here's the clever part.
These accounts aren't presenting themselves as haters. They're pretending to be "loyal fans who used to love this person but are now so disappointed that they can no longer support them."
And that's what makes it so effective. Because when genuine followers see what appears to be hundreds of other fans turning against someone, they start wondering whether they should feel the same way.
Let me give you an example.
I recently noticed an account repeatedly commenting under one of my posts, desperately trying to spark outrage over a controversial topic that day. The person was attacking a creator they claimed they "used to follow" but now absolutely hated because they were supposedly a liar.
Something about it caught my attention, so I checked their profile.
And surprise, surprise...
Almost 200 posts and comments in ONE DAY.
All about that ONE creator.
One person. One day. Almost 200 interactions dedicated to attacking the same individual.
Now, does that automatically prove the account was fake or part of some coordinated operation? No. But it's exactly the kind of behavior that makes me question whether I'm looking at genuine disappointment or someone deliberately trying to manufacture outrage.
And when you see multiple accounts behaving in a similar way, repeating the same talking points, using the same interpretations, and presenting themselves as former supporters, it's worth paying attention.
Because sometimes what looks like a spontaneous wave of public outrage might not be nearly as spontaneous as you think.
My advice?
Learn to recognize when this might be happening.
Don't immediately jump on the outrage bandwagon just because your timeline is suddenly full of people telling you how disappointed you should be.
Go back and listen to what the person ACTUALLY said. Not someone's interpretation of it. Not a conveniently edited clip. Not an emotional post from a stranger claiming to be a former fan.
Take some time to think for yourself, question what you're being shown, and keep your distance from the mob mentality.
Because once someone successfully plants doubt in your mind, it's incredibly easy to start interpreting everything that person says or does through that doubt.
And sometimes, that's exactly the point.
(These are my thoughts and observations - I'm not stating anything as a fact)
I heard we're speaking abour Charlie's necklace again
What do Erika Kirk, Charlie's necklace and Kanye West have in common? Watch and find out 👇🍿
youtu.be/YgDH5Zunbwc
#candaceowens #erikakirk #ye #charliekirk
⏰EARLY LIVE TODAY:
9:00 AM CDT
10:00 AM EDT
7:00 AM PDT
5:00 PM Cyprus
WATCH HERE:
youtube.com/live/ZwjWK0WFmZY
Given that I just sat through the most boring interview with Erika Kirk in the history of interviews, I have a question for you…
If you had the chance to sit down with her face-to-face, on camera, and ask her absolutely anything, what would your question be?
Soooooo... To prove that the video of Charlie appointing his wife the next CEO exists, Erika Kirk:
- privided transcript of the video to Candace
- organised private viewing of the video to Daily Mail journalists
- provided hevaily cut, stitched & edited AI-looking video of Charlie to troll the trolls.
So everything except the actual, unedited video. INTERESTING 🤔
I am genuinely not sure where this rumor is coming from as it would appear Turning Point USA is launching another cannon of Z-list influencers into our orbit, who will prove all too eager to lie for cash…That aside, allow me to state this unequivocally: at no point before, during, or after our meeting did Erika Kirk ever offer to allow me to see Charlie Kirk’s autopsy.
She has never made that claim publicly nor could she, because it simply never happened.
The only document Erika offered to allow me to view was a typed transcript from Charlie’s Aspen event, which she alleged was proof Charlie passed the organization onto her. I declined to see/read the transcript of the video because the offer itself was nonsensical. It would have made sense to show me the video itself—not a transcript of it.
Hope that clarifies matters.
Let's bully this one out of the internet too
🚨🇬🇧#BREAKING | NEWS ⚠️
Another plane today with suspected passengers with Norovirus EasyJet registration EZY 43KU headed to Glasgow, at least 8 passengers, throwing up doctors on standby to board plane when it lands.
See my previous post same issue plane from Greece on Sunday.
Few days before @baroncoleman takes over @RealCandaceO there is suddenly a campaign against him? Color me shocked.
Yup just saw & heard the planes over here in Cyprus. Here we go again.
🇺🇸🇸🇦🇦🇪 The U.S. just told Americans in 12 Middle East countries to be ready for cancelled flights, closed airspace and sudden changes to their travel plans.
The alerts cover Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen, Israel and Iran, warning that hostilities could spread and that Iran and its allies may target U.S. interests, including American businesses.
They also flag Houthi strikes on Saudi airports and infrastructure, and Americans are being told to keep a low profile and steer clear of crowds and anywhere tied to the U.S.
The alerts don’t mean airports are shutting down, but when Washington’s travel warning reads like a map of the whole region, maybe hold off on that Gulf getaway.
Sources: U.S. State Department, Iran International (anti-IRGC outlet) / Writer: Julie
Screenshot this
The January 6th pipe bomber terrorist was…
- a young black guy
- radical anti-Trump activist
- sued Trump & ICE & DHS
- extreme racial justice advocate
- works at his family bail bonds company that frees criminal aliens from ICE custody
Yeah, this explains exactly why the FBI & DOJ could not “find” this guy for 4 years. The Biden FBI had mountains of evidence against Brian Cole. Receipts, cell data, license plate, photos and videos of the crime. They knew exactly who did it!
But Brian’s profile destroys their entire ‘MAGA white supremacist insurrection bomber’ narrative in one blow.
The FBI didn’t “fail” to catch him.
Leftists protected their own.
This is the biggest FBI cover-up scandal in history. What a nightmare…
I'm not from America... Is the FBI working on this case different from the one working on Charlie Kirk's case? Do you have honest and dishonest FBI over there? Because apparently only honest and truthful FBI agents worked on 9/10, while Brian I guess was just unlucky?🙃
🚨UPDATE!🚨 - Brian Cole Jr's grandmother (Loretta Cole) just phoned me, saying the jacket her grandson was wearing in this video is the exact jacket she'd given him for Christmas, only two weeks prior. That explains the tag still hanging from the jacket. @FBI should be able to get that purchase record from Kohl's immediately. Loretta recalls making that purchase, along with other gifts, using her Kohl's credit card.
There ya go, @FBIDirectorKash, I just made it easy for "This FBI" to do their job.
RELEASE BRIAN COLE JR. NOW!
